HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 9174 N.C.S. 05/18/1981-~,
,; i .
~ ~ ~ 1 ~~iS(JlUf10Yl ~°'~O. 91.74 ~. ~. s, .
of the City of Petaluma, Califorpia
~ '
' A RESOLUTION ARPROVING THE ISSI;ANGE OF A MITIGATED DEGLA'RATiON PURSUANT
TO CALIFORN`.IA ENVLRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND THE PRiOR AD0'FTION OF A CITY-
' ~~WIDE MASTER ENVhRONMENTAL hMPACT REPORT FOR LINDSAY GENERAL PLAN
' I AMENDMENT (A,.P: Nb. 1:37-060-15) ~ ~ __
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the issuance of a
y Mitigated Negative De,cla'ration pursuant to the Cal`-i'fornia Environmental
Qual'i ty Act (CEQA~) for the following project (s)
LINDSAY`GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (A.P. NO.. 137-060`15) /
ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PLAN .AMENDMENT TO ,-REMOVE PLANNED.
INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION AND REDESIGNATE A'S' PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, the City has adopted a M'as~ter Environmental Impact Report on'
the City's General Plan/Envi ronmentaT 'Desi~g.n 'Pl,am which depicts the land use
cla~ssficati~on pr~osed for the project; an`d, ,
~. WHEREAS, additional focused environmental studies have been prepared
-for the-a.rea and. which h'ave~ been reviewed' by the; Community Development and
Planning Department and 'the Planning Commission; and,
6JHfREAS, such mit.gatin.g measures have been recommended 6y the Plann-i.ng
Commission and Staff where necessary to .eliminate, or minimize any significant
adverse environmental effects;
NEuATIVE UECLARA"rI~UN
5-4-81 °~
0~0~ -0.~
COUNCIL RILE.
RE8. NO. ._ _._„
Ntu~-~ I 1 UL ULGLNRNTI'ON 5-4-f31
,,: . .
,,
Tom.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT P,ESOLVED that the issuance of said
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act is hereby approved, based upon the following findings:
1. The City Council has considered any comments and mitigating rneasures
received pertaining to issuance of said Negative Declaration, and finds the
responses thereto to"be adequate. ~.
2.- No signi;fican adverse environmental effects will result from the
project as proposed, or any potentially significant effect will be mitigated
by the proposed design and execution of the project.
3. Further environmental` review inclu'd,ing,traffic and growth
inducement impacts will be conducted at such time as 'a development
proposal- is submitted.;.for said parcel.
Und'er_ the. power °and authority conferred"upon .this Council by the. Charter of said City
' ~ { I hereby certifylthe:iforegoing Resolution vas introduced and adopted by the '
I Council of the City of Petaluma_ ~at a (Regular) (~~~41XiX~~°X,~$ACeJ4 meeting ~P ro d a's Eo
' .... y f in
on the -.': ~ ..i.., dja of .,...... ..:.....: ; ..........:, 19----•$>lby the
follgwin~{voh ~ I ~ '
C.~ _ ... ......_ ...................
.- I I
City Attoiney
AYES:Councilmen Perry/Harberson/Bone/Vice.lMayor Battaglia/Councilman Cavanagh/
.Mayor Mattei • ` ~:` - ~ 1
NOES: -0- .; ;:::'
• ' < <
ABSENT•'Co n' i" Bales ~ .
• :.
ATTEST: -- ~.. - ..::..:: .:. ,..... .....
' ~ City Clerk ~/~qD Ma or
COUNCIL F(C"T`~~ -
FpRb~ ~;a ~? :rrsc' ResF•~ Nri.. A~:17~L1 N (.'-. S' - ~ - .