HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 89-014 N.C.S. 01/17/1989
JAN 1."1 ~i~~ 3
Resolution No. 89-14 N ~.s.
of the City of Petaluma, California
DENYING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
ON BOULEVARD BOWL ANNUAL REVIEW
(AP NO. 008-471-18)
WHEREAS, on April 15, 1985 a use permit was granted by the City Council
(Resolution 85-109 N.C.S.) to allow an expansion of the Boulevard Bowl,
.located at 1100 Petaluma Boulevard, subject to twenty-five conditions of
approval, one of which required Planning Commission review of the use
permit one year from date of occupancy of the expanded facility; and,
WHEREAS, on September 22, 1987, the Planning Commission reviewed said
use permit approximately one year from date of occupancy of the expanded
facility; and
WHEREAS, at that time the Planning Commission and, upon appeal, the City
Council added more conditions and required one more annual review; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission again reviewed said use permit on
November 8, 1988, for which time and date all persons previously
expressing an .interest in this matter were notified; and
WHEREAS, all testimony both written and verbal were considered by the
Planning Commission prior to rendering a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 1988, the Planning Commission decided that no
further revisions to the previously imposed conditions of approval were
necessary and that no further annual reviews were warranted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's action was appealed on November 21,
1988 by Valentina Garzoli Magers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing to consider this appeal on
January 9, 1989, at which time all previously submitted information as well
as a noise study commissioned by the appellant, was reviewed and
considered by the Council; and,
89-14
Rcs. Nn . .............................. N.C.S.
WHEREAS, a previous appeal based on noise levels of the Boulevard Bowl
use permit was denied by the City Council (Resolution 87-131 N.C.S.) ; and
WHEREAS, separate noise studies commissioned by the applicant and
appellant, as well as observations made by staff, indicates that ambient
noise level s are generally higher than those eminating from the Boulevard
Bowl and that all noises are generally below City Standards established in
the Zoning Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the
overall operation of the Boulevard Bowl has improved in terms of noise,
surveillance, and aesthetics since its expansion and that the Planning
Commission acted properly in its decision of November 8, 1988; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby denies that appeal
of Valentina Garzoli Magers, thereby leaving all conditions adopted and
actions taken by the Planning Commission in full effect.
reso.blvd.bowl/resol0
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~~at>~~OSaial) meeting
on the ....---....1.7.ih.... day of .....................lanuary....................., 19..$.9., by the
following vote.:
'ty Attorney
AYES:. Cavanagh, Tencer, Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayor Hilligr~ss
NOES: ~
ABSENT: Sobel
ATTEST : ...... ..... .... ....... .. ....... ........--•-•---..........---........,. ..........- :.
City Clerk Mayor
(buncil File ....................................
CA 10-85 Res. No. ..~.7.-.14,,,,,,,,,,,, N.C.S.
(/
r r