HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 87-344 N.C.S. 12/07/1987?~
Resolufion No. R~-~~~ N, C~~.
of the City of Petaluma, California
RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED..N,EGATIVE DECLARATION
PUR'SU'ANT TO CEQA FOR AN, AMENDMENT TO T.HE CREEKVIEW COMMONS
P,LAN.NED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT ELY BOULEVARD NORTH AND
MONROE STREET (AP NO. 1'36-111-19)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
"(CE.QA) for a proposal to -incorporate a half-acre parcel into the existing
Creekview Commons Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, an initial study. .which noted potential :traffic, noise, and visual
iinp.acts has. been prepared for the area and has been reviewed by the
Community Development and Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, . the results of this study have indicated that approval of this
project ,as conditionally approved will not trigger any significant adverse
environmental impacts; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development and Planning Department and the
.Planning Commission have recommended that a .mitigated negative declaration
be issued on the above project,;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE :IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is
hereby ~ag,proved, based upon the following findings:
a. Due to the developed nature of the existing site, the project does not
have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat: of a fish or wildlife species, cause fish
or wi d-life population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a; plant or animal community, re.du,ce the number or restrict
th,e range of, a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important .examples of major periods of` California history or prehistory.
1
RESO. 87-344 N.CS
b . The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to
achieve short term to the disadvantage of long term environmental
goals .
c. Because the project does not include additional phased development,
the project as conditionally approved does not have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively considerable.
d. The project as conditionally approved does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings
either directly or .indirectly.
e. The project as approved, includes conditions intended to mitigate
identified impacts including
- Extension of soundwall along Ely Blvd. and sound reduction
measures in construction of the new buildings to provide sound
reduction .
- SPARC review to insure architectural and landscape compatibility
with the surrounding development.
- Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee.
reso, creekview. pud/reso8
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) ~9p~~1) meeting
on the ..----...._7>;.h-...---. day of ......Ae.c.eml~.ex .................................. 19. ~.Z.., by the
following vote:
ty Attorney
AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey
NOES : 0
ABSENT: C an r Hilligoss
.. .............. ... -.....-~~6R.:....•...~..........-...
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.. .......- ~.... .-.-!-r ................... ........... ...-.-..
Mayor
Council File-.-...op...-.....p.-°--.-°----...-..
CA 10-55 ~ Res. No. ........... G7.7.'..J.44 N.C.S.