Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-200 N.C.S. 07/05/1988e l~esolt~tion No. 88-200 NC.S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1988 - 1989 WHEREAS, the City Council of Petaluma did adopt its Resolution No. 88-174, Describing Improvements and Directing Preparation of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988-89 and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, for the Village Meadows Assessment District in said City and did refer the proposed improvements to the Engineer of Work, and did therein direct said Engineer of Work prepare and file with the City Clerk of said City a report, in writing, all as therein more particularly described, under and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. WHEREAS, said. Engineer of Work prepared and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. 88-174 and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that neither said report, nor any part thereof should be modified in any respect; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma as follows: 1. That the plans and specifications for the existing improvements and the proposed new improvements to be made within the assessment district or within any zone thereof, contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 2. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemi2ed and total costs and expenses of said improvements, maintenance and servicing thereof, and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report, be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved. Hcs. No . ............................_ N.CS_~~e ~ V 3. That the diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the assessment district referred to and described in said Resolution No. 87-31 N.C.S. and also the boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said district as such lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's parrs for the fiscal year to which the report applies, each of which lot or parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said diagram, as contained in said report, be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved. 4. That the proposed assessment of the total amount of the estimated costs and expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several parcels of land in said district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such parcels, respectively, from said improvements including the maintenance or servicing, or both thereof, and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 5. That said report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings to be had .pursuant to said Resolution No.87-31 N.C.S.. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ed as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (dkr~o>~4a~e~~~(~1) meeting ~, on the ---5th,---•----...... day of .............................:Ju.ly....................-, 19..88, by the .. following vote: ------------------------------ City Attorney AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Cavanagh, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hillis/gloss NOES: 0 ABSENT: Mic ael Davis ,. ATTEST . ..... ... . .................. .... ..•--••------•--.........-.......... DQ~~.G.1 City Clerk CA 10-85 Council File .................................... Rcs. No . ................:............. N.C.S. ,~. 0~~-2®ON CS ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE 6aTS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPE AgAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA Prepared by: Thomas Hargis, City Engineer Submitted: July 5, 1988 ATTACHMENT A ~~S®.~~ ° 20 ON~~ EIdG1dEER' S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE' ASSESSMENT D`I'STRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits. the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.. Dated: ;1988 Thomas_ Hargis, City Engineer By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the, enclosed Engineer's; Report,, together with Assessment bpd Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of,1988• Patricia E. Bernard, City Clerk, City of Petaluma, County of n a, California By' I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City ounc'l of the .City of Petaluma, California, on the day of ,1988... Patricia E. Bernard, City Clerk, City of Petaluma, County of Sonom , California By _ _~ I HEREBY~CERTIFY that the enclosed Eng;neer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with°the County Audtoz of the Count of Sonoma on the day of ~ ,1988. Patrfca E, Bernard,,. City' `Clerk., City of Petaluma,,,, Sonoma.. County, California By ,. ENGIAiEER' S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPTNG AND LIGHTING ACT OF _1972 Thomas Hargis, City Engineer and Engineer-of-Work' for Village Meadows Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution No.88-174 N.C.S. pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows: The maintenance of all the public. landscaping improvements as part of "Village Meadows Unit `No. 1" 5.ubdvson, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover., irrigation systems, pathways, and fences located in the public areas shown as Parcels "A" and 10Bt0, Clary Way, Acadia Drive,, .Flanigan Way:, Baranof Drive, Culpepper Drive, and Maria Drive as ,shown on the Assessment Diagram for "Village Meadows ,.Landscape. 'Assessment District11 R~~Oo 8~° 2 0 0~ C S LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA (1972 .ACT) ESTIMATE OF COSTS: Fiscal Year 1988-89 I. Estimated Maintenance Costs per Month is $681.67 Estimated Total Maintenance Cost per Year is $8,180. II. Estimated Incidental Expenses a. County Collection Charges (.25$) $ 24. b. City Administration Fee (.15$) 1.22'7. Estimated Total Incidental Expenses: 1 251. Estimated Total Costs and Total Amount to be Assessed for formation & first year. 9 :4.31. III Estimated Total Annual Cost per Lot: 76 Lots 124.09 ~~s®e s~- 2 0 0 N C s VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (1972 ACT) Basis of Allocation of Assessments The estimate of the total maintenance costs per year were estimated and incidental administrative expenses added to yield a total annual cost. This cost was then prorated equally to the 76 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. ~~~088 ®20 0NC$ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING .DISTRICT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUT~3A (1972 ACT) ASSESSMF~IdT ROLL r'4RCEL NUME~EF ## FY 1988-89 ASSESSMENT ## ~?AF' PAGE F'AR CY' ASSESSMENT TOTAL XXX XXX XX X NO. ASSESSMENT" 49 =+i ~i t 1 1 124 . i t9 t 49 4t_ii ~ ~ ~ i 2 124.09 1 c+q c+i tt? 3 8 3 124 .~ t9 149 Ott? 4 b 4 124.09 i 49 4i tt ~ ~ 3 5 124 . G9 149 4~>t? b 1 b 124 . t?9 149 4VU 7 9 7 124 . ~ t9 149 4i tc i 8 7 8 124 . t79 149 4c?tj 9 5 9 124 . c i9 149 4i ttj 10 3 10 124.09 49 4~ ti t 1 1 1 1 1 124 .~>9 149 4~>tj 1 ~ 9 12 124 . tj9 149 4i tt_i 13 7 13 124 . ~ t9 149 4~ tt? 14 5 14 124..09 1 ~9 =+i tU 15 2 15 124 . ~ t9 1~+9 4~it? 16 tt 16 124.~~9 149 4t,tCt 17 8 17 124. ,t9 149 '+i?c? 18 6 18 124.09 149 4c tt_t 19 4 : 19 124 . i_t9 149 4t?t? 2t> 2 20 124.09 149 4~ t0 21 0 21 124 . ~=t9 1 !+9 4~ i~ ~ ?2 8 22 124.09 149 4t?~> 23 6 23 124 . ~t9 14° 4tji t 2~+ 4 24 124 . ~ ~9 14~ 4i ~t7 ~,°., 1 25 124 . i ~9 149 4QO 26 9 26 124.179 149 400 27 7 27 124.09 149 400 28 5 28 1.24 . X79 149 4~ >t7 29 3 29 124 , i >9 149 4~ ~~ i 30 1 30 , 1:24.09 149 4~>0 31 9 31 124. ~>9 149 4~ it7 32 7 32 .124.09 149 4~ tU 33 5 33 124.09 149 4~?0 34 3 34 124.09 149 4'?0 35 > 35 124.09 1 ~'+9 4~ ti ~ 36 9 3b 124 . ~ y9 1 i+9 4~ ita 37 6 37 124 . ~ i9 149 ~=t.t?t? 38 4 38 :1.24 . ~ t9 i 49 4~ ti t 39 2 39 12'4 . c79 149 ~+{ x_t 4c7 t? 4i t 1 z4 . tag 14y 4~>0 41 8 41 124..ta9. ~' C~ ~ ~. O C'~ GJ 0 '® ;. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT VILLAGE PgEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSNENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALiJMA - (1972 ACT) ~'F~~;;CEL NUMBER ~~ FY 1988-89 ASSESSME_ NT ## "'AF' f~'AGE ~ 'AR CKK: ASSESSMENT TOTAL X ;< X X X ;i X X NO . ASSESSMENT 149 ~+tic i 42 b 42 124 . C~9 149 ~+t iCr 43 4 43 124 . ~ ~9 t t} y iii ~ti 44 2 44 124 . c?9 149 4t>~ r 45 9 45 124 . i.i9 t ~+9 4c~c i 46 7 46 12~+ . ~ r9 149 4CrG 47 5 47 124.49 .144 4C~ci 48 3 48 124..49 1 ~~9 4i rU 49 1 49 124 . U9 149 ~+c7 ti 5Cr 9 54 124 . U9 i 49 =+Cr r 51 7 51 124 , ti9 149 ~+C ri 1 J2 5 52 124.. Cr9 149 4~rC~ 53 3 53 124.49 L'+9 4~ ~~ r 54 1 54 124 . Cr9 i 49 4i rCr 55 8 55 124 . Cr9 1 ~+9 4c iCr 56 6 56 124 . U9 1 ~+9 4CrU 57 4 57 ~ 124 . U9 149 4ti0 58 2 58 _ 124.U9 i 49 4ticj 59 0 59 124 . C>9 149 4~ is i bcj 8 bc~ 124.49 i49 404 61 6 61: 124.09 1 r+9 4c iCr b2 4 Ei2 124.49 149 4~>C> b3 2 63 124.. U9 1-+9 4~ ~O 64 0 64 124 . Cr9 149 4tic7 b~ 7 65 1:24.49 i 49 4C~c i bb 5 bb 124 .49 ~ 1-+9 ~-rCrc~ f,7 3 67 1 ~4 . Cr9 ~ 149 4Cr4 68~ 1 68 124.49 ~ 149 4c?U 69 9 69. 124..49 1 '+9 %ri ac~S' 70 7 70 124 , 49 149 4~=r! i 71 5 71 1:24.49 ~ 149 4c?~ ~ 72 3 72 124.49 ~ 149 4c>Cr 73 1 73 124.49 149 4c y4 74 9 74 - 124.49 ~ 149 4c>c ~ 75 b 75 124.49 ~ 1 ~+9 4t>c? 76 4 7b 124 . C r9 ---- --- ------- ___- --- -------------------- Cp) :CUNT 76 9, 43Cr.84 _16.67H i • • ~'• /19 09 V/L L AGE" MEADOWS UN/T ~lO. / - PU. D. ,, - +.p~• REC. T OCTt7BEFy /9®6 /N IIIP B/f. 9B9 AGS. I/-41 , , w• ±„~ y O ......... + ~ E{~ E o - cR .,,• ~ - 1 PTN: -ARCEL ABP W _. a ~ TAX RATE AREA /~~ - 4 3 -004 3- O/ / . SCALE ~ 1' • pO' .!/ ~ . ~. a ~ "'~• ~ 1 ~• ' ~ 2 2 v REVISId1 DAfE a^i,.,, 1 . UFE_ 'ESTATE ~ 7.; ••~` ~ Oi.., ~ Y i Vi I _/~~ • ...1 ~ ' H9. !g PARCEL / 0 •. ...:: ~ F ~, p ~ a 0 ~ rm.r aC w- w- o ~>~®+ o ~s - CLARY - I~AY ,,+ f. 3=004 ,. ~ O ~' 5• O+ •0 eooa ~,~~,~. Z, w Q y O L r,~ ~, .,.....w. ~e,.+• w;e . RAE to a. e = ~: a p /4 ~.. .~s~. Y -- ~ ~...: ¢ ml,a u~w. / ~y .r• - ~~' Pr ~. rs y tas~ p .J .sr - O 0,2 .. •4 o r , ! ,. g ~~Z t,~ ~ e , f„•c ~ 99 ', vw.d. -s ais. w.w m.w - ~. a; /2 -! O 9 ;3 W"`YW = -"~~_ 9®• 3 ~ 09 Q ~ 4'42 ~:~ -_ 2 •:,.+`~w ~ -I • W ~ • ~ • ` sr a+ e- • w Q. ~ r ., ., :p W < ,~-. w ww.w .~ 7 7 r:'~ ~rr o~ ..w 1. ! f /49 o, ~ ..• ., ' ,~ - w.~ .. eO Q ~ ~ 2 2/ So' s .. w.- 9e 3 ~ os Q e - ..n.w „`.'• y4 8 99 ~ 9Y 29 4 2a 1 29 20 ! 27 26 ~ i ® O i O7 T ~ O :v + ~ ~. ~ r ..! /!6 1 u•.w ~~ w rw ~ .w ,/ 6.; w,® c 6 Q • ~ I, e .~..: a`:+° ea 9g de s~ ® se se ~ ss sY 51 00 ` qs a® si ~ ee ~ ~ n 7/ ••' ~ 1 O 1' g®i Q ~S ~ j- Q i- O i® $©A O 5/ - ®!0 49 s" O 47 i~ ~ _ I ,. /~6 Assessois .Mop BAr. /49 Pg. 40 PHOTO -$~_200NC~