HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 89-121 N.C.S. 05/01/1989L
FZesolution No. 89-121 N ~.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PURSUANT TO CEQA FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHING THE RIVERFRONT WAREHOUSE ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for
an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance establishing the Riverfront
Warehouse Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, an initial study has been prepared for the amendments and has
been reviewed by the Community Development and Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the results of this study have indicated that approval of these
amendments will not trigger any significant adverse environmental impacts;
and,
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a
Negative Declaration be issued on the proposed amendments;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based upon the following findings:
1. The amendments do not have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory.
Res. No..9....1.. ..!..~.~.._.. N.C.S.
.'
1
2. The amendments do not have. the :potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term,, .environmental goals.
3. The amendments do not have impacts which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable.
4. The amendments.. do .not have environmental- effects which will cause
substantial adverse ` -effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly.
reso.neg.dec/cega.gp
gP2
,{- :, ;`
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
I hereby certify the foregoing .Resolution was introduced and adopted by the A ,proved to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (A7~14~ meeting form
on the ...---1 s ~ ............. day of ..:....._.............,:..1.1~~'----.................-....., .19..$x., by the
following vote:
C y Attorney
AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayor Hil igoss
NOES: C
ABSENT: ~ _ ~~
• ~~~i'~i
ATTEST: ......... ..... .. ...... ... -. .- ... ..... ...................
ity Clerk Mayor -
Council Fil .-2 .... ...............
pp ....
,Form CA 2 7%81 Res. No.. ..L.~.-~.~1....-,.. -
S