HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 89-269 N.C.S. 08/21/1989:x
r
FZesolution No. 89-~ 6~9 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CEQA FOR THE
CREATION OF THE MIREMONT SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON
CHERRY STREET EAST OF KEOKUK, AP NO.'s 006-031-03 and 16
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) for a proposal to create an eight-lot residential subdivision at 210
Cherry Street, east of Keokuk; and,
WHEREAS, an initial study which noted traffic, drainage and scenic impacts
has been prepared for the project and has been reviewed by the Community
Development and Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the results of this study have indicated that conditional approval
of this project will not trigger any significant adverse environmental
impacts; and,
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a
mitigated negative declaration be issued on the above project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based upon the following findings:
1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory.
1
Rcs. No. ...... V.9.'1l..-6 ?.... N.C.S.
2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals .
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.
5. The traffic impact of this eight-unit subdivision will be slight, relative
to the required improvements and capacity of the existing road
network and the impact of the subdivision will be mitigated through
conditions of approval.
6. The potential adverse drainage impacts of the project are adequately
mitigated through conditions of approval.
7. Conditions of approval and site design adequately mitigate potential
adverse impacts on the scenic qualities and plant species of the site.
reso. neg. dec. miremont/resol2
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ~_~;:--~~ A as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (,~~~(~~Qt,~}}~meeting' fo
on the .......2_l.~ ~......... day of ....................... .. August............, 19...$.x, iby the ,.
following vote.:
ity Atto ney
AYES: Davis, Woolsey, Cavanagh., Balsahw, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: 0
4
ABSENT: Tence
~~
~,~~.~e~
ATTEST: .-... .. ... ....-. ... .. . .... . .. .. .....................-................----.......-..........
City Clerk 2 Mayor
Council File ....................................
CA 10-85 Res. No....8.9.-.~.. J ~..,,, N.C.S.