HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2003-197 N.C.S. 08/04/2003Resolution No. 2003-197 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
DECLARING THE RESULTS OF BALOTTING
TABULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIID
OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
AND CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 53753,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE TURNBRIDGE SUBDIVISION
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
FOR THE 2004-2005 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 ("1.972 Act"), codified in
California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq., establishes procedures whereby
local agencies whose annual taxes are carried on the county assessment roll and are collected by
the county may fund the construction and maintenance of improvements by formation. of
assessment districts; ~ and,
WHEREAS, the general procedures for formation of an assessment district. under the
1972 Act include: adoption of a resolution initiating proceedings, proposing formation of a
district and ordering an engineer's report; approval of the engineer's report; adoption of a
resolution of intention to form an assessment district, levy and collect assessments, and, if
desired, issue bonds or notes; and following canvassing of balloting that has been noticed and
conducted in accordance with California Government Code Section 53753, and a noticed public
hearing on the assessment, adoption of a resolution ordering the improvements and formation of
the district .and confirming the diagram and assessment; 2 and,
WHEREAS, improvements that may be funded under the 1972 Act include: installation
or construction of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, appurtenant
structures or facilities, park or recreational improvements, acquisition of land or existing
improvements for park, recreational or open space purposes, and acquisition or construction of
community centers, auditoriums, halls or similar public facilities, for indoor presentation. of
performances and events, including public and private events; 3 and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2003-188 N.C.S. adopted September 15, 2003, the City
Council of the City of Petaluma initiated proceedings for formation of the Turnbridge
Subdivision Landscape Assessment District ("District"), designated Tom Hargis, Director of
Engineering, as the Engineer of Record ("Engineer") for the proposed District, and ordered the
Engineer to prepare and file a report pursuant to the 1972 Act; and,
WHEREAS, the Engineer prepared a report ("Report") concerning the District, District
improvements ("Improvements") and the proposed assessment ("Assessment") in accordance
~ Cal. St. & High. Code §§22500 - 22501
2 Cal. St. & High. Code §§23585 - 22587, 22594
s Cal. St. & High. Code §22525
Resolution No. 2003-197 N.C.5.
with the requirements of the 1972 Act, filed a copy of the Report with the City Clerk and
submitted a copy of the Report to the City Council for consideration; and,
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on September 15, 2003, the City Council of the City
of Petaluma duly considered the Report and. found that it complied with all applicable
requirements of the 1972 Act and other applicable law, including the requirements that the
Report refer to the assessment district by its designation, specify the fiscal year to which the
report applies, and contain improvement plans and specifications, an estimate of the
improvement costs, a diagram of the district, an assessment of the estimated costs of the
improvements, and estimate of the principal amount of improvement bonds or notes to be issued,
if any; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2003-189 N.C.S., adopted September 15, 2003, the City
Council of the City of Petaluma preliminarily approved the Report subject to pending
proceedings, including balloting proceedings and noticed hearing proceedings concerning the
District in accordance with California Constitution Article XIIID, California Government Code
Section 53753 and the 1972 Act; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2003-190 N.C.S., adopted September 15, 2003, the City
Council of the City of Petaluma declared its intention to order the levy and collect assessments
for the District and set a public hearing on the formation of the District and levy of the proposed
assessment pursuant to the 1972 Act; and,
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 53753 (which implements California
Constitution Article XIIID, known as Proposition 218) requires that prior to levying a new or
increased assessment local agencies must provide mailed notice, including balloting materials
and instructions as specified in Section 53753, to each record owner of a parcel within the
proposed assessment at least 45 days prior to a public hearing on the assessment; and,
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2003, City staff mailed notices and balloting materials and
instructions to each record owner of a parcel within the District announcing that ballots would be
canvassed and a hearing conducted on October 6, 2003 on the formation of the District and levy
and collection of the Assessment for the 2004 - 2005 fiscal year, and, for each future year
following establishment of the District, of the percentage increases specified in the U.S.
Department of labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Prices Indexes, Pacific Cities and the
U.S. City Average, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose from February 1; and,
WHEREAS, the mailed notices included: the total amount of the proposed Assessment
chargeable to the entire District, the amount chargeable to the record owner's parcel, the duration
of the payments, the reason for the Assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the
proposed Assessment was calculated, the date, time and location of a public hearing on the
proposed Assessment, a summary of the procedures for the completion, return, and tabulation of
the Assessment ballots, including a statement that the Assessment shall not be imposed if the
ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the
Assessment, with ballots weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the
affected property, an assessment ballot, including the City's address for receipt of ballots, a place
Resolution No. 2003-197 N.C.S. Page 2
for the person returning the ballot to indicate his or her name, reasonable identification of the
parcel, and his or her support of opposition to the proposed Assessment;4 and ,
WHEREAS, the 1972 Act requires one published notice at least 10 days before the
public hearing on the Assessment; and,
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2003, City staff published notice in accordance with
California Government Code Section 6061 of the public hearing on the Assessment; and
WHEREAS, ballots mailed concerning the proposed Assessment were in a form that
concealed their contents once sealed by the person submitting the ballot, and all assessment
ballots were received at the address indicated on the ballot for tabulation; and,
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2003, at a regularly schedule meeting at the time date and
place stated in the mailed and the published notices, the City Council of the City Petaluma
conducted a hearing on the proposed Assessment, permitted any interested person to present
written or oral testimony, and considered all objections or protests to the proposed Assessment,
including any objections to the Improvements, maintenance of the Improvements, the extent of
the District, and/or any zones within the District, the District diagram, and the Engineer's cost
estimate, and the City Council of Petaluma fully considered any such written or oral testimony
concerning the proposed Assessments and,
WHEREAS, ballots on the Assessment were permitted to be submitted, changed or
withdrawn by the person who submitted the ballot until the conclusion of the public testimony at
the hearing on the proposed Assessment, and ballots remained sealed until the City Clerk
commenced tabulation of the ballots following the conclusion of public testimony;6 and,
WHEREAS, if there is a majority protest against the imposition of a new assessment or
the extension or increase of an existing assessment, the assessment may not be imposed,
extended, or increased; and,
WHEREAS, a majority protest exists if assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn
in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed the assessment ballots submitted, and not
withdrawn, in favor of the assessment, weighting the assessment ballots by the amount of the
proposed assessment to be imposed on the identified parcel for which each assessment ballot was
submitted;g and,
WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public testimony on the proposed
Assessment, the City Clerk tabulated one (1) ballot submitted and not withdrawn in support of
the proposed Assessment, and zero (0) ballots submitted and not withdrawn in opposition to the
proposed Assessment; and,
' Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(b), (c)
5 Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(d)
6 Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(c), (e)
Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(e)(3)
$ Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(e)(2)
Resolution No. 2003-197 N.C.S. Page 3
WHEREAS, when weighted according to the amount of the proposed Assessment to be
imposed upon the parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted, the ballots submitted
and not withdrawn in opposition to the proposed Assessment did not exceed the ballots
submitted and not withdrawn in support of the proposed Assessment, and thus a majority protest
does not exist concerning formation of the Assessment; and,
WHEREAS, if a majority protest has not been filed concerning a proposed assessment,
the legislative body may adopt a resolution ordering the improvements and the formation of the
assessment district and confirming the diagram and assessment either as originally proposed by
the legislative body or as changed by it, and adoption of the resolution constitutes levy of an
assessment for the first year referred to in the assessment;9 and,
FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma finds, based on substantial
evidence in the whole record before the Council, as follows:
1. Formation of the proposed District and levy of the proposed Assessment is for the
purpose of meeting operating expenses of maintaining the District and the
Improvements in accordance with the 1972 Act, and/or for the purpose of
obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain services. within existing
service areas in accordance with Title 14, Section 15273, subsection (a)(4) of the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines.
2. Maintenance of the Improvements funded pursuant to the Assessment constitutes
maintenance of existing landscaping in accordance with Title 14, Section 15301,
subsection (h) of the CEQA Guidelines.
3. The Improvements constitute minor public alterations in the condition of land,
water and/or vegetation that do not involve removal of healthy, mature scenic
trees in the .form of new gardening or landscaping in accordance with Title 14,
Section 15304, subsection (b).
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma does resolve as follows:
1. The above recitals are true and correct and hereby declared to be findings of the
City Council of the City of Petaluma.
2. Formation of the proposed District and levy of the proposed Assessment, the
Improvements and maintenance of the Improvements are exempt from CEQA in
accordance with Title 14, Section 15273, subsection (a)(4), Section 15301,
subsection (h) and Section 15304, subsection (b) of the CEQA Guidelines.
9 Cal. St. & High. Code §22594
Resolution No. 2003-197 N.C.S. Page 4
3. All protests against the Improvements, the proposed District and annual
Assessment proposed for Fiscal year 2004-2005, including protests against
maintenance of the Improvements, the extent of the District and/or any zones in
the District, the District diagrams or the Engineer's estimate of the cost of the
Improvements and/or their maintenance have been received and considered.
4. The District that will benefit from and be assessed for the Improvements and their
construction and/or installation and maintenance is situated in the City of
Petaluma, California and is more particularly described in the diagrams of the
District contained in the Engineer's Report on file in the office of the City Clerk.
The Engineer's Report is attached to and made a part of this resolution as Exhibit
A. The diagram of the District indicates by a boundary line the extent of the
territory included in the District and any zone within the District and the general
location of the District.
5. The plans and specifications for the Improvements (both existing and proposed)
within the District as contained in the Engineer's Report are adopted and
approved.
6. The Engineer's estimate of the cost of the Improvements, and of constructing
and/or installing and maintaining the Improvements as contained in the
Engineer's Report is adopted and approved.
7. The public interest, convenience and necessity require and the City Council of the
City of Petaluma hereby orders the Improvements to be made and/or installed and
maintained as described in the Engineer's Report.
8. The public interest, convenience and necessity require and the City Council of the
City of Petaluma hereby orders the formation of the District and the levy and
collection of assessments, including the annual Assessment proposed for the
2004-2005 fiscal year pursuant to the 1972 Act and other applicable law for the
construction and/or installation and maintenance of the improvements as
described in the Engineer's Report.
9. The diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the boundaries of
any zone within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of
land within the District as such lot or parcel is shown on the County Assessor's
map for the applicable fiscal year, each lot or parcel of land of which has been
given a separate number on such diagram, as contained in the Engineer's Report,
is approved and confirmed.
10. The Assessment of the total amount of the costs and. expenses, including
incidental expenses, concerning the Improvements fairly distributes such costs
amount all assessable lots or parcels of land within the District in proportion to
the estimated benefits to be received by such lots or parcels from the
Resolution No. 2003-197 N.C.S. Page 5
Improvements and from the maintenance of the Improvements as contained in the
Engineer's Report, and such Assessment is approved and confirmed.
11. The entire Engineer's Report concerning the District, the Improvements, related
costs and the Assessment is adopted and approved.
12. The City Clerk is directed to file with the Auditor-Controller of Sonoma County
the Assessment and any attachments and diagrams as confirmed by the City
Council of the City of Petaluma along with a certificate of such confirmation to be
attached to the Assessment.
13. The Sonoma County Auditor-Controller and the Sonoma County Tax Collector
are directed pursuant to the 1972 Act to apply the Assessment filed with the
Auditor-Controller as contained in the Engineer's Report on file with the City
Clerk to the tax roll and the Sonoma County Tax Collector is directed in pursuant
to the 1972 Act to collect the Assessment in the same manner as all other such
assessments collected by the Sonoma County Tax Collector.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: [hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting `l
:~
/ '
on the .........4 ............... day of ........August................................., 20..Q~, by the
following vote: ••••••••••• •• ••••••••••~•••
City Attorney
AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Harris, Vice Mayor Healy, Moynihan, O'Brien, Torliatt
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: ................................ ............................. ......................... ..... ............
City Clerk ayor
Council File ...................................
Res. Nn. .......20.03..-.1.97...._..N.C.S.