HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-260 N.C.S. 07/18/1988' ~ Resolution No. 88-260 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION ORDERING
ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND CONFIRMING
THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT
CASA DEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted its Resolution
No. 82-171, Describing Improvements and Directing
Preparation of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988-89
Casa Del Oro Landscaping Assessment District pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972;
WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with
the City Clerk of said City, whereupon said Clerk presented
it to the Council for consideration;
WHEREAS, said Council thereupon duly considered
said report and each and every part thereof and found that
it contained all the matters and things called for by the
provisions of said Act and said Resolution No.87-171,
including (1) plans and specifications of the existing
improvements and the proposed new improvements; (2)
estimate of costs; (3) diagram of the district; and (4) an
assessment according to benefits, all of which were done in
the form and manner required by said Act;
WHEREAS, said Council found that said report and
each and every part thereof was sufficient in every
particular and determined that it should stand as the report
for all subsequent proceedings under said Act, whereupon
said Council pursuant to the requirements of said Act,
appointed Monday, July 18, 1988, at the hour of 7:00
o'clock, p.m. of said day in the regular meeting place of
said Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 11 English
Street, Petaluma, California, as the time and place for
hearing protests in relation to the levy and collection of
the proposed assessments for said improvements, including
the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, for Fiscal
Year 1988-89, and directing said Council to give notice of
said hearing as required by said Act.
~~~5. No ............................... n.cs. l o f 4
88-260
WHEREAS, it appears that notices of said hearing
were duly and regularly published and posted in the time,
form and manner required by said Act, as evidenced by the
affidavits and certificates on file with said Clerk,
whereupon said hearing was duly and regularly held at the
time and place stated in said notice and;
WHEREAS, persons interested, objecting to said
improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or
both., thereof, or to the extent of the assessment district,
or any zones therein, or to the proposed assessment or
diagram or to the Engineer's estimate of costs thereof,
filed written protests with the City Clerk of said City at
or before the conclusion of said hearing, and all persons
interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to
be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to the levy
and collection of the assessments for said improvements,
including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof,
were fully heard and considered by said Council;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Petaluma, County of Sonoma, as follows:
1. That protests against said improvements,
including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, or
to the extent of the assessment district or any zones
therein, or to the proposed assessment or diagram, or to the
Engineer's estimate of costs thereof, for Fiscal Year 1988-
89 have been received and considered.
2. That the public interest, convenience and
necessity require and said Council does hereby order the
.levy and collection of assessments pursuant to said Act, for
the construction or installation of the improvements,
including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof,
more particularly described in said Engineer's Report and
made a part hereof by reference thereto.
3. That the Casa Del Oro Landscaping Assessment
District and the boundaries thereof benefited and to be
assessed for said costs for the construction or installation
of the improvements, including the maintenance or servicing,
or both, thereof, are situated in the City of Petaluma,
California, and are more particularly described by reference
to a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk of
said City. Said map indicates by a boundary line the extent
of the territory included in said district and of any zone
thereof and the general location of said district.
2 of 4
4. That the plans and specifications for the
existing improvements and for the proposed improvements to
be made within the assessment district or within any zone
thereof contained in said report, be, and they are hereby,
finally adopted and approved.
5. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized
and total costs and expenses of said improvements,
maintenance and servicing thereof, and of the incidental
expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report,
be, and it is hereby, finally adopted and approved.
6. That the public interest and convenience
require, and said Council does hereby order the improvements
to be made as described in and in accordance with said
Engineer's Report, reference to which is hereby made for a
more particular description of said improvements.
7. That the diagram showing the exterior
boundaries of the assessment district. referred to and
described in said Resolution No. 88-197, and also the
boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and dimensions
of each lot or parcel of land within said district as such
lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's maps
for the fiscal year to which it applies, each of which lot
or parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said
diagram, as contained in said report, be, and it is hereby,
finally approved and confirmed.
8. That the assessment of the total amount of
the costs and expenses of the said improvements upon the
several lots or parcels of land in said District in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such
lots or parcels, respectively, from said improvements, and
the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, and of the
expenses incidental thereto, contained in said report, be,
and the same is hereby finally approved and confirmed.
9. That said Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year
1988-89 be, and the same is hereby, finally adopted and
approved as a whole.
10. That the City Clerk shall forthwith file with
the Auditor of Sonoma County the said assessment, together
with said diagram thereto attached and made a part thereof,
as confirmed by the City Council, with the certificate of
such confirmation thereto attached and of the date thereof.
~~®o ~~- 2~ O N C S
3 of 4
11. That the order for the levy and collection of
assessment for the improvements and the final adoption and
approval of the Engineer's Report as a whole, and of the
plans and specifications, estimate of the costs and
expenses, the diagram and the assessment., as contained in
said Report, as hereinabove determined and ordered, is
intended to and shall refer and apply to said Report, or any
portion thereof, as amended, modified, revised or corrected
by, or pursuant to and in accordance with any resolution or
order, if any, heretofore duly adopted or made by this
Council..
12. That the Sonoma County Controller and the
Sonoma County Tax Collector apply the Casa Del Oro
Landscaping Assessment District -assessment to the tax roll
and have the Sonoma County Tax Collector collect said
assessments in the manner and form as with all other such
assessments collected by the Sonoma County Tax Collector.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a {Regular) (Adjou~~4~ting ~
i
on the ................18thday of ...........................~lla.y........................, 19........, $~~ the
following vote:
` y Attorney
AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer, Sobel, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayor~Hil~goss
NOES: C ~ '
1~
ABSENT: W ~ ey _ , ~.
ATTEST : ..... ............................•-•---..-........-----..-.....-..........:...........-•--•--.... ~~!(/.....-• ~-- ..._............... -.I/-.c--.................---•
City Clerk Mayor
Gbuncil FiQlep .........................•-•--.-. .
CA 10-85 ~ Res. NO. ...4547.-.~.~.Q......... N.C.S. 4 Of 4
,~ _
*~
ENGINEER'S REPORT, t
CASA UEL ORO I~AAiDSCAPIAdG ASSESSPgENT DISTRICT
LAYdDSCAPE I~INTEAIANCE DISTRICT
.CITY OF PETALUA9A
Prepared by:
~__...•~
rte. f~'r` F~--~'c~,
/ f~ F
Thomas Hargis,
City Engineer
Submitted
July 5, 1.95'$
ATTACHMENT A
~~~o,. ~.~ ,d - ~ a ,0 ~ 'C S
i
EAiGIIdEER' S REPORT
CASA DEL ORO LANDSCAPING 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDSCAPING AND~LIGHTING ACT 1972
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as di"reefed
by the City Council.
Dated: ~ G~ ,/~~,1988 Thomas Harg.s,,
City Engsneer
By 1
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer"'s' Report,.. together with
Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached,, was filed with me
on 'the ,Gr~d'ay- of ,1988 .
Patricia E~. Bernard.,
City Clerk, City o Petaluma,
County of So a alifor"nia
By
g.' 's Report, together with
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed En sneer
Assessment a_nd ,Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and
confirm d. by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, California„ on
the - day of ,1988.
Patricia E:. Bernard,
City Clerk, City of Petaluma,
County of Sono a, California
By
;I .HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report,.toge,ther with
Assessment and Asse sment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the
County Auditoz of the, Count of Sonoma on the day of ,1988.
Patricia E,. Bernard,
City Clerk., City o Petaluma,
Sonoma.Coun~ ifornia
By -
~,
E1dGINEER''S .:REPORT
CASA,DEL ORQ LANDSCAPING ASSE_$SMENT.DISTRICT
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1,972
.Thomas Hargis:, City Engineer and Engineer-of-Work for Casa Del Oro
Landscaping Assessment D~s,trct, City of. Retaluma, Sonoma. .County,
California, makes this, report, as directed by the City :Council,
Resolution No. 88-171 N.C.:S. pursuant to Section 22585 of 'the Streets
and, Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
The improvements which are .:the subject of this report are briefly
described as follows:
The construction or installation, including the maintenance or
serecng,, or both.,, thereof, of landscaping, including trees,
.shrubs., grass or other ornamental vegetation, drainage, statuary,
fountains' and other ornamental structures., facilities, and
appurtenances, including the cost of repair, remo~aT or
replacement of all or any part thereof, providing for the life,
growth, health a_nd beauty of landscaping,,,:., inc udrig cultivation,
irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing nor treating for
disease or injury, the removal of tr.imm'ngs, rubbish, debris and
:other solid waste,. water ,for the irrigation of any landscaping,,
• the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other
improvements.
LANDSCAPING: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
CASA_ DEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSES'S.MENT.DISTRICT
CITY OF PETA`LUMA
(1972 ACT'}
`ESTIMATE OF COSTS FISCAL YEAR 19.8'8-89
I. Estimated Maintenance Costs per Month is $43,1.67
Estimated Total Maintenance Cost per Year is
II. Estimated Incidental Expenses
_ "a. Cour-ty Collection Charges (.25%) $` 15.
b. City Administration 'Fee (.15%) 777.
Estimated Total Incidental Expenses:
Estimated' TotaT.Cos,ts and Total Amount
to be Assessed for formation & first year.
$ 5,180,
$ 792.
$ 5,_922.
LII Estimated Total Cost per lot: - 151 lots 39.55
CASA DEL 'ORO LANDSCAPING AS;SESSM~ENT DI'5TRI'CT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
~- ( -197 2 ACT') _ .
Basis of Allocation of Assessments
The estimate of the total maintenance cows per .year were. es imated
and incidenta`1 ~ .admini"strative expenses added to~ yield a total annual
cost. Thies cost. was then prorated equally to the 1.51 lots , so that
each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance
expenses.
LANDSCAPIATG AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
CASH DEL ORO L~iPdDSCAPING ASSESSEMENT. DISTRICT
CITY OF'PETALU
(1972 ACT')
F'~akCEL NUMBER #~ 'FY 1-988-89 ASSESSMENT ~#
fi•1AP F'AGE PAR CK ASSESSMENT TOTAL
XXX XXX XX X NO. ASSESSMENT
r 17 311 1 ~ ~ 1 39~.'S
~,?17 311 2 8 ~ 39.55
~' 17 31 1 3 6 3 3;9.5J
17 31 1 4 4 4 39.55
i ~ 17 311 5 1 5 39,.55
t? 17 31 1 6 9 6 ~ 39.55
U 1'7 31 1 7 7 7 39-.'S5
~?17 311 8 5 9 39.55
cr17 311 9 3 9 39.55
t?17 311 10~ 1 10 3.9.55
~~17. 311 11 9 11 3:9.55
r 17 31 1 12 7 12 39 ,. 55
i:r 17 31 1 13 5 13 39,. JS
~> 1 ; 31 1 14 3 I4 39 .,55
i i 17 31 ~ 15 U 15 39.55
t?17 311 lb 8 16 39.55
~> 17 31 1 17 b 17 -.39 . JJ
i_i i 7 3':1 ! 18 4 18 -39.55
i ~ 17 31 1 19 2 19 39.55
c i 17 31 1 Wit? p 24 39.55
r 17 31 1 .21 8 ~ 21 `39.55.
?17 311 ?2 6 .22 39'.:55.
cr17 311 .23 4 23 ~ 39.SJ
~:>:17 31 i 24 2 24 39.55
i 17 31 1 25 9 25 39.55'
i 17 :3'1,1 26 7 26, 39'.55
~ S 7' 3 4 1 27 5 27 39 . S.cJ
~"> 17 "3i 1 1 28 3 28 39.55
i:~ 1 T _
31 1 29 1 29 39.55
17 31 1 3S? : 9 34 39.55 .
r17 311 31 7 31 39,..55
~ 17 31 1 32 32 39.55.
i t 17 3'f 2 1 8~ 33 39'..55
~? 17 312 2 b~ 34 39.55
r.17 3'12 3 4 35 3.9.55
~? 17 3:18 4 2' 36 39 .55
?17 31;2 5 '~ 37 39'. ~5
r 1 ; ' 31 ~ b 38 39.55'
t :17 312. 7 5 39 39 . ~55
?17 312 8 3' 44 39.55
> i 7 312 9 1 41 39 .;55
L~PMDSCAPIIdG .AAdD .LIGHTING DISTR-ICT
CASH DEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSESSEASENT~DI'STRICT
CIT-Y ,OF PETPiLiJt~Pi
(19 7 2 ,ACT;)
F'i=~:LEL NUMBER #~ FY 1' 988-89 flSSESSMENT ~~
MA'F'' F'AGE F'AFi CF" AS$ESS.MENT TOTAL '
X X X X X X X`X X NQ. ASSESSMENT'
~?;:1 ; :312. 1'~ 9 42' 39 . ~5
i~17 312 11 7. 43 3.9.5.x.!
~`i 7' 312 12 5 44 39.55
>:17 31:2 13 3 45~ ~ . 39.55
t 17 .:312 ~. 1~4 1 46 39- • 55 .
17 312 15 8 47 39.55
c_~r17 312 16 6 48 39.55
i r17 31,2 17 4 44 39.5
c? 17 3 S 2' 18 2 5~~; 39.55` .
r17 3:1:2 19 cj 5`1 39.55
~'~ 17 31.2 ,2~~ 8 52 .39.55
~ 1,7 3:1.2 2;1 6 53 39'.55
cj17 '313 1 6 54 39.55'
~ 1'7 3'13` 2 4 55 39.55
c=~ 1 'T 31 3 ;3 2 'S6 39.55
,~ 1~'? 3'1°3 4 i ~ 59' 39:.:5 5
~_~ 1 313 5 7 '~8 39.55
c.> 17 313 b 5 59' 39 .::55
~_~ 17 313 7 3 b~~ 39.55
i ~ 17 31"3 8 l • b.l -39 g5
E~ 17 313 9 9 ,62 3'~.,~5.
i x'17 3.13. 10 7 b3 39.55
c_i 17 3 `13 1 1 5 64 ~ 3,9'~.'S5
°17 313' 12 3
65 39.55
C 17 31'3 13 1 66 39 .~5
~.j.17 3 ' 3' 1.4 9 67 '39:55'
ri17 3'L3 • 1S 6 68 39.;5
c:17 313 1:6 4 69 39.55
~
~ i 1;7 31;3 17 70 . 55
3;4
i ~ 17 31.3 1:g 71 39.55
c i 17 3'::1;3` 19 72 39 .+55
c~ 17 3 f3 2a '73 39.5.
ci 17 313 81 74 35- •;55
U17 313. 22 75 39.55
~> 17 3:13 23 76 ;39.55
t > 1 ?
31,3
~4 ,,
, 7 ~~
39 : ~.,
c ~ 17 313 25 78 39.55
r ~ 17 3':1,3' ~ 26 79 39.55
x,.17 3.1.3 .2? 8~ 39.55
c=i 1'? 3'13 ~8 8:4 39.55
c i 1 i 313 29 82 39.55
LANDSCAPING AAID LIGHTING DISTRICT.
CASA.DEL ORO:LANDSCAPING ASSESSEP~ENT DISTRICT
CITY OF PETAI~UTrI~-
(1.972. ACT) .
a_SSF'SSA4Et~'I' ROLLS
F ~r~F~GEL . NUMEsEF~ ~~' FY 1988'-89 ASSESSMENT : ~#'
h1AF' PauE ~'AF~ Ck, ASSESSMENT ,TOTAL
:~:'X X a X'X X X X !VO . ASSESSMENT
~? 1'? 313. 3ia 83 - 3;9 . ~5
~? 1`7 313 31 84 39.55
t? 17 313 32 $~ 39 .;55
~? 17 3:.14 1 4 86 39.55
~ 17 314 2 2 87. 39..55
{ i 17 314 3 u 88 39.55
C~ 17 314 4 8 89 39,0;55
~ 1 ? 3;14 5 5 90 39.55
c? 17 314 6 3 91 39.53;
~
~? 17 314 7 1 92 3.,9.55.
'~ > 17 314 9 9 93 39.5
~? 17, 3;14 9 7 94 39.53.
c_z 17 _
314 1 t7 5 95 39 , :3
~ ~ 17 314 11 3 96 39.5
~i~17 314 12 1 97 39..5'
~i17 314 13 9 98 39.53
~:> 17 314 14 7 99 39.55
~? 17 314 16 2. 100 39, 55t
> 1 "; 314 17 ~~ 1~Q 1 39.53
~?17 314 18 A 102! 39.55
> 17 C~ 14 19 6 - - 1.03 39.5
~> 17 3`1.4 - 2s3 4 1'04. 39'. 5~"
c? 17' 314 21 2 La?5. 39 0 55
z i 17 3.1:4 22< <~ '106 39.55
~~ 17~' 314 ?3 8' L,Q7 ~ 39.55
~> 17 314 24 ,b 1 OB 39 .~5
i i 17' 314 25 3~ 109 39.53
~? 1 ? 3-14 5;6, 1 110 39:55
~ 17 3 14 27 _9' 111 39.53.
~~ 17 3'.14 28 7 112. 39.53
r~17 314 ~_9. 'S': 113 39.5:3'
~~17 320 1 1 i i'4. 39 a 55
i ~ 1 T 327 2 9: 2~ 15 X39.. 55.
~?17 32i~ 3 7 ' 1Y6 39..35
~? 17 :32~"~ 4 5". 117 ~~ 39.55
X717 32~~ 5 2 118 3,9:55
i:i 17' 327 b ~ >, 1 19 39:55'.
i ~ L7 32U 7 8` 120 39 a 55
i 17 •32~i '8 b 1;21, 39:55
~? 17 320 9 4 122 39,.55
i ~ 17 ,32V 1.~7 Z` 1:23 ' '89:55
LANDSCAPIYdG ~ildD LIGHTJING DISTRICT
CASPi 'DEL ORO LANDSCAPIPdG ASSESSEMEIdT DISTRICT
,CITY OF PETALUMA '
(1.972 ACT)
F'Af~CEL NUMBER ~~ fY .1988-89 ASSESSMENT #~
MAF PAGE F`AFc CK "ASSESSMENT TOTAL
XXX XXX XX X N0.
--------------- ASSESSMENT
------------------
---
~`1 7 -----
324 -----
1 1 ----
~~ . -
124 39.55
i~17 324 12 8 1:25 39.55
~?17 324 13 .6 126 39:'55
c~ 17 '324 ~ `14 4 127. 39 . ~5
~?17 324 15 1 128 39.55
1? 17 320 '1~6 9 129 39 . J5
~? 17 32U 17 ? _ 130 39.55
> 1 ? 324 18' S 1.31 39.55!:
017 320 19 3 132 '39.55
u17 320 24 1 133 39.55.
~?17 324 21 9. 134 39:55
~~ 17 320 22 7 1.35 39.55
i~17 320 23 .5 136 ~ 39:55
C>17 3c4 24 3 137 39.:55
~ ~ 17 324 25 ~~ 138 39.. 55
~ 17 324 Zb 8 ~ 139. 39.55'
~?17 324 27 b 144 39.55
~~17 324 2S 4 141 39.55
~ 1~7 320 29 2 142. 39.5.5
~:~ 17 324 34 O 143 39 ..55
17 '32~? 31 8 144 39.55
~:> 17 °320 32 6 - 145 39.55
0'17 '32~? 33, 4 146 39.55
017 32C~ ~-~4 .2 1.-47 39.55
~ 17 32~ f 35' 9 148 39 .55,
~:~5 7 ;32 ~ ° ,3b 7' 1:49 39:55'
~-17 32n. 38 3 150 _ 39'.55
x;17 32~ ~ 39 1 151 39.55
COUNT 1'51 ~ 5'972.45
~ ~ -, I ~ i I I, No 4~' Qj No:6f ~ ...o I. _;.o I „ I '
• •"" i 27 2B ~ 29 31 30 g '3/ gi 3? ~, ~'I - _ ~~ ZB I- 27 26 ~c 25
- ,-.. ~ - ~ 2a ~1.. ZS 3 ~ 26 311:,. 27 ~` ~ `. v ~. O !' O i ~ ~ V I~ ' OO 0 S O O 24' I 23~ / -%
9 30 3/ 2 ~. S • ~ 2B 27 I 6 S - -' %
t J -' . .... .. 1 I
F `,zze ~ ~ ,_ _ ~ r •., ' 9 i5 , _•.~ \, /~37 . I O O O ~ 23 I 24 I •25 ~ ~~ I^ /z 271 \~ ., '2!, 23
' „ _
22 ~ /O a" ,~ `8 36 g 33 I8 34 g 33 B 9 /O 7c // 3' ~ ~---_-
\ ~ ~ /6 a- _ 1 7 ~s _
s s a I~
.a +. ,_ •,v _. 6 '. ~ f•c.. fx_. ~ '•a • ao. •f • a _ VI-~ 2(J Z
~ l h p /4 c ,, 3 28 ~ Z
2/ - `~ O •. ^a• n•s uao uoo .a or, f±a :•v
7/ //
Z :" 6
/ 3 /4
' ~„
1. 2
- _
_ 2O ' 2 O/2 : ~ ~ ~ /3 ,.. 1 // ~° _ /Z ~° /3 I /,~. /5 , , ~ O / 20 '~ :L_ -
~c /B `~ _ -. T I - I No. p; Ny~ ~ .,. /3 ~ I_ ZD
- .:
-,. oo ~ x_., ,3Q -
. '/9 /S' , - t 1'~/9 /3- _ 6 /2 ~ Hh' ~ ort -- - _- \ ` -.Ol /9,~.4 s -- ~ `_ ,
O - ; r (F-
c /B /8 ~r ~:Q ~O a 3 'P a e. 3 8 z ':~a,g / a ~ / ~ L7 \' 3 :~.a.,.
' ~ ~ ? /~
- ~`~!, fit' :' 3/2"`~ ~= - ~!> FC ~~ ~ ,6 /B
Z-~ „ No.4' 'N06
/ \ ' c ~ ~ ~ I
`/ . • e,p ~ ,~ •`1 ,:+ R 3/ 3? S 3d ;6 34 S 33 ~"'~ _ 36 ';8 37 ,~8 38 8 39 .zg 40 (, /4 /<~03 t
/6' '/6 1/ 30 F 8 8 8 '~ 8 B 8. 8 /~ 3.
- - •~
,,... O /S
No t _ /`
329 /5 : ~ ` R p n ~. , .. ~iti ~ MA f .C/irt_ %'£i ",. x •' C= i?R~ ~ a ~IYG;tifA~-~ // 'r~' ~~ : ~ /
_ _ I ~ .. ,_, /2
?B ?7 ?6 4 73 ? J 2/ ~w .10 /9" /B A /7 // ' ,ir/-
ys IS 8 8 ; . ~ sg 8 ~s. '~
••0: ~+fM •f •° •400 ~ •, O4 •~.0! ~ ••i0t •f ,>D '•4f N-.. ~ ,
_ /2 ~ /j ,
S ~cc " ,.. 1 ~c / F 8 2 I 3 S 4 € S ~8 '6 1:g ~ 8 i ~. ~ B ~£ 9 g /O /'/
~~+
it ,
is~
` ~
`,
+ ~'~
__ \ \,"
\UO.
.\ •'~\
\~~ ~~
.y•
,X,
~ •-
•:.
~~ -.
i6 -
~~ Rw,seG
• _~.
~„
J ~ • ~J = gas?.
3 ~7 ~ ~~° .m K.m asm wm • n~, .o.o
u a•y
~O) A- 0
o~ ~
1 1 Z6 ?7 I 2B I 29 I 30 I 3/ I 32' ~ = 3/ I 30 I 29' I 1B I 17 I 26 I 23 /
71
23 ~ L ~ ~-
c n
J/
y)
NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPApED FOR'AS- Assessors .Mop Bk. /7Pg. 32
SESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY
IS ASSUMED FOR sHE ACCURACY Of THE SOnO/AO COUn/y, CO//f ~
• nnTn nCI.I.IC~TCfI YCDC(1.1 DunTn_
r