HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-130 N.C.S. 04/18/1988j""' J
FZeSOIUtIOrl NO. 88-13o N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO
CEQA FOR THE CREATION OF THE DAWN PLACE SUBDIVISION
LOCATED ON PACCIORINI DRIVE
(AP NO. 019-203-02)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) for a proposal to create a 9 lot residential subdivision, at the
extension of Pacciorini Drive; and
WHEREAS, an initial study which noted traffic, drainage, grading and
erosion, and visual impacts has been prepared for the project and has been
reviewed by the Community Development and Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the results of this study has indicated that conditional approval
of this project will not trigger any significant adverse environmental
impacts; and,
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a
mitigated negative declaration be issued on the above project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based upon the following findings:
1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
88-130
Rcs. No . .............................. N.C.S.
;- ..
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory.
2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals .
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.
5. Any impacts related to the potential archaeological sensitivity of the
site are mitigated through conditions of approval.
6. The traffic impact of this nine-unit subdivision will be slight relative
to the capacity of the existing road network and the impact of the
subdivision will be mitigated through conditions of approval, which
include payment of Traffic Mitigation Fees and contribution toward the
Sunnyslope Assessment District.
7. The potential adverse drainage impacts of the project are adequately
mitigated through conditions of approval.
8. The project, as conditioned, will minimize grading and preserve the
hillside .
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) r>~ed~xb~oial) meeting fO~
on the ..18th-•-----...-.. day of ......................Air.?:1....................-..., 19..$$., by the
................
following vote: ~ ~~-...•.
City Attorney
reso. dawn.place. eiq/reso9
AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Davis, Tencer, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: 0
ABSENT: Vi e Mayor o1s
ATTEST : .... ...... ............ . . .-............ ... ......._.....
i y Clerk
~~~~/4•
Mayor
Co~mcil File ....................................
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No...... .... N C S
88-I.3.~...... .. .