HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 9188 N.C.S. 06/01/1981' NEGATIVE ULCLARA'('I,ON
~.: . .
:~ DEFEATED MAY 2 g 19 ~ 1
des®luho~~ 110. 9ss 1~1. ~. S.
of the City of Petaluma, California:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISS~l1ANGE OF A h1ITTGATEDDECLARATION PURSUANT
.TO CALIFORNIA ENULRONMENTAL Q A~LITY ACT AND'THE PRTOR ADOPTION OF A CITY-
; WIDE MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMP,~CT:REPORT FOR w1LLOW cREEx BUST-rrESS PARx
I
I
~~ WHEREAS., the Planning Commission.has recommended the issuance of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act.(C,EQA) for the following project (s}: '
Willow Creek Busin°ess Park Rezoning and Tentative Subdivision; and,
WHEREAS,~the City ha adopted a Master Enviro'hmental Impact Report on
the C.ity's General Plan/Env`ronmental Design Plan which depicts the land~use
cl'assificat,on prQ~osed for 'the project; and,.
WHEREAS; add`i=ai ona) focused envi r.onmental studies have -'been prepared
for the area .and whch.havebeen. reviewed by the~Communty Development and .
~ Plannin.g Department and the Planning Commission; and,
6JHEREAS; such mitig'ati:n.g measures have been recommended by the Planning
Commission and~Staff~whe:re necessary to eliminate, or minimize any significant
. adverse environmental effects; .
;,,
„ ~ NEGAI~IVE DECLARATION 5-4-81
..
• I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: I
A'TTE5T:
NOW, THEREFORE:,'BE IT P.fSDLVED that the issuance of said
Negative. Declaration. pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act is hereby approved, based upon-the following findings:
1. The.City Council has considered any .comments and mitigating measures
received pertaining to issuance of said Negative Declaration, and finds the
responses thereto to be adequate:
2. No significant adverse environmental effects will result from the
project as proposed, or any potentially significant effect will be mitigated
by the proposed design .and execution•of fhe project..
3. .Mitigating measures,for po.terital future .ar;chaeologicai finds are
required as a condition of the'Tentatve Map,
4. Addtion'a ,demand for public services will be. compensated for by
anticipated,properfy t•ax revenues and requr-ed impact fees.
5. Projected traffic gener.atiori is not 'expected to impact neighboring
streets beyond their ,planned .capacity.. (Addtonal lanes into site and
traffic. signals :are~pr.op.osed as mtiga ng measures.).
6. Future improvements in..the f,l`ood;'plan.will be required to conform
with all .pertnent.f lo,od..safety regulations.
7.. Additional air pollution generated by~the pr-oject is not expected
to exceed permssbae standards.
8. Issues. rais'e'd. by ahe proposed.,v'ew of industrial lots backing onto
US 101 are addr'essed.as a condition of tfie Tentative Map,
9. Design approval of: the W'llow.Creek.improvements by the State Fish.
and Game.Departmerit should insure proper consideration for fish and wildlife.
Under the ;power and aufhori}y 'conferred. ulion. this Council by the Charter of said.
I hereby~•certify, the, foregoing Resolution was introduced aiid Day 'tlie.
Coui%il of ~tlie City rof Petaluma at a (Regulav). ( ~ meeting;
• on, th"e :.~~ -`---.. day of ...;•--•~UI1~:..:. - :..........:.........:...:.: 19..1, by the
,-'~` i I
following- "v;ote: f r
~ ,
.e Mayor B taglia,;Mayor`Matte, Councilman Cavanagh
,.
~a~ al r>.a
A ro d o
f
City Attorney
c1. Perry,, r n,: Bon B s w
r
/~ f .
Cuy Clerl: 9J+88 Mayor
' ~LOU NCIL FILE-~~~-