HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-261 N.C.S. 07/18/1988.~
•~..
~~ ~ Resolution No. ss-261 N C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION ORDERING
ORDERING THE IMPROVEP~YENfTS AND CONFIRT~IING
THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSNENT
CASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION NO. 1
JOSETTE COURT LANDSCAPE ASSESSI~TENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted its Resolution
No. 88-172, Describing Improvements and Directing
Preparation of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988-89
Casa Del Oro Annexation No. 1, Josette Court Landscape
Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 19T2;
WfIEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with
the City Clerk of said City, whereupon said Clerk presented
it to the Council for consideration;
WHEREAS, said Council thereupon duly considered
said report and each and every part thereof and found that
it contained all the matters and things called for by the
provisions of said Act and said Resolution No. 88-172,
including (1) plans and specifications of the existing
improvements and the proposed new improvements; (2)
estimate of costs; (3) diagram of the district; and (4) an
assessment according to benefits, all of which were done in
the form and manner required by said Act;
WHEREAS, said Council found that said report and
each and every part thereof was sufficient in every
particular and determined that it should stand as the report
for all subsequent proceedings under said Act, whereupon
said Council pursuant to the requirements. of said Act,
appointed Monday, July 18, 1988, at the hour of 7:00
o'clock, p.m. of said day in the regular meeting place of
said Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 11 English
Street, Petaluma, California, as the time and place for
hearing protests in relation to the levy and collection of
the proposed assessments for said improvements, including
the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, for Fiscal
88-261 1 of 4
Res. No . ..............._............. N.C.S.
6aHEREAS, it appears that notices of said hearing
were duly and regularly published and posted in the time,
form and manner required by said Act, as evidenced by the
affidavits and certificates on file with said Clerk,
whereupon said hearing was duly and regularly held at the
time and place stated in said notice and;
Ti~HEREAS, persons interested, objecting to said
improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or
both, thereof, or to the extent of the assessment district,
or any zones therein, or to the proposed assessment or
diagram or to the Engineer's estimate of costs thereof,
filed written protests with the City Clerk of said City at
or before the conclusion of said hearing, and all .persons
interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to
be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to the levy
and collection of the assessments for said improvements,
including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof,
were fully heard and considered by said Council;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Petaluma, County of Sonoma, as follows:
1. That protests against said improvements,
including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, or
to the extent of the assessment district or any zones
therein, or to the proposed assessment or diagram, or to the
Engineer's estimate of costs thereof, for Fiscal Year 1988-
89 have been received and considered.
2. That the public interest, convenience and
necessity require and said Council does hereby order the
levy and collection of assessments pursuant to said Act, for
the construction or installation of the improvements,
including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof,
more particularly described in said Engineer's Report and
made a part hereof by reference thereto.
3. That the Casa Del Oro Annexation No. 1,
.7osette Court Landscape Assessment District and the
boundaries thereof benefited and to be assessed for said
costs for the construction or installation of the
improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or
both, thereof, are situated in the City of Petaluma,
California,. and are more particularly described by reference
to a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk of
said City. Said map indicates by a boundary line the extent
of the. territory included in said district and of any zone
thereof and the general location of said district.
~~~~. iy i~7 2 ~ ~. ~ C S 2 0~ 4
4. That the plans and specifications for the
existing improvements and for the proposed improvements to
be made within the assessment district or within any zone
thereof contained in said report, be, and they are hereby,
finally adopted and approved.
5. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized
and total costs and expenses of said improvements,
maintenance and servicing thereof, and of the incidental
expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report,
be, and it is hereby, finally adopted and approved.
6. That the public interest and convenience
require, and said Council does hereby order the improvements
to be made as described in and in accordance with said
Engineer's Report, reference to which is hereby made for a
more particular description of said improvements.
7. That the diagram showing the exterior
boundaries of the assessment district referred to and
described in said Resolution No. 88-198, and also the
boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and dimensions
of each lot or parcel of land within said district as such
lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's maps
for the fiscal year to which it applies, each of which lot
or parcel of land has been given a separate: number upon said.
diagram, as contained in said report, be, and it is hereby,
finally approved and confirmed.
8. That the assessment of the total amount of
the costs and expenses of the said improvements upon the
several lots or parcels of land in said District in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such
lots or parcels, respectively,. from said improvements, and
the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, and of the
expenses incidental thereto, contained in said report, be,
and the same is hereby finally approved and confirmed.
9. That said Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year
1988-89 be, and the same is hereby, finally adopted and
approved as a whole.
10. That the City Clerk shall forthwith file with
the Auditor of Sonoma County the said assessment, together
with said diagram thereto attached and made a part thereof,
as confirmed by the City Council, with the certificate of
such confirmation thereto attached and of the date thereof.
~~~+®e~ 8 ~ 2f 1 NCB
3 of 4
11. That the order for the levy and collection of
assessment for the improvements and the final adoption and
approval of the Engineer's Report as a whole, and of the
plans and specifications, estimate of the costs and
expenses, the diagram and the assessment, as contained in
said Report, as hereinabove determined and ordered, is
intended to and shall refer and apply to said Report, or any
portion thereof, as amended, modified, revised or corrected
by, or pursuant to and in accordance with any resolution or
order, if any, heretofore duly adopted or made by this
Council.
12. That the Sonoma County Controller and the
Sonoma County Tax Collector apply the Casa Del Oro
Annexation No. 1, Josette Court Landscape Assessment
District assessment to the tax roll and have the Sonoma
County Tax Collector collect said assessments in the manner
and form as with all other such assessments collected by the
Sonoma County Tax Collector.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was in
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~
on the .------....18th..... day of ....................~7>~~.y....
following votes
AYES: Cavanagh, Tenser, Sobel, Balshaw, Vice M~
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
CA 10-85
~~ ~_
Council File...p ...........................
k2es. No. .....8.°.-.26.' ...... N.C.S.
~,.
~.
EPiGIYdEER' S REPORT
CASA DEL ORO' ANPiEXATION ATO. 1
JOSETTE COURT L"AYdDSCAPE ASSESSPgEA1T' DISTRICT
' I~AAiDSCAPE TKAIA1TEYdAATCE DISTRICT:
CITY OF . PETALUI~A
Prepared `by;
,~ ~ ~ \
Thomas Hargis,
City Engineer
Subiiiitted;
July 5,~ '1.9'88
ATTACHA'IENT A
EAiGIAiEER' S REPORT
CASA'.DEL ORO ANNEXATION N0. 1
JOSETTE COURT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT'
._ _ ~ , _
LANDSCAPING''AND LIGHTING'ACT 1972
The uriders;igned 'respectfully ubmts the enclosed .report as d`ir'ected
by the City Colzncil. ,
.Dated r ,,198:8
Thomas .Hargis,
City Engineer
By ~"~~ ~"
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together w-ith
Assessment ,and .Assessment, Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me
on the day of ~~ ,1988.,
Patricia E. Bernard,
City Cler i of Petaluma,
Count. o_ a, California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the ene.losed Eng-neer''s Report, together with
Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and.
confirm ~ ~~ f~he. City u 1 of the City of ..Petaluma, California,, on
the. ~ d_ay ~of - ,1988..
Patricia E. Bernard,
City Clerk,, City of Petaluma,
County of S9no, California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that t$e enclosed Engineer's Report,-together with
Assessment and Asses"sment Di'a'gram thereto attached, was failed with the.
County Auditor of the Count of Sonoma on the day of ,1-9:88.
Patricia E:. Bernard,
City Clerk. Ct of Petaluma,
Sonoma nt California
By
~`
,~ 7
ENGINEER''S REPORT
CASA.DEL,ORO ANNEXATION NO. 1.
JOSETTE COURT :LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Thomas Hargis, City Engineer and Engineer-of=Work for Casa Del Oro
Annexation No:. 1, Josette Court Landscape Assessment District, City of
Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by
the City Council, Resolution No. 88-172 N.C.S. pursuant to Section
225'85 of the Streets and 'Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1.972).
The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly
described as followsr~
The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as a
part. of Parcel-'.Map 220, consisting of ;plant materials, trees,
ground cover, and irrigation systems .located in the public areas
shown, as Josette Court as shown on the Assessment Diagram for
Casa Del Oro Annexation No. 1, Josette Court Landscape Assessment
-District.
J
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT`
C-ASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION NO. l
JOS:ETTE COURT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
CITY OF P_ETALUMA
(1972 ACT)
PROPERTY. OWN-ER'S LIST:
FAF:CEL :VUMPEP,
"lAF' F'AGE F'Ai: CIE. F'ROFEr-tTY ~7WNER Nc~ME ='F~1~F~GFtTY OtdNER
{XX !(XX '+(X X CA$ GF .h1(~RCN 7,, 19y81 R(Ai'L1'MG ADDRESS'
~?.1.9 2~2 23 BRIAN P. ~ GLFaD!!S, DOMERGUE 2`31 I STREET F',ETAL'JMA. !:F-` ~u~7~2
x:119 ~n°_ 25 PRIAN'C:•. ~ JUDLTH L. WHITNEY 11.6:nUWNY r/OURT FETALUM9, CA' ~74y°Z
U19 cll2 2S' DAWNY RAV ORTEGA! _°. 'MARY ARGENTINA ~ JOSETTE CQ~JFtT FETALUMA,. CA '~.4~5c
C>19 2C!2 2S POPERY & ALANA 60ET°~UPGER 1~4 HOWARD 3T F'ETALUMA. CA 94'i5~
COUNT 4
LANDS.CAPING.MA`INTENANCE DISTRICT
CASA DEL ORO'ANNEXATION:NO. 1
J.OSETTE COURT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DTSTRICT
_ CITY OF PETALUMA
(1972 ACT)
ESTIMATE OF COSTS
I. Estimated Maintenance Costs per.Month is $' 69.17
Estimated Totai`Maritenance Cost per Year is $ 830.
LI. Estimated Incidental Expenses
a. County Collection Charges $ 3.
b. City Administration Fee 124.50
Estimated Total Incidental Expenses: ~ 127.5.0
.Estimated Total Costs and Total Amount
to be Assessed for formation & first year. $ 957.50.
III Estimated Total Annual Cost per Lot,: 4 Lots 239.38
~ ~~
C~ASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION 'NO. 1
JQSETTE COURT LANDSCAPE`ASSESSMENT DI`STRIGT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
(1972 ACT)
Bass~of Allocation of Assessments
'The estimate of the: total. maintenance costs per year were estimated
and incidental administrative expenses added to yield a total. annual
cos :. This cost was then,prgrated' equally to the.4 lots, so that each
lot wil share equally in the annual .lands.cape maintenance expenses.
LANDSCAPI=NG AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
CASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION'NO:. l
JOSETTE CALJRT;LAMDSCAP-E ASSESSMENT QISTRIGT
C~ITY~QF PETALUMA
(1972 ACT)
ASSESSMENT ROLL:
F'.af~± ~EL na!Jt•lBEF ~«-# FY i 988-~9 ASSESSt~1ENT #~
•1fi~' ~'F?uE F'~~Fi Gk:: Fl'SSE~Bt'1EhaT TOTAL
:; X~ X i;t X X X t`JC'~ . (~S:SESSMENT
i 19 2~ ~2 23 1 ~ 239 , 38
~a 19 2C~~ 24 ~ 2 239.38
i:19 2~~2 . 2~ 3 239.38
t -1.~ 2~_~2 2b 4 239.38
GOUI`aT 4 95.7.52
~s 16 . d7H '
~;.r _ - -
~:„
o.' ~
~~ ~ _
ROUMD ' - YALL£Y OA/C> S/J6D.
~OUpi \ ~•~ /. 3D•7 hfA PS~ PGS: .28'8 29 ~ -
s _
\ EDVNRDB -IS ~ .. -
en-oz~ee~ o:R. 48 \ 45
is
~-- Mu .\ •I.N Ib.•• rE lPi.b ,•,ET, j
o l ~ .E.b ~.-,
\ ~.,.~ aP• R, • j ~
~ ~ ~. - ,~
\~\ ~ ,ra,r I 7
a I g
;c ~. / 8
K \'~ - 'k' ~ + 2(1,000'S.E. ItO:00! S.F. l0,81014.F. •8y081.g F.;, ~ t.t ..
~ $ r
U) ~~ S .L ~ oo~dy ,rs,f1~ ~ / >_ ~ I a I. ,6 ~ o
• _
a
~"'_ ~ .L.
.__ R ? -` \ :. a .. ~ ~ ,. ~~,
~`4 s :~~~:~:r~ .~~~v~~ a11`Id I 1
`~~ ~ I
~ _n~__ 7
5, '
_- ... _. S' - I I
POLLARD,
.~~a .t 80-.00621Q 0.R.. i
NOTE! J
IBUILOING $ETB•CB$ Fpl LOTS I,= B) i
b RE•R •q0 \ .
T! GGR FG•iE $ OE T•RD 1 ~ 1 -- a.li4
10 Y N 510E YARD -~ t 10 •-•
(.,BUILD MG $ETB•C•$ FOR lOT •:
1! •GGREG•TE 510E Y•RO -
IS' YIN~~$IOE. Y•RD
' G/TY OF PE.TALUMA
L[Yt»D ~ PARCEL ~ MAP /VO. 220
O SEI /2" IRON PIPE REf~faN ,., 4Y I! 'e.i = -r~ I' LANDS. Df _
EougD a/i IRDN vIPE /vLUD RGE nam LARRY B.MARIE .gNAB ANO 'IRV 6 ClAUD1A PIOTRNOtTSRI
F~1 al•ND•ND EITr' YONIIrExr SET DOCUMENT NOMBER 86-OYIB26'.,O R:
® suuw~D un.YUruY(NT TouND 9.00 .ACRES ~OROSS: -
q/Y RECONO •ND/OR NE•9MED COURSE
lEINO NITNIN $[C TION 1, TO'NN$NI/ 1 MWTN; R•MGE -T YIE$t, YWNI DI•B: J
1 1 GEED - NORTH M$[ •ED YERIDI•N.
RI Wi\EY p•N$ $uBplv15WN, y» YAP$.Ia
crtr ~or P[TLLUYA - CWNTY M lONOrA _ aT~TE 0E' CALIEd1Yi~
RE NE$TRIDGE UNIT. MQ ], Na, Y/04 N
R) RSTRIDG(. WIT. MO. I, 220, Y•PS.!!
O.R. Of i1Ci~L R[CORp! ~I AV I
SCR. SOIN)YA; COUNIY.q(COgO$ I~O VEL ENG'INEER'ING, INC.
BSL. BUILDING 9ETB•C•. LINE
PDE PuBLIC_uIRRC E•aEYENT E~ E G 1 9 T E R EL C-1 V I Cr E N G I N E E F c
REO BOFDEq InDM:•TF9 •RE• 0(.TMII vRCEL ~.. PETALIIMA' , CALI'FOf'tN.IA 94 QF
>II fYC fANCEa ARE $NpNN UI /EEi. •ND,DECIYLL! 1NEREOf. k A.DC TIDR aAP ,,P q, Iy~t07-06 J04 1b. 912 SN(fl ~ OI 2
E