The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPresentation 05/20/2013 Pre4e cl-odor' - Docwnn evtt received/cifte r cLge c1CV d t4trQYat'i,o-w 1 Mattioli, Allison From Sandy Lipitz c sslipitz @solarsonomacounty:org> Sent: Friday, May,17 2013,913 AM To: citymgr;- City Clerk Subject SOLAR SONOMA COUNTY SUPPORTS'SONOMA CLEAN POWER Attachments: City Council Member Letter.on Sonoma Clean Power.docx Dear City'Manager/City Clerk, Could you please either forward this email or provide the attached,letter to your City Council. Thanks. Dear City Council Members and City Manager, Attached,is a letter outlining Solar Sonoma County' position on Sonoma:Clean,Power and our list of action items by the City Council that are vitally important to our residents and businesses and the long-term success of Sonoma Clean Power. Solar Sonoma County is a local non profit whose mission is to educate, advocate and promote clean energy related to solar and energy efficiency. Please let ine know if you have anyquestions or would like to discuss this very important matter with us personally. Thank you for your time, Regards, I Sandy Lipitz, Controller SandyLipitz, Controller 1300 Valley House Dr. #.100=5 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 main: (707) 664-6488. mobile' (707),237-1337 www.solarsonomacounty.org Join us the 4th Wednesday ofrevery month«for the Clean Energy Series! FREE.Clean Energy Series Workshops 1, Disclaimer:the information provided by Solar Sonoma'County:through;Es Clean Energy Advocate program(CEA)is limited to an unofficial overview of energy efficiency and solar upgrades:available rebates,incentives,-and other related information It does not coitstitute'.profes ional advice or other professional financial guidance,and it should not be relied upon as such or:used as the only source of infomnatton when making purchasing decisions,investment decisions,tax decisions of when executing other binding agreements While the CEA strives to,provide the best information possible,,the C EA makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the information provided or arising out Of your u'se of the information provided by the CEA. 2 soar sonorna county BOARD OF.DIRECTORS rLfcWable.`i.e'ffiCi( flcy.SVnergy' John Haig Board Chair May 16,2013 County,Of.Sonoma Chris W arner Vice Chair Dear.City Council Member. ZFA-Associates I would like to first take this opportunity to introduce myself,Alison Heaty,.as the Executive Director of Barry Cogbill Solar Sonoma County(SSC):rSSC is a nonprofit consortium of local businesses,elected officials,city Secretary and Treasurer governments and individuals who are dedicated to reducing greenhouse gases through the installation of Pathways Energy Consultants solar.and energyeffciency applications., We develop programs,resources,and initiatives to bring solar • Tim Holmes and'energyefficiency into the mainstream. Working together, we are making Sonoma County a national Kenwood Energy leader in clean energy,preserving and protecting our,.environment for our future generations. Jeff Mathias SSC'is'also an active supporter of Sonoma Clean-Power'(SCP)`as this new utility will be focused on Synergy Solar&Electrical Systems renewableenergy,•wliich is vitally important to preserving our planet. Peter Renfro The-potential benefits to the City, its residents and businesses are as.follows: Solar Management Consultant I. •Consumer choice for a greener product at competitive rates. Peter Zullo 2. Local jobs for contractors;engineers,designers,business-to-business goods and services Solaria companies. 3. Commercial businesses can secure new revenue stream through the"Feed-In-Tariff'Program HONORARY BOARD 4.. Residents can-be incentive to install solar through the Net Metering"Program to sell back their Jack Buckhorn surplus Business Manager 5. SCP Profits reinvested.in Sonoma.County IBEW'Local-Union 551 6.. City-facilities will be powered through green products, reducing the carbon footprint E$en Carrillo 7. Cities can join the JPA and have control over SCP andthe•electricity rates. Supervisor, Sonoma County _ SSCis-requestingthat each City take an,active part'in the development of Sonoma Clean Power and Grant Davis' establish'policies and procedures'that are consistent with the City's and County's environmental goals. General Manager Sonoma County Water Agency .Furthennore'and,equally important, SSC is requesting that each City require that certain mandates be included,inlIcontraqtual agreements'that achieve the following: Randy De e M ada I. A minimum percentage:of local jobs for installation-projects(RFP structured to allow small, PG&E Executive Manager local companies to be competitive). Rod Dole • 2. A date(s) for ivhen the Feed-In-Tariff Program;and Net Metering Program will begin. (City County of Sonoma(retired) representation,oncreating.and,designing both programs is encouraged) Noreen Evans 3. Primary and ancillary business-to-business goods and services are provided through local California State Senator Sonoma County businesses when feasible: (This will provide a new,permanent,revenue stream for the Cities and.County Tong after the project installation are completed. Jake.Mackenzie Regional Climate Protection Authority 4. City."s input;:review and adoption of electricity rate structure and rates to ensure equity and Chair financial stability. Lynn Woolsey We thank^you in advance for your prudent participation in this endeavor to ensure the success of Sonoma California Congresswoman - Clean Pciwer;and the positive impacts that can.6e achieved:for your residents„your businesses,the local Shirlee Zane economy and the environment! Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board Meiiiber Sincerely, Jeannie Schulz Alison Healy FOUNDERS Executive Director .Lori Houston Marty Roberts 1300 Valley House'Dr. #100-5 *•Rohnert Park, CA 94928 *'707.664.6488 * fax: 707.794.0440 prea'evttdt''i,o=v Dor,uunent'rece iNedi after a ffext ai d ibty t& ttfo-vv 2 Mattioli,•Allison .. From: Stephen Gale <stepiengalel @yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday,,,May 18„2013 614 PM To: :David Glass; - City Clerk Cc: David Babbitt; Teresa.Barrett; Mike Healy Gabe Kearney dalea @sonic.net Subject: Sonoma Clean Power Mayor Glass& members of the PetalumaCity Council, f'.learned earlier today that Dale Axelrod forwarded you'a portion of:an:e-mail that.I posted to a private yahoo group as part of a robust discussion about Sonoma Clean Power that was taking place among a small group of people: The manner in which the mail was forwarded could create that the Sonoma County Democratic Party has taken a positionon Sonoma Clean Power. I want you to clearly understand that-is notthe case. The local Democratic Party has not taken up consideration of this issue and 1 do not expect thatwe will. I have been involved in the:public dialog<in Santa Rosa, where I live, but did not consider it appropriate to interject myself iii:Petaluma's°process for deciding what is best for your citizens. Because of the nature of the excerpt that you were forwarded, without my permission; I now feel is important to express my own opinion to you in amore comprehensive manner --'rather than as an excerpt from a wide-ranging discussion on a private yahoo group. I.firmly support the concept of Community Choice Aggregation & the workdone to date to form Sonoma Clean Power. l The questions that remain for me arerelated'to what the structure --;including.cost structure for residential and other rate class groups-- will be. The polling that has been done by the proponents clearlyshows that residents are willing to pay more for "clean power” -- perhaps up to 5% more -- while businesses'are€not. I.believe that rate setting will likely be:done;using a full-cost recovery model that'is'designed to ensure equity within a rate class. There are also goingto-likely be different:rates established for different rate classes. In addition, the "implementation plan",(].believe) includes reference to special contract pricing that will be available to.provide an:iticenti'veforibusiness users to join SCP. Looking at the-Levelized Costof New Generation Resources;in the,Annual Energy'Outlook for 2011 (the most recent reporta have --although it's likely a year old) Departmentof Energyhas estimated the cost per megawatt hour for various generation'sources. According to that source document, for example, the full cost(system levelized cost) is estimated for 2017 in $$ per Megawatt hourin a range from a low of,$65.5 for natural gas generation using advanced combined cycle to $251.0 for Solar Thermal. Solar PV isestimated_at?$156.9 while geothermal is $99'6,-wind isk$96i8kand_hyro is $89:9. After establishing a mix-of sources & defining the portfolio of power to be;purchased; the rates established will likely reflect the "renewable content" decisions a buyer has made (assuming therewill be options-forhigher renewable content'available),and by type of user -- residential,or industrial.ranging from "small general useriwith different,rates for unlimited of limited time `period consumption" to "maximum demand users". In the complex process of rate setting, decisions will be made that either transfer costs to one rate class or another. 1 Allocating,costs Will be a technical process for which results will be apparent onlyafter'the;rate schedules are available for review. Since the County has already created a "critical mass" to:allow the utility to go through rate setting-- why not allow that process to unfold? I agree with the intent of CCA and I .wonder why the rush to enroll everyone before there is the ability to know the'impact on the vast majority of residential users. We already know that the decision makers have been told that residential userstmight:;be willing to pay 5% more for power while business users will not. I.personally thinkjthat the Cities who are being ask to enroll every resident in their jurisdiction owe it to those ratepayers to fully understand whatthat decision means. [know there is an "opt out period." I also know that most residential users`will,absorb a small rate increase but likely will:not request pricing for the PG&Eralternatives:available. I know.,that businesses will ask their PG&E rep to,review their bills and recommend ways to reduce costs before they make the opt-out decision. Based on those discussions with PG&E, somesmart business.owners may also ask to=negotiate a "special pricing contract." That option is not,available to residents. I don't think that puts residential rate payers inia good position. I am concerned that may be one of the unspoken reasons that the County wants Cities to make a procurement decision for their residents without knowing the impact on their city's-rate payers. I would hope that City Council memlers,will realize they are making'adeci'sion that will affect the rate paying public. When the decision is made, you won't have a large number of residents screaming at you about increased electric power rates. You wilhsee a well organized"love fest" that the Climate Protection Project and the Water:Agency and the Board of Supervisors will orchestrate. I wonder how City Council members will react to citizen outcry to rate increases,,five-years down the road, or perhaps two years from now, when the high"exist costs" for opting out then are realized. What is being created is NOT a competitive market. Competitive markets-- by definition -- have relatively low entry and exit costs. Wliat is being created is a Public Monopoly with two players. Both players will establish financial barriers to "switching." I'm"not convinced that.the"rush" "get this done" is needed and that makes me wonder why it is being demanded. I agree withChair Rabbitt, who was-the lone vote to/slow this:process. The questions I am raising are not related-to.a.disagreement about the concept of CCA's or about Sonoma Clean Power. In the final analysis -- I expect I will ultimately support it and likely will pay slightly higher rates for higher "clean power"?content than is available through PG&E. But this "timeline" seems,arbitrary_ It was established without input:from Cities about what information they need to make procurement decisions for their residents and what-time the Cities might need to do an evaluation -- given the City issues that are already on their plate. I am cautious by nature. I have developed a habit of asking who is likely to benefit from and who is likely to be harmed by actions taken by government. • Several Cities have already decidedto wait and see. Windsor, oh a split vote, is "all in." 2 Speaking only for myself, I think its prudent for Cities to say "not now" and also provide a list of additional information needed or questions to be answered in order to make.a fully informed decision before they make this procurement decision for theinratepayers, their citizens and the voters who elected them. There are unintended consequences ito.every action. And the devil is always in the details. Taking the time to do itright the first time seems appropriate to me., I am forwarding this e-mail to the Mayor and the City Clerk for distribution to City Council members prior to your meeting on Monday, May 20, 2013 and for inclusion in the public,record if deemed appropriate. All my best, Stephen Gale 9025 Oak Trail Circle Santa Rosa, CA 95409 3 P re e ikta t'u t, - Doc tAne vtt rece%vecL after affewicti ci,i4trartAtton 3 Mattioli, Allison. From Woody,Hastings <woody.@climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday;May 20, 2013 9:S1:AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd:.New petition signature from,Ernily Betts in Petaluma Begin;forwarded.message: Date: May 20, 2013 9:20:54 AM POT Subject: New petition signature from'Emily Betts in:Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do notadopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote ``yes" forSonoma Clean Power. Emily Betts • Address, ; .. 403 Broadway Street Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It Hive within the city limits Yes 1, t rebevtta t"to-tti - !7 recei vecL alter ct94e da cU' t u tov4 Mattioli, Allison From:From: Crump, Katie Sent: Monday,.May 20, 2013 8:12 AM To; - City.Clerk Subject: FW:Caution--Sonoma Clean Power Late document From: Dale;Axelrod [mailto:dalea@isonic.net] Sent: Saturday, May-18, 2013 9:22 AM Cc: Stephen Gale - Subject: Caution--Sonoma Clean Power Good Morning Councilmembers, I'ani pasting the following comments from,an'email I just received from Sonoma County Democratic Party Chair, Stephen Gail, that I think you-may find useful in deciding,how to proceed with the Sonoma Clean Power issue on Monday's council agenda. It's been my experience that-any,time,politicians (regardless of their party).who are rushing for a decision to be made when thereiis no obvious reason to rush -- it's a-.good idea to slow down the process. The Cities are NOT being asked to give their citizens a choice. They are being asked to make a procurement decision for their-citizens that obligates them to participate in Sonoma Clean Power. Be clear -- Cities WILL make.the-separate decision about which:specific-meters in the City will "opt out" based oh the final priding froth SCP,&„PG&E. But you,have-only one meter & there won't be any"special contract rates" offered by either SCP or PG&E to residential users. Everyone likes the concept ofclean power. But j u' st like he PACE Prograin thatthe County put in place and proudly announced as the first-intheState --:they were indignant when they were informed that they rushed to quickly and what they put in place violated federal regulations • the program could not qualify for the many benefits that were "sold” to County residents. When Rate Payer $$ are+at stake, the political prestige that comes with "creatingmy own utility" isn't worth;the fB space it's printed on. If you have,not seen therate structure that will apply to YOUR HOME or YOUR BUSINESS -- evenrif you like the concept of choice' would you be willing to hand a sales person a credit card to purchase at an unknci vn,pried? If you were asked to'!sign on the dotted line" when the contract was marked "draft" and was subject to change AFTER YOU SIGNED'IT and WITH NO INPUT FROM YOU Would hand the sales person aeredit card-an&sign that contract? In my opinion, the only member of the•Board of Supervisors who voted with an eye toward THE RATEPAYERS was David-Rabbit. He urged caution and wanted the,Countyto give more time. The most important answer of the day was when Supervisor Rabbitt reminded the 1 presentePthat`the proponents.have been saying for over a year that"there is no quantity discount" in the wholesale market. If that's true -- than°why must ANYONE,beyond the minimum needed to have "critical mass" be;arm twisted into signing ablank check? The County has already declared that their action createsa,"criticalimass" by requiring+all residents & businesses in the unincorporated country to participate in Sonoma Clean Power. S'o`what's the rush? Sorry to be such a progressive,=- but I remember 3 wars, a bank bail out and a wall street bail out that were rushed through in the sameimanner. And don't let anyone tell you-this`is'about choice: If your Opt Out after.a very short deadline -- the "entry & exit fees" on both sides --meaning from Sonoma Clean Power and also PG&E -- will be real barriers to choice. All my best,. Stephen Best regards, Dale Dale Axelrod Sonoma.County Democratic Party Chair—Outreach,Advocacy, & Legislation Committee (titles for identification purposes only) 522 East D St Petaluma CA 94952 Phones (California; USA): SF Voice Mail,(24 hrs) 4157824=1549 Petaluma studio(7am-11 pm): 767;76'2-4125 Mobile: 707-235=9089 Fax:.70T762-4041 Email dalea(o)sonic.net www.sonomademocrats:orq www:cadem:orq 2 , reevttatww - Doc aneint re;ce:Oveth after age,ncla,cli attrtb utw-w 5 Mattioli, Allison, From: trump, Katie Sent: Monday, May 20,20118:1S 8:1S AM To: - City Clerk Subject: FW: City of.'Petaluhia - Sonoma:Clean Power Attachments: CLEANPOWER,pdf Importance: High Late document From: Thom Shelton [mailto:thom @sohic:net] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:43'PM To:;citymgr, Cc:;'Dave Glass' Subject: FW: City of Petaluma -Sonoma Clean Power Importance: High Dear Mr. Brown Per Councilman Glass'suggestion, I'd like to have the attached documententered='into the record at Monday's meeting on the subject of Sonoma Clean Power. Thank you, Thom Thom Shelton Thom @sonic.net If there are:no dogs:in Heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they went. Will.Rogers From:Dave Glass.[mailto:daveglass @comcast:net] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 7:40.AM To: Thorn Shelton Subject:Re: City of Petaluma Sonoma Clean Power y p talumaon Monday. Due to the Thank you for the detail Asa am sure ou are aware there will be a resentation m Pe controversy of this:proposal I will,be taking public comment on this issue as'well even though it isnot actually required as . the council will not,be taking any official action on Monday Publicicomment will be limited to three minutes per person.. You have submitted this letter You may request of the city manager that your letter be entered into the record weather you are present(Mondaynightornot If you do that please copy me on that correspondence and I will make sure that is done. David Glass Mayor City of Petaluma Original Message From:'r'ihom:Sheltontcd`k F'.13;':', ' .,;_.,a 7„;$Pt A V 1>>~~ r!iti1/4 d .r.M:; To: daveolass(a�comcast net ;,councilrnan.albertson(a gmail com ;4eresa4petaluma(o)comcast.net ;'mike4petCaaol.com ; mthealy sbcolobal net?;+councilmemberkeamey(o?me:com ; kathleeriorriilleroffibe dmail:com citvmgr(cilci:petaluma:ca:us, Sent: Thursday, May 16,.20133:37 PM 1, Subject: City of Petaluma -Sonoma Clean Power Dear Council Member, I am submitting this article to provide you, and hopefully your constituent's, with information to help the public to better'understai d the Sonoma?Clean Power initiative and its:ramifications. I had hoped it would be amore concise document, but`felt'that all aspects should be included to see the whole picture. The Clean Powerproposal ismoving:ahead with little or no clear information on cost, commitment, or potential long term liability to the participants and, although it appears to'be well intentioned, there are-shortfalls in the argument which'should be discussed rationally and in-depth. Please review the attached and decide if it merits inclusion in your council meeting agenda and for distribution or publication to the public. Thank you for your consideration: Sincerely, Thom Shelton 2154 Hastings Ct Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707-292-6115 or 707-577-0100 Email: Thom @sonic.net If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they went. -- Will Rogers • 2 CLEAN`GREEN POWER? Will the Sonoma Clean Power(SCP) deliver more "green" power to its,users than the current provider? The answer is likely, "No!" You:may ask how this-could'be true`vvhen'SCP has promised'moregreen energy. The truth lies somewhere between physics, policy and reliability. SCP promises to deliver 33% mix of green power which is greater than the approximately 20%green power delivered by PG&E, if you don't include large hydro or other low greenhouse gas sources. Physics dictates that delivering,additional green energy.to'Sonoma County.is virtually impossible for many reasons, most of which can be researched and verified by independent sources such as California Energy Commission and other online informational sites. In truth,we may never be able to exceed--:more than 40%of green power under our current technology and regulatory limitations. The reality is that unless SCP disconnects from the grid,there remainsa necessity that the overall electrical grid system be "balanced"within each electrical control a ea,.a function which is overseen by one ofthe:control area's participating utilities or municipal districts. That is, all of.the green power sources,except for combustion processes using waste or biomassproducts, and geothermal mustbe balanced by another base.load.power source(24/7 operation)to produce power when the green energy resource is notavailable. This occurs:every night for solar based projects and in periods of calm or storm for wind based resources: Additionally; all power plants require that some percentage of their output is backed up by spinning reserves to guard against brown-outs or blackouts in of an unplanned outage. Solar projects can generally provide neat full output for8 to 12 hours per day,depending upon the season. A well designed and maintained solar PV project has an annual availability of about 33%of.its total potential capacity output due to availability of the sun and inherentsystem inefficiencies. Thatmeans.that;there must be another source of power availableanytimethat the sun is not shining to make up for the loss of the solar system's output. Similarly, but more unpredictably, wind generators operate only when the wind is blowing at sufficient velocities to 'rotate the immense turbine blades to power:these generators. When;the wind is below the turbines requirement for reliable output, or above the.maximum operating output, another source of energy must be available to match the. electrical.load. While modern meteorological predictions provide some indication.of wind potential, changes occur frequently and without notice. Another issue with wind generation is that it may be most availablewhen it's not wanted.' From early evening until early morning and on weekends,system demands'may not be able accommodate wind energy production,without,curtailing the balancing resources. This fact limits any green resource to the need for the power at any given time and the balancing authority's ability to provide,that power. Due to these limitations, most green energy sources cannot'provide'thelevel of.reliability required and the only savings that can be.obtained by these sources is fuel avoidance. • Both solar and,wind energy costs have come down in recent years, but those costs are still roughly equal to the most expensive solid fuel combustion plants or$3;000to'$4,000 per installed:kilowatt. The primary advantage of not having a high fuel cost is diluted by the fact,that these sources cannot produce 24/7,as woulda comparable sized combustion based power plant and the,costs incurred to maintain back-up or replacement power for.these part-time power sources. Although California has added-almost 5,000 MW of wind and solar projects since 2005, over11,000 MW, of new or retro-fitted natural gas;powered'projects, have been added to the California grid with an additional 4,000 MW of natural gas and solar/natural gas hybrid projectsthatare slatedto.come online'in the next two years. The reason? As utilities and municipal districts,add green-power,they must maintain or even add brown power to enable them to balance the loads within their control areas or purchase standby resources to accomplish this balancing act. SCP's,current plan into provide the additional green power by purchasing RECs (Renewable Energy.Certificates)which come primarilyfrompowergenerated out-of state, where the:greenattributes have less or no:value and can be transferred to California to satisfy the State's renewable energy:mandate. Will you receive additional green power? No but you'Il have the o'say that you're using more green energy, regardless of the facts.. Unless the SCP adds its own transmissionjlines, or isolates itself from the grid'and builds its own power plants, 100%of SCP power must come from the existing PG&E system, which means that you will usethe identical mix of power as do all other users in PG&E's territory. If more greertenergy could be built in Sonoma County, Marin or Mendocino for thatmatter,you'll still have the same mix as PG&E. Though you might feel as green as Kermit,your power useand mix will remain unchanged from any other user throughout PG&E'ssystem. The ability of SCP to bring about more green energy in Sonoma County should also beheld suspect as there is limited opportunity to add green power in the local area. Prime agricultural land is likely to be off the table for solar projects, as environmentalist and farmers agree that we must maintain this true green spacewithout commercial or industrial intrusion. Potentially available hillside land,and sub-prime or marginal pasture has been removed from use for solar energy projects by city and county/planning commissions,who have ruled that the negative visual impacts and loss of continuous green space are not worth the power received. As aside note, the investment in Sonoma County and the jobs that SCP talks about would be limited to the installation of solar panels, as'the solar PV panels and many of the components are principally manufactured,in China and otheriforeign locales, Wind turbines have been fought by virtually all quarters in Sonoma County and neighboring counties and the total number of large turbines installed can be counted on your fingers. I cannot imagine that the County, the Coastal Commission or any environmental,group would allow the installation of 300 foot wind turbines to harness the coastal winds either onshore or off shore along the Sonoma coast Other potential sites have been ruled out due to noise and visibilityissues, or by the potentially lethal'impactson migratbrybirds and bats. Bio-gas is a viable green option, but the County Water Agency has already captured its landfill and digester bio-gas for use in electrical generation. It is also doubtful that a commercial sized biomass plant could be permitted within the county, due to the opposition by the environmental community to'anycombustion based generation. These limits would suggest that the only developable green power would be solar PV primarily installed on rooftops and empty urban lots or parking structures. Oddly,if rooftop installations were to proliferate,theywould eventually drain away SCP customers. We might find ourselves in the same,boat as we are with the County's water agency, where cutting back on our water consumption caused the agency to raise rates to maintain its programs.and lifestyle. Last Question: Why is Sonoma County doing,this? I would suggest, as a cynic, that you follow the money. Sonoma County, alongmwith most of California's agencies and municipalities, is greatly overextended financially,with little or no new'income to fund:pension shortfalls,or expensive,continuing programs. The.County is ina constant pursuit to find new sources of income. IstbeSCP intended to be that source? When asked aboutthis,the.SCP,:.like virtually all other agencies,touts that it agency,and though it is notan answer,sounds positive. That is until you read their FAQs and consider'the implications. In SCP's FAQ#4,on their web site it states:"SCP`s goal is to keep rates comparable with PG&E's rates while providing a greenerproduct. Areaspnable;person would interpret this to mean that they will charge roughly the same, or probably a little more than PG&E.charges'to;deliver the identical service except for the imaginary green component increase. In FAQ/410, regarding P.G&E'siwholesale energy purchases,SCP states: "The market for electric energy is very competitive, and PG&Ers size does not,provide an advantage on wholesale prices." A reasonable person might conclude that the SCP mightnegotiate'lower.energy purchase-costs, enhancing purchase/sale margins Which would be greater than'.PG&E's current margins. Added to this, from the same FAQ#10: "PG&E also has costs that SCP will not have PG&Emust make dividend payments to its'stockholders andtmust pay various taxes. These costs impact PG&E's rates." One would have to conclude that the profit or"non-profit"margins:that the SCP would experience would be very high indeed. I have asked, but have not received an answer to the question: Where does the money go? Perhaps if enough people ask this question, the County or SCP might eventually providea reasonable answer and in-depth accounting. If SCP is not burdened by dividend payments and'.pays no taxes,why isn't their energy offering less expensive? When a tax paying entity is replaced by•a governmental "non-profit,"don'twe,all lose when PG&E no longer makes these payments? The SCPIhas not shared the response to their request for offers from energy-producers, which incidentally are not located in California and are some of the largest brown energy producers in the U.S. and yet are asking cities in the County to sign up for the program. Without thisiinformation,and the intended rate structure, how could anyone make thatdecision? As the California:Public Utility Commission(CPUC) does not have authority over the SCP,there is no one to provide regulatory oversight on the energy prograrns,and rates adopted by,SCP. If you don'toptout initially, can you return to PG&E without penalty? It is interesting to note that the all of the successful bidders to the SCP request for offers are not only primarily brown power companies, but they have less than 4%of their total,power emanating from renewable sources. Even the offer from the Geysers,which was considered a'green'resource, is from Calpine, a company with less than3%of their"generation coming from renewable energy sources. Obviously,the start of this paragraph:was not my Last Question, nor should it be yours. Take some time, do some research and then decide. I think I might just-opt out... Thom Shelton 2154 Hastings Court Santa Rosa,CA 95405 707-577-0100 My energy experience includes over 26 years working to develop, permit build and operate independent power projects and related transmission systems from 1:0 to 850 MW in California and throughout the U.S. These includes natural gas, tires, rice hulls,wood waste, municipal solid waste and bio-gas. • rebentatto-vv Doe nnent recthve,th after c gendcwdatrtlrutww6 MattibIi,aAllison To Crump, Katie Subject: RE: Sonoma Clean Power-'Vote''YES From: Kitty de-.Braiiwere [mailto:kitty @Flvingace.net] Sent: Friday, May.17, 2013 1:13 PM To: citymgr Subject: Sonoma'Clean Power - Vote YES Dear John, Would you kindly be sure Petaluma Council Members receive a copy of my attached,letter; urging them to vote YES on Sonoma Clean Power. Best regards, Jean F. Schulz Jean Jean F. Schulz 1 Jean Forsyth ocianz May 16,2013 City of Petaluma Council Members: Mayor David Glass Mike Healy Vice.Mayor Chris Albertson Teresa Barrett Mike Harris Kathy Miller Gabe Kearney Dear Council Members, I urge you to vote`yes"for Sonoma Clean Power. As a longtime resident, business owner,and investor in Sonoma County, it matters a great deal to me that local policies match the,can-do, innovative,and caring`spirit of this community. The need to take action to reduce`greenhouse gas'emissions is urgent. Last week the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reached 400 parts per million,when scientists say that the concentration needs to be no more than 350. Additionally,residents and bustnesses in Sonoma County deserve a choice— .PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power.,Unless'lyou vote"yes,"you deprive us of a choice. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ;Jean F.-Schulz -Santa Rosa;CA 4900 Upper Ridge Road • Santa Rosa, California 95404 f remvitatwvv - Document race/Ova 'a to r avjeguto.cUistranAttatv 7 Mattioli, Allison. From: Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8.40.AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Barbara Morrison in Petaluma Begin forwarded_message: Date: May 20, 2013 8:38:34 AM PDT Subject; New petition signature from Barbara Morrison in Petaluma Dear City'Council Members:"Thank.you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give,residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Barbara Morrison Address 1672 Kearny ct. Petalura, California 94954 , United States Map It I • I live within the city limits a ; ` ' •i5 . . Yes tta Email_ :' _ a; ' u ,�, Barb @seankane.net 1 }rebentatto-w - V oruate.nt receWed.after c -en:dw d iztribu boty 8 Mattioli, Allison. From: Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection:org> Sept: Monday„May 20,:2013 8:37 AM To:. Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from;Marjorie Helm in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May 20, 2013 8:06:17 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Marjorie Helm in. Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This,program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not,adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote"yes"for Sonoma.Clean Power. • Naive Marjorie Helm Address . ` - - •, .. 901 West Street. Peyaluma, California 94952 United)States Map It I''live within.the city;limits Yes fz, £mail '. ■. ar, °_ - � Helmatkin(Wearthlink.net Phone - - ' ' '(707)7:78-0674 It Pre5entat n/ - V receWediaftev agenda,cUstranAtCcrvv 9 Mattioli, Allison; Frdm: Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May`2Q'2013 8'35`AM. To: Mattioli,,Allison Subject: ' Fwd: New petition signature from John Shribbs in Petaluma • Begin forwarded message: Date: May 19, 2013 6:39:06 PM PDT Subject;: New petition signature from John!Shribbs in Petaluma Dear City!Council Members`. Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or=Sonoma Clean Power.If you do not!adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote"yes forSonoma Clean Power. Name ' John Shribbs Address 108 Wyndham Way Petaluma, California 94954 United States Map It I live within the'city limits , Yes Email' v., ., Lh ri b b s@ co m ca s t net sone _ - Ph - � - (707)769-8961 1 fPresent&ttwnw - DocwmemtreceGvedi after agenda/cUtrthutton,10 Mattioli, Allison From: Woody'Hastings;<woody @tlimateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:34 AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Lisa Murgatroyd in Petalima Begin forwarded.message: Date: May 19, 201.34:28:19 PM PDT Subject: New petition signature.from Lisa Murgatroyd in Petalima Dear City;Council Members: Thank you-for:considering Sonoma',Clean:Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you,db not`adopt;a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Name _ 'I f Arai_ = ri 'I ' Lisa Murgatroyd Address, • 24 Laurel Ave. Unit A Petalima, California 94952 UnitediStates Map It I live within the city limits , Yes t . v? ' Email' - - u�l _ M urgatrovd corn Phone: • (707)637:62691 1., Prebevrtattaw Doc umw: t:received/after agenda/d i btrcbu-t t:w 11 Mattioli, Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody@cllmateprotectlon.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:33 AM To: Mattioli,.Allison 'Subject: Fwd:New petition signature from Jan Elfman`in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: M'ay 18, 2013 9:46:44 AM PDT Subject: New petition signaturefrom Jan Elfman in .Petaluma Dear CitylCouncil Members: Thank'you for considering,Sonoma Clean.Power, This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. , Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes” for•Sonoma:Clean Power. dName i1 d�' , }I`.:j tY. n, iF y.n i.0 9'Y'_ Jan Elfman Address , 3913 Middle Two Rock Road Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It Yes 6 i h F =,r .. - x y v 1e. t' avEmall 4 I . _ ,wtx n r �titi q , II jan.elfman( pmail.com Phane (310)968-7175 1 Pre e/nta Vin&, - DO-Game/Kt received,after tx ei id a dd%trarat on'12 Mattioli, Allison. From: Woody Hastings <woody @cliinateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May20,2013 8:32 AM To:, Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature'frorn EricElfman'in.Petalwna Begin forwarded message: Date: May 18, 2013 9:38:31 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Eric Elfnman in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If.you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote"yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. , f FI §y.;,- Name Eric Elfman Address, 3913 Middle Two Rock Road Petalurna, California 94952 United States Map It ! 1-live within the cityllimits Yes EricE100@aol.com • -�. , . ; Phone; I _ (310)963-7175 11 Pre4n nta-tow - Document received after a. endarcd trelru tton 13 Mattioli„Allison From: Woody.Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent Monday, May'20,.2013 8:31AM To Mattioli; Allison Subject: .Ewd`New petition signature from.Ferne Campbell in Petaluma Begin forwarded,message: Date: May 17, 2013 3:48:58 PM PDT SUbject New petition signature from Ferne Campbell in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you'for-considering Sonoma Clean Power: This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or'Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt aresolution, we will not have a 'choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes” for Sonoma Clean Power. Name- a ' Ferne Campbell Address -` 724 1/2 F Street Petaluma, California 94952 United!States Map It � ,. • I live within the ctty'lirriits , i "'x p a Yes yr ._a.,� , x� � l _ fernecampbel113(a)gmail:com I _ (707)778-2137 1 ri • Prebevtta tioni - V oci ctn nt recei>veob after aee vt ia,d&strt u tiow 14 Mattioli, Allison 'From: Woody'Hastings <woody @clirrmateprotection.org> Sent: Friday; May 17, 2013 1:03 PM To: - City Clerk Cc:, Mike Healy; Mike Harris; Dave.Glass; Teresa Barrett; Gabe Kearney; Kathleen Miller; Chris Albertson SUbject: Fwd: Newpetitidn signature from.Erin Axelrod'in.Petaluma Hi Again, Please let me know who needs to'receive'these emails so that they are'entered into the record. I will be happy to send them to only the person's that need.to°receive them. Thank you, -Woody • Begin forwarded message: Date: May 17, 2013 11 :21:56 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Erin Axelrod in Petaluma Dear City'Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power: This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. I Please give us the choice! Please vote;"yes" for Sonoma;Clean Power: Name Erin Axelrod • Address . : ,.+ ., �` .. 522.East.D.St Petaluma, California.94952 United States ' Map It - I�Irve within the cdy limit's .' � '- a° .11 � � Yes erin andailyacts'orq � .. Phone. '..... ... .. � - .. ,: (707)332-1967 11 Preisevtta fow - Docu:wie vctreceived/after c+.cO.e vtdaw cl i..trtUutw-w 15 Mattioli, Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013'7.11 AM To: Dave Glass;:Mike Healy; Chris Albertson;Teresa Barrett; Mike Harris; Kathleen Miller; Gabe Kearney Cc: - City'Clerk Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Michael Keehan in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May 1.7, 2013 6:54:15,AM •PDT Subject; New petition signature from Michael Keehan in Petaluma • Dear:CityiCouncil Members:Thank you for,considering Sonoma Clean'Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not;adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote"yes"for Sonoina Clean Power. Name • Michael Keehan Address • 305 Bishop Circle Petaluma, California94954 United States Map It' I live within the crty.limits� .. ; 4,• • '�. - - i Yes • Email I mtkeehanCa�mac.com ry i P.hone 1 iF•. w. - _. .I "„ ti (415)264-5415 1 Prebentc ttaty - Docu te.evitileceOved after agenda,cU4trayatww16 Mattioli; Allison' From: Woody Hastings <woody@climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 9:01 AM To:' Mattioli,Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Jeff'Muchow in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May 20, 2013 8:58:58 AM PDT Subject New petition signature from Jeff Muchow in'Petaluma Dear City'Council Members: Thank yoth,for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents ' and businesses the choice—PG&E or,Sonoma,Clean Power.If you do not adopt a.resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma'Clean Power. Name Jeff Muchow Address ' 306 Olympic Ct Petaluma, California 94954 United'States Map It I'live within'the city4imits Yes 1. Pre,se vttattevv - Docwme vtt recei vedi agte r'a.c ntiicw& trC&u ttovv 17 Mattioli„Allison From Woody,Hastings <woody @climateprotectioh.org> Sent: Monday, May 20;2013 4:02 AM To: Mattioli;Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Grayson James in Petaluma Begin forwarded:message: Date: M'ay 15, 2013 7:37:31 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Grayson.:James in Petaluma Dear City'Council Members: Thank you for considering_Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please givieus the choice! Please vote "yes” for Sonoma„Clean Power. Grayson James Address - I:. 840 Western Ave. Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It Hive within the citylimite Yes Email ti .. : „g., I,, I a rayson(o)q is m esconsu lta nts.co m Phone . r - •,. ..�:. • (707)696-8167 I 1! • • Prat-at-Con - Docu tnl received'after agenda/cUatrL utwvv 18 Mattiol , Allison From: Woody'Hastings'<woody @clirnateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20;2013 9:02 AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd:-.Newpetition signature from Eric Storm in Petaluma Begin forwarded.message: Date: May 15, 2013 7:44:33 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Eric Storm,in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thahk;you for considering„Sonoma Clean'Power: This program will give residents and businesses the choice PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote for.Sonoma,Clean Power. • EriciStorm Address • 405"H Street-cottage Petaluma, California94952 United States Mao It I-live within.the city limits Yes. 'Please let!me know how l'can help in other ways ` • No thanks 1 f resevttat'w-vv - l»Ir.e e-vveciafter a.;ev ciet/cWheraYiktiew 19 Mattioli, Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody @dimateprotection.ofg> Sent Monday,-May 20,32013 9T04 AM. To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature:from Beverly Alexander in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May 16, 2013 10:02:44 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from,Beverly Alexander in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses:the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not , adopt a resolution, we will nothave a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Name Beverly Alexander Address 341 Liberty St. Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It I live:within'the"city limits Yes ' 'Email I smileybevAgmai I.com Phone - L . k.1-`1 "'at.. '(707)217-6884 1, P reaevitcLt'wni - Docu n>ient received.after ow e v aw cli4telbu twnw 20 Mattioli,.Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody @clirnateprotettion.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 .9:04 AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from,Angelo Silva in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: Mlay 16, 2013 11 :03:05 PM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Angelo Silva in Petaluma Dear City Council Members:Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice: Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. - Name Angelo Silva Address , 841 Western Ave • Petaluma, California 94952 United lStates Map It IiVe within the'city limits i Yes , Email_ h a avlisai@4mail.com • Pl one (619)534-5974. i 1 tPre/entatum - 17ocumeint'received/after agenda/l tr butt n 21 Mattioli ,Allison From Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent Monday,,May 20,-2013.9b6 AM_ To: Mattioli„Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition-signature from Richard.5achen in Petaluma Pretty sure you got this one but here it is;just in case.:. • Begin forwarded,message: Date: May 17, 2013 10:52:44 AM PDT Subject: New petition signaturesfrom Richard Sachen in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank,.you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you de not ado' pt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote"yes" for'Sonoma,,Clean Rower. Name • Richard Sachen , Atld'ress 1617 Madeira Circle Petaluma, California:94954 U nitedi States j Map It I live within.the city'lim is Yes • Email gov(o7rsachentnet Phone` (707)327-8298 1 t rw vtta.ttavv - Document rece%ved,after a.g e vt dw clO ranAt'lan.22 Mattioli,;Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May/20, 2013 10:00 AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from-Linda.Carpenter in Petaluma Begin forwarded.message: Date: May 20, 2013 9:36:39 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature'from Linda Carpenter in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for,considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma'Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" forSonoma Clean Power. • Name ' Linda Carpenter "Address I' ,:11%. 724 H-Street ' Petaluma, California United States Map It I'live within the city limits Yes 1 Pre4enta tton' - V acust rece ovecl after a c evt,d aw ci&strthuruon 2 3 Mattioli, Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody @dimatepirotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 2b, 2013 9:51 AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New 'Petition signature'from Emily Betts in Petaluma Begin forwarded.message: Date: May 20, 201;3 9:20:54 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Emily Betts in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote"yes"''for Sonoma Clean Power. Name Emily Betts Address 403 Broadway Street Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It I'live within the city limits ' ' Yes 1 • Prase vttta tto-vv - Document received agtev aueem.clai d i trLbu.twty 24 Mattioli, Allison. From: Woody Hastings<woody @dimateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:14 AM To:: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Bobbi Seibert in Petaluma, Begin forwarded message: Date: May 20, 2013 10:06:34 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from Bobbi Seibert in Petals Dear City Council Members: Thank:you for.considering Sonoma.Clean.Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or,Sono ma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Nance 1 i Bobbi Seibert Address 570 Eastman Ln I Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It I iwe witF in,the city limits` ° No g Email _ �� I t M�-,f,� �a ' r• ..: � r Y ,a.; _. L _ bse l be rt(a)comcast.n et 1' MA.Y-17-2013 10 : 12 AM DAVIS. 707 658 2599 P. 01 ' Presa uani Docw spent rece cued'after a f n sldci ckstrthuttcovv 25 TO: Petaluma City Mayor and Councilmembers FAX: 707-778-4554 FROM: Dana Davis DATE: May 17, 2013 RE: Community Choice Aggregation/Sonoma Clean Power Deer Mayor Glass and Councilmembers: I am not able to attend the City Council meetingon Monday. May 20, so I wanted to write to express my strong support for allowing Community Choice Aggregation and Sonoma Clean Power: As a resident of Petaluma and a business owner In Petaluma (owner of Sonoma Body Balance posture and yoga studio). I care very much'about.sustainability for our city and county,and beyond. I have heard great things about Marin Clean Energy and other local Utility that have taken back control from PG&E. I want our community to have,a voice in choosing renewable energy rather than polluting fossil fuel sourced energy. I care about my health and the health of my family, neighbors, friends and our community as a whole. ';;know that carbon emissions leading to climate change could be disastrous for.future.generations. Let's lead the way by choosing renewable energy, and also putting control back In local hands. I.believe that locally generated power will also create jobs in our economy— healthy Jobs. I don't want to support PG&rs use of polluting energy sources or extremely dangerous energy sources, such as nuclear energy. I don't'want to pay for that either, Please support Sonoma Clean Power! Thank you, Dana Davis Pre eAetta-oVv - Docwvnent received'a fte acjeA .clw c&4traiu tf ovv 26 Mattioli, Allison From Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection'.org> Sent: Monday,tMay, 20,;2013 10:53 AM. To: Mattioli, Allison Subject:. Fwd New petition signature from Patsy Griffin-Young;in Petaluma Begin'forwarded message: • Date: May 20, 2013 10:38:55 AM, PDT Subject: New petition signature from Patsy Griffin-Young in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean;Power. This•program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma,Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes' for.Sonoma,;Clean Power. Name :4 Patsy Griffin-Young . .Address, • 23 Webster Street Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map'It I live wrttiin--the city limits' . Yes 1 • • f re*en taztt ant% - Doc&Gt evtt received'after a.Oe lwdi.4trcbuttio-w27 Mattioli, Allison From: Woody Hastings<woody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013:11:17 AM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Matt Maguire,in'Petaluma. Begin forwarded message: Date: May 20; 2013 10`49:53 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature:from Matt Maguire in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you:forconsidering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice— PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If do not-adopt a.resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Name I 1 Matt Maguire - k Address . 626 East St. Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It I live within the citylimits Yes Email . �� fi :. r I! lis.g r �° mmaquire oncrcnetworks.com (707)769-1556 1 Pre' evttatCo-w - Docu.va7e treceived/after agen.dawd;.atributtc w28 Mattiol , Allison From: Woody Hastings <woody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20,:2013 11:17 AM To: Mattioli; Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from susan'h'ermah ih petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May 20, 2013 11 :01 :40 AM PDT Subject: New petition signature from susan herman in petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for"considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma.Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes"TorSonoma Clean Power: Name susan herman • Address • 127 sunny hill drive petaluma; California:94952 United States Map It I live within the city limits , • �( _ i • , I Yes • Email ;' 9, jude1248Wcomcast:net 1 Pre,e4ltatto-iv - Dorku e ltrece%ved&after age111dwcU traiAtw'w29 Mattioli, Allison W. T. Knudson <wtknudson @BNKLaw.net> Monday, May 20, 2013 12:14 PM To: - City Clerk Subject: Council Comment - Community Choice Aggregation District Petaluma City Council Members, I am concerned that the county is rushing in too fast to develop the Community(Choice Aggregation District. I understand and agree with a goal of developing more clean energy. ,However,the current proposal gives no assurance that clean or renewable energy will be developed. I have read the RFP and note that there is no requirement for a future clean energy component. The only mention is that such a_component would,be:"preferred". Instead, the proposal allows a bidder to use "credits" for clean:or renewable energy already being generated for other purchasers. Like other CCA's,'not one kilowatt of additional renewable or clean energy is to be produced under this plan. I strongly recommend that the county provide anecdnomic analysis of this plan,so communities have a better idea of whatto"expect. Also, It would seem premature to sign;on to:a longterm contract when we have not even decided on the types of renewable or clean energy that would,be preferred. For example, not,all renewable energy is clean, and we have no priorities for evaluating competing proposals, nor have we determined whatwe want to see produced locally. Se the Council to take a cautious approachiand demand that the County slow down and "do it right." Warren Thom Knudson Behrens, Nelson & Knudson 36 Fifth Street Petaluma,CA 94952 (707)763-1911 THE INFORMATION CON AiNGD IN THIS E-MAIL IS PRIV(EGGED AND CONFIDENTIAL AND IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR‘THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED ABOVE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE IT:IF YOU ARE NOT INTENDED RECIPIENT,ANY DISSEMINATION, D .-_ . ._ r DISTRIBUTION,USE OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICA"rION IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY S li Preaevttatw=w - 'Voce t received/after,c ffenvia,ckstr ibuttww30 M Ittioli, Allison From Woody Hastings <woody@clirnateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20„2013 2:32 PM To:'' Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petitionsignatu`re from Oz,G?imesin.Petaluma Begin forwardedlniessage: Date: May 20, 2013 12:1.8:44 PM' PDT Subject: New petition signature/from Oz Grimes in Petaluma Dear=City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power; This program will give residents and businesses the choice PG&E or'Sonorna Clean Power. If you do not.adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes"-for Sonoma,Clean Power. - Name Oz Grimes Address . 1629 St. Anne Way `I Petaluma, California 94954 United States Map It • I live wrthin`.the city limits . f_ Yes ■ Email obbieone(Wsonic.net ( . (707)762-2512 1 Pre4entati vv' - Doci etMnt Vecthved/aft-en, a.cievtdc cli traytAtwvv 31 Mattioli, Allison. From: Woody Hastings•<woody @climatep'rotection:org> Sent: Monday, May'20, 2013 2:33 PM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition sighature`from Jude Mion in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May 20, 201.3 12:24:02,PM PDT Subject: New petition signature-from Jude Mion in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you:for considering Sonoma Clean.Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. if you do not,adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma,Clean Power. ?( +rr i tt Name I l 7 - ' • Jude Mion • • Address ' , 2210 Aaron•Ct Petaluma, California 949.54 United States ' Mao It Clive within';tle city limits - .,, Yes • 11 Pre se v/ta tton - Docu the n t received/afte,r ct ,e tciw ct i4tvth tto-ry 32 Mattioli, Allison. • From: Woody Hastings <wdody @climateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:34 PM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petition signature from Bonnie,Allen in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: . 'Date: May 20, 2013 12:54:40 PM PDT Subject New petition signaturefrom Bonnie Allen in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for,,considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do notadopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote ``yes"-for:Sonoma,Clean Power.. Name t Bonnie Allen '" . 'I - - 1 Address i I- 31 Kelly Lane ' Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It I live'within,the city limits" ., ° ' `s 1 r ;a! Yes wordburnereomail.com (707)763-2544 • 1, Prese ntatwvv - V o kutne t receuveth after a.4evtdw cUstrC&uttoni 3 3 Mattioli, Allison. From Woody Hastings.<woody @climateprotection.or_g> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:35.PM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd:'New petition signature from Andrew Ferguson in Petaluma Begin forwarded message:. bate: May 20, 20131 :57:30 PM PDT Subject: New petition signature-from Andrew Ferguson in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank,you:for.considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power, If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote:"yes"`for+Sonoma Clean Power. t. is -�'�� ,� Name ` Andrew Ferguson Address » rd 415•Chaco Canyon dt Petaluma, California 94954 United'States I Map It I li live witfiinthe city limits • Yes ,t Email' • andyf @sonic.net (707)338-2100 1; Prestct Lovv Docu:tne nt received after agenda/vtc/d,%atrQrtAtwvv 34 Mattioli, Allison. From: Woody..Hastings <woody @,climmateprotection.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:37'.PM To: Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd';New petition signature from Gregory Reisinger'in Petaluma Begin forwarded message: Date: May,20, 2013. 2:32:04 PM PDT Subject: New petition signature°from 'Gregory Reisinger in Petaluma Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice—PG&E;or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote-"yes for.'Sonoma,Clean Power. �s 3 .x Gregory Reisinger Address •521 Howard Street • Petaluma, California 94952 United States Map It Hive within the city limits: - i.• _ Yes I •�e, Email : .I y . • oreq.reisinger(Wsbcolobal.net • 1' f re4enta twvw -'Docwrn?nt'recet ved'after a.Oevtdw d:strth u t one 35 Crump; Katie From: Dana G <dana_roland @botmail:eom> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013.3;36 PM To Mike.Healy city council;Teresa,Barrett; citycouncil Harris;,citymgr; councilmemberkearney @me.com; kathleencmilleroffice @gmail.com; councilman,albertson @gmail.com; daveglass@comcast.net Subject: Public Power Co. May 20,2013.council Meeting Hello all, I.have written in the past to voice my strong opposition to the Public Power Co. which is being proposed at this time by the County Supervisors:, • Although my'husband and I are unable to attend tonight's meeting, I want you to consider our opposition to this plan. It seems ill advised Ito sign on to,something Which makes citizens opt out of a plan which isn't even specific as to cost ( savings or added costs), or even to.the *green savings* is supposedly offers. It also seems ill advised for the county'totake on more debt at a time when we can't even keep up with our current responsibilities such as roads and pension funding. The idea that the county can either passion savings to customers who choose this option, or simply use the money for *projects*, seems terribly close?to.allowing the county to inflict a type of taxation on citizens without any need to vote-on the measures it may choose to fund. • Why not work with PG&E to offer more'green power if,it is'available, or as an option for those,who don't mind an added expense? The county is asking the cities to'join in a venture without the facts needed to make a reasonable decision., While I understand that Windsor voted for this plan,,the°vote was close at 3-2, and I would hate to see this happen in.Petaluma. Please vote against'this ill advised:plan. Thank you for representing us even ifwecannotbe thereto do,it ourselves. Dana.-.1 Garcia Roland J. Garcia 347 Walnut St. Petaluma, Ca 94952 763-5832 i Pre'e rLta ttoyy - Dact upn.t received/after acj a'd i4trthuttlo-vv 3 6 Mattioli, Allison From: Annette DeBacker <snowlily @sonic.net> Sent: Monday, May 20,,2013 4:34.PM To: daveglass @corncast.net Cc: —city Clerk, Subject: Sonoma Clean-Energy. Attachments: EnergyJustice Power rPlant Map (2).pdf Importance: High Dear Mayor Glass, Unfortunately I am unable to attend the Petaluma City Council meeting this evening. I would like to share my concerns about the energy programwith you. Prior to taking!anyactioh on this agenda'iteml:hope that you will share the attached map and my of concerns with'the rest ofthe Council. Sonoma Clean Power is a well-intended, but misguided program. Its primary assertion is that we'can do;better'at delivering CO2-free electrical energy on the PG&E grid than what we are already receiving. It cannot. Let us assume weshut down all the coal-fired power plants in the county. There are none. OK, how about all the oil, natural gas and all`other fossil-fueled,plants? .Nope,none of these either. OK, how about shutting down all of the.fossil fueled plants;in Mendocino, Lake, Malin and Napa counties and throw in,biomass as well. Sorry, ALL of our North Bay power is alreadyproducedlocallyand it is already free of fossil-fuel CO2 load. A few years ago, our county (and Lake County);did something,brilliant. Sonoma county spent$225 million to send our wastewater up to the Geysers geotl ermallfield to recharge that flagging installation and turned it into the world's largest geothermal electrical generation facility. It provides 39%of US`geothermalgeneration and 18%of California's renewable power. Last year the Geysers field produced.enough';'zero-carbon electricity for,50,000 more households than the North Bay contains. ;Assuming expansions^already planned, factoring in annual production losses and demand growth that exceeds recenttrends„our'home-grown:green power will continue to meet our needs for about fifty years. It creates300 local, well-paying jobs with more'to come. Unlike'solar or wind generation, geothermal produces power day and night, independent of weather. Each generator was.ayailable 97%of the time last year. Sonoma Clean Power plans to send some+ofour-.rnoney out<of state, creating and building infrastructure of no benefit to our residents:via the purchase of clean energy credits. There would be,incentives to waste valuable agricultural land under vast solar.arrays. We have already spent $225 million to give:.us a world-class'geothermal facility, why=shouldwe spend more now, when,our infrastructure is insuch a great need? ,Let's,wait,35 years for the renewables industry to rshake out the losers :improve efficiencies,,lower costs, evolve.new technologies not yet'imagined and, commit to the bestUelectrical;generation technology of 2048. The State forces PG&Eito only give us credit for its service-wide share renewable:energy. Think how it would attract green business to this,,naturally beautiful area if we could get our local,representativesto"amend this policy and allow us to market,the full share of our locally-produced clean,power'that is contributed to°the state grid. PG&E would still count it toward their state quota. Say no to Sonoma Clean Power and take credit for our huge current investment in`clean,geothermal power. Thank you for your consideration:ofthis important issue. Annette.Milliron DeBacker 1! 5/20/13 EnergyJustice Map _ ., ' 'tt 'St 4""4 Map Satellite PI . �+ - - - Cloverdale '6+rg ountarn'w _ S �`'°i �a ..; .. 'N''' State Forest is: i •r a„ ,_„ ire i Rot:•eri Louis. pt� gic- tt 3 H'` a +j 'Stevenson - - GapaY 1 ” .. #' 4., 1 State Park ' •VSruse tut "fii+°�,% '`t Rhooccene€ron `k *t ht �„ ' . is ' .ete�,Rc�serve " Heal isb1. X31' `� rey san 1 P s_, . .. Gaistogl . ewee x . tl '- Wlndsor > ,._>�'' '. ti f ar -"' r - :winters a, a 4''. a 3-r � 4" t.arRficia s{55- ,P- SY Neiena',s ., . 'tie. a -•4 a „-y -ter'. 'v, , z�• Rd°.s. Put li P 4': Ct 2 w i ,. C_=-.)• a ale"�sai �GfaaP Siafe ��fi ..�.„�� t � t2 1, 1; .� _ Wi4dlrfe Ared 4 rititinoto '0 Sebastopol "� - Sonoma Goast� M`"" ? u . R r - ' 'State Beach , t7tlePi rya tT4# t # v Mlle 1 j^Li § Sonoma h€aa irk y Petalu }Y �#^',�E ,�r �- zo- ,1 ei e°••a 6 bi �t I x.$`, s 0P{ a 2;,.... .,,.:::::"=17 '}a i 1\t" ( i ..t; a �• ' { , ffi'�- n ,t n ue hapitt']t4 "'g r ,w,G, UB�teJtt i ii tC t � f z a:'%�' `n a4, +: ,,« . �, 1 a 0 rip #t �� ,ti Map data©2013 Gobgle-Terms of Usel Report a map error 1 Gt= geothermal H= small hydroelectric (dams) L= small landfill gas plants (methane, non-foss_il fuel) w1/1 m.energyjustice.net/map/community Preie ntatti o-n/ - V ocu the nt received'after agenda/cU4trt u tLrnv 37 Mattioli, Allison �� Woody Hastings <woody @climatepfotection.org> Or: Monday, May 20,2013.4:57 PM To:. Mattioli, Allison Subject: Fwd: New petitionsignature from BernieAlbum in Petaluma Begin forwarded.message: Date: May 20, 2013 4:51 :37 PM PDT Subject: New petition signature from. Bernie Albumin Petaluma Dear City Council.Members:`Thank you;for•'considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice PG&E or'Sonoma Clean Power. If you do;not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes'for Sonoma Clean Power: :Name y- ., q „ U •h, P ;..• Bernie Album Addre ss - • •;.1666 Creekviw Cir. Petaluma, California 94954 United States Map It I live,within the city limits _ , • Yes • ,Email ' 1 � cadexbike@yahoo:corn 1 Phone_ a I i• F • :i (707)766-7056 •` 11 u ax< ;, Proe.YtL�Q,:�a1.o'W ; oriartti ; /n e wj 80J y - , - — —--ate MAY 14 2013 1 4 q CHAMlirI< OF CO['I ll,ICt.i., MAYOR May 14,2013 City of Petaluma Mayor and City Council Members 11 English Street i 044 Mg t`: t 1, Petaluma, Ca. 949.52 ,a re. y • �san4.44„, I ' a. Dear Mayor Glass: . h'uslness �na d'viz, • wro 510 bironutiin `4 X Petaluma g �og )er rri,a� The l etaluma Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors asks that the City corn'm � of Petaluma withhold support of the County of Sonoma's proposed Clean Power u o 9Iris rre ' ' program until which time that further information can be made available. 481 ineas ;a �'o�enlaarkl�e�eihe � � Our membership, through the Chamber's Government.Affairs committee, has "au�iy t llfeunt: ,e studied this proposal in the limited amount of time made available. There is ate�r Pe��durrta _ serious concern with the haste to push this proposal forward in the absence of adequate answers to a large number of fundamental questions. ,, ^'4 : t` First, where is the economic analysis, giving us a reasonably clear expectation of k ': ,r, the risks and rewards inherent in this undertaking? It is concerning that a comparable proposal in San Francisco has stalled after an economic analysis 'exposed a number of flaws in the original proposal. r , ' . g I Second, there is no clear answer to how greenhouse gas emissions reduction can * be realized locally, or achieved as a result of shuffling credits for projects in other ° "' A parts of the country. tii g •',� ., ' The factual basis for arriving at a projected rate structure is hazy at best, based on 1. suppositions, each of which could be subject to challenge. U WSO u ) D I-las any effort been made, whatsoever, to determine if the same environmental i � , 1 . gains could be made working in concert with PG&E? LCAtlja`l 'I^ 171 There.area great many other questions that need definitive answers, and these gt,g " 4 answers have hot been forthcoming. G ; 4 It seems only prudent that the County should slow this rush to implementation at least long enough to engage representatives of the affected sectors of our County and consider what unintended consequences may be threatening to destroy even 1 the best of environmental intentions. 9 Y i �, �� , >, Sincerely, l" '.. 1 i r V- Onita )ell � lim, CEO CU C` o1y-ii , , Y, P4;?-1, , "a3,u -1 ' ;t' Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce Prese_vitattLo-vv - 7oca+ns tt rec,el'keth a fter agenda/a cd& trcbv t o-vv 3.9 Text of proposed resolution./ letter-to Members of Congress Congress: :Put.a tax on carbon to curb climate change Nearly all the:scientific,experts agree.on the basics of climate change. The.Earth is warming. Humans are doing;it.:It's already harming us and other species. If we continue burning fossil fuels at recent rates,it poses far more dangerous and significant risks for our children and grandchildren: We are approaching a dangerous threshold whereby, if it is crossed, the earth will simply take the controls out of our hands,,and tropicalforests, peat bogs, permafrost and the oceans will switch from absorbingocarbon+to releasingit We still.have time to act—if we start now We know what to do. We have affordable, practical solutions that don't require great sacrifice We can adopt a balanced approach. We can cut energy demand:with,efficiencyinnovations and some additional conservation, and we can scale up energy supplies with`existing alternative technologies-that don't burn carbon. Our first step has to be a big one. We[can avoid,('the worstimpacts of global warming if we put a federal,'revenue neutral:carbon tax on fossil fuels thatreflects their'trite costs to society. There is an emerging,consensus among economists that the smartest approach is to enact a consumer-friendly carbon.taxin the following way: • Goat Reduce emissions to,80 % below 2005 levels by 2050. • Start small, Increase predictably. Increaseathe tax slowly but steadily until we hit our emissions goal. Businesses need predictable energy prices. The economy needs a smooth transition. • Easy to administer at home and toemulate abroad. The tax is collected only once— at the first point of sale—the mine, wellhead or border crossing. • Revenue neutral. All the revenue is returned to citizens to mitigate the economic impact. Government keeps none of the funds. • Protects thevulnerable. For lower-income,Americans, the refunds match or exceed increased energy costs. • Protects,business from unfair domestic and international competition using border taxes and credits. • Doesn't play favorites: Lets-markets and,localities pick the winning technologies. For the;good of ournation„and to preserve a livable world for future generations, we urge you to enact this revenue-neutral tax on carbon. For more information,contact: Bruce Hagen Citizens Climate Lobby Brucehagen.pm(a)gmail.com www.citizensclimatelobby:org 707-338-7363 Prebeettat'i 0;w - Duca me/It rec& wdz after ale n.d ci clvbtri;Uvttto-w 40 Business for Sonoma Clean Power As Sonoma County businesses, we call on our elected representatives to implement Sonoma Clean Power with an emphasis on development of Sonoma County renewable energy resources. Financial benefits from developing energy resources in.Sonoma County include: 1. Competitive, stable,energy costs—By incentivizing customers with a customized, integrated suite of services including financing)energy efficiency, renewable energy generation, automated demand response, and-smart grid technology, Sonoma County will cut its energy use and costs. � 2. Business Opportunities far growth—Rooftops, parking lots, and other under-utilized spaces will be assets that generate energy and revenue as surplus power is sold into the grid, enabled by Sonoma Clean Power. • 3. Overall community economic gain including job creation—Keeping the millions of dollars of electricity payments now leaving Sonoma County will stimulate the local economy and create much needed jobs,iespecial ly for building trades. To achieve the above financial benefits from development of widespread local energy resources, we urge the Board of Sonoma Clean Power to 'set ambitious goals. to develop a strong business plan, and to pursue focused implementation of the plan. Sonoma County has the natural and professional resources to realize the Sonoma Clean Power vision—.one that offers competition and choice, stimulates the local economy, builds local resilience, and maximizes environmental benefits. We'would be proud to participate in such an endeavor. Thank you for your consideration. Business people and businesses that have signed on to the above letter as of May 15, 2013: Adam Capital Schurter Inc. Amy's Kitchen Simi Winery Anytime Fitness Solar Universe BODean Company Solar Works Codding:Enterprises Sonoma Mountain Village Dry Creek Winery Sonoma Wine Club Francis Ford Coppola Winery Sonoma Wine Company Hafner'Vineyard So_noma Compost Labcon Synectic Technologies Merry Edwards Winery Straus Family Creamery Paradise;Ridge Winery The Ratto Group Pat.Kilkenny Windsor Oaks Winery Paul Hobbes Wines Wright'Contracting Puma Springs Vineyard Xandex Ralf Konietzko Ygrene Energy Redwood Hill Farm & Creamery Santa Rosa StVklitk1401 CL N Stonorim Clean Power Petition P01NER Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will buy and generate'electricity for businesses;and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the . • first time'in a long time It also promises to'boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resell ution, we will not have a choice. Please give.us the choice!. Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Name (p Lr��✓� I-c' ,p-,I I I • Address ? C 7e i✓, 9 P-e+atvala C 6/4/5)._ Phone 707 3 v 7537 / Email Name S // — Haggr Address 2 J .7 k/� IA/Ut A7-36v- SA Phone .5/yr- Email Name El CL y0 .I Q e-c— Address 2O) Ev�G,„-im . P // u1M0. cat / �� Phone +TY* SC, _S(p Lf� :Email�JYNE.e @ si dokacity e Cch& J Name /7tA.A. /-Jeer< Address 5 7 3 Uvdti\reo" I \_ J !- Phone . Sb7 ( Email CAavc4 - : et / !{k a,( j .Ca.✓` Name ick Address 70 rn-40t i✓k 1)1 CLtJ Phone POr) -"`89'cl Tea° Email Name tai."\ .\stlit\ C Address 12-°\ \ce,Vcit Phone 1tk 1/43 59 — `' 'k ..Email (Scar nW:kSC" .t ta dit‘,od• 0vv. — Pleasesretum:this petition to the Climate.Protection Campaign: P.O. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 • 5frAlikWoi, CLEAN Sonoma Clean Power Petition POWER Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boost economicdebelopment while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will givexesidents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Name /14-414(-: : 127/4:Litio C Cw' Address 7/7/ Sl✓"iu i f& r ;..' City G ' r . ( let- Phone 79.c., /77C Email A C' rci/i did rec-Ii.. c :a -, Name J'' '•iAitrCit,\ f Address I I.k't t; ; rdv S 1LU > City Sat,' 'fARI t.CA Phone 9 ! ' .- +S0 .° `1 i Email anSa^: Name it'.-{a O1/4,n1 E C (TO Address -S`4U\ D 1 vtu cA YP.) l City- PeAeAUwi/,l Phone C10t,t) ,27%_ 17,ZiC 7 Email Scoop C:;° 'tYailli Name Address 44-4.0 19 Li C_a.\ \ 1i . City 1, Phone 107 4L4'7 `7112- Email Name !sP.�?.Y' ? d£`yl iA° 1 Address City Phone 7c, r -416 `h Email i :ja.\ C iie/ '7 `ytc'AC/.`J 1/14 [ &5 .l U M Name Address City Phone Email Please return this petition to the Climate Protection Campaign: P.O. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 58-N-114t/ CL EAN Sonoma Clean Power Petition on POWER • Sonoma Clean Power:is a local program that will buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice'into•the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. Italso promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities:must decide by June 30 whether to participate. • Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice = PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. • � + Name C+� `. i ,1 O1\ , Ilte""i ;,1 13 \A Address �f c` i°rinrl/ r r !. at City la + c;"'�- Phone `1( 7 - * 3t: - ¶ltl 3 pl,-. Email i)L.+.iill :u.Aim co:Lam': .v.(1,2",,.e.al DOILY Ni i • Name Lit( t" 'I k L ✓� Address `i ItJ t ;Li l';=1 i(r 1-72 City Zs� Phone (-7117) '; j5" I09 Email tCCc;9to D&Vi;IC r Name AC's :V' Address 4f 77 Av.t.1 a,t at.io` >Y_ 1.1 C' City `2 ! !2t5 Phone, ¶ i- 5 V2-2,, Email ]r Az_ ((::" f-,: to Name lw <ct -ec) ec&s J(\-INJ Address t" i Z C C.--)% I 1. City .n -t-. A=A \ C."as.k Phone CZ Email c-:$-- Name ,Iles, /fled F ` Address Po. Mora is City /the G _ 9795, Phone.7d, ' fl7 Email r /dhadoem * • Name J-■61vt 'l,"vtlJl-L.._dr1 S'ET Address lie i1 J;V4i jet if �E'VU �1 7 �, a ,r ( : ` 1 city 1, t .-� �- t Phone lb 1‘ big L-�:�U Email ,r.uAn ✓Jr'i Ll Please return this petition to the Climate Protection Campaign: P:@. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 56417144, • CLEAN Sonoma Clean; Power Petition POWEP • Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity Sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. • Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice -PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do riot adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choke! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. I - Name fli k A v it f,-7 i41c��,i i i) I >.,"1 t z v y Address .77.0C,)✓C? 6 = * 1\1/4.t ice. City 94?- 1.3 Phone .7 i _7 7 •L I 01 Email • .•+ („'s <a. P1 r_%41 _ Name ,c t t ' i iy <V IC /(°ZS _ -> Address ( GAG 7 7 7‘17/L `t iil City ',472:-.<1,5,57-1,//i_e_LIC Phone c; /-- -.e - J Gr l':Z- Email : ca: . i -°. ,K; >v:/i( - oL r • %� Name ` fJtiia. ;'7 -8 /3,6 ( r Address 35. , t7 Prli Ci.to.( .k fr City Phone /0 J, q Email y C Lf(6)SG( situ/10.4 Name :71:5'=,'-' :tee. iui4"-C" 7 Address .1 / Gi ) cam. 'u"+'t-10, ` ) -'( City ;'1°) K? P'• Phone?C.' / ``�(t•, 71 Email s;lC?C/C:L_N%Y 1 g-i-10_! i :ul"/ / Name 11 -/1 r-m' v tsi 1 1 S-!2 T [' `' Address t•( (!;1 J�� (1- Se/• �'"� City ?_ l 4 r Phone -2c2--1-- (� �� . -i � 7I-7 Email %E1-`= i11ARC,/SS a', i" Hci ,<? ,iit Name 1"2,44,-I L ?.7k) Address • 7fiI,, 7 /-u r4' 1 e,-I OA- city yA.\•.v\ tL ti1\ Phone le c r∎ ..:141`i Email ti° f :: l+1 rlLD ,C Ceil Please return this petition to the Climate Protection Campaign: P.O. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 Cn-i Santa Rosa of 7CL AN Sonoma Clean Power Petition Sonoma Clean Power is a local program thatiwill buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choke into the electricity sector for the first time in-a long time. It also.promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse'gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do riot adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice!Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. C Name )td.,�''' ((/t125it:_;!) Address :;(..;',A '( ( '(`G 7.-c>>,:(.G3c::/± , Phone 7 - Z; ;1. 1.,'t'Si: (! Email . 1 Name ,'c 24 7it P ,i r7 i t r/ / rry( / .1 ) (_ Address % /7.; 1. ;� ' ( ra(' /-r f -i . ■,�. , (/ ,.c� ) <;%'1 A Phone - ./ 1 "1 - )(,J' %.-r ' / Email i` L;_ ,! Name N J h )r( •--`' i ;t 2-_el Name . Address % �1) Jr� (':'� A. � � �-I �t�'r ?jam(-',7iLr2 /j'� /- /.. ;) Phone Email Name \--\-:-.-.\__. \,\1^'c'\,=\`} _ ' - . ' Address ' 1i'.l 7.- '? 1- '1i-A(-- , inn— �= 9V ItF S C- !. 1Er ( S Phone Email ,n, — y. Name (` '� L > > <:z: Address 1 � --) ■ i > 4 '1, t r' 1 ?I> Phone Email Name l��.�.�”,�-- II—� \ r i r ciAddress / L. Rte' g /,^1{.. �( L.;r- L Phone Email Please return this-petition to the Climate Protection Campaign:P.O. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 . 84Sa=Ra CLEAN Petition POwER Sonoma Clean Power i Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice!Please vote "yes"for Sonoma Clean Power. Name K. \r; �,\ta. -,'1. (.%�C (. Address . i >� � i.1 i cl). Phone 'z ` . 'o - l r 1 Email Name � s Cki Address ( 0 L64 <cr:.F_f 4i,=4= 744, ,94. 4_4-4-4 4-4, (7-/- e. `( t: ,1 Phone j7�} ,7 - 5-- - 51 c7 OY6�.'/ f Email i 7,t 3, <.E;/3 E=4 c #ic c. -... -. Name 1) P1 I,� .(i: @f1 V' Iell ------ _%�� ` , 'w,i 7_> ( , S /�//) c --- r' Address ` CV 0 V 1 ) I ' 7) Email /C; if��.62 °- .dca�(% (" c: 7o _(- c,,,^ Phonet I _. � , �. •-�L !. i/ / ,-"{/�..i r-`, c.—tom--_ / . Name l �` :l ` c- --I' i� , S Address J J<iJ 1.7 'j , 6? :C�''1 i'�, e .1 4— if 2-Al ,— 0 4. Z Z Email Phone: Name Address Phone - Email Name Address Phone 'Email Please return this petition to the:Climate Protection Campaign: P.O. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 • 5b- Rohnert Park GLEAN Sonoma Clean Power Petition • POWER Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will:buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents.'Itwill bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boosteconomic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June.30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma ' Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes?' for Sonoma Clean Power. z"--- J —. Name / I L t=•>__ 1 . ��j'�1 �` f` . �/ J<A— <,/ Address 9- I °t /\-- 0 y1 I-c'_ I—r-� at--Q--------- Phone ' j l 6' 6 - Email ' _k- ( - / I i £2 I z."l l ! t U t 1' 4 , ?„ t,t Name 7(( ✓( l h �f -Lac/ 7 I� Address/ rO.3 C>/7 l 'rc:6;C. 1 Ci ,7 -&--:\----- _ Phone ciS ° 7 ..J Email r%�•�G 1%1.,g( G'' G /—if.: L 8Lcx,C( I � i Q Name <--S 7In _ � e n c_ \ Address U l�l 1 0":J t '• `I i(A. stn, c . Phone, '')� / I Email 11 / 5�, 0-e(--g-ti` I i t� I K/ . Name Address Phone Email Name Address Phone Email Name Address Phone '. Email Please return this petition to the Climate Protection Campaign: PD. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 Y V Windsor • CLEAN Sonorna *Clean Power Petition POWER Sonoma Clean Power'is,a local'program that will buy and,generateelectricity for businesses and residents. It-will;bring;consumer choice into the'electricity sector for the first time in a long-time. It also;promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities=must decide by June.30-whether to;participate. Dear City Council Members ;Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give.residents and businesses the choice,—PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not-adopt a resolution,:we will:not have a.choice. Please give us the choice!'Please vote "yes" for Sonoma:'Glean Power. Ai Name \• \( o. Address s \ �? d `� ONI,�'G s GN( U}_ i gS 67i PhoneT E !AA- Email .4 G -a 0 . Lt's .Name it Address 7 .`J,5-- rk44. i fF J/a Phone /' f _ •Email • 9LName t1fi/ �/ /,C Ij0 -/�• Address � 7J 1 Pl" !� �V4.:At 141v e O `. Phone /f l_ ' 627-4Pi 4`<O Email ek- e 414/2 4 "& /1 ° c Name G e'et„ P[i iciet4 i W' ' a Address 2 . Phone 70-7-34O 1-3( Email:,• eel/i1-, IIitGY °, i �J' Nei'/i eight Name Address Phone Email Name Address Phone Email Please return this petition to the Climate Protection Campaign: P.O. Box 3785, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 • Santa Rosa ;CL_EAN Sont®n a Clem P®we Petition POV�/E_R :• . Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will billy.an generate electricity„for • businesses and residents .It will bring consumer choice into the electncity'sector for the . first;tim It e in a long time also m proises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions:'Cities•niust decide'byJune 30whether to participate Dear City Council Members Thank yol for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and bustresses thecliotce —_PG&E or Sonoma Clean,Power:If you do'not=adopt a resolution;we willxnothave a'choice. Please;give us the choice! Please;vote:"yes" for'Sonoma,:Clean Power. Name Cf(L ,e.tu '„ i n,.' ” '{1 Address la q[- d I>(QTfR ':.- �1 <� W Z:' rlls�: �� S•a- . Phone 4:4 icgiC(j Email C 4 PJ p esvii,l (,-i.�l. _�.✓(, s� r ,- A, Name t`1eigb"� tJEe< )�s=e�-(/1(`y i „^ �:- v ` Address � C ej :b-�-Lt�LQAl n • �.Ls)cdd v oct-: � _ f c ie". 14t& t 675x-'" Phone 40/V-i�J 31a . Email • ' r _' ._. Address t,49:_. .4 9j I . 'L Cc:h a 1?-/vC &, 7 as /LA iti r { ' Phone 9 Q'"/"cc _:Zil C .: •; lEmail . . - >. r t Name _ „zt_ 7w . • Address.• . . • PFione` - _ Erriaif i Name Address - , • Phone. • ,.- _ .- « ;._ . ' Email Name_, Address. - . Phone:; Email, a Please return,this petition to the•Climate Pro e non Camper gn P'0' Box 3785, Santa Rosa,CA 95402 ;' f .o .., 1 Santa:Rosa CLEAN; ; • P.owER .:. Sonotha CIeant PQwei Petition Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will buy and generate;electricity for businesses and residents It will bring consumer choice into the electncity_sector for the first time in a long tmie It also promises toiboost economic development while`decreasing greenhouse gas emission Cities;must decide by June 3%whether;to participate. • Dear':City Council Members Thank you'for considermg,Sonoma'Clean:Power. This program will give residents:and businesses the choice;—PG'&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do;not-adopt�a°resolution, we;will not rave d choice. • Please give us,the choice' Please vote "yes"for Sonoma Clean Power: Name LJ1�� 1: � x' '! rSh, Address. /3a� 7��'"fu `. S C. r.074- _,, clt ` . Phone Email e Leif 'S a'570/4/ . )- _ Name L a Uri S'F} Le* y; f Address 2l `-1 '� C P=Pit-k-fJ''`�iQ tV C _ Phone. 52S., _:?21 .ST s 4 Email - 4 /�N�/ � Name j r �J 7r Address ��C7S5 t : ''. C2 l 9 7 —fl ? Q�--off:' • >`n :P` s T Phone .\. _:Email. , - • :Name {M R.\\ `mn •' f l^' Pte, , �.- ? q n a • _-_ Address LD'J I C �GPI, �`-" -�, • Phone Z-1.Z 7 Z': `rCe-=XC�ao, • Coa� Name%C(4A374:y f • Address f6B �f; TEI•tKr MTC. S z .. �.."S 46 t., Phone; 7-40 5!,#2_,-S#5Z— Email t2!i;G10.r 6se.o5'("oR;Irlao� , n,,, • Name. -, Address _ Phone . °Email ' -.. ' Please return this petition:to.the Climate Protection Campaign Po Box=3785,_Santa Rosa,CA 95402 • 5e-m-W(1 P etaluma • POWER • S:onoma Clean:Power-_Petition • Sonoma Clean-Power-is a-local program that will buy and,'generate"eleectricity for 1 businesses and residents. It will bring-consumer,choice into the electricityksector for the first time in a long time It alsokpromises to boost economic='d'evelopment while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. ' . Dear City Council--Members: Thank you for considering;Sonoma Clean.Power. This program will givefesidentsand businesses the choice,-;PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you-do'riot adopt-a resolution, we will not'have a choice: • Please give us the cheicePPlease vote "ye's"iiiicSeiiiiiiiaitleantawer. \ % fy Name `�1 e. c _.•... .It-(1Q.1Ci/LJ�' I `�gSY pal ,y� '// r , 1- p /h Address • S 79,5A S' rr l'l,U Q fu v,,K,,---- eit G Phone I - _ 2. i Email ' - et ®SYi.,c-,40 Name pafa S . JAI,! Gf .. . t `J. . �3� h� `,D/J -.-� �/ Address �� Kti✓t Sr „&_-, "r:wC.L�F/ Re' Phone 1° ( - I Z-1 1 tU-' Email ( Ii CI �,rvo i t 1�. I 1 �� Name ti,.J � , J', ,G`� oxi-„<v` ,• r Address / q Lr'-e( `7�ILto `fit!)-t!1 te- ./4 22 J G( 7� (i-11 - Phone [9^,��J-- 10 j5 Email . 61—odia - pritc, clef Name l%�1 �0-Ji. Address ?�Z 1"S vp,'�`?6,— Au 2 Ph lam ti ; n: ("15 Z` / �. ete5' Phone 1OT-(0S t--2;c9.9 Email ,CU- x.071 -,'JbnI C • rah \X Name Address L Phone • _Eriail _ . Name Address I Phone •Email •.. Please return this petition to the Climate Protection.Campaigti: P!O..Box 3785,;Santa Rosa, CA 95402 5F-1_4114,,ouCLAN Sonoma Clean Power Petition POWER Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that will buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank your for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote `;yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Beverly Alexander 341 Liberty St. Petaluma, CA 95952 I Emily Betts 403 Broadway Street Petaluma, CA 94942 Jeff Muchow • 306 Olympic Ct Petaluma, CA 94954 Barbara Morrison 1672 Kearny ct. Petaluma, CA 95454 Linda Carpenter 724 H Street Petaluma, CA Beverly Ale der d� 341 Lib y St. P luma, CA 95942 Marjorie Helm 901 West Street Petaluma, CA 94952 5B-Ykh-Wia/ CLEAN Sonoma Clean Power Petition POWER Sonoma Clean Power is a local program thatwill buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you.do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. John Shribbs 108 Wyndham Way I Petaluma, CA 94954 I Lisa Murgatoryd 24 Laurel Ave. Unit A Petaluma, CA 94952 I Matt Maguire 626 East D St. Petaluma, CA 94952 Jan Elfman 3913 Middle Two Rock Road Petaluma, CA 95942 Eric Elfman 3913 Middle two Rock Road Petaluma, CA 95942 Ferne Campbell 724 1/2 F Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Jude Mion 2210 Aaron Ct Petaluma, CA 94954 0(2(1/14a;C N POWER Sonora Clean Power Petition • Sonoma Clean Power is a local program thatwill buy and generate electricity for • businesses and residents. It will bring consumer choice into the electricity sector for the first time in along time. It also promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. • Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses;the choice —PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Oz Grimes - 1629 St. Anne Way Petaluma, CA 94954 Susan Herman 127 Sunny Hill Drive Petaluma, CA 94952 Patsy Griffin-Young 23 Webster Street • Petaluma, CA 94952 • Bobbi Seibert 570 Eastman Ln • Petaluma, CA 94952 Erin.Axelrod 522 East D St, Petaluma, CA,94952 Michael Keehan 305 Bishop Circle Petaluma, CA 94954 Angelo Silva • • 841 Western Ave Petaluma, CA 94952 0)-frHykfrilfticu CLEAN Sonoma Clean Power Petition POWER Sonoma Clean Power is a local program that-will buy and generate electricity for businesses and residents: It will bring consumer choiee into the electricity sector for the first time in a long time. It also promises to boost economic development while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Cities must decide by June 30 whether to participate. Dear City Council Members: Thank you for considering Sonoma Clean Power. This program will give residents and businesses the choice — PG&E or Sonoma Clean Power. If you do not adopt a resolution, we will not have a choice. Please give us the choice! Please vote "yes" for Sonoma Clean Power. Bonnie Allen 31 Kelly Lane Petaluma, CA 95952 Richard Sachen 1617 Madeira Circle Petaluma, CA 94954 • •