Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2013-011 N.C.S. 2/4/2013Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California ACCEPTING THE FY 12 AB1600 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma imposes fees to mitigate the impacts of development, pursuant to Government Code §§66000 et seq.; and, WHEREAS, fees collected are deposited into a separate fund account for each type of development impact fee; and, WHEREAS, a description of each fee, its amount, and various information required by Govermnent Code section 66006(b)(1) to be reported on an annual basis is set forth in the Development Impact Fee Report — Fiscal Year 2011-2012 attached hereto as Attachment 2 and incorporated herein by reference ("the Report"), as required by Government Code §66006(b)(1); and, WHEREAS, the Report was made available to the public on the city's website on January 17, 2013; and, WHEREAS, copies of the Report were mailed on January 17, 2013 to all persons having requested notice of City actions relating to fees; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, that: 1. The recitals stated herein are true and correct and adopted as findings of the City Council. 2. The City Council has received and reviewed the Development Impact Fee Report— Fiscal Year 201 1-12 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference ("the Report"). Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the App7oved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 4i' day of February, form: 2013, by the following vole: _' y Attorney AYES: Vice Mayor Albertson, Barrett, Mayor Glass, Harris, Healv, Kearney, Miller NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST:G�'4/)�` City Clerk Mayor Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page I Exhibit A a� i Y85'a, 9 CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR2011-2012 Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 2 City of Petaluma Annual Development Impact Fee Report Fiscal Year 2011-12 Background The Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code §§66000 et seq., (the "Act") governs the establishment and administration of development impact fees paid by new development projects for public facilities needed to serve new development. Fees must be separately accounted for and used for the specific purpose for which the fee was imposed. The City's adopted development impact fees are listed in the attached exhibits. -Expenditures are authorized through the annual Capital and Operating Budgets and theCity's Capital Improvement Program. The annual adopted City Budget is on file with the City Clerk. Annual Development Fee Reporting The Act requires that the City prepare an annual review of all development impact fees as defined in the Act and make a public report on the fees available to the public after the end of each fiscal year. Government Code §66006(b)(2) requires the report to be placed on an agenda for review at a public meeting not less than 15 days after the report is made available to the public. The Fiscal Year 2011-2012 report was made available to the public on the City of Petaluma website on January 17, 2013; a copy of the report also was mailed to all persons who had requested mailed notice relating to city fees on January 17, 2013. Excluded from this report are developer fees which are not subject to the reporting requirements of the Act. For example, fees collected pursuant to the City's zoning powers, rather than pursuant to the Act, are in -lieu housing fees, the commercial linkage fee which is the non-residential equivalent of an in -lieu housing fee, public art in -lieu fees and two fees related to the Central Petaluma Specific Plan area. Water capacity fees and wastewater capacity fees are not development impact fees as defined in Sections 66006 and 66001 of the Act. The Quimby Act parkland acquisition fee for residential subdivisions is imposed pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Gov't. Code §66477). and is also not included in the Section 66001 reporting requirement. The Storm Drainage Fee was last updated in 1986, prior to the January 1, 1989 effective date of AB1600, but nevertheless included in this report and findings for informational purposes. The city is also required to adoptbyresolution certain findings for any fund accounts which contain unexpended funds as of the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into those funds and every five years thereafter. (Gov't. Code §66001(d).) In FY 1 1-12, no impact fee funds fall into this. category and therefore no resolution has been adopted related to unexpended funds. The report is organized as follows: Exhibit A: A brief description of the purposes of each development impact fee and its authorizing legislation (Gov't. Code § 66006(b)(1)(A).) Exhibit B: Summary of the July 1, 2011 beginning balance, annual fee revenue collected, interest earned, returned unused funds from projects, identification of public improvements on which fees were expended and the ending balance as of June 30, 2012 for each fee (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(I )(C)-(E).) Excess funds from capital project funds were returned to the originating revenue funds. The annual expenditures on each specific public improvement are listed, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with development impact fees. In addition to public Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 3 improvement project costs, the City incurs costs to administer each mitigation fee program and to prepare the annual reports and the five-year compliance analysis also required by the Act. As shown in the mitigation fee cost studies (or "nexus studies") which support the various impact fees, the City charges administrative and compliance costs at 3% of tile program cost for each fee as a program expense. The actual dollar cost for these expenditures is listed for each fee. No individual development impact fee fund has collected sufficient funds to construct all improvements covered by that find as described in the nexus studies (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(F).) Exhibit C: Identifies the amount of each development impact fee, including the modifications which became effective August 27, 2012, when the City updated all development impact fees (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(B).) Exhibit D: Identifies interf nd loans, transfers, refunds or reallocation of funds in lieu of refunds in Fiscal Year 2011- 2012 (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(G)-(H)). Resolution No. 20 13-0 11 N.C.S. Page 4 Exhibit A City of Petaluma Development Impact Fee Summary Fee # Impact Fee Name Fee Authority Brief Description of the Type of Fee 1 Aquatic Center Reso. 2008-086 The Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee is to finance the portion of Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, construction of an aquatic complex with a 50 meter lap pool and a 2008 4,500 square foot recreation pool that is related to the project's services to new development. 2 Community Center Reso. 2008-088, The Community Center Facilities Impact Fee is to finance the Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, expansion of community center facilities, including furniture and 2008 fixtures, to equip new community center facilities space required to reduce the impact of future development. 3 Fire Suppression Reso. 2008-088 The Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee is to finance specific fire Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, protection and emergency services facilities to reduce impacts caused 2008 by future development. 4 Library Facilities Reso. 2008-090 The Library Facilities Impact fee is to provide funding for additional Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, library facilities, furniture, fixtures and collection materials to reduce 2008 the impacts caused by future development. 5 Parkland Reso. 2008-092 The Parkland Acquisition Fee is imposed on development projects Acquisition Fee N.C.S., May 19, that are not subject to the Quimby Act. It funds acquisition of and 2008 payment for parkland necessary to maintain the standard established in the city's General Plan, based on a ratio of parkland acreage to population, including employees of new commercial development, as new residents and employees are added by new development. 6 Parkland Reso. 2008-093 The Parkland Development Fee funds public facilities which improve Development Impact N.C.S., May 19, neighborhood and community parklands as needed to serve new Fee 2008 development. 7 Open Space Reso. 2008-091 The Open Space Acquisition Fee funds acquisition of and payment for Acquisition Impact N.C.S., May 19, open space necessary to maintain the city's standard established in its Fee 2008 General Plan based on a ratio of open space acreage to population, including employees of new commercial development, as new residents and employees are added by new development. 8 Law Enforcement Reso. 2008-089 The Law Enforcement Facility Fee funds the portion of construction of Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, new law enforcement facilities, including a new police station and two 2008 communications towers, and acquisition of police vehicles and equipment, that is related to the need to serve new development. 9 Public Facilities Reso. 2008-094 The Public Facilities Impact Fee funds a proportionate share of City Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, Hall renovation or relocation, corporation yard construction and VOIP 2008 and Wi-Fi communications systems. It also funds additional computer technology and city vehicles to serve the added population and employees brought to the city by new development. Resolution No. 2013-0I I N.C.S. Page 5 Fee# Impact Fee Name Fee Authority Brief Description of the Type of Fee 10 Storm Drainage Ord. 1530 The Storm Drainage Impact Fee funds the construction of storm Impact Fee N.C.S., eff. Sept. drainage improvements needed to control increases in run-off created 20. 1982; Ord. by new development projects. The Storm Drainage Impact Fee was 1653 N.C.S., eff. adopted and last updated before the enactment and effective date of June 2, 1986 AB 1600, but is included in this report for informational purposes. (Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter 17.30); Reso. 9751 N.C.S., June 2, 1986 11 Traffic Development Reso. 2008-095 The Traffic Development Impact Fee funds construction and Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, implementation of improvements to key elements of the citywide 2008 transportation system sufficient to accommodate future traffic demand generated by new development. Resolution No.2013-011 N.C.S. Page 6 Exhibit B Development Impact Fee Report Fiscal Year 2011-12 Fund Fund 'Title/ Project Title Fund Balance 7/1/2011 Fee Revenue Interest Revenue Return Unused Funds Bependitures/ I7ansters Est %funded blImpact Fees Finding Balance 6/30/2012 2110 Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fees 17,508 98 39,251.83 23622 - 5,545 55 51,451 48 e 16052012 Impact Fee Swdy 4,318.00 73% City administrative costs 1,227.55 100�0% 2120 Community Facilities Impact Fees 1,069,81704 29,020.00 3,864.18 - 9,338.60 1,094,362.62 e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 6,318.00 10.7% City administrative costs 2,020.60 1000% 2121 Community Center Facilities -08 (0.14) 136,997,82 438.14 - 4,109.93 133,325,89 City administrative costs TI09.93 1000% 2125 Fire Sulgxess ion Facilities hupaci Fees 196226.36 91,44912 1,53457 40,000.00 4926147 279,948.58 e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 6,318.00 107% City adntlnistralive costs 2,943.47 1000% 2135 Library Facility Impact Fees 119,34437 69,,3434 1,01306 - 6.554,03 183,337,74 e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 4,31800 7.3% Cilp administrative costs 2,236,03 1000% 2140 Parkland Acgand Devpmpact Fees 1,64145243 108,66623 6,224.65 307,000.00 313,859.99 1,749,483,32 e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 2,000.00 34% City administrative costs 4,85999 100.0% 2141 Parkland Acquisition ingnret Fees-08 (1,605.75) 600,34200 2,97258 - 22,32826 579,38037 c 16052012 Impact Fee Study 4,318.00 7.3% City administrative costs 18,01026 100.0% 2142 Pakland Development Impact Fees-08 405,955:IS 1,029.83 16,496.66 390,49835 e 16052012 Impact Fee Stud) 4,318.00 7.3% City administrative costs 12 178.66 1000% 2143 Open Space Acquisition Impact Fees -08 (0.14) 184,644,79 147.36 - 9,907.34 174,884.67 e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 4,318.00 73% Cav administrative costs 5,589.34 100-0% 2145 Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fees 240,59040 127,89794 2,007.15 - 10,40494 360,090.45 e 16052012 bnpact Fee Study 6,318.00 10.7% City administrative costs 4,09694 1000% 2150 Public Facilities [mpactFees 68499.91 25,03400 51732 7,122.02 86,929.11 e 16052012 Impact FeeStudy 6,321,00 10.7% City administrative costs 801,02 100.0% 2151 Public Facilities Impact Fees-08 - 130,129.00 475.01 - 3,90387 City adni nistm6vc costs 3,903,87 1000% 2155 S torn Drainage ingact Fees 3,833,896.67 15,098.48 12,32460 997,017.78 1,956,868. 55 2,90146898 c16301307 Payran Flood Control 336,000.00 100.0"/e c00500804 Storm Drainage Iniprovemenis 17,78 Revenue ComecIion-'I'lito Traffic Impact 614,296.88 100.0% City administrative costs 9,571,67 1000% 2156 Storm Drainage Impact Fees -08 344.52 I1,813 00 1920 - 35439 11,82233 City administrative costs 35439 100.0% Resolution No. 2013-XXX N.C.S. Page 7 Fund Fund Tale/ Project Title 2160 Traffic Impact Fees e 16052012 Impact Fee Study c62101001 Lynch Creek'I rail c16101002 Pedestrian, Crossing Sunrise/McDowell Revenue Correction -Tfr to Traffic Impact-08 Revenue Correction - T4fm Stonn Impact City administrative costs 2161 Traffic Imryact Fees -08 Revenue Correction - TB fin'[ ranicImpact GIN administrative costs Exhibit B Fund Balance Fee Interest Return Unused L penditures/ Cst %funded Fading Balance 7/1/2011 Revenue Revenue Funds Transfers by Impact Fees 6/30/2N2 1,740.649. 76 155,624.00 12,349.24 98988749 530,03700 2,368,473.49 10,000.00 17.0% 3,000.00 0.3% 2M90.61 148,91 i87 100.0% 614,296.88 100.0% 13,121.13 1000% - 1211,52650 1,225.72 148,915.87 25;174b7 1336,49342 148,915.87 100.0% 25,174,67 FOOD/, Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 8 Exhibit C Development Impact Fee Schedule Fee Type Land Use Type Fee Unit of Measurement City Facilities Development Impact Fee (A) Single Family Residential $5,399 Unit Multifamily Residential $3,635 Unit Accessory Dwelling $1,852 Unit Commercial $1.022 1,000 sq ft of building space Office $978 1,000 sq ft of building space Ifn,dustrial $622 1,000 sq ft of building space p 3 xs}�i '�:FiskFW...�cc. t Open Space Acquisition Fee Single Family Residential $379 Unit Multifamily Residential $255 Unit Accessory Dwelling $130 Unit Commercial $72 1,000 sq ft of building space Office $69 1,000 sq ft of building space Industrial $44 1,000 sq ft of building space Park Land Acquisition Fee (Quimby and Non - Quimby Act Pro'ects)1n1 Single Family Residential $1,616 Unit Multifamily Residential $1,093 Unit Accessory Dwelling $554 Unit Commercial $306 1,000 sq ft of building space Office $293 1.000 sq ft of building space Industrial 1 $186 I,000 sq ft of building space y, .,C ,1.. ��:�3� :. R >��.�, P��i`d�F^"'.�".�,.', ao°�'� 1 - S_ye^fi _ �+t3ia5d�F"i`�e72`Ia' aG .:: qv'3 R-t at x � i x i:c_.� h cv_3fm�'m �`#"n° �i "rF-_-u _ Park Land Development Impact Fee Single Family Residential $5,212� Unit Multifamily Residential $3,510 Unit Accessory Dwelling $1,788 Unit Commercial $987 1,000 sq R of building space Office $944 1,000 sq ft of building space Industrial 1 601 1 1,000 sq.ofb.fuildiang space ka.ve.. 'YE L$ .ft; -«" Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 9 Exhibit C Fee Type Land Use Type Fee Unit of Measurement Traffic Development Impact Fee Single Family Residential $18,978 Unit Multifamily Residential $11,650 Unit Acccssory Dwelling $5,261 Unit Senior Housing $5,073 Unit Office $18,199 1,000 sq ft of building space Hotel/Motel $11,086 Room Commercial/ Shopping $17,522 1,000 sq ft of building space Industrial/Warehouse $12,928 1,000 sq ft of building space Education $2,894 Student Institution $6,718 1,000 sq ft of building space RIF r: M t t Is The City Facilities Impact Fee is a newly established fee which consolidates the following six previous development impact fees into a single fee: Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee, Community Center Facilities Impact fee, Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee, Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee, Library Facilities Impact Fee, and the Public Facilities Impact Fee. e� The Quimby Act applies only to fees and/or dedications imposed on certain subdivisions subject to the Subdivision Act to fund land acquisition costs for park or recreational purposes. *NOTE: The 2 adopted traffic impact fees reflect the cost differential between two design alternatives for the proposed Rainier Avenue Crosstown Connector and Highway 101 Interchange ("Caltrans Preferred"; "Locally Preferred"). Until a final determination is made on a design alternative, the City will collect the higher (the "Caltrans Preferred") of the 2 traffic impact fees on all projects subject to that fee. Should the "Locally Preferred" design alternative ultimately be selected, the City will then charge the "Locally Preferred" traffic impact fee amount and refund the incremental difference between the two fees to those projects that had already paid the "Caltrans Preferred" traffic impact fee. Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 10 Exhibit C Storm Drain Impact Fee Calculation of Fee Runoff computation: The increase in runoff created by a given project is calculated fora 100-year storm, utilizing runoff coefficients based upon the portion of vegetated area to impervious surfaces, and expressed in acre-feet. Runoff coefficients are based upon the type of use, slope of the land, and percent of vegetation coverage. Commercial/Industrial: Projects pay a fee of $30,000 per acre foot of additional runoff. The amount of incremental runoff created is directly linked to the amount of landscaping provided. The maximum fee possible is $9,000 per acre of land. This would apply to a project with 20% or less landscaping. A project with 25% landscaping can expect a fee of $6,750 per acre, 30% would pay $6,300 per acre, and so on. Residential: Projects pay a fee of $15,000 per acre foot of additional runoff. Incremental runoff is dependent upon the density of a project and the amount of landscaping and open space provided. A high density project with 20% or less area in landscaping could expect to pay $4,500 per acre. A type detached single-family subdivision would pay approximately $1,500 per acre. Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 1 1 Exhibit D Status of Interfund Loans, Transfers, Refunds or Reallocation of Funds Fiscal Year 2011-12 Interfund Loans During FY 11-12 the Storm Drainage Impact Fee fund lent the Storm Water Utility Operations fund $208,641 to cover storm water maintenance costs from January I, 2012 through December 31, 2014. Payment of principal and interest shall begin on June 30, 2015 and shall be made in 12 equal annual payments. This loan is scheduled to be repaid by June 30, 2026. There were no Transfers, Refunds or Reallocation of Funds duringFY 11-12. Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 12