Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-166 N.C.S. 06/06/1988.: ~ ~;, • Resolution No. 88-166. N. .S. of the City of Petaluma, California RESOLUTION AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MADRONE VILLAGE PORTION OF MAGNOLIA HILLS PUD LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF MADRONE LANE AP NO's 006-461-34, 35 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1497 N.C.S. , Assessor's Parcel No's 006-461-34 and 35 were rezoned to PUD (Planned Unit District) to allow a 23 unit residential apartment complex; and WHEREAS, a development plan was adopted. for this PUD by the City Council in October 1982 and amended in June 1986; and WHEREAS, application was subsequently made by Burbank Housing Development Corporation to amend the PUD development plan to allow redesign of the 23-unit apartment complex; and WHEREAS, by action taken on May 10, 1988, subsequent to a public hearing on this matter, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the amended unit development plan in said Planned Unit District; and ,~ K WHEREAS, a mitigated negative declaration prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act was adopted by the City Council (Resolution No. 88-165 N.C.S.) on June 6, 1988 as recommended by the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the unit development plan on file in the Office of Community Development and Planning (File 3.358A) is hereby approved pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072. N.C.S. , as amended; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts findings of the Planning Commission as its findings as stated hereinafter; 88-16:6 1 of 4 Res. No . .............._.............. N.L.S. Fin dings 1. The site plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts or the previous PUD Development Plan. 2. The PUD district is proposed on a property that has a suitable relationship to one or more throughfares and that the throughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic carried by the development has been determined by a focused traffic study. 3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified., organized arrangement of buildings with appropriate relationship to adjacent and nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included to ensure compatibility. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces designed into the Unit Development Plan. 5. Development of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interest of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Petaluma and the Petaluma General Plan. 6. Proposed changes to the Magnolia Hills PUD (Madrone Village) development plan are in general conformity with the goals and policies of the Petaluma General Plan. 7. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare clearly permit adoption of the amendment to the Magnolia Hills PUD development plan for Madrone Village. Reso. 88-166 NCS 2 of 4 ~~ • • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the development plan, subject to the conditions hereinafter set out as follows: Recommended Conditions: 1. All provisions of the previously adopted Magnolia Hills PUD development plan, except as hereby amended, shall remain in full force and effect, as applicable to the Madrone Village portion. 2. An analysis shall be completed by City Engineering staff to determine potential traffic impacts created by the project. Project sponsor shall be responsible for implementation of mitigation measures, including contribution toward signalization, as deemed necessary by City staff. 3. Architectural elevations, landscaping, and other design elements for Madrone Village shall be subject to SPARC review and approval, with emphasis on tree size, staking methods, and provision of evergreen species. Specific design standards adopted as conditions of approval for the PUD amendment shall be incorporated into the plans submitted for SPARC approval. 4. The site plan shall be revised, if deemed necessary by City staff , to relocate units or buildings out of existing utility easement prior to SPARC review of project. 5. All requirements of the Chief Building Inspector, Engineering Department, Fire Marshal and Police Department shall be met prior to issuance of development permits. 6. Tenant parking shall be assigned so that one garage space is reserved for each dwelling unit, and visitor parking restricted to uncovered spaces. Parking areas shall be appropriately marked, subject to staff review and approval. Reso. 88-16 6 NCS 3 of 4 ,~ - i i 7. Each unit shall be provided with an address which is illuminated and clearly visible from interior walkways within the complex . Address assignments shall correspond with appropriate access drives to encourage efficiency in locating individual units, and shall be subject to City staff review and approval. Directories shall be provided at the north and south entrances to the complex. Design and placement subject to SPARC review and approval. 8. Exterior lighting plans shall be submitted specifying location and design of all proposed fixtures, subject to staff review and approval. 9. No on-site storage or repair of recreational vehicles, trailers, boats or inoperable motor vehicles shall be permitted within the complex. 10. The project. sponsor shall participate on a fair share basis in any future assessment districts or other funding mechanisms formed to improve traffic congestion for which development of this property is found to be a contributing factor. Calculations for traffic generation data shall reflect the low-income status of these units . 11. This project shall be subject to imposition of all applicable development fees, .including, but not limited to, water and sewer connection fees, storm drainage impact fees, dwelling construction fees, park and recreation land improvement fees, and school facilities fees . Fees are calculated and must be paid on a basis established by Resolution of the City Council. reso . madrone .village reso9 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter_of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~d~>~r~e>~k~$l~e~) meeting ~.. on the ....~ kh.--•---------. day of ....................lztn.e......---......................, 19...8.8, by the ~, reso. madron~oll~g''late: ------------- -----_-------...------------ Ci :Attorney AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Cavanagh, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsex, Mayor ilf goss NOES: 0 4~ _ 4• ABSENT: ~ // ................I , , ATTEST : .. ............................................. ...._.. a~e~........................... .(/ d' " City Clerk Mayor Council Filppe.QQ ..............°--°--•----.-... CA IO-85 ~ Res. No. .._V..4T.~. 1.6..6....... N.C.S.