Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 88-087 N.C.S. 03/21/1988.f Resolution No. 8s-87 N C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR A GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AMENDMENT AND A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE FOR AP NOs. 008-303-14 & 21 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the following project: 1. .Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Designation from "Urban Standard" to "Urban High" for a 47, 218 square foot property located between Mountain View Avenue and "K" Street, Sonoma County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 008-303-14 & 21; and 2. Amend the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance to institute a Planned Unit Development Zone designation for the same parcel (formerly designated R-l, 6500 square feet) to allow twenty-four units low-moderate cost housing for senior and/or physically handicapped citizens. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the issuance of said Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby approved, based on the following findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drip below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The project does not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals. 88-87 Ncs. No . .............................. N.C.S. .. w 3. The project does. not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively •considerable . ~ • 4. The project does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly . - 5. The development plan, as conditioned, contains adequate measures to mitigate potential adverse effects pertaining to traffic noise and drainage. ~"` 4- reso.pep.neg.dec ~~ reso9 ~~' '•:, `'•~. Under the power and authority conferred upon this. Council by the Charter of said City. I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approve as to Council of 'the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) Y>i~~~ meeting /~'~ °~ on ,the .---••2_lst......_.. day of .....................March..:.,:.:..........._....., 19...88, by the 6 following vote: ... r: ~ ...;?. 'ty Attorney AYES: Balshaw, Cavanagh, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey ~' ' NOES• ~ ,~ • ABSENT: So e l , i1 Li go s s ~ < ATTEST: ......................................................................~............. __.. ..----.L.~..----.._.....................---............ City Clerk Mayor Council File ................................... Form CA 2 7/$1 Rea. No...~~.-.~.~._...........