Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-096 N.C.S. 04/04/1988- ,~ ~. resolution No. 88'96 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PETALUMA ECUMENICAL PROJECTS LOCATED ON MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE AND "K" STREET (AP Nos . 008-313-I4 & 21) WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1717 N.C.S., Assessor's Parcel Nos. 008-313-14 & 21 were rezoned to P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development); and WHEREAS, by action taken on February 23, 1988, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the unit development plan in said Planned Unit District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the unit development plan on file in the Office of Community Development and Planning (file 3.377) is hereby approved pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. , as amended; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission as its findings as stated hereinafter: 1. Said plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. 2 . P . U . D . District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one (1) or more thoroughfares (Petaluma Boulevard South) ; and that said thoroughfare is adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. 3. The plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or .nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure compatibility . Res. No. ..88-96............ N.C.S. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of this urban site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Pl an. 5. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan. 6. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant and conditionally approved, shall continue to provide affordable housing for elderly and handicapped persons through conditions of approval requiring restriction on occupancy to meeting specific criteria in perpetuity. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council hereby approves the development plan, subject to the conditions hereinafter set out as follows: 1. The project sponsor shall execute a binding agreement with the City of Petaluma, insuring that the occupancy of twenty units shall be held in perpetuity for persons 62 years of age or older and that a min imum of four units to a maximum of 7 shall be held in perpetuity for persons qualifying as handicapped and/or for persons 62 years of age or older. 2. The site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations are subject to review and conditional approval by SPARC. These plans, once approved by SPARC, shall become the PUD development plan for the project site. SPARC review shall also include: a. review of potential to provide street trees on "K" Street in conjunction with street improvements both on and off the project site. b. adequacy of handicapped parking spaces to provide access by side-loading ramp vehicles. c. Fencing options to be considered by SPARC. Reso. 88-96 NCS 2 of 4 3. SPARC shall closely examine possibilities for increased social environment and outdoor areas for sitting or recreation. 4. Mailboxes are subject to approval of the Post Office. 5. The project shall meet State noise requirements for residential construction to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Inspector. Sound insulating walls and windows shall be installed on the east side of the building units which parallel Petaluma Boulevard South to provide protection for interior activities . 6. A solid wood (tongue in groove) fence shall be constructed along the east boundary of the project site, to reduce noise impacts to residents while enjoying outdoor amenities, subject to SPARC review and approval . 7. The project sponsor shall comply with all applicable flood mitigation requirements adopted by the City Council, as contained in Municipal Code Chapter 17.30 "Storm Drainage Impact Fee" . 8. All improvements and grading shall comply with the Sonoma County Water Agency's Design Criteria. 9. Project site grading shall not result in no more than 18" difference in elevation from project site to adjoining lots, subject to staff review and approval . 10. All requirements of the City Engineer must be met prior to the issuance of a development permit. 11. All utilities serving the proposed project shall be placed underground, subject to staff review and approval. 12. All conditions of approval associated with the Fredericks Parcel Map must be met prior to the issuance of a development permit, subject to staff review and approval. Reso. 88-96 3 of 4 13. The project sponsor shall be required to pay school facilities impact fees as determined by Petaluma School District. 14. The project sponsor shall be required to pay Community Facilities Development Fees per Municipal Code Section 17,14, unless waived by the City Council. 15. The project sponsor shall be required to pay Dwelling Construction Fee per Municipal Code Section 17.12, unless waived by the City Council. 16. The loading/unloading spaces served off "K" Street shall be signed as such to prohibit long term parking, subject to staff review and approval. reso.pep.pud reso9 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~~~}ri~ meeting ~' on the ..-.4-X)a .............. day of .........-Agxi.1.............-.....................-, 19...88, by the ~ _.,. following vote: •--•------•----...--•--••---- ity Attorney AYES: Balshaw, Cavanagh, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hil go NOES: ~ ABSENT: Sobe 1 ATTEST : ......................................................:.............................................. City Clerk Mayor Council File........-_......------°----...:.. CA 10-85 ~ Res. No........58.-.9.6........ N.C.S.