HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2003-023 N.C.S. 02/03/2003
Resolution 1~To. 2003-023~,sC,~,
of the City of Petaluma, California
RESOLUTION URGING THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO REJECT THE
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED SHIFT OF LOCAL VEHICLE LICENSE FEE (VLF)
REVENUES AND TO HONOR THE 1998 COMMITMENT TO RESTORE THE VLF
n
WHEREAS, prior to 1935, cities and counties collected property taxes on motor vehicles
to fund essential local public health and safety services; and
WHEREAS, in 1935, the Legislature first enacted the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Act,
replacing the property tax on vehicles with a 1.75 percent fee charged against the value of the
motor vehicle; and
WHEREAS, in 1948, the rate of the VLF was increased to 2 percent of the value of the
vehicle; and
WHEREAS, in 1986, the voters voted overwhelmingly to constitutionally dedicate the
proceeds of the VLF to fund city and county services; and
WHEREAS, in 1.998, a period of strong economic growth, the Legislature approved the
use of a portion of the rapidly growing state General Fund to reduce the VLF payments of
vehicle owners. This amount, known as the "offset," grew in future years to a 67.5 percent offset
against the amount owed. The amount paid to local governments in lieu of the reduced VLF
payment is known as the "VLF backfill"; and
WHEREAS, the 1998 legislation and subsequent enactments contain clear provisions that
when insufficient funds are available to be transferred from the General Fund to fully fund the
offsets and backfill amount that the VLF offset shall be reduced and VLF payments increased;
and
WHEREAS, VLF and. backfill revenues constitute 15 to 25 percent of typical city and
county general purpose revenues. On average, more than 60 percent of city general fund
spending and more than half of comity general funds go to front line law enforcement, fire,
emergency medical services, and health care programs; and
Resolution No. 2003-023 N.C.S.
WHEREAS, revenues derived from the VLF and backfill are of critical importance in
funding vital local public health and safety services; and
WHEREAS, any failure by the Legislature to maintain the VLF backfill or restore the
VLF will cause widespread disruption in local government services essential to the well-being of
California citizens and their cities and counties; and
WI~EREAS, Governor Davis' proposal to divert $4 billion in local VLF backfill
payments over the next 17 months fails to honor the 1998 commitment and is a direct assault on
local services that will be felt by every California resident; and
WHEREAS, shifting $4.2 billion in locally controlled revenues for local services is
neither equitable nor fair. No state program or department has been asked to shoulder such a
disproportionate share of the budget pain. These cuts. come on top of the nearly $5 billion each
year that is transferred from local services to fund state obligations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma,
California, that if the state General Fund can no longer afford the expense of part or all of the
VLF "backfill" that the Legislature and Governor of California are hereby respectfully urged to
implement the provisions of current law providing for the reduction of the VLF offset in bad
economic times and to restore the VLF in an amount necessary to reduce the VLF backfill; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Petaluma hereby expresses its profound
appreciation to the legislators who support such VLF restoration legislation.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify 'the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting ~°' ` -~- fo
on the ........~.~d............ day of .......Fabraar.3r ................................ 20.03., by the .-,
following vote: •••••••• ••••• •°••• °••••••••••
ity ttorney
AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Han-is, Healy, Moynihan, Vice Mayor O'Brien, Torliatt
NOES: None
ABSENT: Non
ATTEST:
....................
City erk Mayor
Council File ...................................
Res. No.......2003-023........ N.C.S.