HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 86-097 N.C.S. 05/05/1986
IN i
• 1
"~ =' ~ Resolution No.gs-97 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR A
REVISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF A PUD AND A
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR VILLAGE 1~4EADOWS
(A.P, NOS. 136-111-16, 20, 21, 43, 44 and 45)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) for the following project:
1. Revision of previously approved Unit Development Plan for 22
acres from 132 Townhomes to 81 Single-Family Homes for the
Village Meadows project, A.P. Nos. 136-111-16, 20, 21, 43, 44 and
45.
2. Approval of a tentative subdivision map creating 81 parcels for
single-family residences, a neighborhood open space along Lynch
Creek and public streets and landscape areas for the Village
Meadows project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the issuance of. said Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based on the following findings:
Findings
1. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of major
periods of California history or pre-history.
Reso. 86-97 NCS
Rcs. No. _ ............................ N.C.S.
. ;,f.
,~
2'. Removal of significant vegetation (e.g. mature and healthy eucalyptus
trees) shall only be done in conjunction with a systematic replanting as
reviewed and approved by the Site Plan and Architectural Review
Commi"ttee .
3. The project as conditionally approved does not" have the potential to
achieve short term to the disadvantages of long term environmental
goals . '
4. The project as conditionally approved does not -have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
5. The project as conditionally approved does not have environmental
effects which will cause, substantial adverse effects on human beings
either directly or indirectly.
6. This project represents a reduction in the number, of housing units on
the site over the ! project previously found to have negative
environmental impact at the same site and will therefore have a lesser
environmental impact .
7. No significant unmitigable environmental . impacts were found in review
of that previous more intense project.
Under the .power and authority conferred upon this-Council by the: Charter of said City.
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was iritioduced and. adopted by the p _ d as to
Council of ,the City of Petaluma at a (Regular)X~4~1X~1) meeting fO
reso. village~~~dowg~~---------. day of .............Ilia..y..........--------.:......--------•---, i~.6--•--~ by the
reso5 following vote: • --- •-- ••••-••••---••-°••---•-•-••-
Ci y Attorney
.AYES: Sobel, Cavanagh, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Vice 1Vlayor Balshaw, Mayor at i
NOES: None
ABSENT: N e
~,
ATTEST: .....- • ...... ...:... ....:.... ' .....-............... ...---................-..
ity Clerk Mayor
Council File_.._ ...............................
Form CA 2 7/81 Res. No.......;..$~j.,..9.'.~......,