HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 86-019 N.C.S. 01/21/1986Resolution No. 86-i 9 N.C.S. JAN 211986 7
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PURSUANT TO CEQA FOR THE REVISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
OF PARK PLACE VI SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT
PROFESSIONAL DRIVE AND RUSHMORE AVENUE
(AP NO's 136-111-33 and 46)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for
the following project:
A proposal to remove 16 one -bedroom units from Park Place VI, Phases
2 and 3 and, install 8 additional two bedroom units.
WHEREAS, an initial study has been prepared for the area and has been
reviewed by the Community Development and Planning Department and the
Planning Commission; and,
WHEREAS, the results of this study have determined that approval of this
project as conditionally approved will not trigger any significant adverse
environmental impacts; and,
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a
negative declaration be issued on the above project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council issued a negative declaration for a similar
proposal regarding Park Place VI, Phase 6 on September 3, 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative
Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based upon the following findings:
Findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
86-19 1 of 2
Res. No . ......... . ............. N C.S
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major
periods of California history or prehistory.
2. The project does not have the potential to achieve short term to the
disadvantage of long term environmental goals.
3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable.
4. The project as conditionally approved, does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects in human beings
either directly or indirectly.
5. The project is subject to site plan and architectural review pursuant to
Petaluma Zoning Ordinance section 26-41 et al.
reso . park. place. vi . vii . neg. dec
reso4
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved auto'
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (cc�sg►elgi�ik meeting f o f J
on the ............21st..... day of.........,Jaauary................................1 19.86-., by the
following vote:
ty torney
4
AYES: Bond, Cavanagh, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Vice Mayor Balshaw, Mayor Mattei
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: .. d...............................................................
City Clerk 203-02 Mayor
Council File ....................................
CA 10-85 Res. N........ 86-19 ...... N.C.S. 2 of 2
ZONING MAP
I
IVE l ' �.
BERNARD
jJ ELREDGE SCNDOL I
RIVE
likM6 1 (� co@�. MARIA DRIVE,
[y. (jam
'SITE9Q 9 I LUC.CHESI
Pe,rALUMA PARK -
V'A• L L E.Y
HOSPITAL
0 47 KPACE6-7
- SUBDIVISION
AVN NOTE: E
•Will be Named'PARK PLACE DRIVE
J I
I
utoTs PRO
for AfnendV%f%t.