Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolutions 88-263 N.C.S. 07/18/1988
Resolution No. 88-263 N C.s. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION ORDERING ORDERING THE IMPROVEMEAiTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989 WHEREAS, The City Council adopted its Resolution No.88-174, Describing Improvements and Directing Preparation of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988-89 Village Meadows Landscape Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with the City Clerk of said City, whereupon said Clerk presented it to the Council for consideration; WHEREAS, said Council thereupon duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and found that it contained all the matters and things called for by the provisions of said Act and said Resolution No. 88-174, including (1) plans and specifications of the existing improvements and the proposed new improvements; (2) estimate of costs; (3) diagram of the district; and (4) an assessment according to benefits, all of which were done in the form and manner required by said Act.; WHEREAS, said Council found that said report and each and every part thereof was sufficient in every particular and determined that it should stand as the report for all subsequent proceedings under said Act, whereupon said Council pursuant to the requirements of said Act, appointed Monday, July 18, 1988, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock, p.m. of said day in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 11 English Street, Petaluma, California, as the time and place for hearing protests in relation to the levy and collection of the proposed assessments for said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, for Fiscal Year 1988-89, and directing said Council to give notice of said hearing as required by said Act. ass. N~......8.g....2.6.3._... N.c.s. 1 of 4 WHEREAS, it appears that notices of said hearing were duly and regularly published and posted in the time, form and manner required by said Act, as evidenced by the affidavits and certificates on file with said Clerk, whereupon said hearing was duly and regularly held at the time and place stated in said notice and; WHEREAS, persons interested, objecting to said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, or to the extent of the assessment district, or any zones therein, or to the proposed assessment or diagram or to the Engineer's estimate of costs thereof, filed written protests with the City Clerk of said City at or before the conclusion of said hearing, and all persons .interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to the levy and collection of the assessments for said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, were fully heard and considered by said Council; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, as follows: 1. That protests against said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, or to the extent of the assessment district or any zones therein, or to the proposed assessment or diagram, or to the Engineer's estimate of costs thereof, for Fiscal Year 1988- 89 have been received and considered. 2. That the public interest, convenience and necessity require and said Council does hereby order the levy and collection of assessments pursuant to said Act, for the construction or installation of the improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, more particularly described in said Engineer's Report and made a part hereof by reference thereto. 3. That the Village Meadows Landscape Assessment District and the boundaries thereof benefited and to be assessed for said costs for the construction or installation of the improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, are situated in the City of Petaluma, California, and are more particularly described by reference to a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Said map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in said district and of any zone thereof and the general location of said district. 2 of 4 ~~~. `~ ~~ 2 6 3 N C S 4. That the plans and spec'i'fications for the existing improvements and for the proposed improvements to be made within the assessment district or within any zone thereof contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, finally adopted and approved. 5. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of said improvements, maintenance and servicing thereof, and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report, be, and it is hereby, finally adopted and approved. 6. That the public interest and convenience require, and said Council does hereby order the improvements to be made as described in and in accordance with said Engineer's Report, reference to which is hereby made for a more particular description of said improvements. 7. That the diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the assessment district referred to and described in said Resolution No. 88-200, and also the boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said district as such lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's maps for the fiscal year to which it applies, each of which lot or parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said diagram, as contained in said report, be, and it is hereby, finally approved and confirmed. 8. That the assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the said improvements upon the several lots or parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by .such lots or parcels, respectively, from said improvements, and the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, and of the expenses incidental thereto, contained in said report, be, and the same is hereby finally approved and confirmed. 9. That said Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988-89 be, and the same is hereby, finally adopted and approved as a whole. 10. That the City Clerk shall forthwith file with the Auditor of Sonoma County the said assessment, together with said diagram thereto attached and made a part thereof, as confirmed by the City Council, with the certificate of such confirmation thereto attached and of the date thereof. ~~~~ ~~ °' 2 6 3~ C S 3 of 4 11. That the order for the levy and collection of assessment for the improvements and the final adoption and approval of the Engineer's Report as a whole, and of the plans and specifications, estimate of the costs and expenses, the diagram and the assessment, as contained in said Report, as hereinabove determined and ordered, is intended to and shall refer and apply to said Report, or any portion thereof, as amended, modified, revised or corrected by, or pursuant to and in accordance with any resolution or order, if any, heretofore duly adopted or made by this Council. 12. That the Sonoma County Controller and the Sonoma County Tax Collector apply the Village Meadows Landscape Assessment District assessment to the tax roll and have the Sonoma County Tax Col-lector collect said. assessments in the manner and form as with all other such assessments collected by the Sonoma County Tax Collector. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (?ctlgw~r~x¢~lt) meeting f°~ on the .-...._.l~.th-.-..... day of ..................Ltil.y..._.-._.__..-.._-......-......., 19.88., by the following vote: - •---••-• ....................... City Attorney AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayor Hill'g ss` NOES: ~ r' ABSENT: W olse ~_.-.- ,, ` ATTEST: .__ .-- - ..... ... ..... - ... ..........-..- -V. r.:'...........-..._. City Clerl. ~-- Mayor Council File ..p...p............................... CA 10-85 ~ Res. No.........Q.V.-.~.6.~.... N.C.S. 4 Of 4 f 'r' •. 7^ F~dGIMEER' S REPORT VILLAGE 'MEADOWS:LAAiDSCAPE AS$ESST DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAIMTEIdAI~dCE .DISTRICT CITY OF PET~IUMA Prepared by ~ 1 f _ G ~.. Thomas Hargis, City Engineer Submtted• July 5, .19'88 ATTACHMENT A. ': EAiGINEER' S. REPORT, ~IILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE AS~SE_SSMENT D3STRICT .LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectf.u'lly by the City Council, Dated• ,19.$8 submits the enclosed report as directed Thomas Hargis, City Engineer' B° I HEREBY CE that 'the enclosed Engineer`s Report, together with Assessment a d Assessme 'a a thereto ;attached, was filed with me on'the_ - day of ,1.988. Patric~s E, Bernard, City Clerk,, ' t. `"f Petaluma, Count of no_a, California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enelo"sed 'Engin'eer-''';s Reports. together with Assessment and. Assessment Diagram thereto attached., was approved and confirme he Ci, oun ~'~~ of the City of ;Petaluma, California, on the day 'o ' ,-k9'88 Patricia E,. Bernard, City Clerk,. City o:Petaluma, County of S- m alforna By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment an'd Assessment Diagram thereto attached, wa failed with the County Auditor of the: Count. of .Sonoma on the day of ,19:88. Patricia E;. Bernard, City Clerk, ity 'Petaluma; Sonoma Coufornfa- By - ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT .DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OE 1972 Thoma's Hargis, City `Engin`eer and Engineer-of°-Work for Village Meadows Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the C"ity Council, Resolut-ion No.88-174 N.C.S. pursuant t'o Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1.972). The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows: part of ntVil.lage Meadows tUnit No lcl 1 Subd i s onmprovements as ~~ " consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irr-igaton systems., pathways, ;and fences located in the public areas shown as Parcels "A" and "B", Clary Way, Acadia. Drive,- Flanigan Way, Baranof Drive„ Culpepper. Drive, .and Maria. Drive as shown on the Assessment Diagram for "Village Meadows, Landscape Assessment District" LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT VILLAGE MEP,DOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OE PETALUMA (1972 ACT) ESTIMATE OF .COSTS: Fiscal Year 1988-89 I. Estimated Maintenance Costs per Month is $681.67 Estimated Total Maintenance Cost .per Year is $8,180. I'I. Estimated Incidental Expenses a. County Collection Charges (.2;5$) $ 24. b. City Administration Fee (.15$) 1,227. Estimated Total Incidental Expenses: 1 251. Estimated Total Costs and Total Amount to be Assessed for formation '& first year. 9 431. III Estimated Total Annual Cost per Lot: 76 Lots 1:24.09 ~' VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (1972 ACT) -Basis of Allocation of Assessments The estimate. of the total maintenance costs per year were estimated :and incidental administrative expenses added to yield a total annual cost. This cost was then. prorated .equally to the 76 lots,, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance . expenses. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA (1972 ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL: F'~,FUEL NUME~EF; *# FY 1988-89 ASSESSMENT #* ;`CAF' F'r~GE F'AR Gr~: ASSESSMENT TOTAL XXX XXX XX K NO. ASSESSMENT 14q =+i~i> 1 2 1 124.09 l49 4t_ii:~ 2 ~:~ 2 124.09 149 4t ii ~ 3 8 3 124 . ~ ~9 149 4~ ~r? 4 b 4 124 . tag 149 400 5 3 • 5 124.09 149 4i it b 1 • b _ 124.09 149 400 7 9 7 124 . i ~9 149 4~ ~~ ~ 8 7 8 124.09 149 400 9 ~ 9 124 . t~9 149 4~ ~0 1 q 3 1 t> 124.09 149 4~ ~~ i 1 1 1 1 1 124 . tj9 149 4~ )tj 12 9 12 124 . t79 149 4~ ~~ i 13 7 13 " 124 . ~ -9 149 4c_~tj 14 5 14 124.09 1 ~9 4C~0 - 15 2 15 124 . ~ ~9 149 !~t_it? 16 tj 16 124 . ~ ~9 149 4t_~i ~ 17 8 17 124 . C?9 149 =+t its 18 6 18 124 . tag 149 4t_a ;~ 19 4 19 124 , i r9 149 4~ ~tj ZO 2 24 124.09 149 4~ >~ ~ 21 0 21 1.24.09 1 !F9 4t it=~ ?2 8 ~ 22' 124 . t~9 149 4r~U 23 6 23 124.09 14° 4tjt? 2~+ 4 24 124. ~t9 14'~ 4U~~ ~~ 1 25 124 . ~ ~9 149 4t~0 26 9 26 124 . ~ f9 149 40c7 27 '7 27 124,.09 149 4~_~~7 28' S - 28 124 . t79 149 4t ~0 29 3 29 1.2.4 . ~ -9 149 4t7~? 30 1 30 ~ •I24.~~9 .149 4~ ~~ ~ 31 9 31 .124 . ~>9 149 4U0 32 7 32 124.09 149 4r,ta ~33 5 33 124 . c:~9 1 !+9 4t?t~ 34 3 34 124 . t79 1.49 4~:~~ ~ 35 '~ ~ 3~ 124.09 14+y 4t_~t_~ 36 8 36 1.24.09 1 t+9 • ~+t ~s > 37 6 37 124.09 149 ;*t_ir? 38 4 38 124 . ~ ~9 149 4~ ~0 '39 2 39 ~ 124.09 149 4~ ft_~ 4t i t.1 4~ ~ 1.24 . ~ ~9 14'~ 4iir 41 8 41 124.t:~9 .~ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. DISTRICT VILLAGE-MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA - (1972 ACT) F'A;~:CEL NUMEsER *~ FY 1988-89 ASSESSMENT ** i`~AF' .PAGE ~~'AF~ L;F~: ASSESSMENT ~FOTAL :~: X ;i X X X X X X NO . ASSESSMENT ? ~+9 4~ ~~ i 42 b 42 124 . ~ ~9 149 ~+i ~0 43 4 43 124 . ~ ~9 149 %+~ ~t> 44 2 44 124 . ~ ~9 149 4~>0 45 9 45 124.09 149 40~ i 46 7 46 ~ 124 . ~ ~9 149 40G 47 5 47 1.24.09 149 40ti 48 3 48 124..09 1 ~-9 400 49 1 49 ~ 124.09 149 400 50 9 .~,0 1.24.09 i49 40t> 51 7 51 124.09 1.49 ~+0i ~ 52 5 ~ 52 124 . ~ ~9 1'~;•9 4Ut~ 53 3 53 124.09 i !+9 4~ ~~ ~ 54 1 _ 54 124 . ~ ~9 149 4C>c_~ 55 8 55 124.09 1%9 4~~C> 56 b 5b 124.09 1 ~+9 4t~0 57 4' S7 1.24.09 149 4~ ~V ~8 2 58 ~ 124.09 i49 4vU 59 •0 59 1.24.09 149 4i ~c:~ b0 8 60 124.09 149 400 b1 b b1-• 124.09 149 4i ~c"~ 62' 4 . • 62. 124 . U9 149 4~:>U b.3 2 63 ~ 124.09 1 ~'+9 4i ~0 b4 0 64 ~ I24.09 1 ~9 4~ ~~~ 65. 7 65 ~ 124.09 i 49 400 66 5 bb ~ 124 . ~~9 1'+9 40c~ 67 3 67 124. C>9 49 4~ ~0 b8• 1 68 124.09 149 4t~0 69 9' 69, -; ' ~ 124,. 09 1 '+:9 %~<:~~~ 7c~ 7 70 124.09 149 4~>0 .71 5 71 _ 124.09 149 4t? ~ 72 . 3 72 124:09 149 4~ .0 73 1 - 73 ~ 124.09 149 4~?~ ~ 74 9 74 ~ 124.09 1 t+9 4Ut~ 75 b 75 ~ 1.24 . t>9 1 ~+~ 4~ ~~ ~ 76 4 76 .1.24 . t~9 CUNT 76 9.!+3i~.84 _1~S.57H '•'• ~ /•9 V/L L,4GE I~9~~4001~S U~//T NO. / - P. U. D. '' ,, ~' 09 '•~~•w+• NfC. 1 OCTOBEN~ /9B6 /N tlIP BK !B9 AGS. I/-11 ,w. i w.w... ~ yN w .. L' Q `.. "' .. ~`•'' y EK o a - ~., ~ AE ~ PTN. PARCEL '!~- ~ TAX RATE AREA /~9 - ~Q 3 -004 3- O/ / SCALE ~ 1' . Rx1' ~ I •'rr; iT 2. \. ! 2 t J ~ ~ REV1910to ORE -a.a~J"' I ~* a s _ _ LIFE [STATE 7•~ ~~`'•> , dom. * t ~ ~ i ~ ~-~ O d, i ~ n a ~ M w w.~ pp -w•~fjwr tt'. •~+ rr~ . /O9 ~ IARClL i 2 72 ..a.., ~ E O t ; 09. 1 .A:,. ~ ca _ _ 3-0// a ....... c ~® •.o ~ ® w.. 4 WAY ~~P 3-004 - - ' _,• . ~ u'w' ,ve R[EL to d• • : - w ° t ~ ° Y M /4 k O 1 ..~, ~. .~a~. Y ; - ..... J ° / 1 .r ~ 9 /3 = V f _ O g'Z i Z ~ .•... a• +9' 0 rasa. re ai•r w.w .~ k 3 9 --O ;,:W =;Q a ~~ v ';• 9e 3 -! 49 4© . 42 4:;4 ~~ _ ........... o ... , ~~ __ Q O ~ i s - ~r rA.w • M.w • ~~ Y.wOr• 'VA1ar ~ O ~. - - ~ f 9 ~ 6 e 69 w w ~ .+.•. w ,V r 94 4 99 ~ 9Y ~ •~ . L9 ~ Y4 ~ 29 Y8 ~ ~ t7 !0 ~ ~I f O ..k O ~ ~ i ~ -~ Q ~ ~ gg ~ ~ 62 gL ~rr ~~ +-~ m ~. -irr L t .rr 1. rr '~ • f 1• O O~ -w w. w. w ' _ 1 1 w rw /!6 `~, .ww ""' ~~,,-~=1 - 1Cl1LPE~PE,~- - -='=-k--- OR/VE ` ~/ ~. t ao sr ., w,.. .k. .E 'I ~ „ • 9f 97 96 99 !4 1 39 !![ SI 90 4f 4f 47 48 I e i k~ k' i k~ k k' V ` n 7/ ~ 1 ® - ~ i Q ; ~ t- O i- O i- O ; O ; 8/ •_ ®~- 49 i- O;•_ 47 A. ~ I Q ~ •~ _ ..« ~ (~ f.' • () /~ Assessor's Mop Bk /49 Pq. 40 ,PI+oTo