HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-333 N.C.S. 09/19/1988.:~ ~~~
Resolution No. $s-333 ~IT~.s,
Of Cjlf' ~,It~' Ot I'F't~l~Ulll~l, (;cl~itOCCIIcl
~~~' i ~ ~9~8 ~ ~~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING A CERTAIN DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND
BENSON INVESTMENTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PERTINENT THERETO
(PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA)
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Petaluma Community
Development Project (the "Redevelopment Plan") was approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Petaluma (the "City
Council") by Ordinance No. 1725 N.C.S., dated July 18, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan provides for the redevelopment of
.real property pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan by owners thereof
or by parties seeking to acquire real property from the Petaluma
Community Development Commission (the "Commission"); and
WHEREAS, Section 33391 of the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 of
Division 24 (commencing with Section 33000) of the Health and Safety
Code of the State of California) (the "Act") provides .that a
redevelopment agency may acquire any real or personal property
within a redevelopment project area or for the purposes of
redevelopment and Section 33430 of the Act provides that a
redevelopment agency may dispose of any real or personal property
within a redevelopment project area or for the purposes of
redevelopment; and
Page 1 of 6
Res. `~.8.$.-333........._. x.cs.
=;. GvHEREAS, the Petaluma Community Development Commission (the
"Commission") and Benson Investments, Inc., a California corporation
(the "Redeveloper") desire to enter into a certain Disposition and
Development Agreement (the "Agreement"), a copy of which is on file
with the Commission Secretary and is incorporated herein by
reference, pursuant to which, among other matters, the Redeveloper
would acquire from the Commission a portion of the Benson Site which
is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference and which is further defined in the Agreement as
the "Disposition Parcel." The Benson Site is located within the
area subject to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Project Area"). The
acquisition would be for purposes of the redevelopment tk~ereof, as
described in the Agreement, including construction by the
Redeveloper on the Benson Site, which consists of approximately
seven hundred twenty-three thousand ninety-six (723,096) square feet
(subject to changes caused by a later survey), of building, parking,
and landscaping area for the development of a commercial retail
automobile center (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Commission Staff has prepared and made available for
public inspection a certain Summary Report (the "Summary")
concerning the proposed Agreement, as required by Health and Safety
Code Section 33433, a copy of which is on file with the Commission
Secretary and is incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Commission -and the City Council duly considered,
certified and adopted an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") at
the time of the approval of the Redevelopment Plan, and the
redevelopment of the Benson Site as described. in the proposed
Page 2 of 6
It.88 ®33 3NC
:. _ '~
`r. Xgreement is within the scope of the Redevelopment Plan and the EIR,
both of which adequately describe the proposed redevelopment of the
Benson Site as set forth in the proposed Agreement; and
WHEREAS, staff for the City of Petaluma and the Agency
(collectively, "Staff") have prepared an Initial Study of the
Project as set forth in the Agreement and based upon the Initial
Study, Staff have prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (the
"Negative Declaration") regarding the Project, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by
reference, in accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000,
~ seq. ("CEQA"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly noticed and conducted a public
hearing in accordance with the requirements of Health and Safety
Code Section 33433 concerning the proposed sale of the Disposition
Parcel by the Commission to the Developer pursuant to the proposed
Agreement, and concerning the proposed adoption of the Negative
Declaration in accordance with the requirements of ("CEQA"); and
WHEREAS, the Commission has duly noticed and conducted a public
hearing in accordance with the requirements of Health and Safety
Code Section 33431 concerning the proposed sale of the Disposition
Parcel by the Commission to the Developer pursuant to the proposed
Agreement, and concerning the proposed adoption of the Negative
Declaration in accordance with the requirements of CEQA; and
Page 3 of 6
E •88°333NCS
'r• WHEREAS, based upon evidence and testimony submitted to the
Commission, it is reasonable and appropriate for the Commission to
approve the proposed Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
EIR pertaining to the Redevelopment Plan. was properly and lawfully
certified and adopted by the Commission and the City Council at the
time of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. The City Council
further finds and determines that the development of the Benson Site
as described in the proposed Agreement is within the scope, terms
and. provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and the EIR, and the EIR
adequately describes the proposed development of the Benson Site for
purposes of compliance with CEQA. The City Council further finds
that no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would
be required for the proposed redevelopment of the Benson Site as
described in the Agreement separate from those effects and
mitigation measures set forth in the EIR, and that there are no
substantial changes which have occurred since the certification of
the EIR with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed
redevelopment of the Benson Site is to be undertaken. The City
Council further finds and determines that no new information of
substantial importance with respect to the proposed redevelopment of
the Benson Site has become available since the certification of the
EIR. The City Council has duly considered the EIR for purposes of
its consideration of the proposed Agreement, in accordance with the
requirements of CEQA.
Page 4 of 6
08~-333NCS
Section 2. The City Council hereby further finds and determines
that the Project as set forth in the Agreement will not have a
significant effect upon the environment, and the City Council hereby
approves and adopts the Negative Declaration, a copy of which is set
forth in Exhibit "B."
Section 3. The City Council hereby accepts and approves the
Summary.
Section 4. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
consideration to be paid by the Redeveloper to the Commission for
the conveyance of the Disposition Parcel pursuant to the Agreement
is not less than the fair market value of the Disposition Parcel.
However, in accordance with the terms and provisions of the
Agreement, the Commission will be required to make certain future
payments to the Redeveloper. To the extent that the sale of the
Disposition Parcel by the Commission to the Redeveloper pursuant to
the proposed Agreement may be deemed to be for less than the fair
market value thereof, the City Council hereby finds and determines
that the conveyance of the Disposition Parcel for less than fair
market value is reasonable and necessary to effectuate the purposes
of the Redevelopment Plan, in that the conveyance for less than the
fair market value will permit the Redeveloper to acquire the
Disposition Parcel for redevelopment and in order to eliminate
blight, to create employment opportunities, to increase the value of
real property in the Project Area and to cause the City and the
Commission to receive additional tas revenues as a result of
redevelopment. Absent the conveyance of the Disposition Parcel for
less than fair market value, the Redeveloper would likely not
Page 5 of 6
~3~ ®33 3NC S
proceed with the purchase thereof and redevelopment of the Benson
Site due to the resulting inability of the Redeveloper to obtain a
reasonable economic return on its investment therein.
Section 5. The City Council hereby approves the proposed
Agreement and the conveyance of the Commission's interest in the
Benson Site by the Commission to the Redeveloper.
Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
PET00004-12/0316P
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Re r) ~ meeting f°~
on the ..........19th.--•. day of ...September 8
.......................................... 19.. by the
following vote: ..............:............................
City Attorney
AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Bice Mayor Davis
NOES: None
ABSENT: a Ma,~y/or Hilligoss
ATTEST : .. ... ......... !.L! ...... .....:::........------.. P.r~.9~....4---o f 6
ity Clerk
Oo~mcil File..._..........._ ..................
c~ io-ss Res. X0..88-333,,...,.,,, v.c.s.
.4
E~XH`I B I T ~ "~A °
Legal Desc:r,p'tion of Dispossi'tion Parcea
situated, in t'he City o.f Pe'taluma,
~• ~ 1 e~s s
A;1>1 that real property
Cou'n`ty o,f Son'oma State of° California, de~crWhedh ais necessary for
that portion o.f the '.beaow-described g`ro'pe y
the constriic'tion o~f that certain pubhic r'i.ghts-of-way delineated in
he A °r;eement as Auto ° Center Drive" and that, poYtipn of Lot 46
t 9. "'.C'attleme_n s Restaurant"' a-nd reasonable
presently occupied by
p a r'k',ng, ~f o r' same
LOT '4 3
(.A..'P: ,N,o. 007-4'1'.2'-43'.,)
onion of the landa conveyed t'o McKel,lar;,, Bens'on,, et al by Deed
A. P Official Records, Sonoma County
filed; .in Dcxcument No . •8~5-028942 of -
Records,; an3 more par.ti,cula,rly d'e crbed as follows:
coiner of s~a:id lands,. on the
BEG,INN~hNG a°t `the most rio~rtherly aloe
line of U.S Highway 1.01,; th`erice southeasterly g
southwesterly
.• e to the' right, radius 10', 006 feet w_ose cen
cu`r-v
- ~ ~~ ~ t .through a cen,tra,l a'ngl.e of 00° 48r
sai:,d 1i,ne on a o Eas :.
,. 44 39 03
b4ar~a'n Sa,rc length of .140..39 feet 'to a set 1/,2''° iron Plpeoint E on12t`he
thence South 36° 24' 32" nds•• thence along said 'boundary' North
westerly b'o.undary of s`a;i:d la
9~ 49' ~2;2" EAast 31'1 ..q~0, feet to the point- of 'beginning.
LOT 46
(A.R. No. 0.07-4.12-46~),
a oxtio.n of Lot, :31.1 of the Pet;,alma R°aizch'o, according to the
Being P August 12.,-- 1.871, filed on February 3,
Map, •mad~e by t~h~e `Rowe ~B r.o~t he r ,
1.872 in Book 21 of Maps, Page 1, Recorde'r''s O;~ffic;e, Sonoma County.
Beg,inn.n at a point • f~o-rmng~ the a d rSantaoRosa Raelroad heandethe.
' g
Route 1,
r'igh`t. of way line of the Petaluma ,.
easter-lay right of way line o£ the C'alif'o,rni.a State Highway, f:rorr
which point is. North 80° 3' East,
SonomaCounty, Section C, a,nd which point.
Engineer"s Station. 64.9+49 .38 of co'tne'r't fe he h27y35 acre tract of
_ s also the most ~southwesterlY Scott,
i
land described in the conveyance Jo ,
r ;5 , 1945 , Ser T N'o . aC x8231 na• thence °f;~rom',
Grantees, dated Decembe
said point of be,g'inning, and runni-n'g along the sa d northeast right
o Railroad, and the southe=l.Y
of way o<f •the Petaluma and Sa_n.ta Rosa, t 649.4 feet to a point,
line of said Scott Tract, South 53 55 Eas~ corner
that is North, 53° 5'S' West' leavi,ngts;a.dmra lwayoutheasofr Way line,
right
of said S"cote Tr,ac't thence East. 600 feet;
line ,of Scott Tract, Nor,tYi 9° 28'
a'nd s°ou:therly ~_
thence North 53:° 55' West b49.4. feet, to a point that i5 South
' 65`5..5 freet from the no,rthw.ester.ly eorne•r of said ~areel
X28' Went corner of the 24.52 acre P
Tract, and t;he southwesterly
A - l
•. ,
of land. described in the conveyance recorded Sept;embe,r 28, 1948
Official Rec'ord~s, 7-0,6/,231:, E-Amer H ,and Theo:. S. Joerge~r, Gran,t,ees
and which pint is on the e;aster •y ri.g'ht o.f way lime. of said State
Highway, .and the westerly ;line' of s;a~id Scotia Tract;, thence running
along said line,,, ,So.u;th 9'°' 28' West 6'0.0 feet to the po,in,t of
beginning, h',e:ing an 8 acre par,alael.o.g°ram in the so.uthwes'terly
portion of .the said Scott Tract, described in the cbnvey.ance,
C-82>3l, r'e~fen°red to above.
EXCEPTr~N.G~ THE•RE~FROM that 0:86.0 of an acre c`ohveyed .to the State of
Cali,forn';Ya, for freeway purposes, by Deed dated J'anua•ry 14~, 1954 a.nd
recorded March 18, 1954 in Book 126.1 of O'ffical Records, Page 5'59,
Sonoma. County'Rec.oxds.~
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM" that portion described in Modification of
Lea e recor;,d'.ed Januja:ry 1~8, 1966 under Recorder'"'s Serial No. J-79901,
Sonoma C';ounty ~Rec'or,d"s.
AL'S0 EX_CEPTI:N6 •THEREFROM tha portion described in Document
Nos. 86-005570 and 86-005;57~T, 'Sonoma County Records.
PET000'04-7%'0311;P
A - 2
CITY bF P'Efi'ALUM'A
C`OM:M'UNITY 'DEVELOPMENT AND PaAN,NIN~G DEPARTMENT
D,AT'E: `19 September 1.98.8
TO; Petaluma Community Development Commission
FROM : Community :Develo;pmen-t and Plannin°g Department
SUBJ-EC.T: Miti_gate.d .Negative Declaration for. t'he Respective. Disposition
and Develop"menu Agreements Between the Petaluma
Community Development Commission, aril Benson Investments
and Henry :Hansel,,, et al.
Project Description:;
The Petaluma Community Development Commission, acting in accordance with
the Redevelopment Plan fore the Pe,taluma~ Community Development Project,
proposes to enter into separ-ate D:isposition_ and Development Agreements
with Benson, Tnvestments, `Tnc., and Henry Hansel:, et al ('the "Agreements")
for th'e purpose of establishing a retail; new automobile center to be known
as the. Petaluma Auto Plaza (the "Auto Plaza") . .The Developers . (Benson
and 'Hansel) in conjun¢`tion with Guardian Builders, acting as the Project
Manager., will. construct nine (9) automobile dealerships, including. all
necessary building parking lots, landscaped areas and certain enumerated
public :improvements ;over a; period of four (4;) years. from the execution date
of the.. A;greements:. ~ In return, the Petaluma Community Development
Commission will. provide specific financial. andcertain other :incentives asset
forth in the. Agreements..
The project ante is located in the northwest. quadrant. of the City o:f
Petaluma and. ,generally bounded by [T. S`. Highway 10'1 on the east.,,
Indu'str:al Avenue on. the west and Old Redwood Highway on the north and.
Corona. Road on the ..south. Total area of the auto center site is
approximately 3:6.7 acre`s. All of properties that' comprise the site are part
of an area commonly known as the Rancho Arroyo Business Park: an
industrial p.a"rk o.f predominately .office and warehouse type uses. The
properties 'ar-.e presently zoned. Planned Community District (PCD) , which
allows new. car dealership"s as a conditional use:.
~.,8~°333NCS
1
EXHIBIT B
~,
This p"rovson was added: to the original PCD regulations in 19$6:. Lt was
' recornrnended by the Planning Commission and. subsequently approved by the
City 'Council in July 1986 (.Res . '"o , 86.-;1'8`8 N .'C . S .) . ,Development of the
Auto Center will be; subject to ;project specific PC'D zoning regulations to be
approv.e,d by the, Planning Commission acid City Council following execution
of the A-greemen:ts .
Petaluma Geiser-al Plan `land use designations for the proposed. Auto Plaza
properties are Thoroughfare Commercial .and Special Commercial,
respectively, Development of an auto center is consistent with both
designations. The definition :of Special. Commercial, in fact, specifically
designates this site for auto dealerships only (Petalixma General Plan, p.
35) . A;, General Plan amendment will :not be necessary in or.•der to
accomplish this projecf.
Finding of N;o. Significant Environmental Effects
Inacting to approve the:Agreements described above, the Petaluma
Community Development Gommissson has determined. that the project, as
originally proposed., would., have- had potentially significant environmenta_1
e~fec.ts, brut hat, based on, Section. 2108-0 (c) of the California
Environmental Quality Act. (CEQA) and Section 15070 (b) (1) of the CEQA
Guideliries, -and the results of an Initial Study prepared on August 25, T988
and' attached hereto, certain mitigation measures .have been incorporated
into plans for the proj;eet which eliminate such potentially significant
environmental effects. As a result,. the Co.mmss.ion, deems i"t appropriate to
approve and 'issu'e a Mitigated. Negative Declaration based on the following
fin ding
1: Revisions in the project plans, or' proposals made by qr agreed to
by. the° applicant before the proposed Neg-ative Declaration is
released for public review would; avoid the effects or mitigate :the
effects to a point where clearly ,no~ significant effects would
occur; and
2. There is nc
project as
environment .
substantial evidence before the Agency that the
revised may have a significant effect on the
REQ. 8 8- 3 3 3 N 'C S
8
2
Mitig~afion Measu~r;es
The following mitigation measures are proposed to avoid any significant
environmental effects::
1; A focused traffic study has. been prepared and adequately
addr-,esses 'the improvements needed to minimize potential traffic
impacts.:
2.. Development of the: ,project site,,. which is in a flood .plain and
subject to ;flooding . ;in a 100-year storm;,, shall b,e: conssten't with..
the analysis.; findings and mitigation, :of the .Environmental Impact
Report for the ,:Rancho Arroyo .Bu,siness Parik (EIR entitled "North
.Petaluma .Center":) calling for designated on-site detention of peak°
storm-runoff,. Tn addition, 'all applicable development shall be
subject to payment of Storm Drainage Impact mitigation fees that
=contribute to the cost of an teventuai long-term resolution of the
:flooding problems along the. Petaluma. River, as well as' the City!
b:uiiding pad elevation and ".zero net-fill" flood plain policies.
• 3',;, The' Agreements bind the Developers to provide specified p,ublie
improvements such :as streets, ,street lights, traffic- signals,, storm
.drains;, utilities;, flood. control, curbs., gutters., sidewalks,
andscapmg~, sewers as well as payment of all applicable .City
development fe.es,.
4',. The ~~Agreements :also' contain stringent Conditions.; Coven~aits;, and
Restrictions that oblgate• the indiy~dtal' dealerships to improve
.and maintain their respective sites in ~a manner consistent with
City policy aii~d compatible with surroundiri.g uses .
5'.... Specif'c project development. plans will be subject to applicable
• review and approval by the Pe.taltzma PTa.nning Commission, City
Council., Site -Plan and Architectural Review Committee and the
various :City departments. Public hearings will be held where
appropriate .and required by law ;and subject to legal public
5.8 8, - 3 3 3 N: C S
3
notification procedures. Condit-ions of approval shall be
developed' i'n accordance.. with .C.ty policy and pertinent pul?lic
~tes:timony s'h'all be applied to said projects where deemed.
appropriate and 'iri accord,anc;e with the; A~greemen s or any other
°applicable city policy, state regulation or law.
memo. Benson.. hon d'a
pd24
.~8'- 33 31VCS 10
4
J
~•~,~o~k City of Petaluma -~~ E„~lish 5~~~~z
,~ .
• Pose •Office Bo;c Gt ~< Per~luma. California 94953
r!ese
E`~IIc~OItTai, C°HEC~.IS~T "rORM
(To b,e compl.eced b.y° Laad a~eacy)
L. ,31.GZG~O.UVD~
L. Vame of Propanea_c `Guardian Builders •
Z.. ~ddr;e~:9 sad °P..honn Number of P,r,opon`eat;; 1;201` Park. Avenue
Oakland;, CA,. 9.4608 415/6'53-98.00
3. Date, of Cheakl~st Submi•c.aed 8/25•%88
4, Ageacy Requir ng Checkl,ist City o~f Pet-alums
5. Name of Proposal:, if applicable Petaluma Au o Centel
II. ENQIRONMENTAI. II~ACTS (:Explaaactons of all "~a~'° -r3 -+~ayb~" aas~r~rs ar-
required on attached sheecs.)
YES i4A~E N0
~_
1, E~r:eh. Will 'the propcaal resole a:
a; Ua~eabl~ ear,tb:; cond. ions cr is chaag~a is
~eolc;gic ;cubs"csuceurs~Z X
b<. Diarupto, di~plac~sta. co~~e~~ or -
avercov~ra~ of 'th® soil? x
c. .C23aa~a a° topc~r~p~ or ~oumm~d. s~ur~aen
`ze~ll~~ ~,aaCu=es? ~ X
®•
d. "rho d'es;trueton,~.coverng or modigcaton
of'•any unique geologic or p;hyscal featusas? ~ .~
e . Aay acrea`~~ as sand • or ~racsr erosion of
Soils, a her on. or off ch® ~ire1 X
f~, C:~ange~ is d~postca or ero`sion' o;f beach '
9aad~e,, or changes la ~~leation, d_epo~e3on or
erosion cahlch nay modify the chanael of a river
o,r st~zs~m or 'the bid :cf the ocean at say bay,
sl e c o r l a~ic~e ? X
3.: E•cp,o9;ur;e c~f peapa,e .cr ~ropercy t,~' ,ge;a,lo`gc'
n~a~~z~a'r~d~s~• -s`ucz as a+ar,=h~q~ua~ke~s, landas li~~des ~, ~Ld'-~
slices, grouted `-.a•ure~, or sai:ar aaz'a:ds' X
.L 8$~- 33 3NCS
i
yrg, 'i~-Y3E VO
. 2. ~..1::;~ '~+ill t-he, pr~~posal resuc ia:
a. SuSSeantial .air emissions or decario~ra~c-ion
o= ambaea'c ai: quality?
Y
o : ~:•ie tree°con Hof o'b j e`ceio.nabl6 odors? X
c. alc.e~r:atian of ar.movemeac, mais;c~.ire
<or c;empe'racure; a~r aay change is cli~cn
,,
eit.'~e,r locally ~o~:r regc:nally?
Y
3. 'hate'r.. 'ail`1 c.~e; p;r:oposal result a:
a.. Ehanges a currea.ts,, or ehe :co,urse or
drect~cn of eater movemenes, is eie~her
marine a•r fresh wae~ers?
X
b. Changes is -a.b orpe ~on .rates, dz,aaage
pattern:s, or the raee and amount of surface
~aa,tar runoff.?
X
c.~ Alterations 'eo the course or f o~ of --
f3o'o
d wae
efs?
.
,
X
d;. Change is eha,,.amouac o:f surface waver -
a any water'bod,y?
e. Dischargn;iato surface waters, or is any
alteration of surface waver q,ua`lc~; acluda~
but not limlaed eo teffiperature, dissolved
oicy~aa or curbld'ity?
,X
f: Alceradon og the direction o-r' rata, of
flow° of gro,uad~ wagers<Y•
R
g;.: C?aage ia. ehe, quaarie~ og` ground ~+atara,
~` ebher c~hrou~h, .di~reeg' addidoas or .~aChdraw~a.,
ar Chrou ~ iacegcap;e~on of as aquifer b~.cut$
. or e~cav~tions X
h,. Subs'~t~aatal reduc;tlon is thn amount of
wa:c~g oeherGrsa avail-~b<°le for public eater
i. cxa_ oaure o:f` p;eople or pro;pert~ to eater
refaced hazards such as £loodiag or cedal vavee? _~
~ . ''la~nt, L'i `~e . 'A-i11 ehe proposal result a:.
a. C: a:::ge id c`;e di•~ers;:y of s;pectes, or
a~b e,_ ~..£ aaq species o € ,planes. (iacludi'ag
__ees., 9hrsba,, gra9's, c:cgs., microflc:ra a_nd
. Z ~0.8~®333NCS.
12
b. 'Redua~ign off ehe numbers of any uaiqu:e,
rare or endangered spec es of p~l'ants2
r.. Imtroduc!tidn of new species; of plants
'into an .area,,, c.r in a barrier co the normal
. _
•repaen~is'nment of exis'ciag specie 2
d, Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
5• animal Life. Will c~he proposal result ia:
a. Ch~aage in the; dlvers•Cy of ap.eces„ or
numbers of. any species. of animals, .(birds.;,, land
animal-s~ i~ncludi~ngrep~tl~e9.,~fis~h.and ahel~lfish,
benthlc organl9ms,, insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction ofi the numbers cf aaq uniquca,.
rare or endangered' species of animals?
c. Ia .roductton of •ne~. species of aaimals
a;to an area, or result is a barrimr to that
migracon or movement of anmala'?
d: Deterioration eo exs~tng•f'~h or wld-
Ii~e habitat?
6. Noase. Will C_he proposal resulE ia:
• a. Increase's in e$i.'ta~ noise levels;?
b. Exposure of people,to severe. noi'ee
levels?
-7.- L~~ht and G;lar.a. Dill tht proposal prcd'uee
~na~' l'ght or `Aare?
8,. Laa~a~;• 'Dill the proposal result a: a sub-
staatal alteration of the pre9ene or planned
Yang, u e. o:f as area?
9. Natural Reso,urces., Will the pr:aposal re~ulc in:
a-. -Increase is tha rata of use of nay naeural
re9aur'ces?
b. Subscanc-al depletion of any nonrenewable
na,cur;al resource?
`.'ES 'iAY3£ VO
Y
X
_~ X
X
X
~~
x
® ~.
X
x
X'
x
x
3
~3
. ,e88_333NCS
10. Risk .o f Ubse,t. Does the proposal i.nyolve, a .
ri's'k of- .an expio .ion or the release of hazard
ou`s subs;.cances (incl,udin_g, but not 11mi•.€ed to,
o.i~l, p,es~tic~~id~es, c4hemical~s o~~r r'a~dia°tion) is fhe
ewenc of an accident o.r upset conditions?
L1. Po..oulacion.. /Will the pr,ooosal alcer'[he loca-
tion, dlstr bucion, density, o,r grow.th race of
the 'human population o'f' an area?
12,. HousanQ. Wial the proposal affect existiag
hou9in~, or er.ea'ce 'a demand for additional
ho"using?
13. Tsansn,ort~a ion/C-izcula:cion. Wi11 'the ;proposal
re§ul_c a:
a,. Generat-ion of. sub~taavial additional
vehicular movement`?
b. Effects on, exsen~ parking fac.il'te9,
or d''emand for ;new pazkn~? r
c. Substant"a'1 impact upon.eai§`en~ trans-
partatSan systam~?
d.: Alterations to preseat pacter,a of cir-
culation o,r movamaat o'f people sad/or goods?
e. Alceration~ to Wa erborne., rail or, as
tr.af-fit?'
f. Inea,ea's~ to traffic hasards eo motor
wehcle~~, bicycli'sta or peda~~traas.?
14. Public Services.. Will: the proposal have an
e°f:f~ea up.oa, or result is a seed f,or new or
,ahtered,gA~~ra~satal services is any o!f the
f o'llowia~ area's
a. Fire protection?
'b. F,:ol~ce, protection?
c;. Schools?
,. d;: E'a°rk9 or ocher reareat2onal facili,tas?
e,, `iain;~cenance of pubYc facilities„ nclud'-
ing road~s~.
.. 0"the: gover-smerical services?
4
ygg u~•:3E V0
Y
X
. _
X
x
X
® ®®
X
Y.
X
X
X
X
~t.88 - 33 3NC S
1~
YE5 MAY3E VO
~1~. cne^ ~~J`ill the p.ropo!sal result in:
a. U,se of'subs~cancal amounts of fuel or
energq?~ _~
b.. Subst-an~tal nc-reas~ in demand upon
exs'ting sourcles of energq, or require the.
development of new sources of ene+rgq? X
lb. -ities. Will, the p,ropasal result in a
Uc-il_
,_
need for new systeffi9r, or substantial al'tera-
tions to the folio~.rng~ utilities:
a;.. P,.ower or natural gad:? g
b. Ccmmunica~tans sq9 ems? X
c-. Waeer? x
d.. s~~~r og s~pt,ic tanks? - x
e. Storm: water. d=alaaga? x
;f. Solid c~a~te and disposal? ~ X
1I. Human..Heal'th. 'Will.-thy p,toposal result ia:
~a. C`reatoa, of aaq h~a~lth hazard' or ;pot~atial.
health :hazard ;('excluding mental health)? R
b. Expoauge of people eo potential health
~h~gardsl R
I8'. ~Aeecheitics',. Will. eh~ pro,posal re~ul~e is the..
obstruct; on ot. nay scenic vista or view open
to the public:, or' mill that proposal reaul'`t~ is
the cres~ton o;t sa ~ea`thetcalhy ,o f f e~ive ante
open to public view? X
i9. &ecrea'~t-ton. Will tha proposal r-esult is as
impact upon the quality or guano y cf'exi~t-
iag r:ecreaconal opportunities.? X
20. Archeolo$,i~cal/Hi~,corieal-.Will the propoaal
r..esul'c is an alceracion ~o~f a .signif'icaac
archeolo,gica'1 or historical ~siee, sxruc,ture,, X
ob j ec't. o.r building'?
5
R~ESO.~' g ° 33 3NC S' 15
2I. Mand~acorv F"nd n:2is 02, S,2;rf.=±car.ce.
a,. Does the project have the po.cencia^1 co de-
grade the ,qualic;y' of, che• environmen~•c, sub`sc'an-
cia~ll;y reduce c'he habitat' of a fish .or wildlife
species, cause a fish:o.r wildlife population to
drop ,be`Iow ,s,elf 9ust°ai:ang 'lev.els, thr:ea¢en, to
elxina'te a;plana or animal communiey--, reduce
the number or re9:;tr.icFt the :range o= a rare or;
endangered plant ,or ;animal ors eliminate Ympot-
can~¢ .examples o~f. Che major p;e=icds of California
historq or. prehis~cgry~~? X
b. D6e c~he', proj.e.c~e have the ;potential to
achieve short=ce"rm, to the disadvantages of
long=term, eavironmen'tal goals? (A shor~t-
term impact ca,c-he eawi_ronmen"t 1s one which
occurs' 'in a: relacve.ly :b,r,lef , defia""hive
period of time while long-ce:rm imparas will
endure will into cha f'ucure.) X
' .~
c . ~ 'Dena the pro'j^'ec~,c `have mparc~ which are
individually mic'ed, 'b.uc, cumula,cively consd-
erable:? _ ,. ,
(A p.ro j;ec'e n.ay imp`ac',t :oa ciao or° more
separ;a,ee r,e~ourcee where the.impact on ehch.
r-esource as "relatively: smell, but :cahare 'eha
effect of the coca of ehosa impacts on ,thy
environmene is sigaifc~anc.) g
d.. 'Do.ea' eha• ~proj;a~cc 'have environman'eal af'faces
which will cause aub~tantial advar-ea sffecta on
homes be ags, either dlractly or indtgecely? X
'-
~IIZ DISCUSSION OF :ENVIRO ,_ AL, EVALUATIOPd
6 RE~O.s~~333NC~ 1f
4
~:'
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEGKLlST.
P:ETALUM~Q AUTO CENTER.
lc. Some excavation and filling will. occur on the- sites to establish, building
pads:. a minimum of two feet. above the 1-00-year flood plain and to meet
the City"`s zero net fill policy in the Flood Plain area..
3b . Impervious roofed and ,p.av$d surfaces will cause a net increase in
saorrn water runoff,, However, on-site holding capacity will be
required. to offset the runoff ;potential..
3c. Flood:waters which are anticipated to pond ..naturally in this area will
have. to continue to. be accommodated by on-.site topographic
reconfiguration . .
3i. The project site is; p:artia_13y in the ~Flgod. Plain.. This will have to. meet
the City and .Federal Flood Plain polici"es,
7. The auto dealership _s wit;1 provide substantial outdoor lighting of sales
-areas. The light sources, however, wl'1 ..have fo be directed so as not
to spill off-site,.
13a. It is anticipated that. substantial auto traf•fie: will be attracted to thus
..location. However, hese trips- will ,be diverted from elsewhere in the
region.. Thus, reg>ionwi_de„ fh~ere ,should, be no substantial increase in
traffic volume.
13b . -Substantial parking demand will be created,, but on-site parlen'g will be
prou_ided by each dealership for employees, ~ customers and deliveries.
21d-~, The only potentially significant impact is raffic, the effects of which
'will. be mitigated by on- and off-site improvements to the
street/highway fac`ilities_ as outlined in the project .focused traffic
report;. '
p~e~~t:,'au~to::center~/pd23
~.~5~ s~- 3 3 3 N C S