Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2002-095 N.C.S. 06/17/2002 resolution No. 2002-095 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g A RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 9 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR 1o L,ANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 11 12 FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 13 14 WHEREAS, the City Council of Petaluma did adopt that certain Resolution, Describing 15 Improvements and Directing Preparation of Engineer's Report for fiscal year 2001-2002 and 16 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, for the Landscape Assessment Districts, in 17 said City, listed in Exhibit A of the Engineer's report on file, and did refer the proposed 18 improvements to the Engineer of Work, and did therein direct said Engineer of Work prepare and 19 file with City Clerk report on the districts, in writing, all as therein more particularly described, 20 under and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. 21 22 WIIEREAS, said Engineer of Work prepared and filed with the City Clerk of said City 23 reports on the districts, in writing as called for m said Resolution and under a pursuant to said 24 Act, which report have been presented to this Council for consideration; and 25 26 WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered the report and each and every part thereof, 27 and finds that each and every part of said report. is sufficient, and that neither said report, nor any 28 part thereof should be modified in any respect; 29 30 >BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma as 31 follows: 32 33 1. That the plans and specifications for the existing improvements within the assessment 34 districts listed in Exhibit A of the Engineer's report or within any zone thereof, contained in said 35 report for the districts, be, and it are hereby, preliminarily approved. 36 37 2. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of said 38 improvements, if any, maintenance, and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, 39 contained in said report, be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved. 40 41 3. That the diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the assessment districts referred 42 to and described in said Resolution and also the boundaries of any zones therein and the lines and 43 dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said districts as such lot or parcel of land is shown 44 on the County Assessor's maps for the fiscal year to which the report for each district applies, 45 each of which lot or parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said diagram, as 46 contained in said report, be, and it is hereby preliminarily approved. 47 48 Resolution No. 2002-095 N.C.S. " 1 2 3 4 5 6 4. That the proposed assessment of the total amount of the estimated costs and expenses 7 of the proposed improvements upon the several parcels of land in each district in proportion to 8 the estimated benefits to be recelved by such parcels, respectively, from said improvements 9 including the maintenance or servicing, or both thereof, and of the expenses incldental thereto, as 1 o contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 11 12 5. That said report will stand as the Engineer's Report for all of the individual District as 13 listed in Exhibit A of the Engineer's report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings to be 14 had pursuant to said Resolution. . IS Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Speci~ meeting , on the ........17th.......... day of .......June 20......, by the following vote: ity Attorney AYES: Cader-Thompson, Moynihan, O'Brien, Mayor Thompson, Torliatt NOES: None ABSENT: ~ e Mayor Healy, Magui e ATTEST: City Clerk 4;7t@f11Y1 Mayor Council File Res. No.......2002-095 N.C.s. ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE 1VIAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS CITY. OF PETALUMA Prepared under the direction of: Thomas Hargis, Director of Water Resources and Conservation Submitted: June 17, 2002 f ~ of LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER'.S`REPORT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. Dated: , 2002 'Phomas Hargis Director of Water Resources and Conservation City of Petaluma Countyof'Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, togetherwith Assessment:and-Assessment'Diagrams thereto attached, was filed with me on the .day of , 2002. Paulette~Lyon Acting. City Clerk City'of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that he enclosed Engineer's Report,. together. with Assessment and Assessment Diagrams thereto attached,. was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Petaluma California, on the day of , 2002. Paulette Lyon Acting City Glerk City. of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the. enclosed Engineer's Report,'together with Assessment and Assessment Diagrams thereto attached,,was fled with the County Auditor of the County of'Sonoma on the day of , 2002. Paulette, Acting City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By F { LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT .DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF PETALUMA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 Thomas Hargis, Director of Engineering and Engineer of Work for all of the Landscape Assessment Districts, as listed in Exhibit A attached, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County,, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution No. N.C.S., pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements and maintenance which are the subject.of this report are briefly described in Exhibit B. The plans and specifications referred to in.Exhibit C are on file: aril are.included in this report 6y reference. The annual assessment costs are summarized in Exhibit D by each district listed in Exhibit A. Included in the summarized costs are the annual assessment by parcel. The basis of allocation of assessments. are described in Exhibit E-for each district listed in Exhibit A. The assessment rolls for each district described in Exhibit A are listed in Exhibit E. These rolls will be submitted to the Sonoma County Auditor-Controller for inclusion in the FY 02-03 tax roll and billed with the FY 02-03 property tax and other assessments. 'r LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT C CITY OF"PETALUIVIA - FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. FOR DISTRICTS LISTED IN EXHIBIT A, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THESE RECORDS r ~ EXHIBIT D CITY OF PETALUMA FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS The assessment district costs and assessments to be determiried by City Council at the July 15, 2002 City Council meeting. LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT'DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT E FY 2002-03 BASIS OF'ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS All benefits ofthe-.improvements are special benefits to land within the districts. General'benefits to the public are.non?inal or non-existent. Allocation of Assessments The annual :maintenance: costs and reserves were estimated and .incidental administrative expenses added to yield tatotal annual cost. This cost was then prorated, as determined at formation, to the.lots in each district;. so thaf each lot will share in the annual'landscape-maintenance expenses;. prorated. equallyamong the single family lots. In the Sonoma Glen 'Landscape,Assessment'District, the-assessmenfs for-the townhome lots are calculated at 66% of the single family lots, The number of lots for each ;district is shown on thernexf page. Annual Indexing Factor For certain Landscape Assessment Districts,. in any year'the assessments shall not.be deemed to have been increased~ifthe amount ofthe increase is not more that;.the.,.percentage of the increase in the: U.S. Department ofLabor,;Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Rices Indexes, Pacific Cities and the U.S. City Average,:San.:Erancisco-Oakland-San Jose from February 1 to February 1. n~ ' i~ .LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTSENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT E Continued # of Single # of Townhome Total Family Lots Lots # of Lots Casa Del Oro 151 151 Sycamore Heights 45 45 Village Meadows 79 79 Village East 71 71 Spring Meadows 78 78 Shelter Hills Village 110 110 Meadow Park 177 177 Anna's Meadows 74 74 Adobe Creek ~ 326 326 St James Estates 19 19 Park Place 5 82 82 Glenbrook 83 83 Fairway Meadows 41 41 Country Club Estates 75 75 Sonoma Glen 303 142 445 Mountain Valley * 180 180 Kingsmill 117 117 Cader Farms 177 177 Westridge 4 167 167 Hillview Oaks 30 30 Corona Ranch 0 74 74 Crane Glen 21 21 Tatum 3 3 Judith Court 24 24 Sequoia Estates 9 9 Graystone Creek 160 160 Liberty Farms 44 44 Americana 100 100 Kingsfield 14 14 Magnolia Terrace 12 12 Wisteria 28 28 Woodside Village 59 59 Twin Creeks: 40 40 Corona Creek II 40 40 Cross. Creek 200 200 McNear Landing 185 185 Willow Glen 236 236 Westview Estates 42 42 Stoneridge 19 19 Lansdowne 97 97 Totals. 3,718 216 3,934 * For these assessments, all.lots are considered single family lots. These lots are apartment housing . LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT ' EXHIBIT F CITY OF PETALUMA FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 ASSESSMENT ROLLS: The annual assessment rolls;. of each Landscape Assessment District listed in Exhibit A are on f le with the City Clerk.