HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-197 N.C.S. 07/05/1988~~' - r
resolution No. a8-197 NC.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
CASA DEL ORO LANDSCAPSNG ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1988 - 1989
WHEREAS, the City Council of Petaluma did adopt its
Resolution No. 88-171, Describing Improvements and Directing
Preparation of Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 1988 -89 and
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, for the
Casa Del Oro Assessment District in said City and did refer
the proposed improvements to the Engineer of Work, and did
therein direct said Engineer of Work prepare and file with the
City Clerk of said City a report, in writing, all as therein
more particularly described, under and pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work prepared and filed
with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called
for.~in .said Resolution No. 88-171 and under and pursuant to
said .Act, which report has been presented to this Council for
consideration; and
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said
report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each
and every part of said report is sufficient, and that neither
said report, nor any part thereof should be modified in any
respect;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Petaluma, County of Sonoma as follows:
1. That the .plans and specifications for the
existing improvements and the proposed new improvements to be
made within the assessment district or within any zone
thereof, contained in said report, be, and they are hereby,
preliminarily approved.
2. That the Engineer's estimate of
and total costs and expenses of said improvements
and servicing. thereof, and of the incidental,
connection therewith, contained in said report,
of them are hereby, preliminarily approved.
the itemized
maintenance
expenses in
be, and each
DES®. ~~- 1 9 7 N C S
~« ~~ his.
3. That the diagram showing the exterior
boundaries of the assessment district referred to and
described in said Resolution No. 85-392 and also the
boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and dimensions
of each lot or parcel of land within said district as such lot
or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's parrs for
the fiscal year to which the report applies, each of which lot
or parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said
diagram, as contained in said report., be, and it is hereby,
preliminarily approved.
4. That the proposed assessment of the total
amount of the estimated costs and expenses of the proposed
improvements upon the several parcels of land in said district
in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such
parcels, respectively, from said improvements including the
maintenance or servicing, or both thereof, and of the. expenses
incidental thereto, as contained in said report, be, and they
,;are hereby, preliminarily approved.
5. That said report shall stand as the Engineer's
Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings to be had
pursuant to said Resolution No. 85-392.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the proved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) ~i'rli~)X~~ meeting form
on the ..5th ................ day of ........... J u 1.Y......................................., 19- 8 8_., by the
following vote: .. ............................
'ty Attorney
AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Cavanagh, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor 11~L11~'goss
NQES: ~
ABSENT: Mich 1 Davgi-sg-~ ~ j `~)
A'I"-PEST : ..............~.`..hi.~.t.rSt-`.a1.-.1~~~! V ...------------....
~P~ City Clerk
Council
CA 10$5 ~ Rcs. No.
Mayor
~:~~5 ~~s~. 8~- ~. 9 7 N C S
ERTGIATEER' S REPORT
CASA DEL ORO `I~ANDSCAPI1dG ASSESSA~EIdT :DISTRICT
LA1dDSCAPE Y~lAIAITEYdAAiCE DISTRICT,
CITY' OF PETALUI~IA
Prepared byc
Thomas Hargis,
:City Engineer
Submitted:
July 5 , 1988'
ATTACHMENT A
ETdGIAIEER' S REPORT
CASA DEL ORO IANDSCAPING ASS~ESSM"EN:T D`I'S.TRICT
LANDSCAPING AND LLGHTING ACT'1972
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed
by the City Council. "
Dated: ,1988 Thomas Hargis,
City. Engineer
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that, the enclosed Engineer's Report,. together with
Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached,. was filed with me
on the day of ~~~ ,1988,
Patricia ,E. Bernard,
Ci"ty Clerk, City of Petaluma,
County f onoma, California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with
Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto att_ached;,, was approved and
confirmed by the City "Council of the Gity of Petaluma, California, on
the ,~ day of <T~ C.'N ,19'8'8 .
Patricia, E. Bernard,
City Clerk, City of Petaluma,
County of Sonoma, California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Eng:ineer's_Report,, together with
Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was f-led with the
County-.Auditor"of the Count of Sonoma on. the day of ,19.8:8...
Patricia E. Bernard,
City Clerk., City of Petaluma,
Sonoma Courity, California
By
E1dGLYdEER' S -REPORT
CASA QEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRIOT
__
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1.972
Thomas Hargis, City Engineer .and Engineer-of-Work for Casa Del Oro
Landscaping Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County,
California, makes this rreport, as directed by the City Counc-il,
Resolution No. 88-171 N.C.,S. pursuant to :Section 22585, of the Streets
and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
The improvements which are the subject of: this report are briefly
described as follows:
The construction or installation, including the maintenance or
servicing,, or both., thereof,. bf land'scap'ing'., including trees,
shrubs, grass or other ornamental vegetation, drainage, statuary,
fountains and. other ornamental structures, facilities, and
appurtenances, including the' cost of repair, removal or
replacement of all or any part thereof, providing for the. life,
growth, health and 'beauty of landscaping, including cultivation,
irrigation., trimming°, apraying, fertilizing or treating for
disease or in°jury, the removal of trimmings, rubbish, ,debris and'
other solid waste, water for the irrigation of any landscaping,
the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other
improvements.
~E~O. ~ ~ .' ~ ~ '7 N C S
.LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE D`ISTRI"CT
CASA DEL ORO LANDSCAPING.AS5ESSMENT DISTRICT
._
CITY OF PETALUMA
(1972 ACT)
ESTIMATE OF COSTS FISCAL YEAR 1988-8'9
I. Estimated NTaintenance Costs per Month is '$'431.6'7
Estimated Total Maintenance Cost ;per Year is
II. Estimated Incidental Expenses
a. County Col ecton Charges (".25.%) $ 15.
b. City. Pdminstration Fee (._1"5`%-) ~ 7'7'7 .
Estimated To al. Incidental Expenses:
Estimated Total Costs and Total Amount
to be Assessed for format'i"on & first year.
$ 5,180.
$~ T9"2.
$ 5,.9.72.
III Estimated Total Cost per lot.:
151 lots
39.55
CASA DEL ORO.LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DI'STRI"CT
.v_ _ _
LANDSGAPE'MAINTENANCE,DISTRICT
(1972 ACT)
Basis of Allocation of Assessments
The estimate of, the: t'ot'al maintenance coats per year were estimated
and incidental administrative expenses added to yield. a total. annual
cost. This cost, was then prorated' equally to the 1.51 lots, so that
each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance
expenses.
~o o J• 13 7 N~ S
.L~ANDSCAPIMG AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
CASH DEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSESSEI~ENT DISTRICT
CITY OF PETALUMA
.(1972 ACT)
ASGF.SS-~ .ld'Y' OL~t
F'raRCEL NUI'1bER #~ FY 1988-,89 ASSESSMENT ~#
i1AP FAGE PAR' CIS ASSE^SSMENT TDT:AL
XXX XXX X~ X NO. ASSESSMENT
c'~ 1'7 31 1 1 ~? 1 39 . ~~
>17 3:11 2 8 2 39:55
.? 17 31 1 3 6 3 39.5
~ ~ 17 3.1..1 4 4 4 39 .55
~i1T 311 ~ 1 -5 39.55
017 311 6 9 6 39.55
~~~17. 311 7 7 7 39.~~
017 311 8 5 8 39,55
~ 17 . 31 1 9 3 9 39 . ~5
417 3'1 1 1 c~.• 1 1.0 ~ 39 .55
017 311 11 9 11 39.5
~ 17 3,1 1 12 7 12 39 .55
-1 '7 '.31.1 1'3 5 13 39 . J.=J
~~ 1 3!;i 1 14 3 14 39.55
~~17 311 15 U 1~ '.39.55
~:~.17 31' ~1 16 8 16 39.55
!:~ 17 31 1 17 b 17 . - 39.55
~~17 31! 18 4 18 39.55
17 31 1, 19 -2 19 39.55
~ i 17 3'1 1 ~4 4 24 34.55
17 31 1 2.1 8 21 39:55.
~? 1.7 31 1 ? 2 6 22 . 39.55
i ~ 17 31 1 ~3 4 23 39'..5
c 17 3;1 2!+ 2 24 39.55
{:~i7 311 3~ 9 - 25 ~ 39'.:55'.
~ x'17 `31 1 26 7 26 39 . v5
X717 31 1 2T S - 27 3,9..55
~? 17 31. i 28 3' 28 '39.55
c :17 3:1:1 ?9 1 29 39~.;~5
~? 17' 3 f 1 3~~ ~ 9 34 39.55.
~ 17 3:1 1 3`1 7 31 39 . ~5
~~ 17 31 1 32 5 - 32 39.55
i r17 312 i 8 33 39 a'55
~? 17 31:2 2 6" 34 39.55
>17 3!12.. 3; 4 35 39.55
~:~ 1 ~ 31~ 4. 2' 36 39.55.
~_?.17 312:: 5 9 37 39 - 55
01 31~ 5 a 38 39.55
{ ~i17 312 7 5 39 39.55
+? 1.7 312 8 3 44 39 ..55.
>i7 31z 9 1 41 39.55'
G®
d
LANDSCAPING AND. LIGHTING DISTRICT'
CASA'DEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSESSET~ENT DISTRICT
__ _ _ - _ _
CITY OF PETALUFgA
(.1:972 ACT)
F'r";F'I:EL NUMHER *~ FY 1°988-'89 ASSESSMENT ~~
MAF' F'AGE F"AR CF ASSESSMENT` TpTA'L
XXX XXX XX X NO. ~ISSESSMENT
~~1 312 1~~ 9 42 3.9.5
~> 17 3`1.2 1 1 7 4'3 39 . ~5
~~ 17 312 12 5 44 .. 39.55
i > 1°a 3.12 13 3 45'' 39.5 5
017 31;2 14 1 4;6 3.9.55
~ 1 ~ 312 15 8 4.7 39 .-55
c17 312 16 b 48 39.55
i ~ 1'7 31'2 17 4 49 39 ~5
~_~ 17 312 1'8 2 50 39 a 55
c_~ 17 .3'`12 19 0 51 39.55
~'~ 17 312 2~~ 8' S2 39.55
i ~ 17 .3'12 21 6 53 39.55
~~ 1.7 3..:13 1 b, 54 39 ~: 55
t> 17 313 2 4 55 39.5.
i 1'7 3:..13 3 2 56 39`.55
17 313 4 ~~ 57 39.5~~
~::i 1 3.13 5 7 58' 39.55
i ~ 17 313 6 5 59 39.55
~? -17 313 7 3 b ~~ 39..55 '
i ~.1 ; . 313 8 1 61 39 e~~~;
~~1a 3'1,3 9 9 b2 39•S
~:~ 17 313. 10 7 63 39:55
i ? 17 :3.13' 1,1 'S 6'4 39.55"
+:j 1.7 31:3 12: 3 65 39,,.:55
~_1Z 313: 1.3 1 bb 39.55
~:~ 17 3'.13 14 9 67 39 .;55
~> 17 :313 1-5 6 68 39.55.
i17 313 1b
_ 4 69 39.,55 ~
_.
X17 _
313
17 70 39.55 ~j
i x.17 3`13 18 71 39 .,55 . ~
~_~ 17 31:3 .19 72 39.55 ~..
.i ~~17 3"13 2c~ 73 39.'55 ~'.
17, 31:3 2,1 74 39.55 ~
~r17 3.13 22 75 39.55 ~ a
:~?1? 3;1.3 .23: 76 39,:55.
~?1? 313, ,'34 77 39.55
~? 17 31'3 2 78 39:55 ®.
r ~ 17 3 2;3 ~6 ~ 79 39.5v
x.17 313. 27 80 39.55
i~-1.'? 313 28 81 3..9.5.5 ~
i)1=i 313 29 82 39.55
LAMDS'CAPING AIdD LIGHT;I~IdG D.I'STRICT
CASH. -.DEL ORO. LAPdDSCAPING :ASSESSEA4EATT DISTRIC_ T
CITY OF PETALUI~i
._ ___ _
~ i97a Ac~r.~
As_SFSSI+[ENT ROLLz.
F'AF~CEL NiJMbEF~ #~. FY' .1'988-8.9 ASSESSMENT #~a
t~1AF' FaGE F'AFc Ck: AS5ESSMENT TOTAL
;_: X X ;C X X X X X ,NO . ASSESSMENT
'7'17 313 3c_~ 83 - 39.55
c7:17 313 31 84 39'.;55
~ 17 313 32 '85 39 . SS
c717 314 1 4 8'b 39.'55
> 17 314 2 2 87 39.55
c717 '314 3 4 88 39.55
C~17 3'14 4 8 89 39.55
~ 17 314 5 5 90 39.55
> 17 314 6 3 ~ 91 39.5
c717 314 7 1 92 39..55
~ 17 31.4 9 9 9.3 39.55
~_~ 17 314 9 7 9.4 39.563.
cr17 _
314 14 5 45~~ 39..55
c717 314 11 3 96 39.5-
i > 17 314 12 1 97 39 .:53:
c=~ 17 31,4 13 9 98 .39.53:
t"~17 314 14 7 99 39.:55'i'
c ~ 17 314 1 b 2_ 1.04 39.55 '
i > 17 314 17 ~~ 4 101 39 ;.53
~~ 17 :314 18 8 102 39.55
>17 314 19 6 203. 39.53
~ 17 314 24 4- LO~a. 39.55"
i>'17 3;14 2I 2 1,05. 39;.55'
1.7' '3 L4 22 c~ 106 39.55
i_ 17 314 ?3 8 1.07 39..55
> 17 3'1.'4 24 6 LOB 39.55
i i 17. 3'2 4 ;25 3 109 39.53
~> 17 314 26 1 110 39-. 5g .
c717' 314 27 9 111 39.53
~7 Z 7 314 28 ''7 112 39.55
c717 34 ~9 5 113 39.55
~a 1`7 324 1 1 1.1'4. 39.53
c=~ 17 ,32c~ `2 9. 115 39.55
c~ 17 3~c~ 3' 7 116 39 . Sg
417 32cc~ 4 5: 117 39.55
c;~ 1`7 32c7. 5 '2 1 18 39.55.
c71 T 32~~. b ~ > 119 X39.. 55
c> i 7 32~~ 7 8 120 39 .=55
~ 17 32C~ 8 b 121. 39.55
c7a 7 32~~ 9 4 122 39.55
t ~ 17 32U 1~4 2 123 39'.55
8
a.
}
LAAdDSCAPIYdG AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
CASH 'DEL ORO LANDSCAPING ASSESSEA4ENT DISTRICT
CIT>Y OF'' PETAL,LTI~
(1972 'ACT)
'A~CEL NUMBER ~~ FY"1.988`-89 ASSESSMENT ##
MAF F'AGE F"AR CK ;.ASSESSMENT ~ , TOTAL
X`X,X ~X X X X X X N(] . 'ASSESSMENT
~~ ~ 17 320 '11 ~~ 1.:24 39.55
i ~ 17 .32c~' 1.2 8 ~ ,125- 39 . ~5
~? 17 320 1~3 b '126 39.55
U`1'7 327 14 4 127. 39 . ~5
~~~ 17 320 iS 1 1.29 39..55
~~~17 32;0 T 6 9 129- 39 . JJ
~~ 17 ,324 17 7 1'30 39.55
i? 17 320 18 5 13'T 39.55
c?17 3.20 19 3 132 39.55
i ~r17 320 20 1 1.33: 39.55
c? 17 32c? 21 9 134- 39.55
i>`17 32U z2 7 135 39..55
i ~ 17 3`~? 23' S 136 39.55
~> 17 32U 24 3 137 39.55'
~ ~ 17 320 25 0 135- 39.55
c:r1.7 32tt Zb `8 ~ 139. 39.5
ci 17' .32i? 2T 6 140 _
39.55
17 320 2,ff 4 141 39.55
~?.17 ,32~~ 29' 2 ~ 142 39 . ~5
~:1~7 32G.
~ 3t? C! 143 39 . SS
y 17 3~~7 3:1 8 14~a 39.55
i'> 1'7 :32C~ 32 b 1.45 39'._.,53
U1? 3:~~? 33 4 14.6 39.55
x;,1'7 32U '3"4 2 147 39.55
~"> 17 32f~ 35, 9 148. 39.53
°17 32~ ? 3'6 • 7 1.49 39 ..55
.~_-17 3~n 38. 3 1S0 39.55'
~>17 32s? 39 1 15'.1 39.55
COUcJT 1:511 ~ 3.,'972, G5
G~
W
\
,.
23 \
23
~ /'
z2
22
i/
~,.~~~
:~ -
' i ?6
2a ~ , 25 3
'-: 25 6
24
s>`
. , ~.o .>a >.oc .>oo S;
"` I i I I i Noa ~~
27 2B ~ '29 37 30 g 3/ g :32 ~ l~~
27 •< ~ ~ 29 ~ 30 $I 3/ sI ~ pi
_ _
- » >.-
.~~ . ' .
1/ i0 9 /5 ~ t ~ /037 ;'I , O O' O
t1 1,. /6, ~ 1 ,~ ~8 36 g 33 I8. 34 I8
[~ ~,p '6 >• r '~ !OO {GOD
(/ > >r >.
~ t /7 z 39 •40 ~; 4/
~= /B•
2!
-_ 20
,~ • \~ t\ ,D,OO ~s 3/2
~,
/7 /7 s v 1 1 2/./S
!E > S ~>
~! ~,
/s /6 ~ ~~ ~ 3O ' e -
No:6~ + y ...o
B 3/ 30
'~ - 2B
~`'
--t _~
'29 ~ ?B is 27 ' 26 ~ 2` ;~.
I .. ~ ., ~ ~ 24
~
- . ~~,
,
- _ - ~ ;
25 ~ ~1
I ~~ 1 !,/ z3
h • /O 7: // 3 .
` ~
~ /3 O
~ '~' 2U 22
..
r ~
/1 9 `
~ .~
f
/~~ ~ /s 30 _ /B zo
~~.~
!z ,t
~ !s /
.,
~1 ~\
`,`\S~ f
__ ~ ~=
\UC'.
.. •.~
e ~ ~ ~ --
\~ :~.,
ff` .y
X, ~
' ,~'
J ~ /6 /B -.~
- 3% ~
/~`
~
a ~ ~
/ Er z `~ 3/3 , /~
~ ~ ~ /5 /B
Vo 4~, 'NO6
"'' 36 ' 37 ~ 3B 39 g 40 •' / /4 . /a ~~° a
..
_ /s ,
~-
' qo ,29.' /5 ~; c __ ri £ ~ _/ ~~'> a C f?RCJ .~DiY.rJ.LfA-~~ 1 \~'>`` _~/
>x ~ woo sj T~ sr. ~. /6 4!
•~ 74 _ /3, x' > 72 // ' /O O9 .~ ' ; > 7O BO' 9O /0 ' // sue, / \5 ; ~;
ZB 3^ 27 ?6 4 ?d 2 ~ ?/' sg ?O' -/9 /B R /7 ;'
~~ ~ 0 ;
- NX >0 DD ' fib >. DO .> . ~,:. _
-. '; .l.0: •>00 N.O >C ., nG n'D>' ~ .. ~. .: OC .TL1D >CY ._ -
~`~ = ' - .t `. / F 2 (~ 3 4 3 6 ?ag T ~ r..~ B ~' 9 g /O // ~•
'~ ° / ~= '- Assessor; Mop Bk; /7Pg..';
-- --- ~ -~--- - -- --- - - -- - ---- -- - - -- - . - -- - - -- -- _ .. . _ _ .. _ Sonomo Coun/y, Coif.
.5 ~ ~ - ~~o-c -
-,
~ -- -
.. ---' --~•v-~
REDO. ~ `3 - 1 9 7 N ~C S
_.
.. -
t .
r ` oa I I I I ~ i..
o„~ o ~ o
1 1 77 29 ?9 30 3/ ~ 32 ~. ~I 3/ 30 19 2817 16 113
16 .) ~ ~ ~ I. w~a, ~. I I I ~ I ~.
~ /7
3/
~,~
Assessors Mop Bk. /7 Pg. 32 ~ '`
Sonomo County, Co/if. `~
R~..=~a
q -22-85 =3~
I~E.~ 8 - 1 9 7NCS