HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-366 N.C.S. 11/07/1988z.
4. ~
Resolution No. 88-366 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR "THE CHATEAU OF PETALUMA" P.U.D.
(A.P, NOS. 007-350-04 and 05)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) for the following project:
1. Rezone of 9.62 acres from R-1 6500
to Planned Unit District (P, U,D,), for A.P. Nos. 007-350-04
and 05; and
2. Approval of P.U.D. development plan conditionally allowing
construction of up to 300 units of senior housing, common
facilities and, upon revision of P.U.D. development plan,
ancillary and compatible commercial facility collectively
known as "The Chateau of Petaluma" .
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on
September 13, 1988, and by the City Council on October 24, 1988, at which
times all written and verbal testimony (including staff report, traffic, and
noise studies) were considered by the decision making bodies prior to
action ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is
hereby approved, based on the following findings:
Findings for Negative Declaration:
1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory.
2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals .
Res. ~0.~.0._.3.6.6...,.... n.es.
.. =. .
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.
5. The residential portion of the project is consistent with and further
promotes the objectives, goals, and policies of the General Plan.
Through clarification of the General Plan text,. compatibility of the
commercial portion of the project with the General Plan's goals and
policies shall be assured.
6. A 1980 city-wide survey by the Sonoma State University Northwest
Information Center of the California Archaeological Inventory
designates the project site as "moderate" probability of a find. Most
flat areas bordering creeks are so designated in 'the Petaluma area.
Inasmuch as all surrounding properties have been developed and no
items of archaeological interest were uncovered, no further study is
warranted on this site at this time.
reso.neg.dec.chateau
resol0
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the pproved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (1K~#£}~~ meeting °~
on the .....~.~~1..-...-..... day of _.....--•--....I~IS~.V.~ICI~~~ ..................... 19...$.$, by the
following vote:
ity Attorney
AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor I~a~is
NOES: ~ r7 /7 ~~
ABSENT: M o Hillgioss ~ ,
ATTES'T' : ................ ... -..--...-...... -...............--..........................
Cg~it~y Cgqle~~r~k~/ ~~/ ~+t a orb
6ih~V 1 Y. ~~ 1 A bLER~ Council File ....................................
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No.....H.S..-.3..C).b.... N.C.S.