HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 86-331 N.C.S. 12/15/1986-.,~~, . ,
1~~S.O~L1t10Y1 ~~.86-331 ~. C. S..
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE UNIT D:EVELOPA~IENT PLAN FOR
SPRINGMEADOW V F,E5IDENTIAL PROJECT, ON THE EAST SIDE
OF GARFIELD DRIVE. BETWEEN VISTA LANE AND CAULFIELD LANE
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1670 N.C,.S., Assessor's Parcel Numbers
136-060-47 and. 48 have been. rezoned to 'Planned. Unit .Development; and
WHEREAS, by action taken on November 11;, _ 1986, the Planning
Commission considered and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council
on the unit development plan for said Planned Unit District.
NOW, THEREFO'R'E, BE IT RESOLVED that the unit development plan
on file in the Office of Community Developrnen.t and Planning is hereby
conditionally approved pursuant to Section 19A-504. of Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N.C.S., as amended.;. and,
BE IT FtJRTHER .RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the
following findings:
1. That the PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable
relationship to one (1) or more thorougYifares .('East Washington Street
and Ely Boulevard) ; and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry
any additional traffic generated by the development.
2. That. the plan for the proposed development presents a unified and
organized arrangement of buildings and .-service facilities which are
appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that
adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to
insure compatibility .
1
I
3. That the natural and scenic qualities of. the site are protected, with
adequate available public and private spaces designated oxi the Unit
Development Plan .
4. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed
by the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be
in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the
general intent and spirit of the zoning regulation of the City of
Petaluma, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable
Environmental Design Plans adopted by the City.
5. That the proposed PUD if generally consistent with the approved PCD
and clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better
physical environment than would be possible. under any single zoning
district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves
the development plan for the Springmeadow V residential subdivision,
subject. to the following conditions:
1. The project sponsor shall be required to pay low and moderate income
housing in-lieu fees of an amount to be determined according to the
schedule established by City Council Resolution No. 84-199 N.C.S., or
make alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income
housing provision requirements of the Housing Element subject to
approval of the City and prior to approval of the Final Asap .
2. Landscaped, irrigated parking islands within. the three cul-de-sacs
shall be installed as indicated on "preliminary plan" dated
October 1, 1986, subject to staff review and approval. A landscaped
island on Caulfield Lane at the intersection of Garfield Drive shall be
installed subject to City staff approval. Perpetual maintenance shall
be provided per Condition #3.
3. The applicant shall provide for perpetual maintenance of all landscaped
areas not contained on private property excluding required landscaping
in the urban separator to the satisfaction of the Directors of
2
RED®, f?~ 6 ®3 3~ N C S
Community Development and Parl~.s and Recreation and subject to final
approval by the City Council. Perpetual maintenance may be
accommodated through a maintenance assessment district, the formation
of which must be ratified by the City Council prior to final map
approval .
4. A tree planting, landscaping, fencing and path plan shall be developed
for the urban separator along Persimmon Way, subject to approval of
SPARC and. the Park & Recreation Committee. The developer shall
construct said improvements at time of completion of public
improvements. The urban separator bike/pedestrian path shall be
separate from Caulfield Lane and shall meander from the road.=ray
upward across the top of the retention pond berms to connect with the
Washington Creek path.
5. Landscaping and. irrigation shall be provided between Appaloosa Circle
anal the proposed sound wall, subject to SPARC review and approval,
and shall be perpetually maintained as set forth in Condition #3
6. A legally binding maintenance agreement shall be executed by the
o~frners /developers of the project with the City to insure maintenance
of landscaping, irrigation and other improvements within the urban
separator for a break-in period of three years or until the project is
completely developed, whichever is longer. Said agreement shall be
executed prior to approval of the Final 11~ap .
7. The development plan/landscape plan, fences, unit architecture and
model distribution are subject to review by SPARC prior to issuance of
the first development permit. Any SPARC conditions of approval for
the PUD plan which affect the tentative map sh.a.ll also be incorporated
in the tentative map prior to final map approval.
8. A minimum 4' wide tree planting strip shall be provided between curb
and sidewalk along all street frontages, with the exception of along
Washington Creek and urban separator frontages, initial tree planting
plan subject to review and approval of SPARC.
3
REST. ~~- 3 3 1 N C S
_ -~
9. Any signs erected to advertise or direct .persons to the project shall
meet the. requirements of the City sign ordinance and obtain a sign
permit from the City.
10. A detailed noise study of the proposed units shall be completed and
submitted with the SPARC submission, describing noise attenuation
measures to be incorporated into project s'i'te- and building designs to
reduce single event noise intrusion to acceptable levels. (SEIR)
11. No more than. 20$ of the total n. umber of units may be changed
throughout the entire project without need of a reevaluation under the
Residential Development ,Control System. All such modifications require
prior approval of the Director of Community Development . The
Director shall not grant such approval if it is found to have a
significant detrimental effect on the housing mix or visual
repetitiveness of the immediate neighborhood.
12. Revised sepia prints of the final approved unit development plan,
tentative map and landscape plan reflecting all conditions of approval
shall be submitted to the Gommunity Development and Planning
Department prior to Council consideration of proposed project.
13. The following shall be the PUD development standards
A. Minimum building setbacks shall b.e as follows:
Detached, single-farrrily - front: 20 feet; side: 5 feet (one
side) , 15 .feet (aggregate) ; rear: 20 feet.
;B. Home Occupations shall be a permitted .accessory use subject
to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance
related to~ Accessor~r Uses.
C. Private Swimming Pools shall be a permitted accessory use
subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning
Ordinance related to Accessory Uses.
4
RED®. g s~ 3 ~3 1 N C S
J '~~
D. New fences (e.g. front yard fences.) shall be permitted
subject to the pertinent ,regulations of the City Zoning
Ordinance related to fences and approval of any project
Architectural Control Committee.
E. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of
Section 301 (b) (1) of the 1982 Uniform Building Code shall be
permitted.
F. Homes shall he permitted the following modifications:
1. Room additions (inclu.ding covered patios) subject to the
se-tback requirements as stated` in 13'A.
2. Uncovered decks subject to the pertinent requirements
of the City Zoning Ordinance related to projections into
required yards.
3. Bay windows, greenhouse wirrdows and other projects
subject to the requirements of the City Zoning
Ordinance as stated in F2., above.
G. Any exterior modifications shall be compatible in architectural
styling and exterior colors and materials to the existing
structure and subject to the approval of the City and the
proj'e~¢t Architectural Control Committee.
1-1. Garage conversions .are prohibited.
I. Accessory structures, including accessory dwellings if
permitted by project C. C. &R. s, are permitted subject to the
5
RESO. ~ 6~ 3 3 1 N C S
,~
regulations of the Petaluma City Zoning Ordinance for
accessory structures and the provisions contained therein..
J. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in the
project shall be governed. by the City Zoning; Ordinance as
long as it does not expressly conflict with the project
CC&R's or the adopted PUD unit development plan.
14. Hours of construction activity on the Springmeadow V project shall be
limited to the hours of 7 AAA to 6 P1VI, Monday through Friday
(non-holiday).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines have
been satisfied by Resolution No. 318 N.C.S. , adopted by the City Council
on December 1, 1986.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that identified
potential impacts have been satisfactorily lessened or avoided by the
incorporation of mitigation measures as set forth in Ordinance No. 1670
N.C.S. , and incorporated herein by reference, as adopted by the City
Council on December 15, 1986.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective
as of the effective date of Ordinance 1670 N.C.5.
reso.east.4
reso6 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the owed as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~) ( meeting °~
on the ......~..,~.~.}1 ~.... day of ..........I]f~ C.BICII~ ~~ .......................... 19. ~ ~., by the
following vote: .....
City Attorney
AYES: Dav1S, Sobel, Woolsey, Cavanagh, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Tencer, Ma Mattei
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST : ... ........... ...: ....... .........._.................................. ...................... ---...._.....
City Clerk Mayor
Gbuncil Filep----......6 .......................
CA 10-85 : Res. No.......06.-331..... N.C.S.