HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 9494 N.C.S. 07/12/1982- ~ ~ Reso~ution No. `~~~N. C. S.
~:."~ .of the City of Pefaluma, California
~ .~. s" A RESOLUTION GRAIVTING THE APPEAL OF~ RICHARD PIERACCINI
.,•
~ FROP!I T_HE; .ACTION OF THE FLANNIN!G COMMISSTON- DE~~YING
. - APPLICATION 'FOR A VARIANGE FROM RARKiNG REQUIREMENTS
AT 352 PETALUMA.80ULEVARD NORTH
WHEREAS, Richard Pieraccini' has appealed the action of the P1anning Commission
on June 8, 1982, denying a ~a':r-iance request to. perm;it con'stru`ction of an office
tuilding at 352 Petaluma Boule~ard North,.Petaluma, without reguired on-site
parki.ng;. and, " ' ~ . , .
WHEREAS, the matter,has:been properly brought.before and heard by the City
Council and the applicant and all other interested.paries were permitted to be heard;
NOUJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City-.hereby finds as follows:
1._ That there are pecul'iar a'nd unus:ual condit=ions inh~erent in the property
in question sufficient to ca;use a hardship, and~that su:c._h;.,canditions are not common
to all or most of the propertie`_s in the immedia.te ar.ea. ~
2. That a hardship peeuliar to the property and not created by any act of the
owner exists:
3. That such vari~ance is ne.cessary for the preser:vation and enjoyment of sub-
~ stantial property rights possessed by other p:roperties i;n the same zoning district
and in the vicinity,.and'that~sueh a variance.wi]l not constitute a special p:rivilege
of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
4. That the autfio'rizing of such variance shall not 6e of substantial
detriment to adjacent prope:rty, and will not mater.ially i.mpair the purposes of
the zoning ordinance or the public interest: . ~
BE IT FURTHER RESOL'~V;E'D that based on the foregoi`ng findings, the appeal ought
to~:_.6e„>r- and is. hereby granted and the action of the Planning Commission is
he'reby reversed, and the v.ariance, as requested-is hereby granted.
LJn,der the power And authority conferred upon this;Covncil by the Gharter of said City.
I hereby. certify the foregoing Resolution. was mtrocluced. and-,adopted by the 6"p~ d s to
Gouncil of the City of Petaluma at a(~~~~.> (Adjourned) J~~~ meeting fO~,~
on ;the --•-••-~2.~}l-_.•.-•- day of .................~A,11,~[...__.............. :........., 19_~:Z.., by the ~ C
following vote: ; ° ~ ; '--
~ •• -,-, ~ .,.__....-•--•,•-•-
, ~ • City Attorney
AYES: COUNCILMEN BATTAGLIA,, BOND, CAVANAGH,VICE-MAYO'R PERRY YOR MATTEI
rroES: COUNG ~ N BALSHAW HAR~@RSON /
~~~ ' ~
ABSENT: -0- _ ;
~
.. r ,
.. . ~ s
. ~ ~
: ~-~ . . .. ,~.~~~-'~ .................. ... ... .~~~ ---~
....... . .. ..... . ........ . . .- "--. .. . -~ ..---
ATI'EST: ' .. .. ...-•----•---•
_ . _,
ity Clerk % /f~~ ~, r~. Mayor
Council'.File...~........ ••• ..................
Fo~ cn 2~~s~ x~. ~xo..........9 4.9 4....(V.. C. S. - ~ .