HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 8931 N.C.S. 08/18/1980. ~ ; PLK:ad 8-1-80
_„ ~ -
~ ~ ~ AUG 1 4 1980 ~ ~
. ~ Resolution No:~=N: C. S..
of the ~C,ity .of Petal`uma, ~Galifornia : _ ~
, ~ . .
RfSOLUTIOtV UFDATING THE APPRO.VED.DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RARK PLACE
SUBDIV'ISION, IJN:IT'~VI, PLANNED UNIT ~ ~
` DEUfLOPMEiVT ~ ,
~ WHEREAS, the Gityof Petaluma has been pe~titioned~by the developer to re-
~ise t'h`e Development Rl.an for the: Park F1ace Subdi'vis~i;on, Unit VI, Planned
Umi:t. Develo~pment (PUD) District; and, ~
` WHE;RAS, the Petaluma City Planning Commi:ssi~o,n ha<s~held its hearing on the
.~°~rnatter ~and recommended up:da~ti;:ng.of said General Devel'o:pment P1-an:; and,
WHEREAS, Sectio,n 1~9-I005..4 o:f Zon;ing Ord,inance No. 1072 N.C.S, permits
~ modi"f'r.eat~ion of an approued'•Genera~l Deuel~opmen:t P`l;a~n by resolution~where and
when this Council~:; finds that -such modifi;cat~io.n may be~ nece.sbsary ;and desirable,
_ . x .
. iV0!rJ, THEREFOR`Er,, ~Bf . IT-RESOLVED th'~a't th,is~ Counci~l her.eby.f:jnds `as fol lows:
. M,, . . . ~.
1. The. plan ~clearl,y resu~lts ~in a mo;r.e desirable use of land and
a bette:r physi'ca] environment than woul d' be' p'ossiible under any single zoning di.strict
~ or°' combina~tion of di~st~ri cts. ` ~
~ - ' ~ , `,,.~ ~; - ~.: . _
~ ~. 2. The district is proposed as property.whi~ch has a sui,,table relationship
`to North McDowell B'1vd. , which i:s adequate to ~carry, additio'nal tra_~ffic generated
by the project.
~, ,- 3. : The de:ve.lopment pl~an presents. a un`i;f-ied and organized a:rrangement
•- - . .
of bu'ildi;ngs a,nd~:service facilities whi`ch are appropriate in relation to adjacent
or n'earby~ properties, .and ade:quate~ l;an,ds,ca'ping is 'prop.ose.d. .
_ 4;. The natural an,d s.cenic qual i~9:es of ~t;he:, siste~ are protected, with
ade'quate avai l ab1 e publ i c and pri vate s~pa:ce_s des'i gnate.d .on the -Deuel opment Pl an .
Res. ~No.8931 N:.C.S.
. ~~.'. ~ - . . ' . . ' ... : ' F~~. , . - ~ ~ ~ . -
~. ., - . ~ . . ~ .
~ . . ' , _ . . . . . - . . . . ., ~
~ 5. The propo.sed ~development wi'll' no;t be> d'etrimental to `the publ ic
wel'fare, 'wi;ll be i.n the best' in~terests of the Ci`ty; and wil'1 be in keeping with
. . ~. . ~ .
~ the .gene;ral i ntent and ~spi ri t of the ~ Fetal uma Zon~in,g~ Ordi~nance and the General
~and, Envi~ronmental Desi.gn Plans: ~ ;
_ - . . _ , ..
6. Park Place ~~UII will' be designed to i;nclu;de; a recreation area ~
simi l ar i"n des•i gn and a:t 1 east as l arge as that.,proposed, for Park~ P1 ace VI . .
. BE :IT" FURTHER RESOLVED th'a:t~=thi:s Go:unci'1:he;reby ~approves the r;evision of the
~ Deve.l opmen't Pl an as se,t` fortti°, i n Exhibi t A attached 'hereto ~and i ncorporated 'herein
' .by t•hi.s re'ference: This Counci-T 'di'rec;ts`that~'the~-zoning,map~;shall b,e ame;nded as
' ~ necessary~ to reflect :sa:i.d re,ui,sion. . . . ~~ '
. - . . ~~ .
~ ~ T _ ~ ~.. .
, .. ~ : , . ~. , .
. . , , h ' D ,1 , . . . . ' . .. ' .' .'
" t ".*
• ~ y . .r 'r . ~ .. .
1 .
_ _ . j t _.. _i , . ~ . , _ .. .. .
. :,_ •
I,'lieceby cectify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the.
Council of the City of Petaluma at a(Regular.).:.(~~~j~{1(-j(~¢~(qt~j 'meeting:
_
: . . _ _ _
on the ••...-•----••~:~~rl.. day of --.-•._..~-41L~U-~ ~• ;•:. ._.:.,.19:o8Q., by tlie
~ following vote: •
Jnder .the power and authority ;conferred. upon this Council by ~the' Charter of said
' ~ .~. ~~....
_ AYES: ~Councilmen Harberson, Bond, Balshaw,'~Ca"vanagh:; ;Mayo~r Mattei
. NOES• p.
p as to
r
......-•-•••-• •-••••°°----°•°°
• City Attorney
• . . .. . , n~_ . -- .~._. ....., _
-, ABSENT: ~:C ',man Per ., e or Battac~l i a .
, „ A'I`.I'EST. ' -- - ....... - -~---- ~ --- - --~--~-- - ~
- ---.. .. ... ... : .. ° _ . . -- ~.- --•--- --•----•
~ - --- --- -- ----- -= --~~
.; , , ~ , , ~... ~ . - . - .
. City,Clerk, ' Nlayor
. ,.
~ . , . - ~.. . . . COUNCIL FILE ~ - ' ~ ~: ~ .
- ~~ . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . : .
~ FORM, CA 2. ~1'%80 . - ~ ', - '~• ~ RES~. NO. H9~3~~1 ~~N . C,,,S.,, •, . ~ . .
.~ . .. . ~ •. . ~ ~ ~ , - . ~ ~ . . ~' , i . . '
'. ' PARK PLACE VI - QAIITAS DEUELOPl`1ENT - N.MC •DO.WELL.~,BLVD ~
` P.U.:p. Findings - . ,
,,.
`• 1~. , . •
The plan eLear-ly~ r:esults' iri- a more des.irable use of. land ;and a b'etter
; physical enyironme:nt than would be.possible under any sin~le zoni:ng
'. d'istrict or combina,tion of distric'ts. -
•2;,. , r
;Th:e dis.tr:ict is pr.!oposed a.s property whi.ch'has a suitabl:e relationship t,o:
` ,
N'orth McDoweT-1 B;l~d.,, which .is .adequat'e to carry additional traffic '
- ge:nerated~ by fhe 'project°. - ,
:.,-
`.. .' 3. '
The developuie~nt plan presents a uni'fied and. organized'.~ ar.ra.ngement of
buil;dings and' se"rvice facilities which axe apgropr.iate~in~re-lation to •
' adjacent or nearby properties, and..adequa~te la•rid~scaping is proposed. ,
„ • 4. The natural and, scenic qualities 'of the site' a•re pr_oteafed; with~adequate ~
. ~ available'pub`lic arid pr:iv;ate spaces des'io-nated,on the DeVelopment Plan:
~' `.`5. The pr~oposed develo;pmen,t will not: be det,riment~al. to the ~ubli~c welfare,
;, wil`l be in the 'tiest;f int,erests of the, Ci,:ty, and. will be in keeping with ~
~` : •~ the general intent and spirit of, the Petaluina Zoning prdinance and ,the
General and Environmental Design Plans_ ,_
, .
~ P.U~.D_ Conditi_ons:- ~ `
,
, ,
`
Y. A1]:. pr.;eviqusl>y .approved' c'~ndit'ions of the P.U.D. distriet stiall become
, 'j
i ~ conditions of t~h~ :subje_ct a~~pr'o~al. ' ~
~' " Z.
: The P.U.:D:. mod;ifica;tion-s'taall :be suh~ec:t to :design approyal in accordanee ~
_ .,
~ '~. ~ witli. Section 25-~+00 of tl~e. "Loning• O.r.dinari'ce;.. All c.onditions of desi'gn
i ., .
review sha1T ~beco,me co.ncli:tions of the. P.U.'D: zo.ne. ~
,
„ 3. Each living un_i,t 'shall, 6e• p;rovided~ wit~li, a, mi~nimiim of ~one (1), cover.ed
par.king space and one (.l) ~,uncovered gpaee wit°hin .200, feet of` :tlle unit.
,, ;Outdoor parking':.spaces located at the end of .parking aisl-es shall measure .
_ at least ten (10) feet i~n width. . Co~e-r:e'd par'k-ing spaces located at the
_
° ~ ._~ ~
..
_ end of carport~s„ shall measuxe at Teast, elev:en (11') • fee•t-si~: (6) inches in
width. . Al;l p'edest•rian. ,wa'ltcs. shall ~be co;nstrue~ted 'of~ .concrete,.
~., ..,. 4: ~'Because P'ark Pla'ce VII dev.elo;pmeni' is ,not; subj;ect to 'review a_t this time,
~ '
, „ •a1T comments e:rtaining= L'o ".Phase .II" o,f' `the: development .schedule on '
~
P
' = Page-1 of the
Develo;pmen°t~ Plan sha~l:l b.e` d'e~le,ted.. '•.
., , ,
., ','S.; - P P ',' P '
Lands:ea e lans- shal,l be .~ ex anded ~to znelude fhe area ;t'o be vacated by
, ' ~ t°He t'emporary sales ~ of f ice~-.
~ , 6.. The conditions, co~ena,nts .and',,restrictions ,(CC' & R'~s,)~ fo:r. the development
: ;
~ shall be .subj,ect to approval by ttie: Ci,ty Attorriey pr,ior to Final Map „
~ ~~approval.. This docume,nt ~"shall. include a stat;ement th'at n'a parking' of •, ~
' recrea~tional vehicles shal;l;be permi°t.ted within the P.U.D.
~ .~ 7.
~ ` The -landseaped island containing .the 80 inch d'iameter Eucaly,ptus tre,e
~ ~ d located to: the immediate`'we,st ;of ~~the swimming pool area ~shall li'e expanded
: ~
_
ove~r, the exis`ting driveiaa;y wfiieh cu~r.rentl"y sepa'rates the two {2`) areas.
~
The. number of ;parking sp'aces i~n this_ area~shall not be :~re,duced;~, _, ;
, . , g . ~ 2 . , ~~~~~~ ,
~„
. . '~~~ . .G.M_ . ' , . ' , ' . . . - . ~ ~ .
. . ~ ~ Jul.y 2z, i9so
°„ , REP~RT TO,: Planning Commissiqn
°FROM» ,Communi:ty Development and Pl-'anning De,par:tment ~.
S';UB'J•EC•T-: Qant'as.neve~lopment Go;rp,. P.tU D;. °and, Tentative Map P1ans
Re~ised, to~ Create More~ Parking in, iP.ark Place VI
. . • --
BACKGROUNDt Upon th'e requ~est of .the Plann-i-ng Coiumiss-ion; the developer has '
revised the propii'sed P,ark P1ac,e:Vl P.U.D. and tentative map plans to..proyide
~ ,Re~isions, include
f°or add'i-tional on-site:.parki~rig,. " a reduction in the number:
qf lious-ing units. fr,am 12,0 to '::11`7,.,,, and~ ;an incr:ease in on-site 'uncovered parking
f,rom ~114 to 171:: The cur.rent. rafiio of housing units f'o on-siLe.parking is ~
~° 2.•46:,:1. Several, additional ~spaces were .pr.opo'sed to ~be loca;ted' in the "T:ree
~~ _"' ri t'he re ues,t of~ fhe Planrizng.~sta~`f, these spaces were .deleted.
G-rbvP but upo q
' ~~ The proposed ,plan ameridments are_considered by the~staf'>f to adequately
. ,:, .
~ sup,pl;y tlie deruand f'or on=site parking,
.
, . l/`V '~`~. ~' ' -
U . •
.. ' ..W'AXNE . P'. :RASMUS S EN
.. ~ `Pr:oject Goordinator ,
t