The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 9279 N.C.S. 09/14/1981,. ~ . ~ ~ ~ , . Resolution No. 9 2 ~ 9 N. ~. S. of the City of Petaluma, California ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ~'ETALLTP~IA MAKING APPLICATION . TO THE SONOMA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CO~IISSION REQUESTIN.G INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS FOR A REOGANIZATION PURSUANT TO THE DISTRICT REORGANIZATION ACT OF T965. (OLD ADOBE/FRATES RANCH) WHEREAS, pursu.ant to the District Reorganization Act of 1965, commencing with §56000 of the Government Code, and affected City,. as~therein defined, may, upon resolution adopted by its legislative body, make a proposal for reorganization and request in~.tiation of pro~ceedings therein; and 41HEREAS, the City of Petaluma is an "affected city" for a re- org;anization proposal which contains territory propoaed to be re- organized as a~part of said reorganization. , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby proposes, defines, declares and requests as follows: ' " l. The City Council of the City of Petaluma, as the legislative bod;y for an affected city, does hereby make a proposal for reorgani- zation pursuant to tYie District Reorganization Act of 1965, and does hereby request proceedings pursuant to such Act. 2. The reorganization shall consist of the inclusion, addition and annexation of the following Assessor's Parcels to the corporate bound`aries of the City of Petaluma: • 17-030-17 17-140-08 17-OSD-03 17-140-09 17-050-04 17-150-05 . 17-130-02 17-150-11 17-130-04 17-150-12 17-140-05 17-150-13 17-140-,07 17-150-14 Reso. 9279 NCS -1- ; _, Said territ:ory is more partieular-ly described in Exhibit "A" wh~i;ch is attached-~here:to and incorporated herein by reference. ~ . 3. The City do.es h.ereby deciare that t'he reasons for pro- ~ ~ . pos~ing this reorganization are as follows:. ~ A. The pro~.e'ct will pro~-ide~a~dditionai housing required ; to :accommodate ~future~ planned .grow~th. - + i. B. . The ;proj.ectt will~ provide~ an ~ expand~ed `local employment ~ : . ~ .. ~ •.. . ,., . ~, base there; by,'redu.cing,,,t~h~e .number of out commu.ter~s ~and offering ~ ~ future residents employinent opportuni.ties wit'hin the Petaluma commuriity. ' C. The projeet wi1'l~~ :provide 1ong~-term opportunities for lan~ application of treated waste.-wa~t=er and. thereby redu,ce pot:ential . pollution of the Petaluma.River_ ~~ . j D. The pro j ec.t. wi11 provide ;~a permanent open space buf f er r zone between agricultural.,and urban land us.es.: . ~ 4 All adverse impacts, proposed mit'igation,measures and al- ~ . ternatives to the proposed action have.,tieen add-ress:ed in the Final Environmental Impact~_`Report ap,proved by the'Gity-Council on August 24 , i' 1981 as set forth in Res'olia.t`ian .No . 9264 ~ N. C. S., and furt•her , ~.-` tha`t Exhibit ''B°'' which is hereby inc;orpora:t,ed by ref;erence makes the necessary findings~requir.ed under Title.l~4 o`f the California Admini- strative Code §1-508~8-,§~50"89. ~ 5. A certif ied' co~py of this R'esolution~ shall be transmitted i , -. to ~the Sonoma Cotinty Lo.c°al Agency Formation. Commission. i . Under-.the power and autliority_:conferred upon this_Council' by ,the Charter: of ;aaid City. I ihereby~ ce;tify the. foregoirig Resolution ,was introd'uced and adopted by the ' ' Council of the Cit of Petal'uma 'at a,$ ~ Adiouined ~ppro.ved as to , i Y ( e`~ ~ ( ) (S~}ik~F~ meetind, . form on che --~--:14_th_.__..... ~iay of Septemb,er. --~--•--- ~-•-----.., 19._81., by tiie -. ; , fqllowing vofe: _ . ----._...,-•=-=• .............................. , , . ; , City Attorney AYES•,. Councilmen Perr ,.~-Iarberson, and Vi e Mayor Cavana , . " . ~ ~~ ~': .- NOES: Couricilman ~B aw ' °1 - ' ~ :. - .. ----.._..~ ' . . John W ~l C , anagh., Jr ~ "Vi ce Mayo,~ .. ,. ~ ~.. . . ,. ., - A~BSENT: Couriei. ` " g - ~a.gl, ,n , . >d Ma or Mat ei . _ ~ .,. . . ~ ; ~~..~'% .. , /.~'. ~ . ~ . , ~r'/:-/~ /.,~- . ATTEST;:>• - - ----- --------- :.`-~:~-G...:..Y!°"`°._~~::.. .. . . :.: .... i, r ~ ~~ , /~~ v 1 . .... ..... . .:.. . . . ... .. . .. --- • .~-• ~- ------ _. ' Ciry Glerk ~ Ivlayor • ~ - ~ ~ . ~ ~ - COUNGIL FILE n ' ' ~ ` • - F,QRMCA2;;1'/El0 . . ~ RES.~No:~-~~92~'./ ~ . . ' ~ ... ~ . ~ I^ . ._ ~ EXHI~~I~' 'q° ~ I' I~ C) I' C) ;~ 1= I? 1= .1~ /a: I' I~ ~/-~ I~ I~~ N'`/, /~T , ; . 0 C) I~ I ~ ; ~ , 0~~.~30,04.. 22. ~8 A~. ^ p `' Peto~ V o V~,'~A 1 0 ~ 0I7• 30•02 . . ., ' ` S.OAc. ' _ ~ oic aao e:ROa6.......•--_• ____ _ ` e..... o ............. ..... ~ . 017:140•07 4.32AC , 017•140•09 P. G. ond E. ~ 9.48 Aa Sub~tation ~ 017•140•OS ~ ~'•a " 60. I O AC., i I ~ 017•I50•12 s ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `' g .e 128:95 Ac. . - ^ a I - 0~~:,4o~oe .. 39.90 Ac. ' .. . ~ ~ ~ . a C O l1(V T Y ~ ~ ^ OIT050•03 • 017~J50•13'. ^ e i - . . 123t50 Ac. 30.13' Ac. ~ . , ~ ^0 909~60sA~0 09 -`- " - . . : . . . i i . - ~ ~aomeoeeo eeeeoe '. ~ ', • i ~ ' ~ • ~ m ~ OIZ~050•04 017•150r14 . . e 50.00 Ac. o . :98.80 Ac: Vlllaqe East Subdivision °a ° ~ i s ~ ~ ~ ~ v u m . . . ' 1 ~,Ety Boulevard South . ~ ° ..~~' , _ _ . .- . Ely ~ Rood ~ „ ~ CASA ~RANDE ~ HiGH SCHOOL _ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ pl7•!150•II _ . : ~ 118.67Ac. ' ~ , Coso Del Oro SubCivision ' . 017•130r03 [.37AC,- . ; : . _ eoeme~oae on•o3oa~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ Saitori Diire ~ . ~ .5.79 Ao. ~ Courtrywood~~ ~y~ .-~ BEB'O G9@ Ek'ISTING 'G1TY ,LF MITS~ ~ . ~ . _ . , Subdivinion , ~ :Casa De.Ar~oyo ~ " ~ . ~•• PRO POSE~D' ANNEX~ ATION SuDdivision ,~i~'~. . ~ , . _ ,e . e,.~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ . . ~ . • . ~ 1 ~ I . I i .. ' ,r ..t i ~, ., . . ti ~. ..~,. ' n .n , .. . ~ . , . . ~ . . • ~ ~~~, . ~ ' ~ ~ - 1~ ~ . ~ . ' . .. . , ' 4 .~ ~ ~ ~ '' ~ ' , .. . r'r. . .. - . ..~ . ~ .~ ~ ~ . . ., ~ • „ . . ~ : . . ~ . ~~~~~~ ~ : . A . .. RESO. 9279 . P6, : ,~ .~, u , I ~ FINDING5 AND STAZ~'IQ~'I' OF FACTS ; ~1) Air . - . The Old Adobe/Frates.Ranch Final ~viroru~ntal Imnact Report identi- fied.significant potential air quality effects resulting from the proposed . project. i~These effects were considered in City Council Resolution.No. 9265 N.C.S. ~ -- dated August 24, 1981 wher-ein a statement of overricling considerations was in- cluded. I ~ 2 ) ~ Water I Effect - Increased Surface Runoff and Sedimeritation. Site sedimentation characteristics, whiie.not severe, are important because of the potential for ~ a significant~ctunulative sediment discharge due to the large site area. Sedi- ments would be transportec7. into the local and regional drainage nets, ultimate- ly 'entering Sari Francisco Bay via the Petaltuna River. '~ Effect - Potentials for Flood~ng and Degradation•of Onsite.Stream Channels. Increases in surface runoff fran paved:.surfaces and buildings would ; increase flows in Adobe and Ellis creeks, .thereby increasing potentials for sea- sonil flooding and stream channel erosion, and, as a resul.t,.i.ncreasing long-tezm sedimentation attributable to the project. j Effect - Long-Term Water Quality Iittpacts. Local surface water quality would be influenced in the~long-term by 2 factors; increased.pollutant loads in run- off.from added urban surfaces. Urban pollutant loadings originating from project urban su~aces and golf course fertil.ization could increase the,total Petaltuna R:i_ver~ loadings by about 5 percent. . ; ~i ^` i _ -1- j ~. ~:~ . .. - ' ~. Reso, 9279 ~~~~~I~° .~ Page 1 of 3 `~ T' l Finding - Changes.have,been incorpozated into the project which would mitigate the above mentioned significant environmental effects identified in the Environ- merital Impact Report. ~ Statem~zt of Fact - A surface~water quality and sedimentation control plan is ~ . . required as a condition of the Planned Co~nunity.Developm~zt prezoning. Said. pla~n rrn~st~be reviewed and approved.by~key agencies having jurisdiction in these matters, prior to issuance of grading or bu'il'dirig pexnuts. 3) i ~d _ _ . mitigate the significant enviroi~merital- effects identified in the Envirorunental Impact Report. liquefaction or cc~npaction is present within tYie aTl'uviwn .beneath the site, ~ . there is no information available on conditions below l2 feet. ~ '; Finding -.. Changes liave been incorporated into the project which would ~ . . are~considered law. Although it 'is possible that material suspectible to The ~vironmental Impact Report"identified two unmitigatable significant potential land impacts resulting from tYie propo"sed project. ~. City Council ResoTution No. 9265`N.C.S., dated August 24, 1981 considered ~ sig~ ificant effects of urban area expansion and. conversion , of productive agri- cultural land to non-agricultural uses and made~appr-opriate findings and state- ~ ments of facts regarding said effects. ~ Effect-The Tolay fault, classified as~"potential'ly active," appears to traverse the portion of this,site proposed for golf course use. Potential ; ing~acts inelude surface rupture of golf course grounds. ~ ~ ~ ~ I Effect - Antieipated.future earthqualce activity from active faults in ~ ~ the{region could:cau~e severe grbundshaking and localized failure of creek banks. Potentials for lateral.spreading, conipaetion, lurching and.liquefaction. Statement of Facts - Additional snvestigation and modification of plans to re- flect findings of said investigatioris have been required as a condition of the Planned Co~nunity Develop~nt prezoning. Investigation and.any plan modifica- tion required would be ccxnpleted prior .to issuance of any grading or building permit. ~. :{ , .y, -2- Reso. 9279 ~~~~~~~ ~ Page 2 of ~ 3 ~ +4 , * 4) ~ Minerals - No° significarit adverse effects. ~ 5) ~ Flora . , ~ ~ Effect - Limited realigrunent, to Ellis Creek and.its;tributary could result in significant~effects on riparian vegetation and wildlife. Likely alternatives would be construction.of localized channel proteetion devices, necessitating limited.vegetation remQVal. -The greatest amount of vegetation ~ re~val would occur~at the,junction of E11is Creek and its tributary where a rialignment of the channels is proposed. ~ Eincling -~ Changes have.been incorporated into-the project which would. , mitigate the significant enyironmen~al effects identified in the Environm~zta]: In~ct Report. , Statement of Facts - . ~ • ~ Project plans have beeri altered to avoid realignment of Ellis Creek. A '~ cre~iek preservation and impr-ovement plan has beeri required as a condition of the Plarined C~ity Develo~xnent prezoning:- The plan will be reviewed by the State i. • Fish and Game Departrnent and approved by the Planning Corr~iission. ~ 6) i Fauna No sigriificant adverse effects: 7) ; Noise .; Significant adverse effects have:been identified,:hawever, only the resi- dential portion of this project will be affected. Specific effects, the requisite findings and facts will, therefore, be addressed.at such tiirie as the residential. , . Plarined Unit Develo~nt rezoning occurs. 8) ; Objects of Historical :Sigriificance. . ' ~ ~,Effect - Location of the golf course near the Petal~na,Adobe would en- hance recreation exp~riences for.users'of the golf course, but could.detract ; from recreational experienees at.the historical monwnent. Finding - Changes have been incorporated into the. project which"wbuld mitigate the significant environmental effeets identified in the Environmental ~ Impact Report. ~ Stat~lt of' Facts - As a condition of the Planned Ca~rnxnity .Develo~nent prezoning, special review will be conducted`by the Planning Department to evaluate landscape ;bufferisig along tYie perimeter :of the golf cburse in the ; . ~. vicinity of the Petaltuna Ad~e State Park . . ~ ~. ~ : : . ;~ ,. -: ~ . ~,. ~Y ~'ti . ~ ~y ~ .~~- ~ . ~ . .. .. ~.~r'' _.14, " • . +i,~ ~'g~'~' ~ .. ~ . ~. . - . _ '-_`:~: r~. . -3- . ~ . - :.~' . ' ~ _~~~~~~~ ~ .'_ ~ Reso. 9279 ~ - Page 3 of ~~