HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 86-044 N.C.S. 02/24/1986
F E a 1 s X986 ~
Resolution No. 86-44 NC.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION UPHOLDING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
DECISION TO INCORPORATE SKY PARK ESTATES INTO
EAST OF ELY SUBSEQUENT EIR AND APPROVING THE
ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT
TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR
THE PROPOSED SKY PARK ESTATES, A 20 LOT SUB-
DIVISION IN THE VICINITY OF GARFIELD DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on January 14, 1986 the Planning Commission recommended the
incorporation of the proposed Sky Park Estates Subdivision into the East of
Ely Subsequent EIR; and
WHEREAS, thereafter on January 23, 1986 an appeal of said action was filed
to the City Council, the matter being heard on February 3, 1986;
Whereas, both written and oral evidence was duly presented at said
hearing ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council hereby upholds the
appeal; and issuance of said Negative Delcaration pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act is hereby approved based upon the
following findings;
1. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten or eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
2. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to
achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of
long-term environmental goals.
86-44
Res. No . .:............................ N.C.S.
3. The project as conditionally approved does not have possible
environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable.
4. The environmental effects of this project as conditionally approved will
not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly.
5. Potentially adverse impacts will be mitigated by the incorporation of
design standards relative to noise mitigation, drainage and minimum
water pressure standards as set forth in detail through tentative map
conditions .
Under the power and. authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE:
AYES:
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (E~'c~jylu~frJ~e~)/ (/S~~c~a~ meeting
on the ----....24th..... day of .....February-••----•----------•----------, i98G.., by the
following vote: ( _v
Cavanagh, Davis, Tencer, V.M. Balshaw,
NOES: Woolsey
ABSENT: Bond
ATTEST : .... .. ................................................................................
City Clerk
pity Attorney
yor Mattei
......................................................
Mayor
(,buncil File ...................................
CA IO-S5 ~ Res. No. ....:~ 6..-. ~. ~....... N.C.S.