HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 85-052 N.C.S. 02/19/19851, ' - -
~ _ '~i
_ ' :; '
~ ~~SOI~~~IO~ N~. 85-52 N. ~. ~.
of the C'i~ty of Pe~a~luma, Califor.r~ia ~ .
A RESOLUTION APPROVTNG, THE ISSUANCE OF. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVTRONMENTAL
_
QUALITY ACT FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A REVISED P. U. D.
DEVELOPMENT `PLAN AND A TENTATIVE SU~BDIVISION
MAP FOR A 150-UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING SUBDIVISION
.
AT SARTORI DRIVE`/'FRATES ROAD NEAR LAKEVILLE HIGHWAY
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a
Negative Declaration pursuant. to the Caiifornia Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) for the following projects:
1. An amendment to the Planned Unit Development zone development plan
for Casa Del Oro, Phases 3 through 6, a 150-unit single-family home
subdivision at the intersection of Sartori Drive, Frates Road and
Lakeville Highway, Sonoma County Assessor's Parcel No. 17-040-44;
and
2. A tentative subdivision map for Casa Del Oro, Phases 3 through 6, a
150-unit single-family home subdivision at the intersection of Sartori
Drive, Frates Road and Lakeville Highway, Sonoma County Assessor's
Parcel No. 17-040-44.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the issuance of said
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is
hereby approved, based on fhe following findings :
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community.,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important exarnples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory .
2. The project, as eonditionally approved, does not have the potential to
achieve short-term., to the disadvantages of long-term, environmental
goals .
Reso. 85-52 NCS .. 1 of 2
~ ,~ ~
. ~ ~~
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which
are individually limited, ~b:ut cumulatively considerable.
. 4. The: .pr.oject, as conditiorially approved„ does not have environmental
effects which will cauSe substantial adverse. effects on human beings
either directly or indirectly:
Under the power~and authority:-conferred upon "this .Couricil by the Gharter of said ~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT;;
ATTES7`:
~ ~,.~.,.., ,., ;._g,-,
re3o . casa.:~l~~t~`~ertify ,the, foregoing Resolution was introduced and' adopted by the
Council of the~Cit of P.etaluma at a, (Re ar- meetin
Y ~ ) ~~1~~c~~~~~ °
.._ •
._ _..__ ~~ on the ._._ 19~1_?-••--,. day of .........•-•..~~'+~R~I:f~~.X ... ........... :19.__~.~, by the
, _ _ followirig. vote: . _ ~
Balshaw., Davis, Woolsey, Teneer, .Mayor Mattei
as to
Attorney
None - ~ . . ., ~
- Cav " Vice Mayor Bond ~ _ _
t
. ... .-•-. .... .-•. ... _•• ••-• •- •• -• -•,•--••• ............... ,............••--- • ••••-• -• - . -••-.. ..-•--•_-•••-•-•. ....---•
- -•---•• - • •- • •-
City•Clerk Mayor
.~.. c~,~ncil:File. .
i ~. No...l~:eso ~:::$:5'~5~2 NCS
Form CA 2 7J8