HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2013-011 N.C.S. 2/4/2013 Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
ACCEPTING THE FY 12 ABI600 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma imposes fees to mitigate the impacts of development,
pursuant to Government Code §§66000 et seq.; and,
WHEREAS, fees collected are deposited into a separate fund account for each type of
development impact fee; and,
WHEREAS, a description of each fee, its amount, and various information required by
Government Code section 66006(b)(1) to be reported on an annual basis is set forth in the
Development Impact Fee Report — Fiscal Year 2011-2012 attached hereto as Attachment 2 and
incorporated herein by reference ("the Report"), as required by Government Code §66006(b)(1);
and,
WHEREAS, the Report was made available to the public on the city's website on
January 17, 2013; and,
WHEREAS, copies of the Report were mailed on January 17, 2013 to all persons having
requested notice of City actions relating to fees; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Petaluma, that:
1. The recitals stated herein are true and correct and adopted as findings of the City
Council.
2. The City Council has received and reviewed the Development Impact Fee Report—
Fiscal Year 2011-12 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
reference ("the Report").
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. ^^��
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the AI:played as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 4ih day of February. form:
2013,by the following vote:
ci>y Attorney
AYES: Vice Mayor Albertson, Barrett,Mayor Glass. Harris, Healy.Kearney, Miller
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None nn
4'
ATTEST: _ IISPra4
City Clerk Mayor
Resolution No. 2013-01 I N.C.S. Page 1
Exhibit A
"y 1"p
1859.
CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012
Resolution No.2013-0I 1 N.C.S. Page 2
City of Petaluma
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year 2011-12
Background
The Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code 066000 et seq., (the"Act") governs the establishment and administration of
development impact fees paid by new development projects for public facilities needed to serve new development. Fees
must be separately accounted for and used for the specific purpose for which the fee was imposed. The City's adopted
development impact fees-are listed in the attached exhibits. .Expenditures are authorized through the annual Capital and
Operating Budgets and the City's Capital Improvement Program. The annual adopted City Budget is on file with the City
Clerk.
Annual Development Fee Reporting
The Act requires that the City prepare an annual review of all development impact fees as defined in the Act and make a
public report on the fees available to the public after the end of each fiscal year. Government Code §66006(b)(2) requires
the report to be placed on an agenda for review at a public meeting not less than 15 days after the report is made available
to the public. The Fiscal Year 2011-2012 report was made available to the public on the City of Petaluma website on
January 17,2013; a copyof the report also was mailed to all persons who had requested mailed notice relating to city fees
on January 17, 2013.
Excluded from this report are developer fees which are not subject to the reporting requirements of the Act. For example,
fees collected pursuant to the City's zoning powers, rather than pursuant to the Act, are in-lieu housing fees, the
commercial linkage fee which is the non-residential equivalent ofan in-lieu housing fee, public art in-lieu fees and two
fees related to the Central Petaluma Specific Plan area. Watercapacity fees and wastewater capacity fees are not
development impact fees as defined in Sections 66006 and 66001 Of the Act. The Quimby Act parkland acquisition fee for
residential subdivisions is imposed pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act(Gov't. Code §66477), and is also not included in
the Section 66001 reporting requirement.
The Storm Drainage Fee was last updated in 1986, prior to the January 1, 1989 effective date of AB1600, but is
nevertheless included in this report and findings for informational purposes.
The city is also required to adoptby resolution certain findings for any fund accounts which contain unexpended funds as
of the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into those funds and every five years thereafter. (Gov't. Code §66001(d).)
In FY II-12, no impact fee funds fall into this category and therefore no resolution has been adopted related to
unexpended funds.
The report is organized as follows:
Exhibit A: A brief description of the purposes of each development impact fee and its authorizing legislation (Gov't. Code
§66006(b)(l)(A).)
Exhibit B: Summary of the July 1, 2011 beginning balance, annual fee revenue collected, interest earned, returned unused
funds from projects, identification of public improvements on which fees were expended and the ending balance as of
June 30, 2012 for each fee (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(C)-(E).) Excess funds from capital project funds were returned to
the originating revenue funds. The annual expenditures on each specific public improvement are listed, including the total
percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with development impact fees. In addition to public
Resolution No.2013-011 N.C.S. Page 3
improvement project costs, the City incurs costs to administer each mitigation fee program and to prepare the annual
reports and the five-year compliance analysis also required by the Act. As shown in the mitigation fee cost studies (or
"nexus studies") which support the various impact fees, the City charges administrative and compliance costs at 3% of the
program cost for each fee as a program expense. The actual dollar cost for these expenditures is listed for each fee. No
individual development impact fee fund has collected sufficient funds to construct all improvements covered by that fund
as described in the nexus studies (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(F).)
Exhibit C: Identifies the amount of each development impact fee, including the modifications which became effective
August 27, 2012, when the City updated all development impact fees (Gov't. Code §66006(b)(1)(B).)
Exhibit D: Identifies interfund loans, transfers, refunds or reallocation of funds in lieu of refunds in Fiscal Year 2011-
2012(Gov't. Code §66006(b)(I)(G)-(H)).
Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 4
Exhibit A
City of Petaluma
Development Impact Fee Summary
Fee# Impact Fee Name Fee Authority Brief Description of the Type of Fee
Aquatic Center Reso. 2008-086 The Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee is to finance the portion of
Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, construction of an aquatic complex with a 50 meter lap pool and a
2008 4,500 square foot recreation pool that is related to the project's services
to new development.
2 Community Center Reso. 2008-088, The Community Center Facilities Impact Fee is to finance the
Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, expansion of community center facilities, including furniture and
2008 fixtures, to equip new community center facilities space required to
reduce the impact of future development.
3 Fire Suppression Reso. 2008-088 The Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee is to finance specific fire
Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, protection and emergency services facilities to reduce impacts caused
2008 by future development.
4 Library Facilities Reso. 2008-090 The Library Facilities Impact fee is to provide funding for additional
Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, library facilities, furniture, fixtures and collection materials to reduce
2008 the impacts caused by future development.
5 Parkland Reso. 2008-092 The Parkland Acquisition Fee is imposed on development projects
Acquisition Fee N.C.S., May 19, that are not subject to the Quimby Act. It funds acquisition of and
2008 payment for parkland necessary to maintain the standard established in
the city's General Plan, based on a ratio of parkland acreage to
population, including employees of new commercial development, as
new residents and employees are added by new development.
6 Parkland Reso. 2008-093 The Parkland Development Fee funds public facilities which improve
Development Impact N.C.S., May 19, neighborhood and community parklands as needed to serve new
Fee 2008 development.
7 Open Space Reso. 2008-091 The Open Space Acquisition Fee funds acquisition of and payment for
Acquisition Impact N.C.S., May 19, open space necessary to maintain the city's standard established in its
Fee 2008 General Plan based on a ratio of open space acreage to population,
including employees of new commercial development, as new
residents and employees are added by new development.
8 Law Enforcement Reso. 2008-089 The Law Enforcement Facility Fee funds the portion of construction of
Facilities Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, new law enforcement facilities, including a new police station and two
2008 communications towers, and acquisition of police vehicles and
equipment, that is related to the need to serve new development.
9 Public Facilities Reso. 2008-094 The Public Facilities Impact Fee funds a proportionate share of City
Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, l-Iall renovation or relocation, corporation yard construction and VO1P
2008 and Wi-Fi communications systems. It also funds additional computer
technology and city vehicles to serve the added population and
employees brought to the city by new development.
Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 5
Fee# Impact Fee Name Fee Authority Brief Description of the Type of Fee
10 Storm Drainage Ord. 1530 The Storm Drainage Impact Fee funds the construction of storm
Impact Fee N.C.S., eff. Sept. drainage improvements needed to control increases in run-off created
20, 1982; Ord. by new development projects. The Storm Drainage Impact Fee was
1653 N.C.S., eff adopted and last updated before the enactment and effective date of
June 2, 1986 AB 1600, but is included in this report for informational purposes.
(Petaluma
Municipal Code
Chapter 17.30);
Reso. 9751
N.C.S., June 2,
1986
1 1 Traffic Development Reso. 2008-095 The Traffic Development Impact Fee funds construction and
Impact Fee N.C.S., May 19, implementation of improvements to key elements of the citywide
2008 transportation system sufficient to accommodate future traffic demand
generated by new development.
Resolution No.2013-011 N.C.S. Page 6
Exhibit B
Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year 2011-12
Fund Balance Fee Interest Return Unused Expenditures/ Es t%funded Ending Balance
Fund Fund'Title/Project Title 7/1/2011 Revenue Revenue Funds Translcrs by Impact Fees 6/30/2012
2110 Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fees 17,50898 39,251 83 23622 - 5,54555 51,451.48
e 160520121mpact Fee Study 4,318.00 73%
City administrative costs 1,227 55 100.0%
2120 Community Facilities Ggmct Fees 1,069,81704 29,020.00 3,864.18 - 8,338.60 1,094,362.62
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 6,318.00 10.7%
City administrative costs 2,020.60 100.0%
2121 Community Center Facilities-08 (0.14) 136,997.82 438.14. - 4,109,93 133,325.89
City administrative costs 4,109.93 1000%
2125 Fire Suppression Facilities hnlwct Fees 196226.36 91,449.12 1,534.57 40,000.00 49,261.47 279,948.58
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 6,318.00 10.7%
City admin is trap Re costs 2,943.47 100.0%
2135 Library Facility Impact Fees 119,344.37 69,34.34 1,01306 - 6,554.03 183,337.74
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 4,318 00 7.3%
City administrative costs 2,236.03 100.0%
2140 Parkland Acq and DM,Impact Fees 1,641,452.43 108,66623 6,224.65 307,000.00 313,859.99 1,749,483.32
e 1 6052012 Impact Fee Study 2,000.00 3.4%
City administrative costs 4,859.99 100.0%
2141 Parkland Acquisition Inquiet Fees-08 (1,605.751 600,34200 2,972.58 - 22,32826 579,38057
c 16052012 Impact Fee Study 4,318.00 7.3%
City administrative costs 18,010.26 100.0%
2142 Pakland Development Impact Fees-08 - 405,955.18 1,029.83 - 16,496.66 390,488.35
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 4,318.00 7.3%
City administrative cos Is 12,178.66 100.0%
2143 Open Space Acquisition Impact Fees-08 (0.14) 184,644.79 147.36 - 9,907.34 174;884.67
e 16052012 Impact Fee.Study 4,318.00 7.3%
City admit'is trativc costs 5,589.34 100.0%
2145 Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fees 240,59040 127,89784 2,007.15 - 10,404.94 360,090.45
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 6,318.00 10.7%
City administrative costs 4,086.94 100.0%
2150 Public Facilities Impact Fees 68.499.81 25,034.00 517.32 - 7,122.02 86,929.11
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 6,321.00 10.7%
City administrative costs 801.02 100.0%
2151 Public Facilities Impact Fees-08 - 130,129.00 475.01 - 3,903.87 126,700.14
City administrative costs 3,903.87 100.0%
2155 Storm Drainage Impact Fees 3,833,896.67 15,098.48 12,32460 997,017.78 1,956,868.55 2,901 46898
c16301307 Payout Flood Control 336,000.00 100.0%
c00500804 Storm Drain age Improvements 17.78
Revenue Correction-Tfr to Traffic Impact 614,296.88 100.0%
City administrative costs 9,571.67 100.0%
2156 Storm Drainage Impact Fees-08 344.52 11,813 00 19.20 354.39 11,822.33
City administrative costs 354.39 100.0%
Resolution No. 2013-XXX N.C.S. Page 7
Exhibit B
Fund Balance Fee Interest Retunt Unused Expenditures/ Est%funded Ending Balance
Fund Fund Title/Project Title 7/1/2011 Revenue Revenue Funds Transfers by Impact Fees 6/30/2012
2160 'Traffic Impact Fees 1,740.649.76 155,624.00 12,349.24 989,887.49 530,037.00 2.368,473.49
e 16052012 Impact Fee Study 10,000.00 17.0°/
e62101001 Lynch Creek Trail 3,000.00 0.3%
c16101002 Pedestrian,Crossing Sunrise/McDowell 20,590.61
Revenue Correction-Tfr to Traffic Impact-08 148,915.87 100.0%
Revenue Correction-Tfr fm Storm Impact 614,296.88 100.0%
City administrative costs 13,121.13 100.0%
2161 Trallie lmryact Fees-08 - 1211,52650 1,225.72 148,915.87 25,174.67 1,336,493.42
Revenue Correction-l'fr fin Trallic.lmpact 148,915.87 100.0°/
City administrative costs 25,174.67 100.0%
Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 8
Exhibit C
Development Impact Fee Schedule
Fee Type Land Use Type Fee Unit of Measurement
City Facilities Single Family Residential $5,399 Unit
Development Impact
Fee(A)
Multifamily Residential $3,635 Unit
Accessory Dwelling $1,852 Unit
Commercial $1,022 1,000 sq ft of building space
Office $978 1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial $622 1,000 sq ft of building space
Open Space Single Family Residential $379 Unit
Acquisition Fee
Multifamily Residential $255 Unit
Accessory Dwelling $130 Unit
Commercial $72 1,000 sq ft of building space
Office $69 1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial $44 1,000 sq ft of building space
S i L'. *' .°, inv ,.. 6
Park Land Acquisition Single Family Residential $1,616 Unit
Fee (Quimby and Non-
Quimby Act
Projects?)
Multifamily Residential $1,093 Unit
Accessory Dwelling $554 Unit
Commercial $306 1,000 sq ft of building space
Office $293 1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial $186 1,000 sq ft of building space
•,,, �, ,^� y z* r� xa t
°,?i °°tep,p,:.�,�u,"""^a ,. �� L
Park Land Single Family Residential $5,212 Unit
Development Impact
Fee
Multifamily Residential $3,510 Unit
Accessory Dwelling $1,788 Unit
Commercial $987 1,000 sq R of building space
Office $944 1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial $601 1,000 sq ft of building space
gat a f 'K; r .�.E 'a' im - F.
a' �i(&! ..ea3 'me , +«%` N4'»�"�. .�4.gro .Y'tm RFa�'ro4t''I t `�� �°.'r ..'� 7e,
a �Sy,...-�wwr_ .. • ,� • a.ca.+?.,� kU"� 5 ;•�`..�ri et s-S. w-:
Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 9
Exhibit C
Fee Type Land Use Type Fee Unit of Measurement
Traffic Development Single Family Residential $18,978 Unit
Impact Fee
Multifamily Residential $11,650 Unit
Accessory Dwelling $5,261 Unit
Senior Housing $5,073 Unit
Office $18,199 1,000 sq ft of building space
Hotel/Motel $11,086 Room
Commercial/ Shopping $17,522 1,000 sq ft of building space
Industrial/Warehouse $12,928 1,000 sq ft of building space
Education $2,894 Student
Institution $6,718 1,000 sq ft of building space
a 4 .. �
r q s ,t
°@7- Q m �:.''_ . ^1
(A) The City Facilities Impact Fee is a newly established fee which consolidates the following six previous development
impact fees into a single fee: Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee, Community Center Facilities Impact fee, Fire
Suppression Facilities Impact Fee, Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee, Library Facilities Impact Fee, and the
Public Facilities Impact Fee.
(9) The Quimby Act applies only to fees and/or dedications imposed on certain subdivisions subject to the Subdivision
Act to fund land acquisition costs for park or recreational purposes.
*NOTE: The 2 adopted traffic impact fees reflect the cost differential between two design alternatives for the proposed
Rainier Avenue Crosstown Connector and Highway 101 Interchange ("Caltrans Preferred"; "Locally Preferred"). Until a
final determination is made on a design alternative, the City will collect the higher (the "Caltrans Preferred") of the 2
traffic impact fees on all projects subject to that fee. Should the "Locally Preferred" design alternative ultimately be
selected, the City will then charge the"Locally Preferred" traffic impact fee amount and refund the incremental difference
between the two fees to those projects that had already paid the "Caltrans Preferred" traffic impact fee.
Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 10
Exhibit C
Storm Drain Impact Fee
Calculation of Fee
Runoff computation: The increase in runoff created by a given project is calculated fora 100-year storm, utilizing runoff
coefficients based upon the portion of vegetated area to impervious surfaces, and expressed in acre-feet. Runoff coefficients
are based upon the type of use, slope of the land, and percent of vegetation coverage.
Commercial/Industrial: Projects pay a fee of$30,000 per acre foot of additional runoff The amount of incremental runoff
created is directly linked to the amount of landscaping provided. The maximum fee possible is $9,000 per acre of land. This
would apply to a project with 20% or less landscaping. A project with.25% landscaping can expect a fee of$6,750 per acre,
30% would pay $6,300 per acre, and so on.
Residential: Projects pay a fee of$15,000 per acre foot of additional runoff. Incremental runoff is dependent upon the
density of a project and the amount of landscaping and open space provided. A high density project with 20% or less area in
landscaping could expect to pay $4,500 per acre. A type detached single-family subdivision would pay approximately $1,500
per acre.
Resolution No.2013-011 N.C.S. Page 11
Exhibit 1)
Status of Interfund Loans,Transfers, Refunds or Reallocation of Funds
Fiscal Year 2011-12
Interfund Loans
During FY 11-12 the Storm Drainage Impact Fee fund lent the Storm Water Utility Operations fund $208,641 to cover storm
water maintenance costs from January I, 2012 through December 31, 2014. Payment of principal and interest shall begin on
June 30, 2015 and shall be made in 12 equal annual payments. This loan is scheduled to be repaid by June 30, 2026.
There were no Transfers, Refunds or Reallocation of Funds during FY 11-12.
Resolution No. 2013-011 N.C.S. Page 12