HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2013-096 N.C.S. 6/17/2013 Resolution No. 2013-096 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PETALUMA SMART RAIL STATION
AREAS: TOD MASTER PLAN AND AMENDED SMARTCODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma by Resolution 2009-146 N.C.S.
endorsed the filing of an application for a grant from the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments' Station Area Planning Program;
and,
WHEREAS, at the City Council goal setting session on January 23, 2010, one of the
goals established by the City Council was to implement the Central Petaluma Specific Plan and
maximize the potential for transit-oriented development; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma executed an agreement with the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission in November 2010 to develop a station area master plan and related
amendments to the City's SmartCode, which prescribes zoning standards for the Central
Petaluma Specific Plan ("CPSP") area; and,
WHEREAS, the Petaluma SMART Rail Station Areas: TOD Master Plan Final Draft
January 2013 ("Master Plan") evaluates the potential for transit-oriented development within the
two planned Petaluma SMART Rail Station Areas; and,
WHEREAS, the amended SmartCode contains amendments reinstating parking
requirements for the CPSP area, corrects certain other outdated text in the existing SmartCode
and makes certain changes to implement the Master Plan ("Amended SmartCode"); and,
WHEREAS, the Master Plan and the Amended SmartCode constitute the "project" for
CEQA purposes; and,
WHEREAS, the Master Plan incorporates an analysis of market demand, housing.
access, connectivity, and parking, infrastructure and historic preservation; and,
WHEREAS, the Master Plan and SmartCode also include a framework and development
standards for public spaces, frontage types, building types, and phasing; and,
WHEREAS, the Amended SmartCode implements Master Plan recommendations;and,
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2008, the City adopted Resolution No. 2008-058 N.C.S.,
certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan 2025 ("Final EIR") in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); and,
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2009, in Resolution No. 2008-084 N.C.S., the City Council
adopted findings relating to environmental impacts identified in the General Plan EIR, including
a finding that the General Plan EIR would serve as a document which could be relied on by
future projects to satisfy certain CEQA requirements; and,
Resolution No. 2013-096 N.C.S. Page 1
WHEREAS, because the General Plan EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan
through 2025 would result in five significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts, a statement of
overriding.considerations was adopted by the City Council for the General Plan 2025. The
significant and unavoidable impacts and the statement of overriding considerations are contained
in Resolution No. 2008-084 N.C.S.; and,
WHEREAS, the General Plan 2025 was adopted on May 19, 2008 by Resolution No.
2008-085 N.C.S.; and,
WHEREAS,the project does not modify density, change land uses or provide for future
development other than as contemplated in the General Plan 2025 and evaluated in the General
Plan 2025 EIR; and,
WHEREAS, no specific development projects are approved by the project, which
consists of a general planning and policy document and related zoning amendments; and,
WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study for the project pursuant to CEQA, Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations, §§15000 et seq. ("CEQA Guidelines") and the City of
Petaluma Environmental Review Guidelines to further assess the potential environmental effects
of the Master Plan,including any new or more significant effects that were not studied in the
General Plan EIR;.and,
WHEREAS, the analysis contained in the Initial Study determined that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, other than
possible incremental contributions to the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the,
General Plan EIR, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was therefore appropriate; and,
WHEREAS, the General Plan Final EIR and the Master Plan Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration adequately address the environmental effects of the project for the
purposes of CEQA such that further analysis of the effects in a second EIR would be duplicative
(see CEQA Guidelines §15152(d)); and,
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study were made available
to the public with proper notice and in accordance with CEQA on March 7, 2013, providing
opportunity for public review and comment; and,
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2013, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed
public hearing, and after receiving and considering all comments on the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the Mitigated
Negative Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2013, the City Council held a properly noticed hearing, accepted
comments from all interested parties on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, including
the Initial Study, and continued the hearing to June 17, 2013; and,
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2013, the City Council held a properly noticed hearing,
accepted comments from all interested parties on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
including the Initial Study.
Resolution No. 2013-096 N.C.S. Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Findings and Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration. After independent review and
consideration of the information in the environmental documentation, including but not
limited to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, its supporting Initial Study, all documents
and studies referred to or incorporated in the Initial Study and the record of these
proceedings, the City Council:
a. Finds that the Petaluma SMART Rail Station Areas: TOD Master Plan
and associated Amended SmartCode ("collectively, the project") will not result in nor
increase the significance under CEQA of any significant or potentially significant
environmental effects not previously evaluated in the Final Environmental Impact Report
for the General Plan 2025.
b. Finds that further analysis of the projects effects in an additional EIR
would be merely duplicative and adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study
of Environmental Significance for the project.
c. Adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.
2. Adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations.
a. The project does not change or modify the extent or nature of the
incremental contribution of General Plan 2025 programs and policies to
cumulative impacts which were found to remain significant and unavoidable in
the General Plan 2025 Final EIR.
b. Those impacts are
(i) Transportation Impact 3.2, deteriorated levels of service at 6 City
intersections;
(ii) Transportation Impact 3.9-1, increased noise from traffic along certain
roadways;
(iii) cumulative potential noise impact of possible future rail and trolley
service combined with increased noise from traffic;
(iv) Air Quality Impact 3.10-1, from buildout population numbers that
conflict with the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy (This regional air quality plan
has since been replaced by the 2010 Clean Air Plan but the impact remains the
same.); and
(v) possible cumulative air quality impact resulting from the City's
inability to determine whether or not implementation of the General Plan will
make a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to global climate
change.
c. In Resolution No. 2008-084 N.C.S, the City Council balanced the five
remaining unavoidable impacts against the General Plan's benefits, and
determined that the unavoidable impacts were outweighed by the benefits of the
General Plan 2025. Pursuant to Communities for a Better Environment v.
California Resources Agency(2002) 103 Cal. App. 4th 98.) , the City Council
must adopt new overriding considerations for the previously identified
unavoidable impacts that apply to the Master Plan. The City Council specifically
finds that to the extent that the Master Plan makes an incremental contribution to
the adverse or potentially adverse significant and unavoidable impacts identified
in the General Plan EIR which have not been mitigated to acceptable levels, there
are specific economic, legal, social, technological, environmental, land use, or
Resolution No.2013-096 N.C.S. Page 3
other benefits and considerations, as set forth below, that outweigh the significant
unavoidable impacts on the environment and support approval of the project.
These overriding considerations include but are not limited to:
(i) The project allows the City to plan for growth in an orderly manner
and to carry out policies of the General Plan 2025 and the Central Petaluma
Specific Plan which encourage development supportive of alternative
transportation, contribute to the vitality of the downtown and Corona Road
Station areas, improve connection and accessibility from the existing downtown
depot to Petaluma's historic downtown, and create opportunities for eventual
transit-oriented development.
(ii) The project will further an interconnected multimodal
transportation system to improve traffic circulation, lessen automobile
dependence and lessen traffic congestion.
(iii) The project will encourage provision of a wide range of housing
choices, including urban units and apartments associated with and convenient to
future SMART rail transit.
(iv) By encouraging residential and business development adjacent to
rail transportation and improving multimodal accessibility and circulation within
the City, the project furthers the City's efforts to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
3. Notice of Determination. City staff is directed to file a Notice of Determination following
adoption of the Master Plan and approval of the amended SmartCode in accordance with
CEQA.
4. Record. The location and custodian of the documents and/or other material which constitute
the record of proceedings upon which the decision is based is the City of Petaluma, 11
English Street, Petaluma, CA 94952, attention: City Clerk.
5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take immediate effect.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the / pp ve as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 17" day of June, 2013. or :
by the following vote: ✓✓✓
City ttomey
AYES: Vice Mayor Albertson:Mayor Glass. Harris. Kearney, Miller
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: (/B,arrreett, HHe}aly� ) `,�—� /
ATTEST: 01,0u/up E �;! v Mayor eat.
City Clerk Mayor
Resolution No.2013-096 N.C.S. Page 4