Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 9496 N.C.S. 07/12/1982°\f I~esolut~on. :No. 9 4 9 6 N. C. J. of fhe City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUT`I:ON GRANTING THE APPEAL O:F HAROLD MET.CALFE. FROM.AC'TION OF THE PL~ANNING GOMMISS`ION DEN'YING ~ APPLI'CATIO.N FOR A VARIANCE FROM S~IDEYARD ~S'ETBACK AND REQUI.BEb DRIVEWAY ENTRANGE DEPTH. ~ WHEREAS, Har.ol'd,Me:tca]fe has.appealed the action of the Planning Commission on June 8, 1982 denying a varia~nce request to reduce the requi r.ed i nteri or s'i;de ya:r, d-setback from 5 feet to 3 feet and the required driveway e;ntrance depth from 20 f~e't'to 14 feet at 501 Second Street, in Petaluma, Galifornia; and, ~ WHEREAS, t~he matter h.as been properly brought°b'efore and heard by .; the City Counci:l and the applicant and al1 other interested parties were permi tt~ed to be ;heard; ~ ~ . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RfSOLVED tha,t the C""ity Council hereby finds . - as follows: ~ 1. T,hat there are pecul`iar and unusu`al~conditio:ns inherent in the property in question sufficient to cause a hardship, a'nd that such •_ ~ conditions are not commo.n to~all o,r,mos.t of,athe-properties in the ~ . - , - ~ ~ ~.~ immediate area. _ ; . ~ : 2. ~ That,, a, ~har.dshi:p ~,pecul'iar, to the property and ; not .created by any r act of t~he owner exi's;ts`. ~ - • ~~ ' . ' " ~ ~ ~ 3. That sucfi vari,ance is ~necessary ~for't'he preservation and ~ enj'oyment ~of su'bstantial prope:r.ty`ri~ghts p~ssessed by other propert•ies ~." , i n the same z~oni'ng di st.ri ct'. and, a;n,the vi ci ni ty, and: that such a ~. ~ variance wi11 ,not. consti'tut'e a~'spe:ci'.a-1, p,rivile;ge of the~,r.ec'ipient. not ~ enjoyed by~his neighbo,rs. ~ Res. No. 9496 N.C.S. .~ " 4. That-the authorizing of such vari~ance.shall not be of substan- ~ tial detriment to adjacent property:,~and~wil'l not materially impair the ~ ~ purposes of the, zoning ordinance o,r the publ~ic i'ntere~st. BE IT FUR_THER RESOLVED that based on t'he foregoin'.g. f'indings, the appeal ought ~:to be, and. is hereb.y granted and the: a;ct.i~on of the Planning Commission is hereby reve.rsed, and.;the Variance; as requested is hereby granted. ~ Under the:.power and a_uthoriiy conferred upon :tfiis ~ CounciL by the Charter of said Gity. . I. hereby~ certify-,ihe, foregoing Resolution was ~infro'duced .;and adopted `bg' zhe , Cougcil of tfie ,Cit ; of Petaluma at a;~:.14 Ad'oumed ; ' p rove~ - ._. _ _ Y ~ . . ~) ~ _ l ) Q~~c%'~ meeting ~ ~ .:for`_ on the -'-~.-~-~~'l. -.__..,_ day of ........1.U~~[•••....•.•••-•• ...................•..•, 1SSZ.:•-, by the .,} . following voEe; °:. ' . ~ ~ . ' • • - •--• -=' , ~ , . ~ _ . ity, tlttc t1~'ES: -- ~OUi~CILMC~I '~ BATTAGLIA;,,..EOND, .C/~VANAGH,, ~ VICE-MAY~R PERRY,; - MAYOR MATTE'I ~ ., • ~ , ~ ;~ , '1VOES: COUidCIL~1EN Q SHAW AND FI 'RBE~SON ~ ~~~.: ~' „ ~ ABSENT: -Q- - . _ . p ~ ', , . ~ F ~ . _i ' ,~~~, ~ . ~~j ' - -••• _ A'I"I'EST: ' . ~ ....~~~~%~«t/ `_. ...._ . --~-- ° : r t . .~ .__: .. . _ ;,... -- ---- --~--- - ---- - ------- --. ..---- y ~~ ~s' . .x, ..---- Cit Clerk ~ • ~ ' - Ma or ~ y ~ ~ ~~ ' . COUNCIL FILE - ' • ~ '. ' ~.. ' - ' .. ~ ' ~ . .' .'• . ' . FORM CA 2„1/80 , Res: Nb ~