Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 89-074 N.C.S. 03/20/1989 F~esolution No. 89-74 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 2 LOCATED ON COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, EAST OF MCNEAR AVENUE WHEREAS, by action taken on January 10, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the Unit Development Plan for the development of a twenty-seven (27) lot single-family residential subdivision. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commisison as its findings as set out hereinafter: Findings 1. The revised site plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. 2. The PUD district is proposed on a property that has a suitable relationship to one thoroughfare (McNear Avenue) and that the thoroughfare, as improved concur rently with development of this project, is adequate to carry any additional traffic created by the development has been determined. In response to recognized needed city-wide traffic improvements and implementation of adopted General Plan policy, funding of these impr ovements shall be shared by new development . 3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified, organized arrangement of lots with their appropriate relationship to adjacent and nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included, as conditionally approved, to ensure compatibility by the incorporation of substantial landscaping, and preservation of the natural seasonal creek and woodland grove. 1 Res. N~>..89-74 .............. n.c.s. 'Y ~ 4. The natural and. scenic qualities of the site will be protected with adequate available public and private spaces designed into the Unit Development Plan., through the preservation of the woodland groves and creek and .through implementation of measures to insure preservation and enhancement of native tree groupings and ridgeline features. 5. Development. of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant., and conditionally approved, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interest of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the Zoning Regulation and General Plan adopted by the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the requirements of the C'aliforria Envrionmental ,Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines have been met and hereby incorporates by reference the EIR, certified, approved and adopted by the City Council in May, 1981. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the Country Club Estates Unit No. 2 development plan subject to the conditions of approval set out hereinafter: r:nn r~ i ti nn d e 1. The project, including but not limited to, the tentative map, development plan, Country Club Estates Architectural and Site Design Guidelines, grading plan, tree study, Preservation Guidelines and master landscape plan shall be subject to SPARC approval prior to Council consideration of Final Map . 2. The PUD development plan shall be amended prior to SPARC review and Final Map approval, subject to staff review and approval, to reflect the following: 2 89-74 N.C.S. a. Realignment of southern project's property line to be located to the north of the creekbed and, associated linear woodland grove, as determined by staff. °4~. Realignment of southeast project corner to include Lot #27's remnant piece to the south of the project's southern property line . 3. The PUD development standards and projec CC&R's (if applicable) shall include references, subject to staff review and approval, regarding approved development standards which shall become conditions of PUD zoning approval and shall be incorporated as part of the approved development plan, including: a. Building heights shall be subject to administrative SPARC review and analysis of specific location and needs to insure compatibility with adjacent properties. Maximum building shall be in conformance with the approved Design Guidelines for this project. b. Maximum lot coverage for principal and accessory buildings shall be confined within an area equivalent to the defined building envelope as shown on the approved unit development plan. However, maximum allowable lot coverage is as set forth in the approved Country Club Estates Design Guidelines. c. Setbacks shall be as follows: 1. All lots having a gross square footage of at least 15,000 square feet. but less than 20,000 square feet: in accordance with R-1 10,000 square foot requirements. 2 . All lots having a gross square footage of at least 20, 000 square feet or more shall be subject to the setback provisions of the R-1 20, 000 zoning district. 3 89-74 N.C..3. Modifications to the required minimum setbacks may be granted by the Community Development and Planning Director to address circumstances on a parcel which, if the setbacks were strictly adhered to, would result in excessive grading and/or the loss of substantial vegetation and/or damage or reduction to a natural feature of the site. d. Rebuilding and/'or replacement of structures, including accessory buildings and fences, shall conform to the approved unit development plan . e. Accessory structures, including accessory dwellings, are permitted subject to the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance for accessory structures and the provisions contained therein. f. Garage conversions are prohibited. g. Home occupations are permitted subject to the regulations of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance. h. Private swimming pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. If deemed necessary by the City staff, additional soil tests may be required prior to pool construction to address slope stability. i. Any other questions concerning land use regulations in the project shall be .governed by the City Zoning Ordinance as long as it does not expressly conflict with the project CC&R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan and Design Guidelines. j . Dedication of watercourse open space area, as determined by staff to be adequate to preserve natural watercourse and woodland grove; and, formation of a Landscape Assessment District to assume monitoring and maintenance responsibilities, shall be 4 89-74 N.C.S. ,.:~. undertaken prior to Final Map approval. Costs of Landscape Assessment District formation sha1T be borne by the developer. 4. Each residence shall be subject to administrative SPARC review. An independent review and analysis, by a licensed arborist, shall be prepared for Lots 1:5, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, and Z6 once a home is proposed to be sited on the specific lot. T.he analysis, prepared for the City with costs to be borne by the home developer, shall include evaluation of any potential ,impact to existing and introduced trees and offer specific procedures required to preserve and enhance the trees . Subsequent modifications permitted without administrative SPARC review as follows: Any exterior modifications shall be compatible in architectural styling. and exterior colors and materials to the original structure . 5. Any signs erected.. to advertise or direct persons to the project shall .meet the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance and obtain a sign permit from the City. 6. Hours of construction activity on the Country Club Estates Unit 2 project shall be. limited to the hours of 7 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday (non-holiday) , Trucks and other heavy construction. equipment traffic to and from the project site shall be confined to McNear Avenue from Petaluma Boulevard South. 7. If prehistoric or historic remnants are encountered during project construction, work shall be halted and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate the finds. Mitigation measures prescribed by the archaeologist and required by the City shall be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. 8. Cross .e,asements and joint maintenance agreements shall be recorded where appropriate for joint driveways. 9. The project`.' sponsor shall be required to pay low and moderate income housing in-lieu fees of an amount to be determined according to the 5 89-74 NCS schedule established. by City Resolution No. 84-199 N.C.S. , or make alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income housing provisions requirements of the Housing Element subject to approval of the City Council and prior to approval of the final map . 10. In response to identified traffic impacts within the General Plan (as recognized in findings for approval) , the project sponsor shall execute. a binding agreement which shall stipulate that upon close of escrow of each residential dwelling unit in Country Club Estates Unit 2, developer shall pay a traffic impact fee of $150.00 to the City per daily trip end estimated to be generated by said unit. Each unit is estimated to generate 10.0 trip ends per. day. If the City establishes a Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee prior to close of escrow of any unit(s), the fee for .said unit(s) and all subsequent units in this project the"reafter will be either .$150.00 per 'trip end or the Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee, whichever is lens on a per unit basis. 11. Landscaping plan shall be amended, subject to SPARC review and approval, to include the following a. The developer shall provide hillside and ridgeline screen planting, subject to SPARC review and approval. Irrigation shall be provided to allow separate and independent irrigation systems for each lot. b. Street trees shall include a variety of planting sizes to provide a minimum of two 24" box trees per lot. The remainder shall be a minimum of 15 gallon size per SPARC standards. 6 89-74 NCS 12. Developer shall work with staff toward providing decorative, low-profile streetlighting. Street lighting shall be maintained through an Assessment District or Homeowner's Association, and shall be designed to standards acceptable to the City of Petaluma. Assessment District shall be formed and approved by the City, costs to be borne by the developer, prior to Final Map approval. reso. develop.plan. cc/resoll Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regul~~~t~&c~x~ecial) meeting !.• ~ on tl~r. -.20th .-.•.• day of ..........-1`1.dS.Gl1....-.-..-..•.••....•......•.--...., X9.89., by the i following vote: ity Attorney AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayor H' ligoss NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ' ~~ ~^ , ATTEST: .-.-.--:- .•.- ,{,i~-R,~l~„K.~-..-....... •....._ .•r ... ...............•...-......-...-.•• .-.-......-•-•-•-•--•- =........•...-•-------• ~ihl~C'~.i E 1 ~' 1 p e~E~I~, CbuncilFile.......~-....-...---°---•--•-•-•• Mayor ' CA 10-85 ~ Res. No:.....p.g_.7~........_.. N.C.S.