Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 87-345 N.C.S. 12/07/19871' -.~ Resolution No. s7-345 N. C. S. of the City of Petaluma, California • •.l A RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISIO:N5 TO THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CREEKVIEW COMMONS SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON MONROE STREET AT ELY BLVD. NORTH !" WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1493 N.C.S., Creekview Commons Subdivision was rezoned to Planned Unit Development and, WHEREAS, by action taken on November 10, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended conditional adoption of a revised final unit development plan .for said subdivision to .incorporate/revise development standards. NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED that the unit development plan previously approved for the project by City Council Resolution No. 9314 N. C'. S. is hereby amended to permit revision to development plan as `$"described in the Planning Commission minutes of November 10, 1987. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission as its findings as set out hereinafter: Findings 1. Said amendment to the plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible under the original development plan. 2. The PUD District, as originally developed, has a suitable relationship to one (1~) or more thoroughfares. The traffic impact anticipated as a result of the proposed amendment will be mitigated through conditions of approval. 3. The plan amendment as conditioned continues to present a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are ~'~®0 ~ .Q ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ,appropriate in relation to adjacent '.properties, and adequate landscaping will be required to insure compatibility. 4. The natural and. :scenic qualities of the. site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the original and proposed unit .development plan. 5. The development of the subject property, in the manner as proposed to be amended by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning .regulations of the City of Petaluma, and the Petaluma General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the r.e.vised unit development plan subject to the conditions of approval set out lerenaf ter . Conditions I. The common area proposed for the new units shall be merged with the common area of the existing PUD, subject to staff review and approval. 2. Access to the new units shall be via the Creekview Commons traffic circulation system subject to SPARC review and approval. The driveway proposed on Monroe Street shall. be eliminated. 3. :Rear yard. fencing for buildings 3 and 4, with rear elevations facing .;Ely Boulevard, shall be designed to provide sound buffering. Said fencing shall be an extension of that required in the original PUD for units backing on Ely (i.e., shall provide sound. buffering; shall match i-n. mater-al, style, etc. ; shall be physically connected to the sound bu-fferng fence required in original PUD) . Windows on rear elevations of. buildings 3 and 4 shall be designed. to provide interior noise levels not to exceed 40 dBa in bedrooms. and. 45 dBa in other habitable r"ooms . All are subject to review approval by City staff . ~- 2 . _. ,g~°34~5NCS R~~ 3. On-site pedestrian access (i. e. , in addition to the sidewalk on Monroe Street) shall be provided between the pxoposed 4-unit section and the existing PUD, subject to staff review and approval. 4. A tentative map process shall be required for this project. 5. The Homeowners' Association of Creekview Commons shall be responsible for maintenance of all landscaping installed in the public right-of-way (i.e., between the soundwall and the sidewalk). 7. All applicable original conditions of approval of the existing PUD unit development plans, Resolution 9314 N.C.S, shall be re-adopted as part of this development plan . 8. The four new units shall be annexed into the existing CC&R's for the Creekview Commons Planned Unit Development. If the annexation is rejected by the Home Owner's Association, the project will be returned to the Commission for appropriate revision of conditions . 9. This project shall be subject to 5PARC review, with special emphasis on the following a. Building setbacks, landscaping (including public right-of-way along Ely Boulevard) and architecture shall match or shall be equivalent to that of the existing Creekview Commons development. b . Possibility of creekside walkway connection to be explored by SPARC. 10. The project sponsor shall execute a binding agreement which shall .stipulate that upon close of escrow of each residential dwelling unit in this, ,phase of Creekview Commons, developer shall pay $150.00 to the.. City per daily trip end estimated to be generated by said unit. Each unit. :is estimated to generate 10'.0 t-rip ends per day. If the City establishes a Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee prior to close of 3 - ~CS ~~®. ~~ ~~~ ~ v -~ 5 1, , "~ escrow of any unit (.s) , the fee for said, unit (s') and all subsequent units in this project thereafter be either $150.00 per trip end or the Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee, whichever is less on a per unit basis. 11. Applicant shall participate in an assessment district or other funding mechanism formed to construct Lynch Creek Bridge if such a district is formed. 12. The applicant shall offer to the City (,for- relocation), the existing house located on'the project site should it be slated. for demolition. If the City chooses not to accept the house, demolition may proceed subsequent to obtaining a demolition permit. 13. .For information purposes, the following special development fees shall be applicable: Sewer and water connection,. Community Facilities, Storm Drainage Impact, Park and Recreation Land Improvement and Scliool Facilities. 14 . Applicants shall - contribute a pro rata share for the installation of a landscape median island on Ely Boulevard. Dollar amount shall be based on the amount of frontage of this property on Ely Blvd. and shall be determined by the City Engineer. 15. ,Install fire hydrant as required by the Fire Marshal. 4 5 . C~ .., .~ ; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines have been satisfied and hereby incorporates by reference the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1987. reso , creekview . udp / reso8 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the Cit of Petaluma at a Regular Adjourned g form y ( ) ( ) (i8g~tad) meetin on the .....-7..th..----..._.. day of ...............IIe.cambE.r......................., 19..82., by the following vote: 'ty Attorney AYES: Sobel, Balshaw, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey ......................5 .. .......-...... City Clerk Mayor Cbuacil File...-.-° ..................°---.-... CA 10-85 ~ Res. Nu.....-....8.7.r..3/{.rj... N.C.S. NOES : 0 ABSENT: 'van r Hilligoss ATTEST : .. .. .......... ...-.:.....-................................