HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 89-324B N.C.S. 10/16/1989Resolution No. 89-324 B N ~.s.
of the City of Petaluma, California
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1987-2005
PETALUMA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma adopted anew General Plan in March 1987;
an d
WHEREAS., in the intervening time since the adoption of the General Plan,
certain property owners have requested amendments because they felt the
General Plan, as originally approved, created undue hardship for certain
properties ;
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is therefore intended to clarify or
correct a portion of the General Plan land use maps; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on these proposed
amendment on December 13, 1988 and January 10, 1989 and has
recommended that the City Council approve said amendments; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed
amendment on February 6, 1989, September 18, 1989, and October 2, 1989;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Petaluma City Council hereby
approves the following amendments to the 1987-2005 Petaluma General Plan:
1. The General Plan Land Use Map designation on a property at 731 Paula
Lane (AP No. 048-134-16) from Suburban Residential (up to 2 du/ac)
to Urban Standard Residential (up to 5 du / ac) ; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has determined that a
Negative Declaration as approved by Resolution No. 89-323 N.C.S.
satisfactorily addresses the environmental review requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it pertains to the proposed
General Plan amendments adopted herein.
1
H~,s. ~~~>...$ 9.-.3.2.4... B... h.c.s.
NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in light of all information presented
to the Council, both verbal and in writing, regarding the aforementioned
amendment, the Petaluma City Council hereby makes the following findings
of fact:
a. The proposed amendment is deemed to be in the public interest.
b. The proposed General Plan amendment is consistent and compatible
with the rest of the General Plan and any implementation
programs that may be affected.
c. The potential impacts of the proposed amendment have been
assessed and have been determined not to be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare.
d. The proposed amendment has been processed in accordance with
the applicable provisions of the California Government Code and
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) .
reso.land. use. amendment/resol3
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ^..:_-~.r~A_^p4g~ceued-as~o
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (}a~onia~~e~s~ meeting / .~`'`
16th October 89.. ~ `'
on the .--• ...................... day of ............................. .........., 19.... , by the
-,.,.
following vote: ~~
i City;Attor ey
AYES: Tencer, Woolsey, Balshaw, Davis
NC+ES: Cavanagh, V' e Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
ABSENT: / ~ ~
ATTEST: .- .. - ...... ... .... ............. ....... ..._. _ -.-.-..-..
City Clerk 2 Mayor
(council File .........................°-•----..
ca ~o-as Res. No.... 8.9.-.3.24B.... rv.cs.