Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report Item 1.ACITY OF PETALUMA WATER ISSUES WORKSHOP Department of Public Works and Utilities Presented by: Dan St. John, F.ASCE, Director January 13, 2014 1 INTRODUCTION Water Team Leonard Olive, Operations Manager Leah Walker, Environmental Services Manager Pat Dirrane, Utility Supervisor Dave Iribarne, Water Conservation Coordinator Kent Carothers, Associate Engineer Current Issues Water Supply and Demand in Face of Drought Water Shortage Declaration Out of Town Water Use Recycled Water System 2 SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND SUPPLY SCWA Commitment 13,400 Acre Feet per Year (AF/Y) = 12 MGD avg 21.8 MGD Max Month Average 2013 Delivery: 9,578 AF/Y Ten City Wells Estimated Sustained Capacity: 2.2 MGD 2013 Delivery: 164 AF/Y = 146,000 gal per day Emergency Supply Only Water Conservation Urban Offsets from Recycled Water 3 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FORMAT 4 System Losses 696 712 728 736 815 975 1,023 1,070 1,118 1,166 Demand Reduction Programs 295 588 609 714 776 1,102 2,190 2,295 2,402 2,507 Net Potable Water Demand 10,448 8,130 8372 9144 9780 10,627 10,112 10,580 11,047 11,515 Population 58,771 59,126 59,314 60,457 61,500 63,306 66,376 69,447 72,517 75,587 gpcd 153 119 118 128 131 150 136 136 136 136 Gpcd Target 153 153 153 153 153 153 136 136 136 136 2011 Actual System losses and Population for 2013 are estimated. 14,022 0 Subtotal Gross Demands 10,743 8,718 8981 9858 10556 11,729 12,303 12,331 12,856 Sales to Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Deliveries 10,047 8,006 8253 9122 9741 Total Water Use, acre-feet per year (Calendar Year) 2005 Actual 2010 Actual 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2015 2020 2025 12,875 13,449 0 0 10,754 11,280 2030 2035 11,805 MONTHLY DEMAND TRENDS 5 RELIANCE ON SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY SUPPLY 6 ACTIVE WELL LOCATIONS WATER CONSERVATION & URBAN OFFSETS 8 PROPOSED ALLOCATION MODEL SCWA “restructured agreement” provisions: Sets Local Production Capacity Goal: 40% Max Month Average in City = 4.5 MGD Establishes need for “Water Shortage Allocation Methodology” during periods of “Anticipated Shortages” Draft Allocation Model Under development by TAC since September 2012 Addresses “reasonable requirements” & “human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection” needs Monthly, not annual, model is more responsive Assumes local supply = 1 MGD Going to WAC for approval in February 9 TEMPORARY URGENCY CHANGE PETITION Driest year since 1894 Lake Mendocino at 26,000 AF at end of 2013 (39%) “Critical Water Supply Conditions” < 31,000 AF Potter Valley/Eel River diversions down 50% since 2004 Approved 12/31/13 by State Water Resources Control Board (Filed on 12/19/13) Preserves water in Lake Mendocino Lowers minimum flows in Upper Russian River from 75 to 25 cubic feet per second (cfs) Sonoma-Marin Saving Water Partnership kicking off water conservation campaign Principal contractors commit to regional campaign including “no outdoor irrigation” during winter. 10 LOCAL SUPPLY CONTINGENCY PLANNING Readying City wells for drought contingency Re-drilling replacement well – Park Place Evaluating wellhead treatment on three wells Iron and manganese exceed MCL’s in several wells Arsenic exceeds MCL in one well Hydrogen sulfide in wells – consumes chlorine Extending recycled water service to additional parks and schools Contacting private well owners who could be temporarily impacted by City well operations Water shortage declaration & outreach 11 THERE’S A DROUGHT ON. TURN THE WATER OFF. Water Shortage Contingency Plan Stage 1 –Minimal 15% Voluntary Community-Wide Reduction Public information, hose shut-off nozzles, no pavement washdown Stage 2 – Moderate 25% Mandatory - Set Allocations per Customer Class Irrigation 7pm to 8am only, no fountains, no new swimming pools Stage 3 – Severe 35% Mandatory – Reduction in Set Allocations No new landscape installs, no swimming pool filling Stage 4 – Critical 50+% Mandatory– Further Reduction in Set Allocations No irrigation 12 www.wateroff.org POLICY ISSUE: TRUCKING WATER OUTSIDE CITY Against spirit of PMC without Council OK Prohibition to re-sale of water Demand: 50,000 gpd (0.7% of total demand) Options: Eliminate practice Transition period Impact on ag interests to west Develop standard contract with higher fees PMC allows higher fees for out of service area customers Ability to curtail during drought/supply interruptions Require use of recycled water where possible Evaluate LAFCO and GP implications 13 RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM DELIVERY 14 RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Last summer: Added Prince, Wiseman, and Airport Parks System upgrades completed: Increased delivery capacity to about 4.3 MGD during summer Instituted new ag contracts that eliminated “payment to ag users” policy. All users now pay City By summer 2014, will add: Casa Grande High School and football field Extend to parks, open space and LAD’s near existing purple pipe Increased use by Jackson Family and other vineyards Within next few years: Extend purple pipe north towards SRJC 15 NORTH BAY WATER REUSE AUTHORITY Joined Phase II program in May 2013 Focus on funding of recycled water projects City fee proportional to amount of projects under study by authority consultants Refinement of Recycled Water Project List Projects able to complete within 10 year window Higher benefit-cost projects Council will be asked to approve project list 1.Urban Recycled Water Expansion 2.Agriculture Recycled Water Expansion 3.ECWRF Production Capacity Increase 4.ECWRF Storage Capacity Increase Evaluating impact on GP and UWMP 16 RECYCLED WATER EXPANSION PROJECT LIST Program Area/Project Demand (AFY) Capital Costs (CIP Budget) Cost - Benefit ($/af) 1. URBAN RECYCLED WATER SERVICE Phase 1 - Utilize Existing RW Transmission Main 1a. Airport, Prince, Casa Grande, Southgate, Wiseman 88 Budgeted 1b. Baywood Dr, St Francis Dr and surrounding areas 48 $4,100,000 $85,417 Phase 2 - Extend RW Transmission Main 2a. Transmission Main along Eastern Open Space to Corona Rd (SRJC, Kenilworth School, Corona Creek) 57 $4,300,000 $75,439 2b. Loop through Maria Drive to N. McDowell (Meadow, Bond, Bernard Elem, Lucchesi) 90 $5,800,000 $64,444 2c. Cross Highway 101 (Rainier, McKinley, and Fairgrounds) 12 $4,600,000 $383,333 Phase 3 - Westside Across River 3a. Pet Blvd S, Magnolia, Howard, English St 57 $24,300,000 $426,316 3b. Petaluma Golf & Country Club 72 $10,500,000 $145,833 2. AGRICULTURAL RECYCLED WATER SERVICE Phase 1. Lakeville Rd from Ellis Creek to Old Lakeville Rd 1 1,215 $10,800,000 $8,889 Phase 2. Lakeville Rd from Old Lakeville Rd 1 to Old Lakeville Rd 2 530 $7,000,000 $13,208 Phase 3. Lakeville Rd from Old Lakeville Rd 2 to Old Lakeville Rd 3 840 $14,200,000 $16,905 17 RECYCLED WATER EXPANSION PROJECT LIST Program Area/Project Demand (AFY) Capital Costs (CIP Budget) Cost - Benefit ($/af) 3. ECWRF Production Capacity Increase The current capacity of the two existing ultra violet (UV) light treatment channels is 5.2 million gallons per day (mgd). By adding a third UV treatment channel, an additional 2.6 mgd of capacity will be created. This additional capacity will assist in meeting future demands. NA TBD 4. ECWRF Storage Capacity Increase Winter storage pond to increase summer supply. Will determine feasibility of developing additional storage of recycled water at the ECWRF or on adjacent properties. NA TBD 18 URBAN RECYCLE WATER SYSTEM EXPANSION AG RECYCLE WATER SYSTEM EXPANSION 20 PREVIEW OF FUTURE COUNCIL ACTIONS Adoption of Water Shortage Contingency Plan Purchase of wellhead treatment systems and replacement wells Model contract for potable and recycled water haulers Amended contract for ag use of recycled water Adoption of North Bay Water Reuse Authority recycle project list 21 DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS 22