Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 89-251 N.C.S. 08/10/1989R~SOIUtIOrl Nom. 89-251 N.C.~. of the City of Petaluma, California RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ST. JAME5 ESTATES SUBDIVISION, A NINETEEN-LOT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED ON ELY BOULEVARD BETWEEN EAST WASHINGTON AND EAST MADISON STREETS, AP NO.'s 007-510-36, 42 and 43 WHEREAS, Bryant Moynihan and Robert Lipman, as owners, have filed with this Council a tentative map to subdivide land within this City to be known as St. James Estates Subdivision, and have paid all required filing fees; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer, the Director of Planning, and the Planning Commission have examined and reviewed the same as required by law and all reports, recommendations, and comments thereon have been forwarded to and considered by this Council at its meeting held on August 7, 1989; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Council hereby finds for the Tentative Map as follows 1. The proposed subdivision together with provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in said General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The tentative map provides reasonable public access on a public road to the proposed lots . 1 Rcs. No . .............................. N.C.S. 6. The proposed map, subject to the following conditions, complies with the requirements of the Municipal Code, Chapter 20.16 and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore will not cause substantial environmental damage, and no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat. 8. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the findings set forth above, that the above referred to tentative map, be and the same is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth below and incorporated herein as follows 1. All requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be complied with, including: a. Fire hydrants shall be installed per Fire Marshal requirements. b. Roofing anal siding materials shall comply with Class °B" fire rating as .required by Uniform Fire and Building Codes. 2. All requirements of the Engineering Department shall be complied with, as follows a. The developer shall comply with the Petaluma Municipal Code Section 20.36.010 and 20.36.020 which require the developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in Chapter 17.30) on construction in all sections of the City of Petaluma. b. All portions of the existing roadway structural section for St. James Way, not proposed to be rebuilt, shall require verification this section meets a traffic index equal to 4.0 and a basement soil R-value equal to 5.0. c. The developer shall contribute a pro-rata share for the installation of a landscape median island on Ely Blvd. Dollar amount shall be based on the amount of frontage of this property on Ely Blvd. and shall be calculated by the developer's engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer . 2 ~~;~®. ~ ~ m 2 5 1 N C S d. Appropriate signing for no parking shall be required in the hammerhead along Ely Blvd. on one side of St. James Way and St . James Court . e. The width of the hammerhead shall be increased from 20 feet to 25 feet to insure adequacy of the emergency vehicle turn-around. f. All broken curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be replaced per City Standards. g. If the existing storm drain in St. James Way is to become public, verification is needed to insure it was designed and installed in accordance with City Standards . This would also include the grate inlets. h. The existing sanitary sewer lateral to be removed was originally installed to serve the church property. The developer's engineer shall verify its present use prior to removal. i. If the developer wishes to retain the existing street lights along St. James Way, the developers street light designer will be required to certify they are equivalent to standard PG&E street lights. It is recommended all non-standard street lights be maintained through a lighting and landscape assessment district. 3. Final landscape and irrigation plans for public areas shall be subject to review by the Parks and Recreation Department prior to final approval. 4. All requirements of Pacific Bell, as reflected in letter dated March 23, 1989, shall be complied with. 5. The following minimum setbacks and/or height restrictions shall be adhered to : a. Lots 9 and 1 (Phase 2) shall have a minimum 7 foot (west) side setback to a one story garage and a minimum fifteen foot (west) side setback to a two story house. b. Lot 1 (Phase 1) shall have a ten foot (west) side setback. c. Lots 12 and 14 shall have 25 foot minimum rear setbacks and be limited to one story. 3 ~~~®r ~ g_ 2 5 1 N C d. Corner and reversed corner lots shall have 10 and 15 foot street side setbacks respectively. e. Items a, b and c shall be recorded with the final map through deed restrictions. 6. A wood sound attenuation fence shall be provid and 8 (Phase 2), adjacent to Ely Boulevard. the property line and wrap back to each house setback lines. Landscaping shall be provided the sound fence.. All are subject to review staff. ed for Lots 4 (Phase 1) Said fence shall be on at the respective front against the outside of and approval by City 7. The applicant shall provide for perpetual maintenance of all landscaped areas (existing landscaping which will be located in the public right-of-way, and the proposed street tree planting strips and the fence and landscaping required per Condition 6) contained on public property or within the right-of-way, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Community Development and Parks and Recreation and subject to final approval by the City Council. Perpetual maintenance may be accommodated through a maintenance assessment district, the formation of which must be ratified by the City Council prior to final map approval. Maintenance assessment districts are set up by the City through funds provided by the developer. 8. The project sponsor shall be required to pay low and moderate income housing in-lieu fees of an amount to be determined according to the schedule established by City Council Resolution No. 84-199 N.C.S., or make alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income housing provision requirements of the Housing Element, subject to approval of the City and prior to approval of the Final Map . 9. The development plan/landspace plan and unit architecture are subject to review by SPARC. All SPARC conditions of approval which affect the tentative map shall be incorporated prior to final map submittal. SPARC review shall also include particular emphasis on the following 4 a. Provision of at least l00 of the units in an architectural design substantially different from the remaining units within the project, in response to General Plan policy. b. Where homes are located adjacent to existing homes, privacy shall be protected to the degree possible. c. Architectural design of wall. d. Transition between St. James Way and the Petaluma Senior Citizen Apartments . e. Driveway location to maximize on-street parking. f. Decorative six foot high (as measured from grade of project) solid fencing shall be provided around the project site perimeter and around all private lots, subject to the setback requirements specified in the Zoning Ordinance, and subject to design approval by staff. Perimeter fencing shall be installed by the developer at the time public improvements are constructed and may supplement existing fencing where deemed appropriate by staff . Private lot fencing shall be installed as part of the development of each individual lot . 10. Two covered and three uncovered spaces shall be required on Lots 1, 9,12 and 14 (Phase 2) . All other lots shall provide two covered and two uncovered. 11. Any signs erected. to advertise or direct persons to the project shall meet the requirements of the City sign ordinance and obtain a sign permit from the City. 12. A public access easement shall be provided wherever the sidewalk is located on private property. 13. Non-access easements shall be provided to City to preclude access to Ely to or from Lots 4 (Phase 1) and 8 (Phase 2) . 14. Noise mitigation measures in addition to sound fence shall be incorporated in home construction as necessary such that noise levels inside homes will not exceed 40 db in bedrooms and 45 dba in other 5 ~. ~ ~~~ - 2 5 ~. N C S . habitable rooms. Compliance with this condition shall be certified by a recognized acoustical professional prior to issuance of a building permit. 15. Trucks and other heavy construction equipment traffic shall not access the site via Madison Street. 16. This project shall participate in any future assessment districts or other funding mechanisms formed to improve areawide flooding or other sub-regional problems for which development of this project is found to be a contributing factor. Major Capital Facilities Fees, if found to be different from said funding mechanism, shall also be applicable in an amount to be determined by the City Council prior to Final Map approval, payable at time of Final Map or pursuant to adopted regulations . 17. The following Development Fees shall be applicable to this project: Community Facilities, Storm Drainage Impact, Park and Recreation Land Improvement, School Facilities Impact and In-Lieu Housing . 18. The project sponsor shall execute a binding agreement which shall stipulate that upon close of escrow of each residential dwelling unit in St. James Estates, developer shall pay a traffic impact fee of $150.00 to the City per daily trip end estimated to be generated by said unit. Each unit is estimated to generate 10.0 trip ends per day. If the City establishes a Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee prior to close of escrow of any unit (s) , the fee for said unit (s) and all subsequent units in this project thereafter will be either $150.00 per trip end of the Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee, whichever is less on a per unit basis . 19. If prehistoric or historic remnants are encountered during project construction, work shall be halted and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate the finds. Mitigation measures prescribed by the archaeologist and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. 6 R~~®e ~ ~% m 2 5 1 N C 20. Project street name shall be subject to approval of the City Street Naming Committee. 21. Significant mature trees and existing landscaping shall be preserved where possible, subject to staff determination. Temporary protective fencing shall be erected at the drip line of all trees to be preserved and of alI trees (on neighboring property) in proximity to construction activities. The fencing shall be erected prior to any grading/construction activity and subject to staff inspection prior to grading permit issuance. 22. Existing trees to be removed (north side of St. James Way) shall be donated to the City for relocation. Any cost of relocation shall be at the developer's expense. 23. Lot pad elevations shall not be any higher than 12 inches above the adjacent pad elevations in the Washington Manor Subdivision. 24. All existing overhead utility lines traversing or fronting on the subject property shall be converted to underground facilities as required under the Municipal Code and all new utilities shall be underground, subject to staff review and approval. 25. Per the adopted. Growth Management System, the project shall be phased so that no more than 15 lots receive Final Map approval in a given year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines have been satisfied and hereby incorporates by reference the environmental documentation adopted by Resolution No. g9-250 N.C.S. on August 7, 1989. reso.st.james.tent.map / resoll Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ___._.... proved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) ~~I~€~x~i~) meeting on the .....7th--•-•--...... day of ......... Au t?U:~>t .................................... 19.8.x., by the ~, ' f. . following vote: ~ ~- i y Atto ey AYES: Tencer, Woolsey, Cavanagh, Balshaw, Davis, ~7ice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: 0 ABSENT: /~ ATTEST: _. ............................................................ ... ...........:.. ity Clerk 7 Mayor Cotmcil File .................................... CA 10-85 Res. No......89.-?5.1....... N.C.S.