HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 87-193 N.C.S. 07/06/1987~
~
j' , .
Resolution No. g~-19~ N C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
RESOLUTION APPROVING I5SUANCE OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION PUR5UANT TO CEQA FOR THE CREATION
OF THE FOWLER COURT SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 760
BODEGA AVENUE (NORTH SIDE OF BODEGA BETWEEN RUTH
COURT AND N. WEBSTER STREET AND BODEGA INTERSECTION.)
(A.P. NO. 006-480-21)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) for a proposal to create a 4 lot residential subdivision, at 760
Bodega Avenue (North side of Bodega between Ruth Court and No. Webster
Street and Bodega intersection; and
WHEREAS, an initial study which noted traffic, drainage, and visual impacts
has been prepared for the area and has been reviewed by the Community
Development and Planning Department and the Planning Commission; and,
WHEREA5, the results of this study has indicated that approval of this
project as conditionally approved will not trigger any significant adverse
environmental impacts; and,
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a
mitigated negative declaration be issued on the above project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based upon the following findings:
1. In the event of an archaeological find during construction, this project
bears a condition of approval to require that this finding be
authoritatively evaluated.
The traffic impact of this four-unit
2 subdivision will be slight relative
.
of the
to the capacity existing road network and the impact of the
,
subdivision on~ -Bodega ~Avenue will be mitigated by the fact of the
recorded agreement to switch the a ccess of the three uphill lots to a
future street parallel to Bodega Avenue which will enter Bodega
Avenue at a controlled intersection.
3. The drainage impacts of the project will be taken into account in detail
in the improvement plans for the project which will be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of Final Map .
4. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
uf,s. ,~~~......g~W 193...... v.c.s.
t~
animal eommunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of major
periods of California history or pre-history.
5. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to
achieve short term to the disadvantages of long term environmental
goals .
6. The project as conditionally approved does not have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
7, The project as conditionally approved does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings
either directly or indirectly.
reso.fowler.ceqa
RES07
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a(Regular) (~~~~~ meeting °~
on the ••-•---..fiYh----._.. day of ......................T~tl.s}...._..._..•-•-...........__, 19...8~. by the
• - •-••••--••-•••-•---•-•--...
following vote: .-••-.
City Attorney
AYES: SobeT, Balshaw, Cavanagh, Davis, Tencer, Vice Mayor Woolsey, A~a o Hilligoss
NOES: 0
~
ABSENT: 0 -: /.
ATTEST: ... .. . ~/2~~~ :~. .. L . ._ ..~~~~~
:~`~~ - .--.- .
City Clerl.
~ .
~ ~.
.
.
,: •
.............•- -lf,~.~'~. .~...~",~.-~.•••-•••••••-•- •--•- -~~--•----•
Mayor
Council Fil ._ --....._..
cn io-a5 ~ H~s. No..... ~~-I93
............... N.C.S.