Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 9576 N.C.S. 10/04/1982., .nr ~ '~ d ~~is~~~ ll~n 1~I ~. 95 76 1~I .~. ~. of the City of Pefaluma, California . A P.ESOLUT.ION APPROVING T:HE' REVISED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN F'OR THE PARK- PLACE II. SUBllIVISION LOGATED AT MCD.OWELL BLVD. NOR`TH AND RAINIER AVE1`dUE (QANTAS DEVELOPM.ENT.) AND READOPTING CONDITIUNS OF THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY O:RDINANCE 1283 N. G. S. • WHEREAS, Ordirrance No. ~~~~ N.C.S. repealed Ordinance No. 1283 N.C.S. and deleted references to the ~Unit Development Plan and conditions. thereon from the legislation readopting the PUD zone designation; and WHEREAS, by action taken on June 27, 1982 the Planning Commission recommended adoption of revisions to the Unit Development Plan more particularly described as follows: Substitution of one story, detached si-ngle farnily dwellings of approximately 1, 076 square feet in size for previously approved two story, attached townhouse dwellings of approximately 1,420 square feet in size for the following lots: 105 Glacier Court 101 and 109 Rushmore Avenue 105 Muir Court 2Z8, 224, 200, 196, 172, 168, 128 and 124 Banff Way NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that. the final unit development plan on file in the Office, of Community Develbpment and Planning is hereby approved as revised pursuant to Section 19A-50.4 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C,S:, as amended; and, . BE IT FU.RTHER RESOLV,ED that the City Coiaricil hereby adopts the Findings of the Planning Gommission as its findings as stated hereinafter: 1. Said plan clearly results in a more desirable use of land and a better phy:sical~ :environment than wou'ld be -possible under any single zoning district or combinati'on .of' districts . 2. That the Planned Unit District is proposed on property which has a suitable reTationsh'ip to one (.I) or more thoroughfares; and that .. said thoroughfares are adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. Reso No. 9576 N.C.S. ~.:• 3. That the plan for the proposed development presents a unified and organized arrangement. of the buildings and service facilities which are appropriate ;in. relation to adjacent or nearby properties and that adequate :landscaping and/or sereening is included if: necessary to insure compatibility. 4. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available public and private spaces designated on the Unit Development Plan . 5. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by .the applicant, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the g,eneral intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petalurna, with the Petaluma General Plan, and with any applicable Environmental Design Plans adopted by the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Council approves the revised development plan, subject to the conditions of approval formerly included in Ordinance No. 1283 N.C.S. and hereinafter noted and the additional condition relating to the substitution of units for lots listed above: a. Permitted heights and aceessory use limitations shall be the same as those permitted in Compact Resi'dential Zones (Article 7 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance) . b. All building setbacks shall be the same as provided in Phase I of the PUD . c. On quadraplot lots, the distance between the front wall of the garage and the far edge of the private street shall not be less than forty (-40) feet to provide for adequate vehicular backup. d. Nine (9) housing types shall be constructed, as indicated on the two-page site plan located in the "Planned Unit Development Master Plan Park Place Subdivision No. 2" submittal. Architectural plans shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval indicating the various building forms, color schemes, decorative trim, exterior building materials, energy conservation methods,, locations, etc. Final landscape plans, fence designs and locations, bike path landscaping, and automatic irrigation system plans shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. All above plans shall be ap,proved by the Planning Director prior to Final Map approval. Reso. No. 9576 N.C.S. ' ~ • ~l . . _:v; ' - .- ' o. . " .. : ~ - • ` ~,-~~. . : '. - ° e. Conditions of the Site Plam ~arid Architectural Re~iew Committee ~ approval: shall b,ecome conditions of the . Unit Development Plan ~ ;, .. ~ for Park PTace II 'with regard to the .T2 "substitute" housing : ~ , - . ' units her-einbefore descr-ibed. ~ . ^ ~.. ~ B'~E IT F:URTH~ER RESOLVED that th'e C`otzncil finds fhat the ' requirements of California' Erivironmental Qualit.y ~Act Guidelines Section ,. . 15083 have beeii sa•tisfied and ' hereby incorporate"s by reference the ~ , environmental~ ~impact.report certified~, in 19Z5.. . Y. . , .: T : ' ~ " . . T, , , Jnder the' power and-autlroritc; eonf • ' ~-:. ~ ~ s: 7 r ' . . :rred'upon this Council by the Char ~ ~ _ f ~ _ ~ ~ >. • . , ~ -- I.heceby certify the,:foregoirig Resolution ~was :introducedti and ~adopted by the ~~ ~ :Council of the:; .Ctty of Petaluma ati a• (iRegular), (~`dy6~tiyf~ky~= (:yS~~41~1) meeting rov s to ,. ;" on the .. _4,th.........._. day 'of ..Q~~o~~X.'..... ..... .....-•••• 19_82_.,:by the ' . . .. ~ ,, following vot ~; ' ' ' - ' _.. . ~ _" :i ' % ~ ,~ ~ t ~ = G~Y y.Attorney . fJ - • - . s AYES: Balshaw, Battaglia~, Ca~anagYi., H'arberson, V:M ~P,,erry., . Mayo Mattei ' - NQES: None _ ' _ ~ - ` . . . ABSENT: Bond ~ ~ . ' ' ,~f ------=~ , f ~^ A.I"I'EST: ._-~~-----~--~-~ •-- -. .._ . ~ --~-- - .:---. - ------ - .-,-. ~--... ......_.. •----•------ ---~-•------. ,. -~- - --~-~- --•; :-- -•-- . - , , . _. . - •-- ity ~Clerk Mayor ~ >: .... .~ '; ~,~` . ' ~ . .. .' ~ . .. ~ . . COUNGIL:FILE~ . .` .. , , .. . , . S ~ - . _. • ~ . . ,FO,RM,CA.;2 1/80; . .-- RES..No. ~57Fi: ' .