Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 86-338 N.C.S. 12/15/1986,' ,f. , . ~~ ~~ ." I~~SOlUt10Yl N®. 86-33.8 ~. C. S. of the City- of Petaluma, California RESOLUTION. AMENDIrTG THE I,?EVELOPMENT PLAN FOR COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES LO..C-ATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MCNEAR AVENUE IN 'TH-E VICINITY OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AP NO~s 08-054-02 thru 64 WHEREAS, by Ordinance 1330 N.C.S. , Country Club Estates IA was rezoned to PUD (Planned. Unit District) to allow.. '60 residential units; anal WHEREAS, a development plan was adopted for this PUD by the City Council. in 1982.; and WHEREAS, application :was subsequently made by Len Jay Development Enterprises to amend. the PUD development plan to. allow 32 single-family residential lots; and WHEREAS, by action taken on November 11, 1986, subsequent to a public hearing on the matter, the Planr?.ing Commission recommended adoption of 'the amended unit development plar.~ in said Planned Unit District; and WHEREAS, a mitigated .Negative Declaration prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act was adopted by the City Council (Resolution No. 86-336N.C.S.) on December 15, 1986 as recommended by the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, 13E IT RESOLVED that the unit development plan to be kept on file in the Community Development and. Planning Department (File 3.284A) is hereby approved pursuant to .Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance No. 107.2 N.C.S., as amended; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts findings of the Planning Commission as its findings as stated hereinafter; 1 ;t' ~~ :~ Findings : 1. The revised site plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts or under the previously approved `1982 PUD development plan. 2. The PUD district. is proposed on a property that has a suitable relationship to one ;thoroughfare (McNear Avenue) and that the thoroughfare is adequate to carry any additional. traffic created by the development has' been determined by a previously prepared focused traffic study. 3. The plan for the proposed development presents a unified, organized arrangement of lots with their appropriate relationship to adjacent and nearby properties and that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included to ensure compatibility.. 4. The natural and' scenic qualities of the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces designed into the Unit Development Plan . 5. Development of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interest of the City and v~ill be in keeping with the general inter_t and spirit of the Zoning Regulation of the City of Petaluma, the Petaluma General Plan and with the Environmental Design Plan adopted by the City . 6. The plan for- the proposed project presents a vast improvement over the previously approved 'devel'opment plan justifying an exceeding of the density from the strict interpretation of the Hillside Residential Development :Combining ,District. . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the development plan, subject to the conditions hereinafter set out as follows: RE~~. 8 6 A~ 3~ N C • ~, Conditions 1, The project (development plan, design guidelines, master landscape plan) shall be subject to SPARC approval prior to approval of final map.. 2,. A master landscape plan shall be prepared and approved by SPARC prior to final map approval. Said plan shall indicate street tree type, location, and number; shall indicate lawns or mix of ground cover, shrubs and trees and irrigation system for all parcels in all yard areas abutting streets; revegetation of cut/fill slopes, building envelopes, side and rear yar-cl fencing and/or walls and. landscaping for all public areas associated with the project including, but not limited to: McNear Avenue frontage, entry island., interface area with City open space area, water tank site and access road, pump station site, etc.) . 3. Landscaping and fencing plan shall be required for each lot, approved by SPARC with installation for any given lot prior to occupancy of the dwelling unit on said lot. 4. Design guidelines shall be prepared by the developer which address concerns including, but not limited. to 'building mass;, exterior materials and colors; relationship of building to site;' treatment of uphill/downhill slopes; onsite parking access and adequacy; driveway slope, location and materials of .construction; screening ~ of. downslope elevations, particularly exteriorwalls ` ~of underfloor areas and elevated decks; retaining walls; solar access; view preservation and private landscaping (to insure integration and compatibility to Master Landscape Plan), subject to SPARC review prior to final map. As a custom lot subdivision, building designs shall not be repeated and shall incorporate full architectural design treatment .for all four elevations . 5. The project sponsor shall. be required to pay low and moderate income housing in-lieu fees of an amount to be determined according to the schedule established by .City Resolution 1`10. 84-199 N.C.S., or make 3 .~ . ~~ alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income housing provision requirements of the Housing Element subject to approval of the City and prior to approval of the final map. 6. Any signs erected to advertise or direct persons to the project shall meet the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance and obtain a sign permit from the City. 7. Hours of construction activity on the Country Club Estates IB project shall be limited to the hours of 7AM to 6PM, Monday through Friday (non-holiday) . Trucks and other heavy construction equipment traffic to and from the project site shall be confined to Mc1llear Avenue from Petaluma Blvd. 8. Project must provide irrigation, landscaping, pathway and fencing, etc. for the City open space area south of Hillside Court, subject to approval of SPAkC and City staff, The developer shall install said improvements at time of completion of public improvements. 9. If prehistoric or historic remnants are encountered during project construction, work shall be halted and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate th finds. Mitigation measures prescribed by the archaeologist and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. 10. Cross easements and joint maintenance agreements shall be recorded in the event joint driveways are to be utilized. 11. PUD development .standards shall be as follows: a. Setbacks per tentative map. b. Maximum building height as defined in Design Guidelines. c. Accessory uses, accessory dwellings, garage conversions, building modifications, and other development standards shall conform with all Zoning Ordinance standards applicable to the R-1 (One-Family) Residen-tial Zone. ` 4 c .. .~ d. Home Occupations shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. e. Private swimming pools shall be a permitted accessory use subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance related to Accessory Uses. f. New fences shall be permitted subject to the pertinent regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance and project design guidelines. g. Detached Accessory Structures meeting the requirements of Section 301(b) (1) of the 1482 Uniform Building Code shall be permitted. Accessory structures, including accessory dwellings if permitted by project CC & R's, are permitted subject to the regulations of the Petaluma City Zoning Ordinance or defined project building setbacks if more restrictive for accessory structures and the provisions contained therein. h. Each residence shall be subject to SPARC review. Subsequent modifications permitted ~,vithout SPARC review as follows: Any exterior modifications shall be compatible in architectural styling and exterior colors and materials to the original structure. i. Garage conversions are prohibited. j. Any other questions concerning land use regulation in the project shall be governed by the City Zoning Ordinance and the PUD unit development plan . These de~relopment standards shall be incorporated as part of the approved development plan. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said Ci REFERE1Vl;t;: ' COUntrIylle'r~uy-'Ce't~~~~regoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Ap o d as to reso6 Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) ~) ~ meeting f .. on the ..-.......15th..... day of ................ DeCeIll~er................-..-., 19.86., by the following vote: ty Attorney AYES: Davis, Sobel, Woolsey,-Cavanagh, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Tencer, Mayor Mattei NOES: Q ABSENT: Q ATTEST : .. ...... ..... ....- - ..:...'.'C~?~_... ity Clerk counai File-------•--5-----~ ................. CA 10-85 Rcs. No...B.r.,33.8...--._. N.cs. Mayor