HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-128 N.C.S. 04/18/1988Resolution No. s$-~2s N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE
PETALUMA VALLEY HOSPITAL(AP# 136-111-24)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) for the following project:
1. Amend the Planned Unit Development Zone designation for Sonoma
County Assessor's Parcel No. 136-111-24 (known as the Petaluma
Valley Hospital) to approve a conceptual Master Plan.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the issuance of said Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is
hereby approved, based on the following findings:
1. The PUD master plan, as conditionally approved, does not have the
potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory.
2. The PUD master plan, as conditionally approved, does not have the
potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals .
3. The PUD master plan, as conditionally approved, does not have
impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
Res. No. .. $.8_-.1ZH......... N.C.S. 1 Of 2.
4. The PUD master plan, as conditionally approved, does not have
environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly.
5. The PUD master plan is consistent with the land use designation and
does not conflict with the objectives, goals, and policies of the General
Plan .
reso. PVH.neg. dec.
reso9
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (aeli~x(~w~ meeting
_......
on the .-18:th ............. day of ...........April....-.............................., 19.88., by the
following vote:
AYES:
Sobel, Balshaw, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligos
NQES: ~
ABSENT: ava
ATTEST: .. -.-~ .. ... ...... ....•- ---•-- -...--~..~.~. ,,........... ~/
City Clerk
Council File .....................-°---........
CA 10-85 - Res. No......88.-.L28...... N.C.S.