Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 89-075 N.C.S. 03/20/1989 • Resolution No. 89-75 N.C.s. • of the City of Petaluma, California RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE MAP FOR COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 2, A 27 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO THE. EAST OF MCNEAR AVENUE AT COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, BEING 17.3± ACRES CONSISTING OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 008-472-03 AND PART OF 008-472-05 WHEREAS, COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, as owner and subdivider, has filed with this Council a tentative map to subdivide land within this City to be known as Country Club Estates Unit NO. 2, and has paid all required filing fees; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer, Director of Planning and the Planning Commission have examined and reviewed the same as required by law and all reports, recommendations and comments thereon have been forwarded to and considered by this Council at its meeting held on February 6, 1989; WHEREAS, by action taken on January 10, 1989, the Planning Commission considered and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council on the tentative map for said Planned Unit District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Council hereby finds as follows Findings 1. The proposed subdivision as conditionally approved, together with provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan objectives, policies, general land uses and programs. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed, as conditionally approved. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore, as conditionally approved, will not cause substantial environmental damage, and no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems. 1 ~~s. N~.....89-75 ......................... N.C.S. 5. The design of the .Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed. will riot conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use ,of' property within the proposed subdivision. 6. The discharge of waste: 'from the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system will not result in. violation. of the existing requirements pres'cr'ibed. by the .Regional Water Quality Control Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the findings set forth above, that the above referred to tentative map, be and the same is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth below and incorporated herein as follows Conditions 1: The tentative map shall be revised prior 'to:.,final map consideration, subject to staff review and approval, to reflect the following a. Relocation of southern boundary no.rthwa_rd to be located to the north of the cr.eekbed and associated linear woodland grove, as determined by staff to be appropriate for the. preservation/protection of the natural watercourse and woodland grove. b. Deletion of remnant piece of land at the southeastern corner of the project site,, so that the south perme.ter line of the project site lies to the north of the remnant piece.. c. Inclusion of roadway and appropriate utility improvements for access to lots #8 and 9, unless. constructed or bonded through the processing of a separate map. d. Identification of "Remainder" portion of AP No. 08-472-05. e. Transition of roadway into golf course property. f. All lot lines which .cross tree trunk. locations so that no existing tree is crossed by proposed property lines (exact tree trunk locations shall be located prior to SPARC review of the project) . 2._ The project shall comply with all. conditions required by the Fire M_ar'shal and Chief Building Inspector. 3. Maximum cut/fill slopes shall be 3:1 and. ,:.shall. be sculpted to the extent possible to blend, with the natural curved :contours following. completion of. slope stabilization work, subject to staff=~ review and approval. 4. PubTi'c: ,utility, .easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the agencies°/ departments which provide. the individual utilities and services. 2 89-75 N.C.S. 5. Temporary protective fencing shall be erected by the developer at the drip line of all native trees incorporated into the final landscape plan approved by SPARC. The fencing shall be erected and subject to inspection by City staff, prior to the issuance of any grading permit. 6. The following fees are applicable to this project: School Facilities Impact., Community Facilities Development,,. Park and Recreation Land Improvements and Storm Drainage Impact. 7. In conformance with General Plan Program (#25 - Conservation), proposed grading plan shall be referred to the Southern Sonoma County Soil Conservation Service for comment prior to SPARC review of the project. 8. Proposed street names shall be subject to review and approval of the City Street Naming Committee, prior to Council consideration of the Final Map . 9. The. grading plan shall be revised, subject to staff review and approval, as follows a. Illustrate the changes to topography following conclusion of slope stabilization work. Finished contours shall recreate the natural curved contours of the site. b. Indicate exact .locations of retaining walls to be utilized for constructing public improvements. c. Indicate driveway access points and. anticipated grade. 10. A gate to serve the Golf and Country Club shall be re-established at the terminous of the project site on Country Club Drive, prior to acceptance of the project's public improvements, if a gate is desired by the Country Club Board. 11. Underground utilities shall be provided to the new water tank site, subject to approval of City staff. 12. The developer shall apply to the Department of Fish and Game for determination of jurisdiction over the natural creek along the project's south.. boundary, prior to SPARC review of project. If jurisdiction is acknowledged by Department of Fish and Game, all reviews and permits shall be obtairned prior to Council consideration of the final map. 13. .Additional analysis, if deemed appropriate by the City Engineer, will be undertaken to address the impact of the: proposed outfall of storm drainage into the creek along the prgjeet'`s south boundary. The analysis, costs of which shall be bprne by -the developer, shall also aeldress downstream impact of increased flow .and proposed manner of discharge. Analysis shall be .completed., reviewed, and approved by the. City Engineer and suggested mitigation measures and/or improvements rcorporated into the project's improvement plans prior to Council consideration of the final map . Any streambed alteration work shall be undertaken utilizing techniques of the Urban Stream 3 89-75 N.C.S. Restoration Program of the California Department of Water Resources, subject to staff review and approval.. . , 14. Treatment of the .creek. upstream; along the = south. line of -Lots 23 through 2? shall be. addressed concurrently with. the processing of SPfiRG review of Country Club II Design Guidelines. Any changes within the watercourse area shall utilize .the Department of Water Resources - Urban ` Stream Renewal' guidelines„ subject to SPARC review and approval. 15. No work shall be undertaken on the site which will result in the :damage or removal of -any tree on the project site until SPARC approval of the tree study, Preservation Guidelines and landscaping is obtained. SPARC, review and approval' . of 'the project will include .assurances of tree preservation and penalties for unanticipated tree removal or damage. 16. An independent consultant shall be retained, at developer's cost, on behalf of the City to oversee all activities involving grading, installation of public ,improvements, structural siting and associated construction in an effort to retain and protect the trees. No grading, paving., other earth work or construction activities shall be undertaken within the driplines of; the trees unless the consultant is on the site. The City shall issue stop work orders if violation of the above occurs. 17. The project shall. comply with all conditions required by the City 'Engineer as set forth in the attached letter dated January 5, 1989, as follows a. In accordance with Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter 20.16, Tentative Map Section 20.16.030 Preparation, "the boundary of the tentative: -map shall be certified as to accuracy...." The westerly boundary line of Country Club Estates Unit 2 is not contiguous with that of the approved .tentative map for. Country Club Estates Unit- 1B . The approved boundary line for Country Club Estates- Un"t 1$ includes only a portion of Five Farms Court, and portions of Lots 5 and 6 (Country Club Estates Unit 1B) and a remainder parcel directly below Five Farms Court. This item shall be corrected. b. Approval of the final map :for Country Club Estates Unit II Phases 1 and 2 shall be denied until such time as the public improvements as proposed by Country. Club Estates Unit 1B Phase 2: (water main and storm drain.) to serve this proposed . development are designed, approved and bonded. c. The fo'llowi~ng mitigation measures, as outlined in the final EIR for Country Club Estates Unit 2. and Fairway Glen Subdivision prepared by Larry Seeman Assoc. , April 1981, shall be required with this. ,phase . 1.. McNear Avenue just south of Petaluma Boulevard South shall be striped to provide a separate northbound to eastbound right-turn lane. 4 89-75 N.C.S. 2. McNear Avenue shall be widened to 30 feet between Petaluma Boulevard and the existing 40-foot-wide section, including curb, gutter and no parking... 'both sides. d. Access to Lots 8 and 9 are directly off Five Farms Court. Full street and underground improvements shall be required with Country Clu b Estates Unit 2, Phase. I, to serve these lots. e. The portion areas. of Lots 6 and 27, physically separated by a street from the buildable portion of the lots, shall be deeded to the adjacent property. f. The City shall not maintain the seasonal creek adjacent to Lots 23 through 27 inclusive. The watercourse open space area shall be dedicated to the City of Petaluma. Maintenance shall be assured through a Landscape Assessment District, subject to City review and approval prior to Final Map approval. Cost of Landscape Assessment District formation shall be borne by the developer. g. Installation of the, storm drain pipe crossing the south end of Kingswood Ridge Drive shall be installed with Country Club Estates Unit 3, so, that it may .be located ,at the. low point. h. Design. of all retaining walls shall be. in conformance within the City Building ~ Departments. i. All grading on property outside this tentative map boundary shall require that property owners permission. j . The grading on the .lots adjacent to the creek (particularly....Lot #27) shall be minimized to maintain the. natural state of the lot and creek areas, subject to staff review and approval. k. City standard typical driveway is 21 feet wide, with 2-foot :roll-ups each side,. Some lots within this development shall require. joint access easement to provide adequate lot access, subject to staff review and approval. 1. The developer shall comply with the amended Petaluma Municipal Code Sections 20.36.010 and 20.36.020 which require the developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in Chapter .17.30) on construction in all sections of the. City of Petaluma . m. The water main shall be public'. throughout this development. The sanitary sewer and storm dra'inage' systems located in Country Club Drive shall be public, the remaining shall be private and maintained through an appropriate mechanism subject to City approval. n. Stabilization of landslide areas shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and provisions of the soil' report. 5 89-75 N.C.S. o. Street curve radii shall. be ,designed to accommodate a C50 design vehicle . p. All grading and erosion control shall conform to Ordinance. 1576 NCS. All provisions and requirements stated within said ordinance shall be strictly adhered to. A final detailed. geotechnical investigation shall be required and prepared concurrently with the detailed grading and erosion control plans prepared by the developers engineer. These grading and erosion control plans shall be reviewed and signed by a registered soils engineer. (The existing report prepared by Buller Group,. Inc. , dated 3/2/88, is valid for one year thereafter). q. All backyard and hillside drainage control must be within an underground ,pipe system with surface concrete catchment swales and inlets. r. All public improvements shall conform to the minimum City of Petaluma design criteria. s. Signing and striping shall conform to the City of .Petaluma standards. :Prohibited parking areas shall be signed as part of the final impro~emerit plans. t. The sub drains (as required by the soils report) shall be private, maintained by either a homeowner's association or other mechanism to insure regular routine maintenance and sliall be connected to an approved closed conduit storm drainage system. u. Lot to lot and across property line surface drainage is not allowed . v. All overhead PG&E lines 12 KVA or below, fronting and traversing this development shall be underground. w. Handicapped. ramps shall be provided at street corners with pedestrian traffic. x. All sanitary sewer and water main will be ductile iron pipe (DIP) or equivalent, subject to City Engineer-'s approval throughout the development in sidehll areas, due to the unstable nature of the property. y. If the storm drain improvements. on Petaluma Blvd,. So, outletting into the Petaluma River are not nstaYled, this unit ahall install these improvements based upon .Sonoma County Water Agency _ ,. Master Drainage P~lah. All storm, drainage improvements shall conform to the requi=rerrients of the Sonoma County Water A-gency. z . This development shall. contribute: a proportionate. share of the cost of the' proposed ~ Sonoma County ~ Water Agency Master Drainage Plan improvements for the Mountain View Avenue 6 89-75 N:C.S. .. drainage system. The actual dollar amount extent shall be determined on a ratio of runoff from site to runoff from the watershed . al. The project shall contribute a proportionate share of the cost of traffic signal installations on Petaluma Blvd. So. , at Mt. View Avenue and at McNear Ave. , subject to staff review and approval. a2 . The dimensions shown on the ,Royal View Court turn-around shall be corrected to read 16 feet instead of 32 feet. 18. Project CC&R's shall be subject to staff review and approval prior to Council consideration of the Final Map . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines have been satisfied by the previous certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report for this project site approved by the City Council in May, 1981. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that identified potential impacts have been satisfactorily lessened or avoided by the incorporation of mitigation measures as conditions of development approval as set forth in Resolution No. 89- 74 NCS approving the PUD Development Plan, and incorporated herein by reference, as adopted by the City Council on February 1989. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be come effective as of the effective date of Ordinance 1748 N.C.S. reso.tent.map.cc / resoll Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Ap roved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular~~oo~d;~#~exial) meeting ~' i on the z.Q th.......-•---..... day of ................11arc11....-........................., 1~.9....., by the following vote: y Attorney AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayo lligoss NOES: ~ ABSENT: ~ - ` 1 ATTEST: ......: ...Q..1~P..~_1 ....................................................... City ~[,~ r"~ C~~ ~~~ ~ Mayor Council File....._.1 .......................... CA 10-85 ~ Res. No. ... $.9.-.75............ N.C.S.