HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 9453 N.C.S. 05/17/1982J~ .
,i ' . ~~.~ . . . . ~ . . '
~•~ ~ . -
~ _ r~ .
Resolution 1~10: ~~I~. C: S.
. - RESOLU~IONhAPP~~V"ING T~N~ATIIIE .SU6D~S1ION M~P FOR
. ' - NORTHSTAR ~SUBDIVISION (located on E1.'y B'1vd.: N,orth
, . at Capri G:reek,)
WMERfAS, the h1cBail Gorp,~.as owner and ;S,a;bd'ivider has filed with
thi s Counci l' 'a tentati~_ve' ,map proposi ng to sub;di°vi de 1`and •wi thi n'thi s
City to be~known as North Star Subdivision., and.h.as paid a11 required
f=iling fees; and, -
-WHEREAS, the Ci,ty. Engi neer, the Di r.ecto'r:.:of Pl anni ng,, the Sonoma
County Water Agency; and :the P1 anni ng Commi ssi°~on ha;~e ex~ami ned and
~ revi;ewed the same as: requ~ir'ed by law and .all. reports.,.. recommendations,
and comments thereon hav'e been for.warded to a'nd considered b,y this
Council a.t its meeting beld on May,17, 1982.~~
N01~~, THEREFORE, BE I'T RESOL~VED that. thi:s Council hereby finds as
- follows: ~ - -
1. The proposed s:u'bdivi:sion; together'with provisions for its
. d~esign and impro~veme:nt, ~i~~~s cons~i'stent wi`t~.h th~e~ Gen~e~ra,l Plan.
2. The propose_d subdivision is compatib;le wi~th-the~o6jectiv.es,
policies genera]' land`uses, and programs specifi'ed in sai~d General P1an.
3. The si te i s phy.sa~cal l;y sui tabl e for the type` ~of deVel opment
pro.posed.
f
4. The s`ite i.s ph.y,sical_ly suitable for the proposed density of
development. ' ~. ~ - . - • - ..
,T _ .
~ 5~~The desig,n, of th'e subd'ivi_si~n and the, pro;posed improvements
therefor ~w'ill .~not acause _subst~antia`l~ ~envi,ronmenta,l ,.dama,ge; ~~and no
subst;anti:a`l-or 'avo~i`d_able a,nj~~pry.wi,ll>occur to fish.:or wild:l~ife or their
habitat. ~ ~ - „ ~ . , • . , _, _,
6. The desi;gn:of the Subdivision an'd the type~of improvements
will not cause seri`~ous Publi;c.heal.th problems.
7. The desi gn - ofy the Subd:i u•i si on an, d the type of i:,mprovements
proposed wi l 1 not co.nfl.i ct wi'th>~e'asemen'ts{, acqui r`ed- by tYie ~ publ i c at
large, for access thr~ug~h~'o,r"use of ;pro'perty within the p.hoposed
subdivision. .~~ ~
~8~. , T_li:e discharge of wa'ste from the pro:pos,eci subdivision i:.nrto the
existing,community s,ewer:syst~em will not, resul.t i~n violatio'n of 'tbe
exist'ing requirements prescri'bed.by the~Regional Water Quality Control
Board,
9. The' desi. n of tiie subdi vi si..on f
required, provi.desgto' the ~extent feas~ible~r Whi`ch .tfie- tentatiVe map is
, for future, passive or natural
heat=i ng o.r. cool.i ng opportuni.ti es i n the subda v~i si:on.. ~
.~
9~~'53 Page 1 of 4
10. The tentative map provides reasonable public access from a
public road to that portion of the bank of the stream lying within the
proposed subdivision.
11. The tentative map provides for dedication of a public easement
along th~ portion of the bank of the stream lying within the proposed
subdivision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLUED, based on the findings set forth above, that
the above referred to tentative map, be and the same is hereby approved
subject to the conditions set forth below and incorporated herein.
1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City
Engineer outlined below:
A. Use of the flood storage basin shall be engineered so as to
detain the waters at a rate that is not to exceed the run-off of
undeveloped land for a 24-hour 100-year event.
B. The subdivider shall be required to put up half the cost of the
culverts that may be required at Maria and at Ely.
C. The ~ff-site channel improvements downstream of this property
should be required during the Phase II construction stage.
D. The construction of Ely Blvd. No. should be done as part of
Phase III construction.
E. A proposed sewer line between Lots 176 and 177 and 184 and 185
should be located within the street rather than down the side vard
lot lines. ~
F. The water main along Ely Blvd. should be extended across the
entire frontage.
G. The extension of sewer mains to serve the properties above this
particular property shauld be investigated.
H. The non-access easement should be dedicated along the entire
Ely frontage and across the portions of the subdivision bordering
the Candlewood ~~obile Home Park.
I. The proposed parking islands to be placed in the center of the
street on the cul-de-sacs should be shown on the tentative map and
should be analyzed to prevent conflicts with driveways.
9453 Page 2 of 4
2. Al1 existing widths and grades of adjacent streets shall be
shown on the tentative map. The easternmost street that stubs into Park
Place IV shall line up with the planned Park Place street, and given the
same name. Al1 other streets in the project shall be subject to
approval by the City Street Naming Committee. The curved section of
Maria Drive between Sunrise and Park Place Subdivisions shall be
straightened somewhat to reduce excess curves.
3. Inaccurate lot areas and property line dimensions which exist
on plans shall be corrected. Lots shall contain a minimum area of 4,000
square feet. No lot shall have a minimum width less than 30 feet at the
building setback lines. Front building setback lines shall vary between
20 and 25 feet to prevent a row housing visual effect.
4. Bus loading facilities shall be designed into the Ely Blvd.
entry into the development in accordance with City standards.
5. Al1 grading and drainage design shall be consistent with the
requirements of the Sonoma County Water Agency.
6. The northern property lines at Lots 175 and 186 shall be made
perpendicular to Maria Drive.
7. The two proposed private drives shall be increased in width to
measure 32 feet and stripped for parallel parking on the northern sides.
The four car parking lots proposed at the ends of the private drives
shall be deleted from plans (due to interference with creek or lot
design).
8. The Capri Creek right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.
Creek right-of-way landscaping shall be maintained by a Homeowner's
Association. However, the Sonoma County Water Agency shall be required
to provide for any necessary hydraulic maintenance.
9. Final subdivision map approval shall be consistent with the
phased housing allotment schedule established for the development, and
map approvals limited to portions of the project having full allotment
award.
10. Any proposed off-site improvements and easements shall be
subject to written consent by the affected property owner(s).
11. A masonry wall of a minimum height of six (6) feet shall be
erected along the Ely Blvd. frontage in the 'public right-of-way' design
and in the location is subject to approval of the City Planning
Director.
12. Side and rear yard fencing will be indicated on the development
plan, the design of the fencing is subject to approval of the City
Planning Director.
9453 Page 3 of 4
,.
' .
~
~,
~, _~ c ,
_ ~ ° .
f . . '.
. ; ;, { .
.4 - .
13;. An assessme,nt district sti'all ,be ~fo'rmed prior to approval of the
final map, to provi:de ~fb:r ma`i ntenance of tlie s`torm water retenti on system
fo:r.tiie..: project. This axssessment_ d'~istri:ct, s,hall be comprised of al1
affected prop~rties with'i"n :N~rths~tar' de~e`l:opment area. Details of the
assessment district fo.rmation Shall be-worked out_in conjun_ction with
the C~ommunity Development, Pu'blic Works,.Engineering and City Attorney
departments.
',BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tiie~City Coun.ci_1 finds that:the requirements
of Gal i forni a Envi ronmenta~l. Qual' i ty Act Gu'i d`el i nes:, Se:cti on 15083 have
been .satisfied and hereby ineorporates by reference tiie~Negative
Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission on January 11, 1982 as
its Item 11.680. . ' ~
.~
,
Under the- power and authority ,conferred upon this: Couricil `by ~_~the Charter of eaid City.
_
I hereby cerfi£y the. foregoing Resolution was: i pted by the ~
, , < Pprove to
~~~~~C~ ~ ~ :
• Council, of t:ie, . t of Petaluma at egulai)~ journe~'~ aal) meefing
~ - l~t~h..._ aa of ~I~Y~ ; ~~} - ~ _: .
on tlie Y } t9••-•••._, by the
following v,ote: ~ •~' ~ • ~ ._ _ _... _ ,r. .......~ . ... _....
Ciiy.• Attorney
AYES: PERRY, NRRBERSONs, BOND, BALSHAW, BATTAGL.IA, .VICE MAYOg.~C,VANAGH,: MAYOR
_ MATTEI ~ ~
NONE ~ . -. . ~ ~
NOES: ~ . , ~ . . ~4
=;
NONE . ~ ~ ~
ABSENT: ° , . . ` : ~-
' - ATTEST: - -~' ~ - ~ -- . ..:. __ ._.. _ : ' ' . :-' ' --~ ---- _
City~ Clerk . : : , ~ . '. ~ , May_or , ,~;'
. , •
' ~ ~ ~ ~COUNCIL FILE ' - • ~
FoRM cA 2;;~~;eo, RES. No,-~:453- ~ ' Page , 4. Of 4