HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 85-108 N.C.S. 04/15/1985APA 151~5 _
,,.:,
.. I~esolufion No. _ 8.5 -.~ o sN. C. S.
of the City of .Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTIO:N. APB~ROVIN:G THE IS;S:UAN.CE 'OF A NEGATIUE
DEGI;ARATIO,N PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRQNMENTAL QUALITY AGT ~FOR A. USE PERMIT
ALLOWiNG AN EXPANSION AND RELATED ~SITE IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE BOULEVARD BOWL, 1100 PETALU~MA BOULEVARD SOUTH
WHEREAS, the Planriing Co.mmission h`as ~ recommended the issuance of a
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) for the following project:
Use permit for AP No. 008-471-18 allowing a 21, 712 square foot
addition and related site improvements to the Boulevard Bowl, 1100
Petaluma Boulevard . South, Petaluma,
WHEREAS, an initial study ,has been prepared for the area and has been
reviewed by the Commuriity ,,Development and Planning Department and the
Planning Commission; and,
WH'EREAS, the results of this study have determined that approval of this
use permit as conditionally ,approved will not trigger any significant adverse
environmental impacts,; and,
WH'EREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a
negative declaration be issued on the above project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative
D;ecl'aration pursuant to the 'California Environmental Quality Act is hereby
approved, based upon the ~•following findings:
1. The. City Cquncil has considered ariy eomments received pertaining to
issuance of said Negative Declaration, and finds the responses thereto
to be aelequate.
2. No significant adverse impacts are associated with the use permit as
conditionally approved-.
Reso No 8`5--:1.0'8: N.C:S.
3. The project as conditiona~lly approved does .not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species-, caizse. a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or res:trict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory.
4. The project as coridi~tionally approved does iiot have the potential to
achieve short-ter.m, to the disadvantage of lon-g-term, environmental
goals .
5. The project a's conditiona.lly approved doe"s _ not have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable,.
6. The project as conditionally approved does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings
either directly or iniiirectly. ~
reso. blvd,bowl
reso3
Under; the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
I~fiereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Appr ved as to
Coui-cil.of the City of Petaluma at a(R,egulai) (Adjourned~((~a~ci~l~ meeting
on.the .....15t.h....... day of ..._...-----APr:ll ..:.::.......................... 198:5., by the
following vote:
...•---••C' Attorney-•-••----
AYES: Balshaw, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Mayor pro tem Cavanagh
NOES: None
ABSE1vT: V.M. ~ d', ayor. Mattei r,
-
ATTEST: .. •••- •-,.. _.. .. . ... ....•••••---•••••--•._....... ..-- •• -•.... ._..-•-• ....._ .. ~1.~5.~.t.,~~.~ -r •--•••-•-•
~~ ~~ ~
ity Clerk ~ ~ M-a r ~
Council File.. .. ..:.. ...
Form CA 2 7/81 R~. No.... $~.. .~.~.~.....~ • C• S•