Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-202 N.C.S. 07/05/1988~~' ,4 .~: - _ ~ - ReSOlutiOn NO. 8s-ZO2 NC.S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER'S REPORT SPRING MEADOWS UNIT V LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1988 - 1989 WHEREAS, the City Council of Petaluma did adopt its Resolution No. 88-176, Describing Improvements and Directing Preparation of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988-89 and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, for the Spring Meadows Umit V Landscape Assessment District in said City and did refer the proposed improvements to the Engineer of Work, and did therein direct said Engineer of Work prepare and file with the City Clerk of said City a report, in writing, all as therein more particularly described, under and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work prepared and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. 88-176 and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that neither said report, nor any part thereof should be modified in any respect; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma as follows: 1. That the plans and specifications for the existing improvements and the proposed new improvements to be made within the assessment district or within any zone thereof, contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 2. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of said improvements, maintenance and servicing thereof, and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said. report, be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved. R~~®o 8 8 ®2 0 2 I~ C Res. n~ ............................... v.es. 3. That the diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the assessment district referred to and described in said Resolution No.87-195 N.C.S. and also the boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said district as such lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's gams for the fiscal year to which the report applies, each of which lot or parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said diagram, as contained in said report, be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved. 4. That. the proposed assessment of the total amount of the estimated costs and expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several parcels of land in said district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such parcels, respectively, from said improvements including the maintenance or servicing, or both thereof, and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 5. That said report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings to be had pursuant to said Resolution No. 8'7-195 N.C.S.. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the p d as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (A~gou~~x~ meeting f on the ..5th ................ day of ......................X11.)..y...._......................., 19.s$~-., by the following vote.: .....................................••-- City Attorney AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Cavanagh, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hil i oss NOES ABSENT: Mich 1 Davis ATTEST: .---•----- ... ... ................... .................. ~~ City Clerk r f l• Mayor r c Council File .................................... ~ V 1J CA 10-85 Res. No . .............................. N.C.S. ~~~s V V ~ EYdGI1dEER'' S REPORT SPRING ROWS UNIT V LANDSLIP-E ,ASSES$1~iEAiT ':DISTRICT ;I~AAiDSCAPE; INTEATANCE .DISTRICT CITY OF'PETALUHA Prepared by: Thomas Hargis,,, City Engineer Submitted: July 5, 1988 ATTACHMENT A ~~a ~ ~ ®2 0 2 N'C ~ EAIGINEER' S REPORT. SPRfiNG' MEADOWS UNIT V LANDSCAPE ASSES'SMENT` DISTRICT _ ~: _ - LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1,972 The undersigned -respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed. by the City Council.. Dated:. ,1988 Thomas; Hargis, City Engineer By i' HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's ,Report, together with Assessment a Assessment Di ram thereto. attached:., was filed with me on the day of. ,1988. Patricia, E. Bernard,, City Clerk,, C't, of Petaluma, County of _o California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment .and_ Assessment Diagram thereto attached,, was. approved and confirmed `the City unc'1 of the City of 'Petaluma, California, on the day "of ,19'88 . Patricia E. Bernard; City C1erk,'City of Petaluma, County of; Sonoma„ California By - .. , I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer-'s Reporfi, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the Count of Sonoma on the.- day of ,19`8'8. Patricia E. Bernard, City`Glerk, City of Peta uma; Sonoma County, ~"Cali`forna By ~• ~ 8° 2 0 '2 N C S EAIGINEER' S REPORT 'SPRING MEADOWS. UNIT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 19T2 Thomas Hargis, City Engrieer and Engineer-qf-Work: for Spring Meadows Landscape Assessment Dsfr:ict, City of P-etaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution No. 88-17'6: Ni;:.C.S. pursuant to Seeti~on ,22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1,9`72). The improvements which are the subject o~f th;s report are briefly described as follows: The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of ";Spring Meadows Unit No. 5°" Subdivision,, consisting of plant. material trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways., and fences. located in the public. areas shown as ~~ p 1t Appaloosa. :Court:, Caulfield Lane,~Weatherb SWae, KiwifCourt Drand~Pers°immon Court: as shown on y Y the appended Assessment Diagram for 10Spring Meadows Landscape Assessment Dstrict't0 .. ~~gg m 20`2N~C S .LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRTCT SPRING MEADOWS 'UNIT V LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETAI;UMA (197:2 ACT) PROPERTY OWNER'S•LIST: + FY 19H SS=SSM=NT ~a0. FROPERT'/ O:JNER MAME (AS OF MARCfi '1 , 1988`•) PROPERTY OWNER 1A'IL1'"JG ADDRESS Alamo, CA ;PETALUMA, Alamo. CA F~TALUi1A, "Alamo, C3 9ETAGUMAy rFTAL~_!"fA, PETALUMA, PETALLiI`1A, 'PETALUMA, PETALUMA. PETALUMA, PETALUMA, PETALUMA', PETALUMA, PETALUA,• PETALUMA , PETALUMA, PETALUMA, PETALUMA, PET.PLUMA, F'ETALI-MA , A 1 arras, Ca PE,T..ALUMA',, PETALUMA;, FETA,LUMA, PETA_UMH, PETALUMA, :PETALUMA, PETALUMA•, PETALUMA, PETALUMA, iPE•TALlrMA , PETALUMA„ PETALUMA, PETALUMA., PETALUMA:, 'PETALUMA., PETALUMA,; PETA+_UMA, RETALUt1A , PARCEL ~ NMBE:~ Mi~P PA~~E PAR X.~X X'~X ;iX 1 McBai 1 Ce:mpany 2 ,`?oases ~ Lidia Sanchez 3 McBai1 Company 4 r~obe~~t P. & Dorothy Ol i4:er 5 ^1cBai 1 company b L. Merkling ~ G. McDermott 7 Ronald K. ~ Roberta Andersdri 8 Gary li. ~ Garr*.~en Ekstrom 9 Albert s Dawn Palacios Jr. 10 Harst A. ~ Marianne"Buesckel. 11 ' ~e ~ Kim Caveza 12 Chris D. ~ Margaret Offenbach 13 Frark V. & ^1c•rina Cavaller.o 14 Richard K. Janes 15 George Edgar Bur.rage lb J~~hn M ~ Sherry L yonan ' 1'7 Daniel ~~ Claudia Glynn: IS Robert A. Rice 19..Jai.n M.. Jaques c0 •I`lichaei C & Linda: Schwalm ,2, Robert. P ;f Dar~thy 'Ol.i-~-er 2? Charles W. ,°s Dorothy Gastae ?3 ?1cSai.1 Cc~mpa'ny 2'+ Sca.tt M & Arri=tte Ivey 25 F::cardo ~ Aur°a Ortiz' ?b Dcrad ~ Thor esa k:ushigi3n 5:: Dc,:~aid '.F Coltman ~3 Roger W °~ Donna Graessl= 24 Alan P ~ Audrey L Hedol~ " 80 Henry C-arcia ~ Kathleen ~4roap: 3I Vaughn ~ Marilyn Stratford 32 ::1aurice ~ Chris tine Harold 33 David R ~ Care-lann Janes 34 Richard C Jones 35 5ryan K ~ Pau1a.. R Vert:e 36 Jens Y~ _-ise Skaanild' 37 Jeffery D ~ Christy Campbell 38 Barry N ~ Darlene Headley 39 Lawrance ~ Denise Ennis 40 Tom Bernardi ~ Marie Penge;l 41 Ernest W Lauts~h P:O: Pox 1056 535' Garfield Drive P~.O: Bo.~e 1056 22:06 Appaloosa Lircl;e P.O. Sox 1056 581 Garfield Drive !559 G_ arfield Drive 2iti7 Appaloosa Cour±` cll-1 Appaloosa. Ci;rcl~e 21.:13 App;a oosa Circle 1 APPalobsa Court 3 Appaloosa Court 5 Appaloosa Court 7 Appaloosa Court 2121 Appaloosa Cir:cel-;e 2:123 Appaloosa Circle 2127 Appaloosa Circa.e 2.1`1.4 Appa oosa Gi:rele 211°~ Appaloosa Cir.cile 2108 Appaloosa Circle 210fi Appaloosa Cir:c~le 599 Garfield Drive. P.O: 3ox 1056 603 Garfield Dr°ve bOT 6`arf`ield' Drive; bl'3 Garfield Dr-i~ve: 5,17 'Gar f i ~ d Dr~i ve 6159 Garfield Drive 21,0)1 Wea•ther~y Way ~ 21°q9 Wea'ther.by tJay- ~1,C)5' ;Wea herby Way 21'09 Wea=therb;y. ;day 21.;1.1 JeattierUy W.ay 21:1`5 Weatherby !.lay 1 Kiwi. Court 3 Kiwi Court ~ Kiwi Court 11 Kiwi Eourt . L3 Kiwi Court 15 Kiwi Court 19 Kiwi Court 9407 CA 9492 94507 CA 94952 945x7 CA 94952 ~_A 94952 ~A 94952 CA '9495 CA 94952 CA 94'952 CA 94950 CA 94952 CA 94952 CA 9492 CA 9495 CA 94952 CA 94952 CA ?.4.952 CA 94'5? CA 9495 CA 94952 9.4507 GA 94952 CA ?4952 CA 94952 ~A 9,4952 CR X49.52 ~~A'94952• CA 94952 CA '94452 CA 94952 '-'A iO4952 CA 94952 GA 94952' CA. 9.4952 CA '94952' GA 94958 CA 94952 CA 94952 CA 949SZ' 13b 136 2.3b i3b i `3b I36 13S 136 130 136 136 136 136 !36 13S 136 136 136 136 136 13iS 136 136 136 1:~6 13b 1.35, i36 136. 13;5 136 130 130 1~0 '1'•36 1"36 136 136 136 136 i36 501 Sty 2 501 501 501 ~.,i~i 5n1 501 ~~, 501 ~t~ I 501 5~~ 1 5!?! 501 5~?, 5ei 1 50'2 ~~~2 ~~?2 ~~?2 5!i2 _~? 502. 5d2 ?~2 -':' 2 5f?~ 502 502 5Ci2 5<?2 5!.!2 J~i'G 5~~2 5~?2 5U~ '502 502 '502 502 ~E~Oo ~ ~ ° 2 0 ~ 2' N C. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTTNG.DISTRI:CT SPRING MEADOWS UNIT V LANDSCABE ASSESSMENT CITY OF PETALUMA (1972 ACT ) PROPERTY OWNER"S LIST: rf 98 ~~Et=;".~*JT F'P.[FERTy Ol~NER NAhiB :'~]„ CA5 i7F MA; cC:i 1 . 1988"J PROPERT`( O'~JNER MAIL1nG ADDRESS DISTRICT PARCEL P~UMBEP. s IAP PauE PaR XXX XaX XX 42 Rc,oert 'r s Janet L K'rolak 2151 Caulfield Lane. ~PETALUMA, Ca 94952 136 X02 26 43 Da~cn G i Janet A Sand6:erg . X1;53 Caulfield Lane PETaL!Ji'9A,, CA •94952 136 X02 27 44 D?i~tiert .°: Nannietta Avants 21'57 Caulfield Lane FETALLMA, ,CA 94~~52 13b J~~2 2~3 ~S Gary L . ~ ~!ear'a P~sf f b Sr , 2159 Caulfield Lane PETALUMA . CA 94952 136 5~>2 29 +b Rc,b2r* W. ~ Margaret R. Moore 2-114 :Weatherby Way Alamo,' CA: 945<?7 1.36 X03 1 47 Jeffrey G ~ Cheryl Buckley 211'2 Weatherby Way FETALUMA, 'CA 94952 136 ~C3 2 'A+3. Thamas A ~ Sheila Siragusa 2108 Weatherby Way. !PETALUMA, CA 94952 136 503 3 4.9 Msivin ~ 'Jeanne Pendleton ~ Ob Wea.the~-by Way PETAl~UMA, CA 94952 136 5C:•3 4 ~ij M'ichse s Eileen Berard'ini 21'C}2 Weatherby Way- PETALUMA, CA 94952 136 5~3 5 ~= Brian T ~ Elisabeth Jovi:no 2'100 Weatherby Way, ?ETaCUMA, CA 94952 1'36 X03 b ~2 5ruce ~ carol Stnckslager 551_ Garfield Drive PETAL=UMA,, CA 94?52 13b 5C~3 7 53 John ~ "Patricia McCort 655 .Garfield Drive PET.r?I~UMA: GA '94.95 136 5~~3 8 5f R~o:in ° ere~ '~ Robert ~ E, k:aneti59 Garfield. Drive PETHLL'Ma, CA 94952 1.8.6 5~>:j •~ 55 Luis L Susan Prito 667 Garfield Drive PET;~GUMA, CA 94952 i36 503 i =.5 °atrici aC Shannon bb9 Barfield Drive r~T~"~~t~yt~, ~~a 94452 13S 5~~3 11 57 Rav~~ond J. Solomon 673 Garfield Drive FETRCUMA. CA 94952 13S Si_~3 Y2 `3 Verson D ~ Phyllis Houck 2103 Caulfield Lane P_TaL'~'MA, GA 94'52 136, 503 13 59 Robert J ~ Nancy M Prown 2103 Caulfield Lane PETALUMA, CA 94952 136 X03 14 w .Jcnald Bell s Margaret Church 2127 Caulfield Lane PE`T~LUMA, CA 94952 13b SC~3 15 ~1 Ro;na? d M ~ Barbara Dennis 2109 Caulfield Lane., F:ETaLL;i1A, CA 94952 136 .Si~3 16 ~2• Fr?deri c'k V Tamuty 211'3 Caulfield Lane. PETALUMA~ CA. 94952 136 503 17 63 Joseph F, ~ Anne Hand 2=1,15 Caa-lfield Lane PETAL'UMA, CA 94952 136 Si?3 18 ?w 'rJalt~r !-! ~ Virginia L Fox 21 T7 Caulfield Lane PETAL'v'I'1A;. 'CA 9:452 1.36 503. 19 ~`5 :ss ~ & Hiam k'assis 1 Pers"immon Court PETALUMA, GA 94952 1'36 5E~3 2C~ ~c Raear`do Lopec ~. Susan. Owens 3 Per-smmon. Court FETALUMA,; Ca 94952 1.36 5U3 '21 ~7 Michael Oakes ~ Leslie Jenk-ins5 Pers'immc+n Court PETALLMA, CA 94952 136 S~?3 22 39 Pcbert •f ~"Elizabeth T Rado 9 Rersimmon Court PETALUMA. CA' ?=+952 136 503 23 h9 3?hn T °~ Mary A Glynn Jr,_ 11. Persimmon Court F'ETr~LUMA, CA 94952 136 5n3 24 7i~ Y:znreth 7" k::aren Gugel 1S Persimmon Cour"t PETF,LUMA. ca 94952 •1:36 503 25 7" Richard D Heaslet 17 Fersimman Court PETAL-UMA. CA 94952' .136. ~~~3 26 Lance D i Su Tam;ai Kemp. 1.~ Persimmon Court P.ETALUMA;. CA 94952. 136 503 27 7~ G3r,~ wren Vellbrecht 2114 raul,fi.eld Lane FtETF+LIlMA, GA 9.4~:52 '136 X04 2 '4 RGn3ld ~ Emma Christison 2.11`2 Caulfield Lane 'PETALUMAy, EA 94:952; 136 504 3 ~~ Jch~ F °: r:m D George ZiGB CauYfiel'd; Larse F+ETAL'JMA. CA 94952 1..:35 5~~4 4 ,,S Guenter Sara Klesius 21.06 Cau,lfi~eld Lane PETALuMA;, CAS 94952 1,36 5~~5 5 77 Uilliam ~ Anna Sumrnerfc,rd 2102 Caulfield Lane PE~TALUMA GA 94952 -136 5G4 b 73 Wasfi ~ ladeleir:~ Attalla 2100 Caulfield Lane PETALUMA,, CA 94952 1.35; 504 7 COUNT 7A .. ~. E ~ ~ ~ p 21~ C' LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE''DISTRICT SPRING MEADOWS UNIT V LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT'DISTRLCT CITY OF PETALUMA ' (.1972 ACT') ESTIMATE OF COSTS I. Estimated Maintenance Costs per Month is $208.33 Estimated 'Total Maintenance Cost per Year is $ 2,500. II. Estimated Incidental Expenses a. County Collection Charges $ 7. b. Gity Administration Fee 1,2'7'5. c. Bond.Couns'el (formation) 2,000. d. Engineer of~Work;(formation) 4,000. Estimated Tota1_ Incidental Expenses:, S 7,282: Estimated TotaT.:Costs .and Total Amount to be Assessed for formation & first year. S 9,782. III Estimated Total .Annual Cost per, Lots T8' Lots 125.41 (for formation and first year) ~a~~ ~ ~- e p 2 ~ L ~ SPRING MEADOWS UNIT V LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT `LANDSCAPE TKAINTENA;NCE' DISTRICT (1972 ACT) Basis of Allocation of Assessments The estimate of the total maintenance costs per year were estimated and incidental admnstrat'iye expenses added, to yield a total annual cost. This cost' was then prorated equa ly to the 78 hots, so that each lot will share .equally in the annual 'landscape maintenance expenses. LANDSCAPING APTD LIGHThNG DIS,TR-ICT. SPRTNG, AgEADOWS UYdIT V LANDSCAPE. ASSESSMENT DTSTRICT CITY OF EETALUMA (1972 ACT) F'Ar;GEL IvUME~EFt *# FY 1988-89 A5SE5.SMENT -~# h'!AP F'AGE f'~Ft Cf;~~: ASSESSMF~JT ~ TC)TAL X:XX XXX XX X IVO. ASSESSMENT 13b 5th 1 1 1 125.41 13b 5c<! 1 Z 2 1.25.41 .',. 3b 5t~ 1 3 3 125.41 136 ~i ~ 1 4 =~. 125.41 13b SG 1 5 5 1°25.41 136 5t ~ 1 b 6 1 `5.41 1.3b Si y 1 7 7 X125.41 13b ~t ~ 1 $ 8 125'.41 13.6.. 5t)1 - 9 9 125.41 136 5U1 1U 1a 125.41 13b 5c7.1 11 11 ~ 125.41 13b ~~~ 1 12 12 1-25.41 13b Sc71 13 13 ~ 125.41 136 Sc i 1 14 14: 125.41 136 ~tr1 15 1'S - 125.41 13b Sc=~ 1 1:b 16 ~ 125.41 136 ~U1 17 I7 _ ~ ~ 125.41 136 ~c~2 1 18 125'.41 136 5~]2 2 ~ 19 125.41- 136 St ~2 3 ~. 20 ~ - 12~: 41" 136 5t ~2 4 21 125.41 136 Sc_t2 5 22 125.41 13b ' c=~2~ 7 ~ 23 _ 125.41 3b Sc=~2 8 24 12~'. 41 135 5c?2 9 25 125.41 136 5i ~2 1 c~ 2b 125.41 136 .:,c i2 1 1 ~ 27 125.41 136 5c~2 12 28 125.41 136 5~~2 13 29 125,.41. i 3b 5~ ~2 , 14 30 125:41 13b Jt ~2 15 31 125'.41 136 ~~>2 1b . 32 125..4i~ 136 St~2 1 T 33`: . ~ 125.41 13b 5t~2 18 ~ 34 125.41 *' 136 ~t ~2 19 35 125;.41 2 ~6 5t ~2 2t~ 36 1'.25.41 136 5~?2 2'1 37 1:25.41 13b 5G2 22 38 125.41 136 5t~2 23 39 125..41 i 36 ~t>2 24 4t~ 1'25.41 1.36 ~~?2 25 41 1.25.41 ~ t ~c .~ O C~ e G~ C'J ~? LANDSCAPING :AA1D LLGHTING' DISTRICT SPRING MF~iD06dS. UPi-I1T V LANDSCAPE -.ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF` PETAI~UMA (1972 ACT') - r flF;i~EL NUME{ER ~# F`( 1985-8? ASSESSMENT *# ~~IAF' Y'AGE f'AF; CFA; ASSESSMENT TQ`TAL XX:X XXX XX X NOS. ASSESSMENT. 1;~b : ~~~2 2b 42 15..41 136 5i ~2 27 43 X125.41 136 5~>2 28 44 , 125.41 136 St~S 29 45 1:25.41 1'36 ~~ ~3. 1 46 125..41 13b ~~ ~3 2 47 12~ . 41 136 5t>3 3 48 t25.4;1 136 ~G3 4 49 12.41 136 5~?3`- - 5 50 125.41 13b 5f?3 6 51 125.41 136 ~~?3 7 52 12:5.41 136 5~ ~3 8 53 12~ . 41 13h 5t:1:3 9 54 1.25.41 13b 5~:~3 10 55 1.25.41 _ 36 ~~ ~3 1 1 - 56 125.41. 136 J~_13 12 57 - 1~~.41 136 SU3 13 58 1:25.41 136 5t~3 14 59 1'25.41 136 5i ~3 1'~ bU 125.41 13b SC>3 16 61 125.41 .136 5c?3 17 b'2 1.25..41 13b 5~?3 18 63 125.41 13'b St ~3 19 b4 1.25 , 41 1 ?6 SC~3 24. 65 12~ . 41 13b 5~ ~3 21 66 1'2~ . 41 - i 3b 5~~3 22 b7 125..4'1 136 50.3 23 Ei8' 12..41 136 5~_>3 24 69 125.41 136 SU3 25 70 L25.41 • 136 ~U3 ' 26 71 1'25,. 4,1 136 5~?3. 27 72 ~ `1:25:41 136 5U4 .2~ 73 12.'41 13b 5~?4 3 74 125.41. ~ 136 SC~4 4 75 125..41 1 ~6 5~?4 5 76 - 125.41 136 5~ ~4 b 77 1.25..41 136 Si?4 7 78 '1'2~ . ~+f COUNT. 78 9, 7.91 .9B ~f ~1 t ~ ~ ~• C~3 C~') C• ~ 6~ :. ~~ ~~. ~a16.67H TAX R~4TE AR£.4 /.3~-gQ _' SPR~I,V~ l~~i~~®S U~/~ ~0 J /!6 ~ REC. tt'JUL-, /9®7 A/AF BK. IOb, iG. 11=98 ~ /'!6 ~ ~-O// ./ivRC1EL'C' - ~ 06 ~- _ - cwucs~eco- rw~ _ - ~~\ _~. ~ . ,,. ~ 1 •n ~ '~. 't% V~¢ ~ . .. • ~, f` ~4. N~ ,mot ~« ~ MRQfC 'Q' - - i . ,.. ~ O ~ ~,. ~ ... w. • ~ 10.4 - ` w ~ . w .... # - .. _ •g •.• .. Y r .. V ~` . - ,. ., os t ~+'. .~.,, 9S d i ° •° To 0 ,~ T9 .. i,, ~ ~~ . .:- ~+ .. I,' ~ ~ F G9- ~ 'v ..,n-, O O if ~ yy / _ _ ® R ,_ _ -: - 4 \~V~/ 6rY ` 7G O ' , bm b ~ ,, ~ 8. se .r ...-.r, ---- • - .. - , ,.~/~ ~ ~ ~ ti~. ~'~~J 3 . - .~ ® as ~+r ~ apa .Qj e' Q¢ ~',,3 ..~w7! .~ '©7.9 _. w. _ a.n r .VPPI7000SA ~ C/~C'LE '~ - • nor o /oasr ~ ~ -~~~ ~~.~ , Oast ~ !~ • rsar N _ aw• r ~~ b O.F M O /`'~ ~ ~~ 'aV. gyp. ,'L~.M !~ 1 / _ _- w,,,, a~ ~, O Orp . - - s j ~ 1 /.90Ae .,. ~~' ~ ` . /* ~ ~~ ., v ~l~r" '~.w• ~ •r ``pr - a -TFIfS10AP7SaSPRF~QtA54 r.m ~ " tt .SESSd~Pdl Fi~O~S dILC NO LIABILITY I O d .. b 7 j. IS ASSUMED PQA lflf AdXIRACY Of T1tE o i ~ p ` _ -~~_ - s • o - es Assessar'~ AOb~ Bk /36 P~ ~D Sondno ;Cbr~l~, CoBf. vMOTo ~~