Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 4.A 7/15/2013 A Itevw#4. t e' W y i85a DATE: July 15, 2013 TO: honorable Mayor and embers;ofthe City Council through,City Manager FROM`. Dan St. Jo irectoor, Public Works & Utilities Larry Ziin , .E. Capital Projects Manager SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute°a_Professional Services Agreement for Engineering and Design Services for the Headworks Screen Upgrade and the Performance Optimization.Projects at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility RECOMMENDATION • It is recommended;that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreementt(PS'A) with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. for engineering and designservices for the headworks screen upgrade and the performance optimization projects at the EllisCreek"Water Recycling Facility. BACKGROUND The City's Ellis Creek Water Recycling F.acility_(ECWRF), located at 3890 Cypress Drive in Petaluma, has been in-operation.since early 2009 and currently processes an average dry weather daily flow of 4.7 MGD (million gallons`per day). The plant was dcsigned to process 6:7 MOD average dry weather flow and up to 35'MGD wet weather flow. Annual average rated capacity is 8 MGD. The plant was designed for normal domestic.strengthrwastewater.generated from a typical city with both residential and commercial customers. Industrial and commercial establishments generating:high organic.or solids strength, and/or,grease and fat laden wastewater are required to pretreat their wastewater prior to discharging;to the public sewers. Generally the pl'ant;and the existing policies governing pretreatment have worked.well,since.tlie plant went on- line, however a number;of"changed conditions" and the Council goal to "attract and retain businesses in Petaluma.,..'' have prompted'-staff'to move forward with necessary evaluations and design of certain elements Within the ECWRF. In=fact, the Council held a public workshop on March 11, 2013 to consider "business friendly"actions that the City could employ to promote the specific City priorities for calendar,years 2013 and 2014. Council directed staff to proceed with facility enhancements, and a review of rates and policies towards meeting the adopted priority: "Focus attention on,supporting food and beverage processing, manufacturing, and • alternative.energy busineSS clusters". Agenda Revie ittw City Attorney c Finance Direct. City Manager r DISCUSSION Typically anew \astewater'treatment facility is,evaluatedwithin.the'tifst.5 years of operation to critically review the biological and chemical operational=assumptions inherent in the original dcsign'andto develop optimization.projects tor'tine tuning.of plant operations. Because of the significant energy and chemical costs involved-in operating plant (staff budgets $1,385,000 per year for--these), small changes and adjustments inoperation-during the-early years of the facility's life can yield large financial savings Over its life'cycle. In addition to the normal optimization process, the City desires to review the plant to see what changes'can be economically made to further the Council goal and priority previouslykstated, all of which.leads to the need to hire a qualified engineering consultant to:assist City staff in taking the necessary steps. The goals of the subject project are to: 1. Replace the existing Mechanical bar screen in the'lieadworks (aka: pre-treatment screening and dc-gritting process) toaddressthe phenomenon of non-woven wipes such as "handiwipes". The impact of these products to the wastewater industry is well documented in the literature and is reflected in the significant mechanical hardships and maintenance time required-to expend to "de-rag7 pumps downstream of the headworks and to remove tightly-wound clumps of rags within the:liquid and.'solid streamprocesses. The growing popularity'of baby, personal and disinfectant wipes=and the improper disposal of these items'in the toilet causes.serious problems because the wipes do not break down,like,toilet°paper, thus creating solids build up in tankage and disruptions to the solids handing system. The-existing;headworksscreens were designed and installed before these products rosecin popularity. Staff recommends that the City install new screens to remove rags from the influent prior to.entering thetreatment train to eliminate Operations and maintenance problems With clogging of pumps and equipment. This will entail a review of the existing screen'configuration, evaluation of'inore appropriate modern screen technology using perforated plate and step screens methods, final design of plans and technical specifications and engineering supportduring bidding. 2. Control oft-gassing of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) generated in the'anaerobic digestion process. This is regulated the BAAQMD (Bay Area Air Quality Management District) under state and EPA.regulations. Citystaff agreed to eliminate the I-12S scrubbers from the plant design during value engineering in an effort to keep the project within budget under the assurittion.that;operationai staff'could control 1-128 formation with the addition of chemicals The decision also relied•on the designer's best prediction of the make=upofthe waste activated sludge thatare,generated in the secondary treatment process, rremoved:by'the secondary elarifietsiand organically stabilized and de- watered in the solids train: This treatment train`is comprised of the:gravity belt thickener, anaerobic digester, screw press de-watering devise, and biosolids pumping to an awaiting truck and trailer for final`disposal.. 3. Reliability upgrades to thesolids.stream to allow un-interrupted plant operations during,routine';maintenance'o'f the gravity belt thickener, digestion tankage, and cake,(aka: dewatered,biosolids)'transfer pump. The original plant design envisioned that the waste stream would be diverted into one of the.oxidation ditches to allow the digestion unit processes to be taken down and maintained. While this plan meets the regulations for providing a redundant unit in each key unit process step, it does not 2 provide a practical method for the operators to achieve their routine preventative maintenance:tasks. 4. Evaluate the feasibility of accepting high strength waste currently generated and hauled'by truck out of town by key industrial customers. The acceptance of this waste stream would be.expectedto imprpve the operational efficiencies±of the solids digestion processes while significantly increasing the production of methane. We would evaluate the use of methane:to-produce a clean CNG(compressed natural gas) product suitable to operateCity fleet vehicles such as its buses;of be used to power electrical generators to'produce energy-for'direct use at the plant. With the passage of AB 32 (Global Warming Soluti'ons:Act) in 2006, the City is encouraged to evaluate its greenhouse gas (GHQ) impact especially in the areas;of renewable energy;reduction of transportation impacts; andflaring'oft of"waste" gases and fugitive emissions. While the concept of waste to:energy.was considered during.design, the passage of AB32 should accelerate those-effort's. 5. In conjunction with.the,above, evaluate'-means to:save energy in the aeration basins (secondary'treatmenty'and otht.r energy intensive plant processes. 6. Evaluate the"feasibility of increasing the organic and,solids loading to support'an increase of the "local limits" standards'that currently limit the:strength of wastewater entering the.City's system: Staff has scheduled,a Council agenda item to address an increase to,thecurrent standards on July 1S1 . The proposal would raise the existing 900 mg/I (milligrams=per liter)for BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) and 700 ing/l for suspended solids;(SS) to 1,500;and'2,000 mg/I respectively based:on a recent study. The purpose of this project would,be to:evaluate whether the City has latitude to raise the limits higher for certain industries,that the City is trying to "retain and attract" without jeopardizing plant operations or the City's ability:to meet its NPDES (national pollution discharge elimination system)_perrnif conditions for River discharge. 7. Evaluatemaintenanercontrol techniques and design modifcationsfor some of the existing ponds. The existing vegetated aeiation ponds and effluent polishing ponds are experiencing'over=growth which diminishes their original_purpose as a tertiary treatment process and increases;costto control mosquitoes as required by the Sonoma Marin Mosquito and Vector Control District. Last_year the City's cost totcontrol vectors and bullrush approached''$250;000. 8. Provide technical supportto the City team chargednwith retaining.and attracting targeted businesses to include meeting-with business representative to evaluate business=specific wastewater management needs and ability and cost-to the City to accept those waste streams. These goals would be;puisued in parallel to staffsrelated efforts to evaluate existing policies and rates that may impede the Council's stated goals. Staff circulated'an RFQ (request for qualifications)for a policy and rate consultant to assist-staff in this effort and will be evaluating submittals after July 2 11d when the statements of qualifications'are due. Staff has reviewed the existing"local_limits' ordinance (Title 15, Sections 15.44, 15:48, 15.52 and 15.64 of the Petaliima Municipal Code (PMC) Concerning City Sewers and Sewer'Disposal) and has seheduled'a companion agenda itemte'this one'to recoiiimend initial changes that will help achieve Council goals. 3 Staff solicited Request far Qualifications (RFQ) for engineering,and design:services for the .subjectproject front-nine northern California consulting firms. Seven stateineiits of qualifications(SOQ's)'were,received on April 25, 2013.,Staff'short listed" four teams to be interviewed on May 23, 2013, including;_Brown and Caldwell; HDR; Kennedy/Jenks; and, Waterworks Engineers. These�<four firms demonstrated abilityand experience to provide superior engineering services for municipal wastewater treatment facilities, including facility assessments, industrial waste management and development of capital.improvement plans. They displayed superior knowledge,of hiological, chemical and high strength waste;the ability to produce professional quality work`'in-atiiiiely and.cost-effective manner; and, a high level of service on prior projects. After eareful,consideration, reference;checks, interviews with proposed stall, review of cost proposals,:and scope negotiations,staff recommends Kennedy/Jenks as the firm best suited to perform the subject service to achieve the goals previously outlined. Kennedy/Jenks has significant expertise in all.areas of'wastewater-Treatment facilities design, permitting and operations. Chen. team:has the expertise=to address the:city's needs, is locally based in Santa.Rosa, San Francisco and)Palo Alto,.and,has completed:similar project assessments for the City of Santa Rosa and'the Central MarinSanitaiy District. Their staff is very familiar with the ECWRF, other local facilities„our operationsand maintenance staff and the regulators • at the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board. The proposed scope of work will address the Ci_ty's needs in a manner that will allow the City to adjust the direction of the project as the technical review proceeds. While the scope does cover final design and bidding services for the headworks screen repl'aeeinent, the remaining tasks are for assessment of,the.plant and to begin the process of developing proposals for optimization and "business friendly”improvements. Staff would,expect to present preliminary findings to the Council•at the conclusion of this project phase and recommend additional services that would be better scoped at that time to complete the alternatives analysis'and final design steps, including possible CEQA impacts. The current scope includes set up and operation of a pilot plant study to evaluate the operational benefits;and:desirability of adding trucked in,highstrength waste directly to the anaerobic digester Within"fhe,solids.train. During the assessment phases, staff anticipates a number of low-to-no.cost.recommendations to be offered'and.adopted by operations staff to start the plant optimization process. City Staff recommends the execution of the attached Professional_Services Agreement in the amount of$592,620 to Kennedy/Jenks for engineering.and design services for`fhe Fleadworks Screen Upgrade and the Performance Optimization:Projects at the Ellis Creek'Water Recycling Facility. The proposed action meets Council Goals: "Plan_for=and.implenient priority capital projects as funding permits' and, "Attract and retain businesses in;Petaluma to'enhance the tax base,jobs, and quality of life for the community." 4 FINANCIAL IMPACTS' The tota12013/l4 OP budget for this project is65,230,000'(C66501305 $4,280,000 and (066501306.$450,000) for the ECWRF solids handling and headworks screen upgrades. The services under the prop'osed1PSA.total°$592,620 and include: • Process Energy Audit,($,104,130); • Liquid Process Assessment($101,138); • Solids Process Assessment($100,247) • Headworks evaluation, engineering and design ($185,775); • Project Management/ QA[QC ($26;300); and • Technical "on-call" support'services ($75,000)_ The remaining CIP fund balances *ill be used foralternatives•analysis, design and construction of the Council approved projects thareine'rge from the assessment phases. Staff expects operational cost,savings in,the areas of energy, chemical, vector control, and maintenance that would derive from the optimization process:and"will report these savings to Council. In addition, staff expects improvements to directly benefit;industry by saving hauling and disposal cost, and will be offset by future funding partnerships and/or "tipping" fee structure. Development costs associated.with improvements.directly'.benelittingiindustry will be accounted for and included in future rate evaluations to the same customer category. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. PSA 3. Location Map 5 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER.TO EXECUTE THE PROFESSIONAL;SERVICES AGREEMENT TO KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR'ENGINEERING AND.DESIGN,SERVICES FOR THE HEADWORKS SCREEN UPGRADE AND THE PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS AT THE ELLIS CREEK WATER RECYCLING FACILITY WHEREAS, the City'of Petaluma wishes.to assess the.`Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility operations, energy usage and compliance and replace.theheadworks screens; and WHEREAS, this project requires the services;of a quality professional engineering firm familiar with the project and experienced in design, assessments construction,and complex biological and chemical systems of Wastewater treatment facilities and their Components; and WHEREAS, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (Kennedy/Jenks) responded to the City's Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and was'choscn based:,on then proposal, interview, reputation, and experience in design of municipal waste water treatment facilities; and WHEREAS, Kennedy/Jenks's'ahility to produce superior quality work on complex engineering projects,has been demonstrated with over 95 years of engineering,.desigmand assessment for Northern California municipalities; and WHEREAS, staff recommendsthe City execute.a professionallservices agreement with Kennedy/Jenks for engineering,and design and services for the I leadworks Screen Upgrade and the Performance Optimization Projects at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City hereby: 1. Authorizes the,,CityManager to;signthesattached Professional Services Agreement for engineering,and,'design services with Kennedy/Jenks in support of the l-leadworks Screen Upgrade and the Performance Optimization Projects at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility in the amount not to exceed $592;620.00. 6 Attachment 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,AGREEMENT Engineering and Design.Services for°the_Headworkscreen.Upgradetand the Performance Optimization.Projectsat;the Ell is/Creek'Water Reeve!ing:Facility (Title of.Project, FY 13/14 Fund#6600 Cost Center'66999 Object Code 54110 Project#:66501305-30100 Amount$406.845 For multi-year contracts.or contracts with multiple accounts: FY 13/14 Fund#6600 Cost Center 66999 Object Code 54110 Project#66501306-30100 Amount$36,120 FY 13/14 Fund#6600 CosiCenter+66999 Object Code 54110.Project 1,i66501305-'30300 'Amount$149.655 FY Fund# Cost Center Object Code .. Project# Amount$ FY Fund t# . Cost Center Object Code .Project# Amount$ FY Fund# Cost Center Object Code Project# Amount$ THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into and effective as of ., 20 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Petaluma, a municipal corporation, and a charter city ("City") and Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.. a California Corporation ("Consultant") (collectively, the "Parties!). WHEREAS; the Parties enter into this Agreement for the purpose: of Consultant providing professional services to City under the terms and conditions set forth herein, THEREFORE, in considerationof the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the Parties agree as•follows: Services. Consulta_nt shall provide the;services as descr=ibed in and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Services"). 2. Compensation;,Business Tax Certificate. A. For the full performance of the Seivices as described herein, City shall compensate Consultant in:accordance with the rates specified in Exhibit A. B. Consultant shall. submit detailed monthly .invoices reflecting all services performed during the preceding month, and 'including a_ revised schedule for performance and additional documentation requestedby'City, as applicable. C. Consultant shall be compensated for services in addition to those described in Exhibit A, only if Consultant and City execute a written amendment to this' Agreement describing the additional services to be performed and the compensation-to beTaid.for such:setvices. In no`case;shall the total compensation under this.Agreement exceed $592,620 without prior written authorization ofthe City Manager. Further, no compensation for, a section or work program component attached with a specific budget shall be exceeded without prior written atttliorization Of the City Manager. D. Notwithstanding any provision herein, Consultant shall not be paid any compensation until' such time as Consultant has on file with the City Finance Department a current W-9 forth. available from the IRS wbbsite (www.irs.gov) and has obtained a currently valid Petalurna businesstax:certificate. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 1 (Manage AG093?I)March 2013 7 { E. City's obligation, to pay compensation to _Consultant as provided herein is contingent upon Consultant's perforniancesof'the Services pursuant to the terms and conditions,of thisAgreement and anyanrendnients thereto. 3. Tern], The term of this Agreement commences on•the;Effective Date, and terminates on June 30, 2013, unless sooner terminated in aecoirdance with Section/4. Upon termination, any and all of City's documents or materials. Consultant and any and all of the documents or materials prepared for City for relating to the performance of the Services, shall be delivered to the City as 'Soon as possible, but not later than fourteen (14) days after termination ofthe-Agreement. 4. Termination. City may, terminate, this Agreement without cause upon ten (10) days' written notice.. City may 'immediately terminate or suspend this Agreement for cause. Cause for immediate teriiiiiiation o'r suspension shall include, but not.be limited to, any breach of this:Agreement by Consultant or Consultant's bankruptcy or insolvency. Upon receipt of notice of termination or suspension ',for cause, Consultant shall immediately stop all work in progress under this Agreement. In the event of early termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall be;:entitled`to payment for all Services performed to the date of termination to the;extent such Services were performed to the satisfaction of City in accordance with the terms and Conditions of this Agreement. If City terminates this Agreement for cause, Consultant shall be liable to City for any excess cost City incurs for completion of the Services. 5. Consultantls Repi•esentation;_Independent Contvact'or, Consultant represents that Consultant possesses distinct professional skills in performing the Services. City has relied upon said representation as a material iUdueetnent to..enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall, therefore,'provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all Selvices'under this Agreement. It is•expressly understood that Consultant and its agents and employees, shall act in an.independent capacity and as an independent contractor and not a •officers, employees or agents of City This Agreement shall not be construed asan agreement for employment: 6: Facilities and Equipment Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment that may be required for furnishing- Services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall ,furnish to Consultant no faeilities,or equipment, Unless the City •otherwise agrees in writing•to provide the same. 7. Licenses; Permits,.Etc. Consultant shall, at Consultant's sole cost•andsxpense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses permits.or Other such approvals Which are legally`required for performing tlie&Services. 8. Time. Consultant"shall devote such tithe to the perforinance,,,ofthe Services as may be reasonably necessary satisfactory performance of Consultant's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. • 9. Inspection. Consultant shall provide the City every reasonable opportunity to ascertain thatxhe'Services are being performed in accordance with;the requirements and intentions of this Agreement. All work done and materials furnished, if any, shall be subject to PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (iManage 11609321)March 2013 8 YI inspection and approval by the City. ' The, inspection of such work shall not relieve Consultaiit.of any of its-Obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 10. Progress Reports. Upon the .City's request;, Consultant shall provide, in a form acceptable to City, written:progress reports of all oral.and written observations, opinions, recommendations, analyses, progress and conclusions related to Consultant's performance of the Services. I I. .Confidentiality: In the course.of Consultant's employment, Consultant may have access to trade secretsrandconfidential information, disclosure of which is protected or limited by law. Consultant stiall not.:di •eetly o'r indirectly disclose or, use any such confidential information, except as'ecjaited•for'the performance'of thc"Services. 12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant represents- that it presently has no interest, and covenants that it shall not acquire•any interest,'diiectorindirect, financial or otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services hereunder. Consultant.fiirthercovenants that,lin the:performance of this Agreement, it shall not employ any subcontractor or' person having such a conflict of interest. Consultant represents that no.one who has or will have any financial interest under the Agreement is an officer-or employee of City. Ifasuchconflict of interest arises during this Agreement or any-extension, Consultant will immediately advise•City and City may, at its sole discretion, immediately terminate this Agreement Certain Consultants are subject to the requirements, including the disclosure and reporting requirements, of the City's Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant-to •the Political Reform Act. Such Consultants subject to the City's Conflict of Interest Code include those whose-work may involve: making governmentdecisionsrregarding approval oradoption of,rates, rules, or regulations,;action on'permits.or other-applications, authorization to enter into or modify contracts, or'approval.ofplans, designs; reports or studies,. Consultant agrees to comply fully with all such requirements to the extent_theyapply-to Consultant's performance of the.Services. 13. ConsultantNo..Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall.have no • . authority, express or implied, to act on.behalf,St City in 'any"capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. 14:: :Standard: of Performance. Consultant-shall perform all the Services `.in a• mariner consistent with the standards of Consultant's profession. All instruments of service of whatsoevernature,•which,Consultant deliveis to City pursuant to this Agreement, shall be prepared in a substantial, workmanlike 'manner and conform to the standards of Consultant's profession. All such instruments of service shall become the sole and exclusive property" ofCityupon deliveryofthe:same. 15. Assignment/Transfer. No assignment,ortransferinrwhole.or in part of this Agreement shall be made without theprior.Written consent-of City. 16. Subcontractors. Consultant shalt directly perform°all Services,.and shall not subcontract any portion of perforinanee of the Sei-vices without the prior written consent of City. Any such subcontractors, shall be required to comply, to the full extent applicable, with 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (iManage N6093211.March 2013 9 the terms and conditions',of this Agreement;vincluding but not limited.to, procuring and maintaining insurance coverage as .required herein and which shall name City as an additional insured. 17. Compliance_With. All Laws. Consultant,shall fully comply with all applicable local, state and federal rules, laws, regulations'and ordinances pertaining to the performance of the Services required hereunder; `including but not limited, to,. the California Building ' Standards Code as:in_effect;in;theCity, the-Americanswith Disabilities Act, and any laws and regulations related to any'c,opyright, patent, trademark or other intellectual property right involved in performance of the Services. Consultant's failure to comply with any law(s) or regulation(s) applicable- to the performance of the Services hereunder shall constitute a.material breach of this Agreement. To the extent that any other government agency or entity provides compensation for any Services, Consultant shall comply with • all rules-andregulations applicable to such fiscal assistance. 18. Living Wage Ordinance: Without limiting the foregoing Section 17; Consultant shall comply fully with,all applicable requirements of Petaluma Municipal Code, Chapter 8.36, Living Wage (the "Living Wage Ordinance"), as the:saine may be amended from time to ' time Upon the City's request Consultant shall promptly provide to the City documents and information verifying Consultant's(rcompliance with the requirements of the Living Wage Ordinance, and Shall ,Within fifteen (IS) calendar days:of-the Effective Date of this Agreement, notify each'of its al,fected employees as to the amount of wages and time off that are required to be provided to them pursuant to the,Living Wage Ordinance. The Acknowledgement and Certification Pursuant to City of Petaluma Living Wage Ordinance, attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C; shall be apart of this Agreement for all purposes, and Consultants that are subject to Living Wage Ordinance requirements, as determined by'the City, must`piovide a properly completed Exhibit C in accordance with the requirements of the Living Wage Ordinance. Consultant's noncompliance with the applicable requirements of-the Living Wage Ordinance shall constitute cause for City's termination of this Ag"reeinent pursuant to S'oction 4 hereof. 19. Discrimination. During the _performance of this .Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee Or applicant for employment because of race, religion, creed, color, national origin,. ancestry.; gender, sexual 'orientation, age or physical or mental disability in violation-of any applicable law. 20. Notice. Except as-otherwise specified in-this..Agreement, all notices;+to be sent pursuant to this Agreement shall be made in writing; and sent to the Parties at their respective addresses specified below or to such other address as.a Party may designate by written notice delivered to the'otherParty in accordance'with this-Section. All such notices shall be sent by: (i) personal delivery, in which case notice is effective upon delivery; (ii) certified or registered mail, return receipt requested,.in which case notice Shall be deemed delivered on receipt if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt; (iii) nationally,recognized,overnight�courier, with charges prepaid or charged to the sender's account, in which case notice .is effective on delivery if delivery is confirmed by tle.deli'ery service; of 4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (iManage 4609321)March 2013 10 • (iv) facsimile transmission; in which case ,notice( shall be deemed delivered upon transmittal, provided;that(a) a duplicate copy of the notice is promptly delivered by first-class or certified mail or by overnight' delivery, or (b) a transmission reportis generated reflecting the;,accurate transmission thereof. Any notice given by facsimile shall be considered.to have been received on the next business.day if it is received after.5:00 p.m. recipient's dine or on a nonbusiness day.: City: City Clerk City of Petaluma Post Office Box:6•1 Petaluma; California 94953 Phone: (707) 778-436.0 Fax: (707)'778=4554 Em ail: cityclerk @ci.petaluma.ca.us And: Dan St. John,F. ASCE—Diector, Dept. PW&U Department;df Public Works and Utilities 202 N. McDowell:Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954 Phone: (707) 778-4546 Fax: (707)778.4508 [nail: dstjohh @c'i.petalna.ca.us Consultant: Craig W. Uichty_ P.E., Vice President Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 200 Fourth Street,,Suite2,10 Santa.ROsa,CA, 95401 Phone: (767) 5-26-1064 X1302 Fax: Email: CLichty(cJ,KennedyJenks.com 21. Ownership of Documents. All original papers:documents-or computer material on disk or microfilm, and copies thereof, produced as a.result Of this Agreement, shall be the property. of City,andmay not be used by Consultant without'the written,consel t of City. Copies of.such documentsvor-papersshall not.be disclosed.to others without the written consent of the'City Manager or his or her designated representative. 22. Indemnification. To the..maximum extent permitted by law Consultant shall, at its own expense, indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to the City, (which acceptance will not be unreasonably withheld), and hold harmless' City and its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers ("Indemnitees'') from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, .civ.il penaltiesaand fines, expenses and costs (including, without limitation, claims:expenses, attorney's fees and costs and fees;of litigation) (collectively, "Liability") of every nature, whether actual,.alleged or threatened, arising out of or in connection with the Services or Consultant's failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement, regardless of any fault or alleged fault of the Indemnitees. 5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (iManege H609321)March 2013 1 The Consultant's obligation toindemnify, defend and hold harmless under this provision shall not beexcused because of the;Consultant'sinability to evaluate.Liability, or because the Consultant evaluates!.Liability and determines that,the Consultant is.not or may not be liable. The Consultant must respond within 30 calendar days to any 'tender for defense and indemnity by the City, unless the time for responding has been extended by an authorized repiesentati've'ofthe City'ini writing., If the Consultant fails to'accept tender of defense and indemnity within 30 calendar days,. in addition to any other remedies. authorized by law, so much of the money due or ttiaLniay. become due the Consultant under this Agreement as shall reasonably, be considered "necessary by the City, may be retained by the City .until disposition has been made of the matter subject to tender, or until the Consultant accepts the tender, whichever occius:first. In the event that the City must file responsive documents in a matter tendered to Consultant prior to Consultant's acceptance of tender; :Consultant agrees to fully reiniburse all costs, including but not limited to attorney's fees and costs and fees of litigation, incurred by the City in filing such responsive:documents. The Consultant waives any and all rights to express or implied indemnity against the Indemnitees concerning any Liability of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the Services or`Consultant's failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the;=foregoing,;to the extent this Agreement is a "construction contract" as defined by California Civil-Code Section 2783,;as may be amended from time:to time Consultant's duty to'indemnify under this provision shall not apply when to do so would be prohibited.by California'Civil Code Section 2782, as may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding;the'foregoing, to the extent that the Services include design professional services subject to California Civil'Code Section 2782:8, as maybe amended from time to time, Consultant's duty to'inlemnify shall only be to the maximum extent permitted by California Civil Code?Section 2782.8. 23. Insurance. Consultantiishall comply with the "lnsurance'Requirements for Consultants" in Exhibit B-2, attached 'hereto.,and incorporated herein by reference. [Indicate attached exhibit, e.g., "B-! "B-2, " ,.B-3, , or "8-4. 1 24. Amendment. This.Agreenient may be amended only by a written instrument executed by both Parties:_ 25, Lititation.. IMP litigation ensues which; pertains to the subject matter of Consultant's services hereunder, Consultant; upon request from City; agrees to testify therein at a reasonable.and_customary fee. 26. Construction. This Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise on the part of both Parties and that-the Parties agree that, notwithstanding Civil Code Section 1654, any uncertainty in the Agreement shall not be construed against the drafter of the Agreement. ' 6 � PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (Manage N609321)March 2013 12 '27. Governing Law; Venue. "This Agreement shall b'esenlafced' and interpreted under the laws-of the State of California 'and the' City of Petaluma. Any action arising from or brought. in connection with this Agreement shall be •venues_ in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of State of California. 28. Non-Waiver. The •City'sfailure to enforce any provision of this Agreement or the waiver thereof in a particular instance shall not be construed as a general waiver of any part of such provision. The pro'v'ision shall remain in-full force and effect. 29. Severabili y. If any term,or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continueinfull force and effect. 30. No Third Party B'enefieiaries. . The Parties do,:not intend to create, and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any benefit or right in any third party. 31. Mediation. The Parties;agree.to make a good faith.atteinpt;toresolve any dispute arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The Parties shall mutuallyagree upon the mediatorand shall divide.the.costs-of mediation equally. 32. Consultant's Books?and Records. A. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or.docunents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) .years or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final-payment to Consultantpursuant'to this Agreement. 13. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for ar,minimum period of three (3) years or for any longer period required by law, from the date of terfriination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records'or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made-available for inspection oraudit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager; City Attorney, City Finance Director, or a designated representative of these, officers. Copies of such 'documents shall he provided to the City for inspection at Petaluma City Hall when tit is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is iiintually`agreed upon the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. D. Where City.has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by writteli request by any, Of The above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents. be maintained in Petaluma City Hall. Access to. such records and documents Shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives;;or Consultant's successor in interest. 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (ihlanage#609321)March 2013 13 • 33. Headings. The-headings used in.this Agreement are'for'donvenienee only and are not intended+tb affect the interpretation or construction of any provisions herein. 34. Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination or expiration of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive the termination or expiration of this:Agreement. 35. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated Herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the Services, and supersedes all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, between the Parties in this regard. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theiparties hereto have executed this document the,day, month and year first above written. CITY OF PETALUMA CONSULTAN. By l' City Manager `Name ATTEST: V Ce Pres/oftent Title ZOO recirkk S�y+s {'l Smirk ZI CO City Clerk Address APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sciijtc Roa 04 95401 City State Zip 94-0)17007 City Attorney TaipayerlLD.Number APPROVED: { enciirri G- Petaluma Business Tax Certificate Number Department Director - APPROVED: Risk Manager APPROVED:, Finance Director file name:s:\CIP\W W\C66501305 EC Asses:nent 2013 8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (iMannge'B609Pq March 2013 14 • Exhibit A Scope of Services and Rates Engineering and Design Services for. the Ellis.Creek Water Recycling Facility Optimization Project The City desires to,improve and•optimize,the operations at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility in order tb maintain permit compliance 'reduce operations and'maintenance costs, improve reliability and optimize the performance of the treatment processes. In addition; the City wants;to explore ways in which it can support-area businesses, by improving its ability to cost- effectively accept and process medium and high-strength waste streams This scope of services provides the initial engineering and design related seniides to assist the City in developing an approach to meet,these.goals and objectives. General Assumptions. • The Work will be authorized incrementally and it is anticipated that'the work scope will evolve over time in,response;to:a variety ofnissues as initial assessments are completed and the City's needs are.be-more fully identifiedh This scope of services includes a detailed scope and budget for an Initial Work Authorization and an outline of scope items and budget allowance for On,Call Support Services that will be subsequentlydefined and authorized on a task order basis. • The Initial Work Authorization includes and end-to end°operational and process audit of the facility, an initial assessment of how the plant isioperating relative;to planned/designed capacity, a Co-digestion Pilot Project, and the design and°bidding support services for a Headworks Screen Upgrade Project: This work will provide operations and maintenance benefits.and identify ways to':improve permit compliance and reduce operating costs. The following areas ofwork are included in the initial;work authorization. - Planning Services Process Audit • Initial Liquid Process Assessment • Initial Solids Process Assessment - Design and Bidding Support Services • Headworks Screen,Upgrade Project i - Project Management and Quality Assuranc4QualityControl:Program • The OnCall Support Services includes a budgetfortanticipated work`in,several areas that could include one or more of:the following: written deliverables'for the Initial Liquid and i Exhibit A Page 1 of 19 2 July 2013 15 Solids Process Assessments, CityCouncitcommunications support;:industrial/community outreach, capital improvement planning, regulatory review, permit negotiations, filter pilot testing, policy and rate/fee structure development; grant funding assistance, operational and construction period support services, and design otminor improvement projects that could provide immediate operational benefits. • This scope of services is developed to assess the.Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility for its current rated'Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) capacity of 8 O'MGD and current loading conditions. Assessment of potential future changed operating conditions and any improvements required to meet future or currently.Unidentified permitting requirements are not included, but could be added and On Call Support Services. • The labor effort for each work task is based on a schedule and specified time durations. Certain'work tasks, like project management, are time dependent and the corresponding effort level and fee is.directly.related'to the:work.duration. • The City and Consultant will closely interact.and,share responsibilities in performing the engineering, design ser&ices:and construction. The roles and responsibilities of each party are defined herein. With respectte construdtion services, the City ywill serve as the overall Construction Manager and provide onsite construction observation including daily activity reports. The City will be the primary point of contact with the Contractor, receive and manage all correspondence, review and approve pay requests and change orders, receive and route requests:for information/clarification and shop drawings between.Consultant and Contractor. The City agrees to retain Consultant;to,provide engineering services during construction and,the budget for these services will be satisfactorily negotiated following the 90% Design Subnittarreview penod'and prior to the commencementof preparing Final Contract Documents for the.Headworks Screen Upgrade Project. A contractamendment for engineering services during;construction will be provided by the;City. • Some work tasks maybeperformed for the`City on an "as-requested" basis. These tasks will be clearly defined in the°s`cope of•work and the associated'budget will be closely managed by the City and Consultant. Consultant will advise the Cityof the budget status (spent/remaining) for any as-needed service with each'monthlyinvoice for services. • The Consultant will.study, evaluate and design the project, based partly on information provided by the City and other consultants whoa are not a part of°this^agreement. This information, such as prior geotechnical reports, utility mapping and operational/laboratory data is assumed to be readily available andreorrect to the best of Consultants,knowledge: General Services Provided by Consultant • The-Consultant will'manage.the•scope'ofservices, schedule,and budgets, provide a monthly status report with invoices for services; and:develop.and maintain a'quality assurance/quality control plan throughout the course of the work. • The Consultant-will provide:five draft copies and ten final copies of deliverables including Technical Memoranda and'the Capital Improvement Plan as identified in the Scope of Services, unless specified:Otherwise. Design:deliverables will''include one signed and sealed reproducible set/Of contract documents including drawings (full-sized and half-sized drawings), technical specifications,:supplemental provisions and city-provided bidding Exhibit A Page 2 of 19 2 July 2013 16 documents and general..conditions. Final deliverables wilV`incorporate City review comments. Electronic versions (Adobe Acrobat)-of deliverables will also be-provided. Initial Work Authorization The following tasks of work are included in the initial authorization to proceed Task P1 — Process Audit An end-to-end process audit Will be conducted of the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility to identify operational constraints and opportunities.for.mitigating,operational problems, optimizing process performance, and reducing energy use This audit will.encompass all facilities on the site including buildings, liquid and-solids processes, pumping°facilities, chemical storage and feed facilities, and ponds:and wetlands: Subtask P1.1 - Process Audit Perform Process Audit- The process audit will include an off-site review of data and information (requested undersubsequenttasks P2and P3) provide-a'multi-dayon-site evaluation of unit processes. Consultant team members will include, at a minimum, a Certified Grade V Operator, l&C/Electrical Engineer,Senior Liquid Process/Solids Digestion Engineer and a Ponds/Wetlands Treatment Specialist. The on-site evaluation-will look'for potential savings in energy, capacity enhancement, chemical use, labor savings, and improvements in operations and plant performance. Process Audit Workshop — a one-day workshopwill be conducted with plantoperations staff to discuss the evaluation and`findings and what issues/considerations wilt be'carried forward into the subsequent liquid and solids`processsevaluations The purpose.ofthe'workshop'will be to identify immediate opportunities that the City's Operations Staff can implement that may improve plant performance and permit compliance and reduce O&M.costs. This workshop may be performed in conjunction with the workshop identified in-Subtask P1.2. Process Audit Technical Memorandum- The Technical'Memorandum (TM)will summarize findings and recommendations of the audit and`workshop and,quantify the savings and process improvements, where;possible. Aninterim ponds and wetlands management plan will be included in'the TM that will provide guidance:on how to'best°operate the ponds and maintain the vegetation to improvetreatment performance,''increase dissolved'oxygen;;reduce/control algae, mosquitoes and muskrats. A Drat and Final TM will be provided that incorporates the City,'s written review comments. A review meeting to discuss the Draft TM is included.This TM may be consolidated with the deliverable identified in Subtask P.1.2. Subtask P1.24- Energy Audit Perform Energy Audit-T,he,energy audit will consist of both an"off-site.review:of data and an i review any previous energyaudits; energy an-site t use information, determine what energy efficiency measures (EEMs) have already been implemented, and what EEMs may have been planned or recommended, but not implemented. The second step of the energy`audit'is to perform a 1-to-2 day site visit to gather detailed information about the major pieces of equipment, including: quantities, age and energy use information: During the site visit we will also interview management and operations staff. Consultant team members will include, at a minimum, alCertified.Energy Manager and rf I Exhibit A. Page 3 of 19 2 July 2013 17 • I&C/Electrical Engineer. Afterthe on-siteaudit.we will,cpmplete a detailed analysis of the identified major pieces of equipment bycalculating energy use identifying-potentially energy efficient replacement equipment; and determining: capital cost;energy savings, incentives, net cost,.simple payback, net present value, rate of return, and operational impacts and benefits for selected equipment that are identified as having opportunitiesifor energy savings. The EEMswill then be ranked-by cost-effectiveness which will be the basis of any recommendations. Energy-Audit Technical Memorandum.-The Technical.Memorandum will describe the process, summarize the findings and:recommendations,,,create a discrete set of'EEM5 to implement, and develop a'plan,on how to'implementthe EEMs A Draft and Final TM will be providedahat incorporates the City's written review comments. A review meeting°,to discuss the Draft TM is included. Task P2 - Liquid.Precess Assessment The liquid process evaluation includes-an end-to-end;assessment of the liquid process stream including the conventional wastewater;treatment facilities, oxidation ponds, and wetlands treatment and polishing ponds.Together,,all of these facilities are used to treat incoming wastewater from the collection system and onsite,storm water, manage the discharge of effluent to receiving waters, and produce'recycled water for beneficial reuse and to:meet seasonal discharge prohibitions. The'assessmehfincludes an initial evaluation of existing operational constraints that are negativelyaffecting hydraulic and process performance. A comprehensive assessment and the identification and evaluation of options}and-alternatives for correcting the deficiencies, and providing for'any additional capacity, reliability and`permit compliance improvements is notincluded afthis time. This assessmenfbuilds upon the.process/energy audit performed under the priorsubtask, and also includes the developmentand calibration of models,that will be employed during the subsequent Solids Process Evaluation Task that is inter-related to this task. The scope of work for the liquid process evaluation includes the following subtasks' Subtask P2.1 -.Data/Information Collection and'Review • Consultant will request and,review`the+data and.relevant information to be provided by the City in order to perform the evaluations and,assessments undertnis task. This information will be requested in advance of performing the:process/energyauditunder Task P1. Review local:Limits Report and NPDES Permit: Consultant will review the existing Local Limits Reportand NPDESIpermit to fully understand,the current regulations; pollutants of concern and • how these mayim'pact and shape the;assessment. A meeting will be.conducted with the Regional Board Staff todiscuss-the evaluation and gain an understanding of'any future considerations:that:may be;relevant to the assessment: Data/Information RequestandReview:'Consultant will prepare a written request detailing the specific information that will be,necessary to complete the liquid process,evaluation. Upon receipt-of the information, d will be reviewed and analyed. Additional:Sampling/Testing: Should additional sampling and testing be required.to.fill data gaps or collect new data Consultant may prepare a sampling and testing protocol for the City under On Call Support Services Th"e protocol will identify sample locations, type of sample to be taken,tests to be run do eadh?sample, and frequency and duration of sampling at each location. Sampling and testing will be conducted by the City. The City Will provide test results compiled in Exhibit-A Page 4 of 19 2 July 2013 18 • an Excel spreadsheet,:Consultant will analyze the data and follow-up;with the City should any clarification be,required or'ifany ambiguities are observed in`tne results. Subtask P2.2 - Develop Calibrated Process Model. Consultant will develop and calibrate:a'process modetof the existing biological and solids separation processes (liguid,andsolids streams) atthelfacility'to serve as a oasis for evaluating current capacity and the benefit offproposed improvements. The model will support both the liquids and solids process assessment;tasks that are inter-related. The existing oxidation ponds and wetlands treatment and polishing ponds are not included in;this model and are evaluated separately as noted herein. Model:Construction:°Consultant will construct a'model of the existing biological and solids separation processes using the,,BioWin modeling program based•on information and data gathered under the prior subtask. Should the City have,an,existing BioWin model available, Consultant will review and modify it foiuse under this task,if itis a more efficient way to complete work under this subtask. Tosimplify the model and reduce the processing time for the model to reach a solution, only one Orbal,oxidation ditch will be modeled using half the total flow. The effluent'from that ditch Will be mirrored to reflect the performance of both Orbals at full flow. Calibrate.Mode : Once constructed, the model will be calibrated to the;existing facility performance data and any supplemental data that is gathered"under the prior subtask. The calibration runs will be under steady-state conditions tieing average annual and maximum month flow and loading.conditions: Calibration will include examining and if necessary, adjusting input parameters such as wastewaterlfractions and kinetic rate constants until calibration is achieved. Model results correlating to within 10% of observed values are considered a,good calibration,for most parameters. Calibration-Within 20% for some non-critical performance parameters is considered acceptable to avoid extensive effort calibrating parameters that do not have a.significant impact on primary model outputs and results. Subtask P2;3 - Develop;Calibrated Hydraulic Model Consultant will develop a calibrated hydraulic model of the existing liquid stream at the.,facility (excluding the oxidation ponds and wetlands treatment and polishing ponds, which will be evaluated task)t i current capacity, any identified capac ty'enhancement andthe benefits of proposed mpro ements Model.Preparation:`Consultant will construct the hydraulic model using the Visual Hydraulics modeling program, based on information and data gathered under the prior subtask: To reduce effort and costs of.modeling, split flow will be modeledthrough only one process stream, where parallel processes exist. Calibrate Model: Once constructed, the model will be calibrated to existing facility performance data. The calibration'runs'will be under steady-state conditions using average annual, maximum month, and peak hour flow conditions.:To assist with calibration, Consultant will request City provide supplemental field measurements of water levels and flows.The request for these field measurements will provide the detailed locations and reference points for the measurements. Subtask P2.4 - Model Calibration Review Workshop Exhibit A Page 5 of 19 2 July 2013 19 Consultant will conducts workshop.with^the City to discussthe biological process and hydraulic model calibrations and.resolve:ambiguities between the model and the'actual performance and operating data. The one day workshop•will.beattended by up to four representatives.from Consultant. An agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and workshop notes will be provided. Subtask P2.5 - Evaluate:.Hydraulic and Liquid Treatment Capacity Consultant will use the calibrated'process and,hydraulic models to predict the capacity of the existing facility under the targetedflow and loading cenditionsstated in the general assumptions as well as its ability to comply with;:the current NPDES permit„Local:Limits report, and future requirements that are anticipated as,a result ofdiscussions with Regional Board Staff. Capacity Determination: Consultant will perform steady-state,process model runs under targeted,.average.annual and maxinium`montliflow and load conditions. Additionally, two dynamic process model runs will be conducted to evaluate-impacts of diurnal variations and peak flow conditions. Steady-state hydraulic model runs will'be conducted;under targeted annual average, maximum month and,peak hour flow conditions. Predicted performance from the process model will be compared with the NPDES'perrnit and Local Limits to verify compliance. If the processmodel does-not predict compliance, the targeted conditions will be adjusted and the model scenarios run again to determine under what maximum conditions the model predicts compliance. Assess Impact of Local Limits: Prediction of compliance with:LocalLimits not addressed by the process model (e.g., metals) will be evaluated separately in a desktop analysis. Evaluate Capacity to;Accept.Medium Strength Waste: Consultant',willrun process model scenarios at the targeted average annual and"maximum montfi flow and lead conditions with addition of medium strength waste The predicted performance will be compared with the NPDES permit and Local Limits report'to verify rcompliance. An,estimate will be made of the maximum amount of medium strength waste that can be accepted while predicting continued compliance. Identify Liquid Process`Constraints: Consultantlwill use:the results'of,the model runs above to identify hydraulic and process related constraints in the liquid,process,fstream"preventing reaching the targeted flow and load conditions (excluding the recycled'water system, oxidation ponds and:wetlands, whichare addressed separately in following subtasks. This will include evaluation of the secondary'clarifiers using state point analysis within the process model.,The current capacity of,each constraint will be;estimated and the constraints will be presented in order'of their.impact:on capacity, most to least,limiting. Task P3- Solids Process Assessment Subtask P3.1, - Collect and Tabulate Data/Information The purpose of this task is,to gather and tabulate the recent historicalioperating data on the solids process and review the'solids operations practices'to establish a record of process performance and an understanding of operations practices. This information will be requested in advance of performing the process/energy audit under Task P1. Data/Information Request and Review: Consultant will prepare a written request detailing the specific information that will be necessary to complete the solids process evaluation. At a Exhibit A Page 6 of 19 2 July 2013 20 • • • minimum, it will include'the'past, hree years of operating"data;'The'City will provide,historical operating data in an Excel spreadsheet, with other infennatioii (e.g., equipmentcut-sheets, O&M records) in PDF format. Upon receipt of tfie information,'itwill be reviewed and analyzed, • and any requests for clarification will be submitted to the City. Additional Sampling/Testing;Should additional'sampling and testing be required to fill`data;gaps or collect new'data,,;Consultant may prepare-a,sampling and testing protocol for the City under On Call Support Services. The protocol;will identify sample locations;.type of;sample;to be taken, tests to be run on each sample, and frequency'and`duratiomoc'sampling areach,location. Sampling and testing Will be conducted by the City. The City'will:provide:test?results compiled in an Excel spreadsheet. Consultant will.analyzertherdataand follow=up with the,City:should.any clarification be required or if any ambiguities are observed in the results. Review:Permits: Consultant'will review the City,s current air quality permit, biosolids'permit, and any other permits that relate:to the.solids process. ' Subtask P3.2 - Assess Capacity to HandleiCurrent and Potential Future Solids Loadings This task will assessthe capacitydtexisting solids facilitiesto'handle;variouscombinations of waste loading from the liquid process as well as delivered high-strength waste streams (including fats, oils and grease [FOG], and food waste). The assessment will include a projection for performance assuming existing mesophillic.digestion capacity and associated facilities.are doubled (notuincluding duplication of acid phased digestion). A.market assessment of high-strength waste streams is not included, but may for'under On Call Support Services. Identify Solids LoadingScenarios: Consultant, in consultation With the City, will identify.and evaluate up to four solids loading scenarios using various combinations of the following!options. The four general loading options include: • Option 1 - Existing WastewaterLoadingfrom Existing Facilities—WAS from existing secondary process only. • .Option 2 - Existing°Wastewater Loading-from new Primary Treatment (primary filtration and primary clarification will both!be considered)+ WAS from existing and improved secondary process. • Option 3 - New Medium-Strength Industrial loading —adding'-medium-strengthwaste to liquid stream. • Option 4 - New High'-Strength Industrial loading T.adding high strength-waste (FOG,and food waste streams) directly to digesters, including`use of existing acid-phase or potentially modified`mesophilic digesters. Evaluate Solids.LoadinqyScenarios - Consultant will evaluate the hydraulic and solids loading capacity for the existing facilities?and'potential doubling'yof mesophillic digestion,capacity for the identified loading scenarios .Consultant will identify the solids concentrations and volatile content for each:waste source, based on the current results at Ellis Creek; previous,filtration pilot study information; other available data If required,(Consultant will use typical wastewater criteria or data from other,similar projects to fill data gaps. The results will be tabulated in spreadsheet format for use in subsequent subtasks. 1 Exhibit A Page'7 of 19 2 July 2013 2I • Stibtask P3.3 — Co-Digestion Pilot:Study Using High-Strength Waste This task will assess the digestibility, gas production"potential and impacts on dewatering efficiency ofup to three high-strength waste.sources-that are produced.by local food and beverage industries. Identify Candidate Industries/Waste Sources: The Consultant will discuss'candidate,industries with the City and identify the most ideal:high strength waste sources for the pilot study,based on the information that will be obtained from their involvement Consultant;.working in collaboration with the City, will++contact!up to three local industries-and conduct interviews with the goal of obtaining information including: • Volume of high-strength waste produced • Characteristics (COD, BOD, SS, NH3, pH, copper, nickel) • Daily, weekly, monthly, seasonal-fluctuations in source availability or characteristics • Current disposal method forwaste source. Consultant will develop protocols for sampling and analyzing;the identified waste stream(s) under On Call Support Services; if reliable or complete data does not exist from the identified industries. Develop Pilot Test Program.Protocol: Consultant will.develop a pilot:test program that will include the following: • High-strength waste collection and;transportation plan • Plan for receiving, storing, and processing the high-strength waste at the Ellis Creek facility • Plan for "conditioning"the digester with the new waste stream • Plan for feeding the digester with high-strength waste and monitoring the digester performance It is assumed the City will construct any facilities or facilities modifications.required to perform the pilot study, and provide all sampling, testing;and.laboratory results for Consultant's use. Evaluate.Pilot Test Results and Prepare Technical Memorandum: Consultant-will evaluate the results of the pilot test for up to three different wastes and report the results and findings in a draft and final technical memorandum. Included in,that technical memorandum will be a projection for the potential volume'of digester gas that could,be produced from each source of high-strength wate:andidentification of potential impacts.on:digestion and downstream dewatering.processes. A review meeting will be;conducted.with.the City to review the draft technical memorandum Task D — Headworks Screen Replacement Design, Bid, and Engineering Services During Construction This element of the,..work will-be used to.prepare contract documents to replace the two existing screens at the headworks with new units. The new screens will be designed with smaller Exhibit A Page 8 of 19 2 July 2013 22 ' I openings (1/4-inch norninal) to increase the percentage of nonbiodegradable solids removed at the headworks. Suitability ofte following screen technologies will be ekamined during the design-development phase: • Perforated Plate Rotary Drum Screen • Step Screen • Multiple Rake Bar Screen Engineering effort for the headworks screen replacement task will take place over four phases: • Design Development,Phase"—establishes the:basis efdesign that will be carried forward to prepare contract documents for construction. • Contract Document Phase—preparation of plans and specifications for construction afterCity'approval of:the Basis.of Design. • . Bid Phase—limited engineering assistance betweenihe;bid advertisement and construction co ntract,award. • Construction Phase—engineering assistance during construction will be negotiated and provided for under an'amendmentto this agreement. Given that the scope of Work is limitedtoreplacing the-screens, the planned drawing and specifications lists do not include any civilsite work or Structural engineering. The following tasks descriptions"provide:a breakdown of the engineering activities that are planned for this scope of work` Design-Development[Phase Task D1 — Preliminary Design' This task consists of the work'needed,to establish a detailed basis:of design.for the screen replacement. Accordingly, the following activities will occur during this phase of the screen replacement project: Subtask D1,1 - Data/Information Collection and Review A combined kickoff meeting and site visit will be'.conducted'to;collect and review„available background;data,and information related to theexisting headworks.screens: Desigrrobjectives, fortlie screens will.also be:established at this time. Deliverables:- • Kickoff meeting-minutes Subtask D1.2 -Evaluate Applicable Screen Technologies The following screen technologies wine evaluated for suitability: • Perforated Plate Rotary Drum Screen ' • Step Screen 1 Exhibit A Page 9 of 19 2 July 2013 23 • • Multiple Rake Bar Screen The evaluation process will consist of the following activities: • Establish design requirements for screen appurtenances (washer, compactor and conveyance subsystems) • Evaluate screen head loss to establish-hydraulic compatibility with upstream and downstream processes • • Evaluate geometric-compatibility with the existing headworks structure • Evaluate screen-capture efficiency • Evaluate operations,and`maintenancerequirements • Evaluate instrumentation and control requirements. Results of the evaluation process will be presented in a workshop setting. The purpose of the workshop will be to select the screen technology that will be incorporated into the construction documents. Deliverables: • Workshop meeting minutes Meetings: • One workshop Subtask D1.3 — Draft Basis-of-Design Technical Memorandum (TM) The basis of design for the new screens will be:documente d in'a TM. This document will establish the following: • Screen type(s) and appurtenances that will be specified • Hydraulic criteria • Screen layout • Construction sequencing constraints • Equipment procurement approach • Code,requirements. • Engineer's preliminary.estimate of probable construction costs • SCADA integration requirements Deliverables: • Draft Basis of Design TM Meetings: • (1) review meeting Subtask D1.4 - QA/QC Exhibit A Page 10 049 2 July 2013 24 The draft-basis of design TM will be reviewed in•accordance:with Consultants standard procedures. No'meetings'ordeliverables are planned for this;task. Subtask D1.5 — Finalize.Basis of Design TM City's review comments to the draft document-will`be'incorporated into the final TM Deliverables:. • Final Basis of Design TM Contract Documents'Phase This phase of work consists of developing contract documents (plans and specifications) based on the City-approved basisof design: 'Based on our understanding the project scope, the following drawings are anticipated: • G-1: Project Vicinity-Map, Location Map and Index.to:Plans • G-2: Legend, Piping Symbols, Piping Schedule and Desigh'Criteria • C-1: Site Plan • M-1: Demolition Plan • M-2: Demolition Photos • M-3: Deck Plan • M-4: Sectional Plan • M-5: Sections • M-6: Mechanical Details • E-1: Legend • E-2: One-Line Diagram — Demolition. • E-3: One-Line Diagram Improvement • E-4: Area Plan • E-5: Plan View • E-6: Elevations • E-7 Schedules and Details • I-1: Legend • 1-2: P&ID— Headworks (prior Contract Drawing 01 N0.1 with edits) • 1-3: P&ID— Headworks (prior Contract Drawing 01 NO2:with edits) • 1-4: Control Diagrams • • 1-5: Elevations and Details In addition, the following,specifications are anticipated: • GeneraiRequirements (CSI Division 1) • Metal_Fabrications • Protective Coatings • Identifying Devices • General Equipment and Mechanical Requirements • Electric-Motor Drives • Screen Equipment • Piping, Valves and Accessories , • General Electrical Requirements • Instrumentation and;Cbntrols 1 Exhibit A Page 11 of 19 2 July 2013 • 25 r i • Task D2 - 50% Design Submittal The 59%submittal will be.based onthe-approved basis.of design'as''developed.under Task D1, described above. The purpose of-the 50% submittal is to provide:a..clear understanding of the scope of improvements prior to submitting a complete set of drawings and specifications. Accordingly, the following materials will be developed during this task: Subtask D2.1 - 50% Drawings • M-1: Demolition Plan • M-2: Demolition'Ptiotos • M-3: Deck.Plan • M-5: Sections • 1E-2: One-Line Diagram — Demolition • E-3: One-Line Diagram.— Improvement • E-5: Plan View • • 1-2: P&ID— Headworks(prior.Contract Drawing 01N01 with edits) • 1-3: P&ID— Headworks(prior Contract Drawing 01 NO2with,edits) Subtask 02.2 - 50% Specifications • Table of contents • Division 1 (General Requirements) • Screen Equipment • Subtask D2.3 — 50% Cost.Estimate. Consultant will update the engineer'sestimatefof probable construction costs (estimate) Subtask D2;4 - Meetings '&cSite Visits • (1) site visit to EC \AONTP • (1) Review workshop with City after 50%submittal Deliverables • ,50% Drawings, specifications and estimate • 'Meeting'niihOtesifrom 50% review workshop Task D3 -.90% Design Submittal The 90% submittal will consist of a complete set of draft bidding'documents'for the City's final review prior to submitting final bid documents. Thus, this effort consists of the following subtasks• Subtask 03:1 — 90% Drawings A complete:set of„draft contract;drawings will be prepared based on the approved basis of design and City's 50% review comments. I Exhibit A Page 12 of19 2 July 2013 1 26 Subtask D3.2 90%Specifications A.complete set of technical specifications will be prepared based on the approved basis of design and the City's 50% review comments. The City,s standard boilerplate;documents (i.e. • bid forms, agreement, and contract conditions);will be edited per the City's instructions. Subtask D3.3 - 90%Cost Estimate Consultant will update the engineer's estimate of probable construction costs (estimate). • Subtask D3.4 - Meetings & Site Visits • 90% review meeting • No site visits.plannedtor this.subtask Deliverables: • 90% Drawings; specifications and cost estimate • Meeting minutes from 90% reviewworkshop Task D4— Final Bid Documents Final bid documents will be`prepared and submitted to thesCity'for reproduction;and advertisement, and distnbution'for constructiorCbids. No meetings or site visits are planned for this task. Subtask D4.1 — Final Drawings Edit 90% drawings to incorporate,City's,90%.review comments Subtask D4.2 Final Specifications Edit 90% specifications to incorporate City's 90% review comments Subtask.D4.3 — Final Cost'Estimate Edit90% cost estimate'to incorporate City's 90% review comments. Deliverables • One unbound set of half-size and full-size reproducible plans • One unbound set of'single=sided specifications Bidding Phase Task D5 — Bid Support Services Basic bid-phase'services consist of: Subtask`.D5.1 - Bidders' RFIs Exhibit A Page 13 o(19 2 July 2013 27 rl Respond to bidders' requests for clarification during the 30-day bid period. • Exhibit A Page 14 of 19 2 July 2013 28 1 Subtask D5.2 — Prepare Addendum Prepare up to one (1) addendum, if required Addendum materials,will be submitted to City for distribution to plan holders. Subtask D.5.3_— Attend Pre-Bid Meeting Consultant will attend one pre-bid meeting, which will be facilitated by the City. Deliverables: • One (1) addendum • Meeting minutes City-Provided Services: • Maintain plan-holders list • All advertisement activities • ! Provide/coordinate:all reproduction of bid documents • Task PM — Project Managementzand QA/QC Program. The budget for program management'is developed based on;a six month (6 month) duration for services. The/Period can be extended if necessary%by mutual'agreemehtvia a written amendment to scope, schedule and budget. Task PM.1 — Develop Work:Plan and Conduct Project Initiation Meeting Consultant will develop and communicate an internal Work Plan to the project team during an internal project initiation meeting. The Work Plan will define project team, including subconsultants, and each team members' role'and:kesponsibilities, lines;of.internal`and•external communications, the overall quality assurance;and.quality control program, and expectations for adherence to the scope, schedule andbudget requirements: Task PM:2 — Manage Team Consultant will manage in house,and,subconsultant team members during the course of the work via face to face meetings; teleconferences, conference:calls and email communications, as appropriate. The purpose of these:commun cations will be..to coordinate ongoing work actiwfes, and monitor the progress on the scope of work deliverables, work quality, schedule and,budget. Task PM.3 — Develop and Maintain QA/QC Program Consultant will identify a Quality Assurance /Quality Control(QA'/QC) Manager who will develop and maintain a QA/QC Program consistent with1Consultant's:policies°and generally accepted industry standards. The program will''identify the reviews and reviewers for each deliverable included in this scope of services. The budget for performing the review of'each deliverable is l � Exhibit A Page 15 of`19 2 July 2013 29 included in the"associated task.budget. Also included in this,task will berg Concept and Criteria Review.(C&CR),Meeting'fdn the overall project"with:key team Members-Of the project team. The C&CR meeting will'be conducted within the first45;days of work or 15% of budget expended and will be led by the QA/OC Manager who will bring in qualified senior personnel from outside the project team to provide an independent review of the approach concepts•and'engineering criteria being used to perform the work. Task PM.4 — PrepareMonthly Invoices/Status Reports Consultant will prepare monthly invoices for services that will be provided in a format and on a schedule that is acceptable to the City, Each invoice will include a brief recap of activities performed during theperiod and the status of the project activities; including any important issues, problems or anticipated problems that may regaire.actioh or resolution by the City. Up to six (6) invoices and status reports will be provided. Task PM.5 — City Project Review Meetings Consultant will conduct a quarterly'project review meetings with the`City's Project Manager and the Director of the Public Works and Utilities Department. The purpose of the meeting is to review the status of the scope, schedule and budget; and to assessthe performance of the team and the quality of work being provided. Two (2) project review meetings are included. • On Call Support Services On Call Support.Servicesmay include anticipated work'in several:general areas as described previously in the General Assumptions section herein. The following tasks of work.may be added to this agreement on a task order basis, at the City's request,•and will require;a separate written authorization to proceed..Specific examples of what On Call Support Services may„include are,listed below ,This is not a comprehensive list but illustrates'the types of activities that might be needed including: • Additional Sampling and Testing Protocols at the Ellis Creek Facility to fill data gaps for the Liquids and Solids:Process Evaluations • Development and evaluation of facility alternatives orloading scenarios to be evaluated following the Initial Liquids and Solids Process Evaluations • Capital Improvement Planning ' • Evaluations; hydraulic modeling, market analysis and terminatstorage evaluations for the offsite recycled water system • Stakeholder/Industrial Outreach • Market;Assessment ofMedium"Strength and/or High-Strength Waste Sources • Sampling and"Testing of Medium and High-Strehgth Waste Sources • Co-Digestion Pilot Study Facilities Design,Procurement and Construction Services • Development of public-private partnership concepts for a co-digestion project • Capacity and Rate"relatedsupport services Exhibit A Page 16 of119 2 July 2013 30 • ' Tertiary Pilot Studyto increas&the loading rate on the filters to increase capacity without new facilities construction • Grant Funding assistance for Pilot Projects or CIP elements • Regulatory review and negotiations for re-rating of Ellis Creek.Facilities • Long-term Biosolids Management Plan and Assessment of Future Biosolids Permitting Requirements • Long-Term Wetlands/Ponds/Operations and Maintenance Plan tailored to the final configuration of facilities recommended in the CIP • Preliminary Design.of CIP Facilities to supportthe RFP or CEQA processes • CEQA Compliance.Evaluation of Proposed CIP • Design of minor improvementsthat•might yield immediate cost savings or operational benefits, as identified during plant audits, pilots or assessments • Facilitate and attend site visits to other facilities and examine potential screen technologies with City staff • Develop alternative equipment procurement documents;(e.g. pre-purchase agreements, pre-negotiated agreements) beyond that required for conventional competitive bidding on public projects • Additional structural or civil construction documents beyond those listed in the scope of work for Headworks Screen Replacement • Preparation of a web-enabled O&M manual. ExhibitA Page 17 of 99 2 July 2013 31 Custom Schedule.of'Charges Date: April 25, 2013 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION Classification Hourly Rate CAD-Technician - - $110 Designer-Senior Technician - - ,.. $140 Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 1 _ - - $130 • Engineer-Scientist=Specialist 2 $135 Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 3 $155 Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 4 $165 Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 5 $175 Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 6 $185 Engineer-Scientist'Specialist 7 $210 Engineer-Scientist'Specialist 8 - $220 Engineer-Scientist;Specialist 9 -- $230 Project Administrator -- - - $100 Administrative:Assistant - - - $88 Aide - $65 In addition to the above Hourly Rates; a three percent•Communications,Surcharge will be added to Personnel Compensahon'for normal and incidental copies, communications and postage. • DIRECT EXPENSES Reimbursement for direct expenses, as,listed below, incurred in connection with the work, will be at cost plus five percent for items-such as: a. Maps,photographs, 3rd party reproductions,,3rd party printing, equipment-rental, and special supplies related to'the work. b. Consultants,:soils engineers,..surveyors, contractors, and:other outside services. c. Rented vehicles; local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence. d. Project specific telecommunicationsand delivery charges. e. Special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work. Reimbursement for vehicles;used imconnectionwith theiwork will be•at'the-federally approved mileage rates or at a negotiated monthly rate. Ratesifor professional staff for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses:will be at rates�.;one and one- half times the Hourly Rates specified above. Excise and gross;receiptstaxes„if any,will be added as`;a direct expense. The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the agreementfor the-services provided, effective-April 25,2013 through,December'31, 2013. After December 31', 2013, invoices'will reflect the Schedule of Charges currentlyln,effect. Exhibit A Page 18 of 19 2.July 2013 32 i yea t� ,��' �. Sit«-'gym.4 4_ �#n.t7 a: . a 7 Y ti p.. a a s . m 3 yr WT In r o N C v ' - ' W $ g °. . F N 2%. - 9. rl N V `.f z 'IL' A. u a ❑v N N n a l;N O O U •:5 0: cI n o y' d re, d 4" v t" fM .n * " : P Lb'�ts `_v O ,n vrvi ° _ ry _ `a I `Y c ,fi; q .o D co J N E. m `;.I, n `v LU ° 0,'. _ '.rl" (9 ' II' a i i° ; F- m m E _'s' LL LL' T C rt p k v �_ W W a t U) A N N Q '�a N u ' m m. v, v c fc. .. Q) 0 # Q 4 3 M. N v N n 7�N q E f E .. Lci 1;W O O d W N` C p. O v ` C. a s a N q - .. At;N V V z $1. m, J N. Y. rp m Y, w U C r i — r n. a f N ,""....0 . N = in vl Nom'„ a s a a o a n F: tW;p a -"E Y Y Y Y Y -Y U v`f. • Fes- l u a a e a.' -co FN- f' h al F■ I- 00 q il Exhibit A Page 19 of 19 2 July 2013 i I I 33 • INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT Bt2 Consultant's performance of the Services under this Agreement shall not commence until Consultant shall have obtained,all insurance required under this paragraph and such insurance shall have been approved by the City Attorney as to form and the Risk Manager as to carrier and sufficiency. All requirements herein provided. shall.appear cithec:in the body oldie insurance policies or as endorsementsand shall specifically bind the insurance carrier. Consultant shall procure.and Maintain: for the duration of-the contract all necessary insurance against claims now and in the futurc for injuries to persons.ordamages'to property which may arise from or in connection with, the performance of the. Services by the Consultant, the Consultant's agents, representatives, 'employees and subebiitractors. Required professional liability insurance shall be maintained at the level specified herein, for the duration of this Agreement and any extension 'thcreofand for twelve additional months following the Agreement termination or expiration. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall beat least as-hread as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage: a. Personal injury; b. Contractual liability. 2. Insurance Services Office form covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). 3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance.' 4. Professional Liability,insurance.. 5. Such other insurance coverages;and limits as may be required by the City. B. Minimum Limits of.Insurance Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general:aggregate liability is used either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately' to this Agreenierit or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injwry rand property damage. 3. Employer's-Liability: Bodily Injury by Accident - $1,000,000 each accident. Bodily Injury by Disease - $1,000,000 policy limit. Bodily Injury by-Disease - $1,000,000 each employee. 4. Professional Liability ihsuiance:';$1 ,000;000. 5. Such other insurance coverages and limits as may be required by the City. C. Deductiblesanil Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self insured detentions must}be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of"the City; either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or Exhibit B2 Page I of 2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS(City) (Manage 4609325)March 2013 34 • selfinsured retentions. as Respects the City,, its officers; officials, employees, and volunteers; ;or,, the Consultant shall procure a bond,guaranteeing payment 'of'losses and related investigations,claim administration and defense•expenses. D. Other lnsui-ance•Provisions, The required general liability.and automobile policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain the following-provisions: The City, its, officers, officials, einployces; agents and volunteers' arc to be covered as Additional Insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or Used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed bythe Consultant. The coverage shall contain noespecial`limitations on the scope ot protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees„agents.or volunteers,. 2. For any claims related to this project,`the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City„ its officers, officials; employees, agents and volunteers.. Any insurance or selfinsuraiice maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.. 3. Any failwe'tb;c0iiiply with repotting oriother piovisioiis,of the policies including breaches of wauanties shall not affect coverage,;provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.. 4. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately`to each insured against whom claim.is made;or suit is brought except,!with respect.to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5. Each insurance policy required; by this clause shall,be endorsed to state that coverage shall; not be suspended, voided; canceled by ;either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice.by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been.given.to the:City. 6. Consultant agrees' to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, .and to require all contractors, subcontractors or others involved in a any way with the Services-to do.likewise. E. Acceptability of Insurers • p g, than In suiance is to be laced with insurers with a cuirent A.M. Best's ratm of no;less than, A:VII. F. Verification of Coverage Consultant` hall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage,required by this clause. The endorsements are to' be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All,endorsements,are to be received and approved by the Citybeforc tlie Services commence. Exhibit B2 Page 2 of 2 INSURANCE,REQUIREMENTS(City) 1 (iManage 0609325)March 201335 EXHIBIT C ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CITY OF PETALUMA LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE PETALUMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER8.36 The City of Petaluma Living Wage,Ordiiiance ("Ordinance"), Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, applies to certain service'contracts, leases, franchises anctother agreements or funding mechanisms providing linancialassistance'(referredto hereafter as an "Agreement") between the City of Petaluma ("City") and/or`the Petaluma Community Development Commission CPCDC") and contractors, lessees,'franchisees, and/or recipients ofCity`and/or PCDC funding or financial benefits ("coveredentities"): Pursuant to Petaluma Municipal.Code'Section 8,36.120,.as part,of any bid„application or proposal for any Agreement subject to the Ordinance, the^covered entity shall: • Acknowledge that the'eovered entity is aware of the Ordinance,and,intends to comply with its provisions. • Complete the Reportof"Charges, Complaints; Citationsand/or Findings contained in this Acknowledgement and Certification by providing.information; including the date, subject matter and mannerof resolution, if any,of all wage, hour,collective bargaining, workplace safety, environmental orconsumer.protection charges, complaints, citations, and/or findings of violation Of law.Or regulation by any regulatory agency or court including but not limited to the California Departmentof Fair Employment and Housing, Division of Occupational Safety and Healthv(OSHA), California,Department of Industrial Relations (Labor°Cominissioner), Environmental Protection Agency.and/or National Labor Relations Board, which have been filed or presented to the covered entity within the ten years immediately prior to the:bii:l,proposal, submission orrequest. Pursuant to Petaluma Municipal Code Section 8:36.1'20, before,theebeginning,of the term of any covered Agreement, or prior,tor the execution ofdsaid Agreement by the City or the PCDC, each covered entity shall certify that its employees are paid a living wage that consistent with Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter8,36. By executing:this Acknowledgement and Certification; the covered entity (i) acknowledges'that it is aware;of the Ordinanceandintends.to comply with its provisions, (ii) attests to.the accuracy and completeness,of information.provided in the Report of Charges,Complaints, Citation's and/or.liindings,contained herein, (iii) certifies that it pays its covered employees a Living Wage as defined in',Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter 8.36 and (iv),attests that thepeison executing this Acknowledgement and Certification is,authorized to bind-the covered entity as to the matters covered in this Acknowledgment and Certification. Page.1 o f 3 LIVING WAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. AND CERTIFICATION (iMnnage 81638697.2 (March 2013) 36 SO ACKNOWLEDGED.'and CERTIFIED: Project or Contract I.D: C66501305 Date: (Print Name of Covered Entity/Business Capacity) By (Print Name) Is/ (Signature) Its (Title/Capacity of Authorized Signer) Page;2 of 3 LIVING WAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CER I'll:ICATHON ()Manage#16386972 (March 2013) 37 • ;REPORTOF CHARGES, COMPLAINTS, CITATIONS AND/OR FINDINGS PURSUANT,TO PETALUMA MUNICIPAL.CODE SECTION 8.36.120 FOR EACH WAGE, IIOUR,COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, WORKPLACE SAFELY, ENVIRONMENTAL OR CONSUMER PROTECTION CHARGE,COMPLAINT,CITATION,AND/OR FINDING OF VIOLATION OF LAW OR REGULATION`I3Y ANY REGULATORY AGENCY OR COURT, INCLUDING.BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE • CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIREMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (OSHA), CALIFORNIA DEPARTMEN b INDUSCRIAI. RELA'T'IONS (LABOR COMMISSIONER).ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND/OR NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, WHICH: • AFFECTS YOU AS A PROSPEC'T'IVE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTOR, LESSEE, FRANCHISEE AND/OR PARTY TO ANYCITY OF PETALUMA AND/OR PEPALUMA.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION-FUNDED AGREEMENT OR BENEFIT SUI3JECI'rO PETALUMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER.8 36(LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE),AND • HAS BEEN FILED OR PRESENTED TO YOU WITHIN [HE TEN YEARS,IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE BID, PROPOSAL, SUBMISSION OR REQUEST FOR WHICH THIS:ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION IS MADE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE,THE REGULATORY AGENCY OR COURT MAKING THE CHARGE COMPLAINT, CITATION OR FINDING,THE SUBJECT'1MATTER AND Till: MANNER OF RESOLUTION, IF ANY,FOR EACH SUCH CHARGE COMPLAINT, CITATION OR FINDING. IF NONE, PLEASE STATE"NONE": ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IENEEDED. Date: Regulatory Agency or Court: Subject Matter: Resolution, if any: Expected 'iesolution, if known:. Page'13 of 3 LIVING WAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION (IManage#1638697.2 (March 2013) 38 Attachment 3 ELLIS CREEK WATER RECYCLING FACILITY HEADWORKS SCREEN UPGRADE AND PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER C66501305 & 066501306 LOCATION MAP C p .Li-H-Info !' Th---r) _., C ruij z JL.: ete s v v ELY ROAD %I .ar-tst'''*•71141 \<4? \ . S Z CD LVI- rijill . 1 . • .,,..r_ (STATE 1 1 6) 1 mi Ix( i- LAKEVILLE HWY. '=-__, a-,__ (F1 -7:3 / — _ .....,. li , 1 J11/3 it ill .... ... ...— ....... I • Iti _J ss DR.-12Y)."----eSM,; 1 : 10.„../C etE Thq_. 1„ . ....... F---7 ) i ,' C] __ __---' , ..., •••.1. Ellis Creek i . "\ji Water Recycling IIIPAII (g Facility 1 '''> .... Ii m I ii I I .rn , zl m 14: : - ./ .- - --< ,41704;;?--ifr-Lc:114.-_ __ _ _.---/2"_----- 7/ 7------------- • i 4, I, - - - - - - -, ,.--:- k■Inai------...._ ------- r — 1111.11Pg■all"t"•••-.. .et...'-, . " 34 'CI K-• .$ s 39