Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2677 N.C.S. 03/13/1961 RESOLUTION NO 2677 N.C. S. RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF PETALUMA OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "CRINELLA ANNEX- ATION NO 1", AND GIVING NOTICE OF TIME, AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF-PR►, ESTS T R/ TOO. INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN and ) SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN G% % at an atijour ed 13;th March -re�a� meeting of the City Council of - e City ofAPetalurria on the day of 1961, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA: 1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners of not less than one-fourth of the land in the hereinafter described territory, by area and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Sonoma, was filed with the Council of the City of Petaluma on February 20th, 1961, requesting annexation of the hereinafter described territory to said City. 2, That the territory which the petitioner requests be annexed to. the City of Petaluma and which said City and its Council propose to annex, is situate in the County of Sonoma, State iof California, hereby designated"Crinella Annexation No, 1", and described as follows: Being a portion of Lots 208 and 212, Map of Petaluma Rancho as recorded in Book 21 of Maps at Page 1,, Sonoma County Records, also being all.of Lots 10, U', 12, 13, 24, 25, 26, and 27, and portions of Lots 5, 6, 7, 14, 22, and 23' Suburban Homes as recorded in Book 32 of Maps at Page 18, Sonoma.County Records and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point, in the existing City Limit line which is the most southerly coiner of Park Lane Estates Annexation as the same is shown on that map as recorded in Book 73 of. Maps-at Page 34, Sonoma County Records; thence from said point of beginning and along the, e xisting City Limit line N 54° 31° 30" W 351. 43 feet to the most easterly corner of Kresky Annexation No. 1 as the same, is recorded in Book 73 of Maps at Page 16, Sonoma County Records; thence continuing along the existing X77. City Lim t:.line S: 34° 25' 30" W .1062,-56 ft:, to the most southerly corner of Minogue Annexation,No, 1 as the same is shown on that map as recorded in Book 73 of'Màp at Page 15, Sonoma County Records; thence continuing along said City • • Limit Line N 54° 31° 30" W 742.29 ft. to a point; thence S 35° 27' W 219. 59 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of the U. 5, 101 Freeway., thence leaving said existing City Limits line and along a curve to the, right with a radius of 3090 feet through an angle of 2° 02 34", fora distance of 110, 1.6 feet; thence S 20° 41' 05" E 209. 42' feet and S 22° 03' 10" -E 579, 02 feet along said easterly Freeway right- of-way line to its intersection with the northwesterly property line of Lindberg Lane; thence S 43° 33' ;50" E 40:91 feet across Lindberg Lane; thence S 22° 03° 10" E along the easterly right-of-way line of U, S, .101 Freeway 990, 52 feet to a point in the lot line common to Lots 22 and 33 as the same are shown on that Map of Suburban Homes as recorded in Book 32 of Maps at Page 18, Sonoma County Records; thence along the lot lines. common to Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33, N 35° 23' 54" E 2308, 75 feet to, a '3/4" iron pin and the most easterly corner of said Lot 27 and also tieing the .Mdst northerly corner of said Lot 28, thence along the northeasterly lot line of said Lot 27 N 54° 31' 30" W 553;56 feet to the most southerly corner of Park Lane Estates Annexation as above mentioned and the point of beginning of the above described tract of land. 3, That the County Boundary Commission of Sonoma County,. California, did in session duly assembled on Tuesday, February 7th, 1961,. consider the pro- posed annexation boundaries of said "Crinella Annexation No, 1, " as above des- cribed, and as submitted to said Commission by the proponents of said annexation, 4, That if said territory is annexed it shall become part of the school district of the City of Petaluma. 5, That Monday, April 17th, 1961, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p. m. , in .the Council Chambers in the City Hall in the City of 'Petalutria, County of Sonoma; California, is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where any person own- ing real property within the uninhabited territory above described and proposed to be annexed to the, City of Petaluma, and having any objections to the proposed _2_ annexation, may appeart-_,afore the Council of the City.ob zetalurna and Show cause why such uninhabited territory Shoidd nor be so annexed to the:City of Petaluma, The protest must be in writing, may be filed at any time before the hour set for hearing objections to the proposed annexation, And shall state the name or names of the owner or owners of property affeeted and the description and area of such . property, in general terms:, 6.. The City Clerk.Of the City of Petaluma is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published at least twice, but not oftener than once a week, [fl the Argus - Courier, a newspaper of general circula- tion published in said City of Petaluma, the city to which it is proposed to annex • the aforesaid territory, said publication to be complete at least twenty (20) days prior to the date set for hearing. 7, In the event there is, upon the land proposed to be annexed to said City, a structural improvement owned, being, acquired Or leased by a county fire protection district, the City Clerk is directed to cause written notice of such pro- posed annexation to be mailed to the governing body Of.such district, such notice to be sent not less than ten 00) days before the first public hearing upon such pro- posed annexation, • 8a The City Clerk is,directed to cause written notice to be given to such other persons as may be legally entitled thereto, in the manner required by law, I hereby certify that the foregoing resolutibit was duly and regularly introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of Petaluma, on the 13th day of March 1961, by the following wife: AYES: COUNCILMEN ELLIS , MATZEN, VAN BEBEER , AND MAYOR PARENT . NOES: COUNCILMAN KING , ABSENT: COUNCILMAN GUSTAFSON , ABSTAINED : COUNCILMAN CRINELLA , Z-e44,44/2/ Zi • Mayor Attest: j/i4d 2 1/(a_Ze/4-t. I:City Clerk -3-