Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 2.D 09/15/2003CITY OF P�E+T�A7L7�UIDIA, CALIFORNIA AGENDA ALL Aeenda Title: Resolution approving the final map for the Meetine Date: September 15, 2003 Roclo idge Pointe Subdivision. Meetine Time: © 3:00 PM ❑ 7:00 PM Cateeory (check one): © Consent Calendar ❑ Public Hearing ❑ New Business ❑ Unfinished Business ❑ Presentation Department: Director: Contact Person: Phone Number: Community Mike Moor Curt Bates 778-4311 Development 1p b5 Cost of Proposal: N/A Account Number: N/A Amount Budeeted: N/A Name of Fund: N/A Attachments to Aeenda Packet Item: Vicinity Map Draft Resolution Approving the Final Map for the Rocluidge Pointe Subdivision Resolution No. 2003-052 Approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rockridge Pointe Subdivision Resolution No. 2003-053 Malting an Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Lafco Resolution No. 2003-054 Approving a Tentative Subdivision Map for the Rockridge Pointe Subdivision Ordinance No. 2148 N.C.S. Prezoning a 123 -Acre Parcel to Planned Unit Development Resolution of LAFCO Approving the Annexation for Rockridge Pointe Subdivision Summary Statement: Rockridge Pointe is a 62 -lot subdivision on Windsor Drive near Western Avenue. The project is surrounded by Phases 11 and III of the Victoria Subdivision and California Water Company parcels to the east, Helen Putnam Regional Park to the south as well as existing county parcels and Western Avenue to the West and North. Rockridge Pointe received tentative map approval on March 3, 2003. Construction of the project is scheduled to commence in late April 2004 after the end of the rainy season. No grading will be allowed to occur between October 1st and April 15"i. The estimated cost of public improvements for the subdivision is $3,269,204. Recommended Citv Council Action/Sueeested Motion: Approve the final map resolution for the Rockridge Pointe Subdivision. Reviewed by Finance Director: Date: s (Todav' Date: August 20, 2003 Reviewed'bv=Citv.Attornev: ee Revision # and Date Revised Approved v Citv Manaeer: vrl� Date: File Code: SACC -City Council\Reports\Rockeridge Pointe Final Map.doc CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 15, 2003 AGENDA REPORT FOR RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR THE ROCKRIDGE POINTE SUBDIVISION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Rockridge Pointe is a 62 -lot subdivision on Windsor Drive near Western Avenue. The project is surrounded by Phases II and III of the Victoria Subdivision and California Water Company parcels to the east, Helen Putnam Regional Park to the south as well as existing county parcels and Western Avenue to the West and North. Rockridge Pointe received tentative map approval on March 3, 2003. Construction of the project is scheduled to commence in late April 2004 after the end of the rainy season. No grading will be allowed to occur between October 1st and April 15`h. The estimated cost of public improvements for the subdivision is $3,269,204. 2. BACKGROUND: Rockridge Pointe Subdivision received tentative map approval on March 3, 2003. Annexation of the project site into the City of Petahuna was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission at it's August 6, 2003 meeting. The project is currently being reviewed by the Site Plan and Architectural Committee (SPARC). The City Council required the following condition of approval for the project. As part of the Final Map submittal, the applicant shall submit Improvement Plans that include agreements made with the Victoria Homeowner's Association. Improvements shall conform to City standards and be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. These agreements include the following: a. Victoria will permit members of Rocluidge Pointe to use the Victoria's four developed private parks. Rockridge will pay to Victoria an annual fee for this park usage based on a formula mutually agreed to by Rockridge Pointe and Victoria. An agreement has been signed by the Victoria Homeowner's Association and the Rockridge Pointe Subdivision Developer and is referenced in the project CC&R'S. The City Council approved the following conditions of approval as recommended by the Planning Commission and have been satisfied as mentioned below. 2. At time of Final Map submittal, all proposed open space parcels, with the exception of the parcel (Parcel 1) to be dedicated to the County as part of Helen Putnam Park, shall be shown to be dedicated to the City as public open space. All parcels with the exception of the Parcel I (dedicated to the County of Sonoma as part of Helen Putnam Park) have been dedicated as public open space parcels on the final map. 3. The applicant and staff should work with appropriate County staff to develop a formula for fair share contributions from the applicant for addressing increased traffic on Western Avenue especially in the vicinity of existing schools. Staff and the developer met with County of Sonoma representatives from the Department of Transportation and Public Works as well as the Local Agency Formation Commission to address this matter. The developer signed an agreement with the County of Sonoma to construct County standard frontage improvements along the Western Avenue project frontage including restriping and the creation of a new on -street bike lane. A separated path with public access will be located adjacent to road, on the Rockridge property. Additionally, the developer agreed to contribute a fair share amount to the County of Sonoma for construction of County approved off-site improvements on Western Avenue from the limits of the project site to the extension of the centerline of Cleveland Avenue. The project frontage improvements along Western Avenue will be completed and dedicated to the County of Sonoma prior to the City accepting the public improvements for the entire subdivision. 4. The design, development and dedication of the proposed public park (Parcel C), including trails and benches, shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any individual housing unit. This park has been designed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission in conjunction with City staff. Staff will ensure that no certificates of occupancy are released until the park has been constructed as approved, and is operable. 5. The conceptual unit development plan shall be revised as illustrated in Attachment 7 as follows: a. Show a contiguous open space concept with a cohesive landscape plan — do not look at the property as separate open space parcels. This item is currently being reviewed and will be approved as part of the SPARC process. b. Recommend possible relocation of Lot 15 to the end of the cul de sac "G" Court. This item occurred as noted and is reflected on the final map. c. Integrate detention pond into the project as a landscape feature. Design of the detention basin has included landscape features and is currently being reviewed and will be approved as part of the SPARC process. d. Respond to concerns about contouring and propose solutions that are more like grading for golf courses than just engineering. Proposed grading surrounding the detention basin area has been designed to incorporate varying slopes with a mounded effect and is currently being reviewed and will be approved as part of the SPARC process. e. Lots 43-48 —need particular attention to the rear of these lots —revise architecture and elevations to reflect rural vernacular recommendations from SPARC. This item is currently being reviewed and will be approved as part of the SPARC process. 6. Application materials for SPARC shall include: a. Proposed fencing for variety of conditions. b. Side lot landscaping and fencing for comer lots. c. Particular attention to the most visible elevations for rear and comer lots, specifically Lots 1-4, 14-17. d. Provide further articulation on individual proposed residences with multi -volume concepts. These items are currently being reviewed and will be approved as part of the SPARC process. 3. ALTERNATIVES: Disapprove the final map. 4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The developer has posted bonds and agreements to complete the public improvements, estimated to be $3,269,204. The developer is responsible for all costs of public improvements and, once completed and accepted by the City, the improvements will be dedicated to the City for maintenance. There is no cost to the City for construction of public improvements other than inspection services by City personnel. This plan review and inspection cost is covered by the Engineering fees already collected with the project application (2% of the estimated $3,269,204. = $65,384.08 paid to the City for inspection and design review services). 5. CONCLUSION: The developer has met all the requirements of the City to obtain City Council approval. Construction should commence once the final map is approved, SPARC applications are approved, the necessary building permits are issued and the rainy season has ended. 6. OUTCOMES OR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS THAT WILL IDENTIFY SUCCESS OR COMPLETION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the final map for the Rockridge Pointe Subdivision. S:\CC-City Council\Reports\Rockeridge Pointe Final Nlap.doc 1 2 3 DRAFT RESOLUTION 4 5 6 7 APPROVING THE FINAL MAP 8 FOR ROCKRIDGE POINTE SUBDIVISION 9 10 WHEREAS, the Community Development Director and the City Engineer have reviewed the 11 final map of Rockridge Pointe Subdivision and have reported it to be in conformity with the 12 Subdivision Ordinance, and such reports have been forwarded to and reviewed by this Council; 13 and, 14 15 WHEREAS, the certifications required by law have been endorsed on said map; and, 16 17 WHEREAS, this Council finds that the final map conforms to the requirements of this City's 18 Subdivision Ordinance and is consistent with, and conforms to the general plan for the area; and, IT 20 WHEREAS, this Council finds the final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map 21 previously approved for the subdivision by Resolution No. 2003-054 N.C.S., the findings of 22 which are hereby incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; 25 26 1. That said final map of Roclaidge Pointe Subdivision is hereby approved, provided that 27 the conditions, which have been previously set forth in said Resolution No. 2003-054 28 N.C.S., incorporated herein by reference, shall be carried out; and, 29 1 2. That upon execution of the Subdivision Public Improvements Agreement in the form 2 approved by the City Attorney, and the furnishing of the required improvement security 3 and insurance, approved as to form by the City Attorney and as to sufficiency by the City 4 Manager, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to sign the certificate on said 5 final map certifying that the City Council has approved the same and accepted all streets 6 and other dedications thereon. The City Clerk shall thereupon cause said final maps to be 7 recorded in the Office of the Sonoma County Recorder. 8 9 10 11 SACC -City Council\resolutions\Rockeridge Pointe GM Reso.doc Resolution No. 2003-052 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ROCIMDGE POINTE PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT WESTERN AVENUE AND WINDSOR DRIVE APN 020-030-037; 020-030-039; 020-030-013 and 020-030-015 WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared and the results of the study indicated that the proposed Rockridge Pointe project, as mitigated, will not cause any significant adverse environmental impacts; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Petaluma held a public hearing on October 22, 2002, on the subject application, heard testimony, and concluded that the findings and conditions as amended were adequate and recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Rockridge Pointe proposal on March 3, 2003, and considered all written and verbal communications concerning potential environmental impacts resulting from the project before rendering a decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to the following Findings and Mitigation Measures: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION: 1. An Initial Study was prepared and demonstrated that there is no substantial evidence that supports a fair argument that the project, as conditioned, would have a significant effect on the environment. 2. The project does not have the potential to affect wildlife resources as defined in the State Fish and Game Code, either individually or cumulatively, and is exempt from Fish and Game filing fees because it is proposed on an small, undeveloped site surrounded by development, with none of the resources as defined in the Code. 3. The project is not located on a site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site List compiled by the State pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code. Resolution No. 2001.05, N.C.S. 4. The Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and considered public comments before malting a recommendation on the project. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. 6. The record of proceedings of the decision on the project is available for public review at the City of Petaluma, Community Development Department, City Hall, 11 English Street, Petaluma, California. MITIGATION MEASURES: All mitigation measures contained and described in the Initial Study for Rocicridge Pointe are herein incorporated. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ppro as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting afor on the .......................... day of ........ .lYlkQh................................... 20..03, by the following vote: C Attorney AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Harris, Healy, Moynihan, Vice Mayor O'Brien, Torliatt NOES: None ABSENT: N ne ATTEST: ...................... LU:.....r�!�....................... City Cleric !. ..:.21r.(...: L... ................................. Mayor Cmmeil Pile...... ............................. Rn Nu .21003,052 - JyC'.s Resolution No. 2003-053 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, Califomia MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR REORGANIZATION OF A 123 ACRE PROPERTY KNOWN AS ROCI�RIDGE POINTE TO BE LOCATED AT WESTERN AVENUE AND WINDSOR DRIVE, APN 020-030-037, 020-030-039, 020-030-013, and 020-030-015 PURSUANT TO THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985 WHEREAS, after public review and input, the City Council adopted under Resolution No. 2003-052 N.C.S., the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rockridge Pointe Project; and, WHEREAS, in order to implement the project it is necessary to annex property known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 020-030-037, 020-030-039, 020-030-013, and 020- 030-015. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act (Government Code 35000 et. Seq.) the Petaluma City Council hereby supports application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Sonoma County for a proposed reorganization as follows: are: 1. An Annexation of a 123 -acre parcel ]mown as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 020-030-37, 39 and a 4.45 -acre parcel Imown as 020-030-013 and a 6 -acre parcel known as 020-030-015 to the corporate boundaries of the City of Petaluma; 2. Said territory is developed with a single residence and associated outbuildings, and is comprised of approximately 123 acres plus two additional parcels that are not subject to further development, as described on the Rockridge Point Tentative Map, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for the requested reorganization 1. The property is contiguous to the City and is within the adopted Sphere of Influence and General Plan Urban Limit Line of the City of Petaluma. 2. The City has completed an environmental review process for the area culminated in the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. The owner of said property has initiated said annexation. 4. By Ordinance No. NCS, the City of Petaluma has prezoned the affected property to PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Resolution No. 2003-053 N.C.S. 5. The annexation is consistent with the objectives and policies of the General Plan, as documented in the ordinance to prezone the property and the Resolution approving the Tentative Parcel Map for the Rockridge Pointe project. 6. This annexation will enable several provisions of the General Plan to be achieved, including: orderly improvement of City infrastructure, preservation of the city's Urban Limit Line, and preservation of County land use including residential and agricultural uses. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and its Guidelines have been satisfied and thoroughly addressed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2003-052 N.C.S., on March 3, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. The City Cleric is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the Sonoma County Local Agency Formation Commission. Under the power anti authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE.: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting on the .........3....»......... day of........AIALC.11................................... 20-0, by the following rote: ii y Attorney AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Gass, Harris, Healy, Moynihan, Vice Mayor O'Brien, Torliatt NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: ......._......_......._......................................................._.......... Cit), CI rl: caundi File .... ---- ..___....... . Res. Nn ...... 2003-1153......N c s ........................................... Mayor Resolution No. 2003-054 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR ROCKRIDGE POINTE PROJECT WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR 62 RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED AT WESTERN AVENUE AND WINDSOR DRIVE APN 020-030-037, 039, 013 AND 015. FILE ANX 00004, TSM 00003, PRZ 0001, PUD 00004 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2145 N.C.S., Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 020-030- 037, 039. 013 and 015 comprising 133 acres, has been prezoned to Planned Unit Development; WHEPF " c 1-, tal_en on October 22, 2002, the Planning Commission considered the proposal anc . r , a,ded a recommendation to the City Council to approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for 62 residential lots, dated September 3, 2002; and, WIiEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been satisfied through the preparation of an htitial Study and adoption of Resolution No. 2003-052 N.C.S., approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration to address the specific impacts of the Rockridge Pointe project; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Rockridge Pointe proposal on March 3, 2003, and considered all written and verbal communications concerning potential enviromnental impacts resulting from the project before rendering a decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Tentative Subdivision Map subject to the following Findings and Mitigation Measures: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned, is consistent with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions, of the Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordinance) and the State Subdivision Map Act. 2. That the proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that adequate public facilities exist or will be installed, including roads, sidewalks, water, sewer, stonn drains, and other infrastructure. Resolution No. 1003-05S N.C.S. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the density and the type of development proposed. 4. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, and that no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Study was prepared indicating that there would be no significant, environmental impacts that could not be mitigated. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: From the City Council: 1. As pari of the Final Map submittal, the applicant shall submit Improvement Plans that include agreements made with the Victoria Homeowners Association. Improvements shall conform to City standards and be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. These agreements include the following: a. Victoria will permit members of Rockridge Pointe to use Victoria's four developed private parks. b. Roclaidge will pay to Victoria an annual fee for this pane usage based on a formula mutually agreed to by Rockridge Pointe and Victoria. From the Planning Commission: 2. At time of Final Map submittal, all proposed open space parcels, with the exception of time parcel (Parcel "I") to be dedicated to the County as part of Helen Putnam Park, shall be shown to be dedicated to the City as public open space. 3. The applicant and staff should work with appropriate County staff to develop a formula for fair share contributions from the applicant for addressing increased traffic on Western Avenue especially in the vicinity of existing schools. 4. The design, development and dedication of the proposed public park (Parcel "C"), including trails and benches, shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any individual housing unit. 5. The conceptual unit development plan shall be revised as illustrated in Attachment 7 as follows: a. Show a contiguous open space concept with a cohesive landscape plan — do not look at the property as separate open space parcels. b. Recommend possible relocation of Lot 15 to the end of the cul-de-sac "G" Court. c. Integrate detention pond into the project as a landscape feature d. Respond to concerns about contouring and propose solutions that are more like grading for golf courses than just engineering Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 2 e. Lots 43-48 —need particular attention to the rear of these lots —revise architecture and elevations to reflect rural vernacular recommendations from SPARC. 6. Application materials for SPARC shall include: a. Proposed fencing for variety of conditions b. Side lot landscaping and fencing for comer lots c. Particular attention to the most visible elevations for rear and comer lots, specifically Lots 1-4, 14-17 d. Provide further articulation on individual proposed residences with multi - volume concepts. From the Planning Division: 7. The plans submitted for building pemiit review shall be in substantial compliance with the Vesting Tentative Map, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Grading Plan, dated September 3, 2002, except as modified by these conditions. S. All mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rockridge Pointe Project, revised September 4, 2002, are herein incorporated by reference as conditions of project approval. 9. Upon approval by the City Council, the applicant shall pay the $35.00 Notice of Determination fee to the Planning Division. The check shall be made payable to the County Cleric. Planning staff will file the Notice of Determination with the County Clerics office within five (5) days after receiving Council approval. 10. Prior to submitting for building permits, PUD Development Guidelines and architectural plans shall be reviewed and approved by SPARC including building location, entries, compatibility with surrounding residences, architectural design and landscaping. 11. During construction, the applicant shall be required to utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide use and fully commit to Integrated Pest Management techniques for the protection of pedestrian/bicyclists. The applicant shall be required to post signs when pesticide/herbicide use occurs to wane pedestrians and bicyclists. 12. The Final Map shall indicate that Parcel "A," including the Detention Basin, shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association. 13. Prior to filing the Final Map, the applicant shall dedicate Parcel "I" to Sonoma County as an addition to the Helen Putnam Regional Park. Evidence of an initial offer letter and acceptance shall be submitted with the Final Map. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 3 14. All construction activities shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, unless a permit is first secured from the City Manager (or his/her designee) for additional hours. Construction shall be prohibited on Sundays and all holidays recognized by the City of Petaluma, unless a permit is first secured from the City Manager (or his/her designee) for additional hours. There will be no start up of machines nor equipment prior to 7:00 a.m., Monday through Friday; no delivery of materials nor equipment prior to 7:30 a.m. nor past 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; and no servicing of equipment past 6:45 p.m., Monday through Friday. Plans submitted for City permits shall include the language above. 15. Construction and demolition debris shall be recycled to the maximmn extent feasible in order to minimize impacts on the landfill. 16. CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to approval of the Final Map. 17. Concrete ditches and drainage structures draining the open space areas shall be tinted earth colors. 18. The applicant shall construct a public trail through Parcel "I" consistent with the Sonoma County Regional Park standards to connect to Helen Putnam Park The public trail shall be completed prior to final occupancy of the project. 19. At the time of Final Map submittal, the developer shall submit names for the internal streets and cul-de-sacs to the Community Development Department for review and approval 20. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all drainage inlets, clean -outs, berms, debris basins, slide repair areas, v -ditches, sub -drain and other facilities located in the project area. CC&Rs shall include a provision requiring that the city consent to any revisions regarding maintenance. 21. The CC&Rs for the project shall provide that the Homeowners Association shall be responsible for performing ongoing maintenance and or repair of geologic conditions, debris basins, ditches 22. Plant materials to be installed as part of the Landscape Plan shall consist of a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon can size for trees and five (5) gallon can size for shrubs. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 4 From the Engineering Division: Frontage bnPMVements 23. Half -street frontage improvements along the northeasterly side of Windsor Drive shall include but not be limited to, five (5) foot wide striped on -street bike lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, handicap ramps, curb return at Western Avenue, striping, channelization, signing, landscaping and roundabout (per Traffic Impact Study dated December 2000 by WTrans). Pursuant to direction of the City Council, a sidewalk will be required from Western Avenue to the project entrance on the northeast side of Windsor and shall be constructed on the southwesterly side from project entrance to Victoria. No sidewalk shall be required on the northeast side from the project entrance to Victoria, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 24. Half -street frontage improvements along the southeasterly side of Western Avenue shall include but not be limited to, five (5) foot wide striped on -street bike lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, handicap ramps, striping, chatmelization, signing and landscaping. 25. The City requires a traffic index of 6 (T.I. = 6) for Western Avenue. A geotechnical report addendum is required and shall identify the existing pavement section and traffic index for the existing County of Sonoma portion of Westem Avenue along the project frontage. In the event that the existing pavement section does not meet T.I. = 6 standards, the developer shall be responsible for reconstructing the existing portions of Western Avenue, from centerline, along the project frontage. An asphalt overlay conform shall be required as necessary to provide a smooth street crown and insure positive cross sectional drainage of 2% minimum. 26. hr the event that the Local Agency Formation Commission requires annexation of adjacent assessor parcel numbers 020-030-013 and 020-030-015 or any other adjacent parcels, the applicant shall provide for a future public roadway and emergency access as well as access to public utilities. An irrevocable offer of dedication through the Rockridge Pointe Subdivision with sufficient width to accommodate future maximum dwellings located on all developable parcels in the immediate area, or another scenario acceptable to the City Engineer is required. Off-site public easements for public sewer and water utilities may also be required. 27. City standard public improvements shall be installed within the boundary of the subdivision including but not limited to, full street widths, curb and gutter, sidewalks, streetlights, handicap ramps, sewer, water and storm drain systems, signing, striping and landscaping. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 5 28. In the event that the contractor damages any portion of Windsor Drive during construction, the project applicant shall restore Windsor Drive to pre -construction conditions prior to acceptance of the project by the City of Petaluma. 29. The pavement sections for the proposed interior streets shall be designed for a traffic index of 5 (T.I. = 5) and shall contain a mininmm of four inches of asphalt concrete. 30. The pavement section for the emergency vehicular access road shall be designed to accommodate typical fire truck loads. 31. Sidewalks shall be installed on both sides of all streets throughout the boundary of the subdivision with the exception of "A" Street. A sidewalk on one side of "A" Street shall be allowed between lot 45 and Windsor Drive. 32. Stop -controlled intersections shall be installed per City standards at all interior intersections. 33. Panting shall be prohibited along the entire Windsor Drive (both sides of street) and Western Avenue (development side of street) parcel(s) frontages. No parking street signs shall be installed. 34. All subdivision street widths shall be thirty-two (32) feet wide with parking allowed on both sides. Parking may be limited in cul-de-sacs per Fire Marshals requirements. Cul-de-sac and hammerhead dimensions shall also be subject to the Fire Marshals approval. 35. Maximum street grades shall be fifteen (15) percent. 36. All retaining walls shall be located on private property. 37. All PG&E distribution electric lines and other overhead utilities and service drops along the street frontages or through or traversing the site shall be placed underground. All new services shall be underground. 38. All Windsor Drive and Western Avenue street transitions/conforms shall be subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer Collection and Yhater SupPln Utilities 39. Each lot shall have separate sanitary sewer laterals and water services. 40. A ten (10) foot wide public water main and public access easement is required for the proposed water line located within the boundary of the subdivision and through two (2) Cal Water parcels prior to Final Map approval. The access road within the easement shall be paved (or similar hardscaped treatment). The final Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 6 location and grade of the easements shall be subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer. 41. A twelve (12) inch diameter water main shall be installed from the LaCresta water tank site to the subdivision per the preliminary water system calculations prepared by Milani and Associates. 42. The homeowners association shall be responsible for contributing to the maintenance costs of the sanitary sewer pump station located near the project entrance along with the Victoria Subdivision Phase III homeowners association. 43. All water main piping shall be Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) in hillside areas. 44. All water main piping within the boundary of the subdivision shall be twelve (12) inch diameter pipe as determined by the preliminary water system calculations prepared by Milani and Associates. 45. All units with top finish floor elevations above elevation 270 feet require installation of a privately owned and maintained air -gap water pressure booster bump system. Grading and Drainage 46. Hydrology calculations for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) prior to final map and improvement plan approval. 47. Hydrology calculations shall include all on-site drainage facilities including the proposed detention basin system and Western Avenue storm drain. 48. Parcel "A" (detention basin site) shall be designated as a common area and maintained by the subdivisions homeowners association through the conditions, covenants and restrictions. An operations and maintenance manual shall be created for perpetual maintenance of the detention basin during and after construction of the subdivision. Provisions in the manual shall include but not be limited to, construction and post -construction maintenance for dredging, periodic inspection, functionality, landscaping and repair. 49. An annual report shall be submitted to the City of Petaluma Community Development Department identifying annual maintenance provisions as prescribed in the operations and maintenance manual. 50. The detention basin shall be constructed and operational prior to and during the first year's rainy season defined as October 1 — April 15. 51. A public storm drain easement shall be provided over the entire parcel "A." Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 7 52. Additional geotechnical and hydrological information shall be provided for the design and construction of the detention basin at the improvement plan stage. The detention basin shall be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 53. Lot to lot drainage shall not be allowed without drainage/storm drain easements. 54. The storm drain from the end of "H" Court to the detention basin shall be eliminated. All street stom drains shall be directed to the detention basin by a single pipe from "A" Street as shown on the tentative reap. 55. All backyard and hillside drainage shall be collected in swales and sub surface stoma drain lines and discharged into a public stoml drain system. Rooftop and driveway runoff from lots 31-45 shall not be allowed to flow across the northerly boundary of the subdivision. 56. All storm drain systems located on lots 1-62 and parcels "B" through "P' shall be privately owned and maintained. 57. Grading conforms to adjacent developments and parcels shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board and provide a copy of the filed notice to the City of Petaluma prior to final map approval. 59. The applicant shall submit a detailed Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with latest state standards for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. The SWPPP shall be available on-site in the job trailer at all tunes throughout the construction process. The SWPPP and NOI copy shall be submitted with the improvement plan application package. The developer and/or contractor shall update the SWPPP throughout the construction process per the latest state standards. A section 404 pen -nit (U.S. Army Corp of Engineers) may be required for work within the creek area, 60. A detailed erosion and sediment control plan is required as a part of the improvement plans and is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall file a Notice of Termination (NOT) with the California State Water Resources Control Board and a copy to the City of Petaluma upon completion of the project. Easeutents 62. Ten -foot wide public utility easements (PUE) are required on all parcel frontages to public streets or letters from appropriate public utility companies approving reduced width PUEs will be accepted. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 8 63. Appropriate on-site and off. -site public and private access, drainage, utility, etc. easements are required prior to final map approval. Ahfiscellaneous 64. The final map and improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance with latest City standards, codes, policies and ordinances. 65. All public improvements, except for the public park, Parcel "C," (see Condition 4) shall be completed and accepted by the City of Petaluma prior to releasing the final twenty (20) percent of certificates of occupancy. 66. The homeowners association shall maintain all private utilities. 67. Any existing wells or septic systems located on the site shall be abandoned per County of Sonoma Environmental Health Department standards. 68. The applicant shall submit either a digitized data fee in the amount of ten dollars (SI0.00) per lot or provide electronic base map information for updating the City's base reap system prior to final map approval. From the Fire Marshal: 69. Proposed street widths of twenty-eight (28) feet are acceptable as long as no parking is permitted on either side of the street. Thirty-two (32) feet street widths shall be permitted for parking to exist on both sides of the street. 70. Cul-de-sac radius shall be designed to meet the turning radius of the Fire Department's aerial ladder truck. 71, Roadway grades shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent maximum. 72. Fire hydrant spacing shall not exceed 300 feet and or 150 feet from the furthest structure. Hydrant locations subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal's Office. 73. This subdivision is within the boundaries of the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). Buildings constructed in this zone are subject to the conditions outlined in Section 17.20.060 Petaluma Municipal Code. 74. All residences are required to be fire sprinklered in accordance with NFPA 13-D. Additionally, because the structures are in the VHFHSZ they must be "fully sprirrklered" which includes extension of the sprinklers into the attic, garage or unprotected space. A minimum two -head calculation for the attic is acceptable. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 9 75. Fire flow is required to be a minimum of 1000 gpm at twenty (20) psi residual. Verification of minimum flows must be calculated and provided to the Fire Marshal's Office by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. 76. All fire lanes, EVAs, turnarounds and no parking areas shall be designated as such with appropriate signs and/or red curbs. Sign and curb language, including letter size, shall be in accordance with city standards. 77. Open space areas are subject to the provisions of annual weed/brush abatement. A plan that outlines the criteria for provisions for abatement shall be developed and approved by the Fire Marshal's Office. The plan shall include provisions for fire safe landscaping, as required, and firebreaks in accordance with "fire safe standards" developed by the State of California. 78. Barriers blocking the EVA must be approved by the Fire Marshal's Office. Typically, this is accomplished with a gate. All gate supports must be two feet wider than the approved roadway width of the EVA. 79. Provide a dedicated access point from the hammerhead tum around (Court "H"), approved by the Fire Marshal's Office, to allow emergency vehicle access to the brush/open space behind lots 16 to 21. 80. Provide a dedicated access point from the cul-de-sac (Court "F"), approved by the Fire Marshal's Office to allow emergency vehicle access to the brush/open space near and behind lots 30-37 at the end of the cul-de-sac. 81. Provide a dedicated access point from the cul-de-sac (Court "G"), approved by the Fire Marshal's Office, to allow emergency vehicle access to the brush/open space near and behind lots 22 to 26 at the end of the cul-de-sac. 82. Proposed roundabout at Windsor Drive and the entrance to the subdivision shall be designed to accommodate the turning radius specifications of fire apparatus, per City standards. From Parks and Recreation: 83. The interior park (Parcel "C"), shall be designed in conjunction with, and meet the approval of the Recreation, Music and Parks Commission, and the Parks and Recreation Department. 84. The proposed EVA connection from "A" Street to Western Avenue to be constructed per City of Petaluma Standards, with an asphalt surface. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 10 From the Sonoma County Water Agency: 85. Drainage design for the project shall comply with the Agency's Flood Control Design Criteria, Evidence of compliance shall be submitted with the Improvement Plans. From Pacific Gas and Electric Company: 86. Costs of any relocation of existing PG&E facilities necessitated by this project shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 87. In order to provide gas and electric service to the parcels, PG&E will require the following: a. Property owner shall dedicate 7.5 foot wide Public Utility Easements (PUEs) along the front of all lots bordering "A" Street, "B" Street, "C" Street, "D" Court, "E" Court, "F" Court, "G" Court, "H" Court, as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map dated September 3, 2002. b. Property owner shall offer for dedication "A" Street, `B" Street, "C" Street, "D" Court, "E" Court, "F" Court, "G" Court, "H" Court, as PUEs or franchise streets. From the Police Department: 88. The width of the streets and cul-de-sacs shall be wide enough to accommodate emergency vehicle traffic, including fire engines. From the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee: Bike Parking 89. A street -level bike rack shall be installed at Pari: Parcel "C." Class I BikewaYs 90, There shall be a Class I path along Marin Creels. The perimeter path is particularly appropriate given that this site also contains the "urban separator General Plan overlay designation which requires a 300 -foot setback from the south and west properties line" as noted in Rockridge Pointe Project description and Analysis, July 11, 2000. This path can be constructed of permeable surfacing, subject to the discretion of Community Development Department staff. Resolution 2003-054 N.C.S. Page 11 91. The ten (10) foot water main access road shall also serve as a Class I pedestrian path accessible by bollard at either end of the road, subject to the discretion of Community Development Department staff. 92. The EVA path shall also serve as Class I path from Western Avenue terminating at `:A" Street. Class II Bikeways 93. There shall be Class 11 bike lanes along both sides of Windsor Drive. Signs: 94. "Share The Road" signs shall be installed on the Class II lanes on Windsor. 95. There shall be signs indicating bike paths and parks/open space on Windsor, Western and within the project, including signage for Helen Putnam Park. In addition, there shall be signs regarding childrens' usage of bile/pedestrian paths between this project and Petaluma Junior High School, Petaluma High School and McNear School. 96. A signage plan shall be submitted to the PBAC for final approval prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Pedestrian Needs: The following shall be subject to Community Development Department review and approval: Benches: 97. There shall be two (2) benches and a picnic table on Parcel "C." 98. There shall be four (4) benches in the open space on Parcel "B." 99. There shall be two (2) benches on each side of Marin CreeIc. 100. There shall be at least two (2) benches in Parcel "I," on the prominent knolls. 101. There shall be two (2) benches along the eastern boundary of Parcel "D." Drinking Fountains: 102. A drinking fountain shall be provided in Parcel "C" park. Resolution 2003-O54 N.C.S. Page 12 IWO-SeCdGll finP-dventents: 103. There shall be a crosswalk across Western where the EVA/Class I path meets Western Avenue, subject to the discretion of the Community Development Department staff. Lighting: 104. Project lighting, including security lighting, shall not direct glare into cyclist/pedestrian eyes. 105. Pesticide/Herbicide Use: 106. Under no circumstances shall any pesticide/herbicide be applied in areas used by pedestriansibicyclists anywhere in this project or the surrounding areas without appropriate signs warning of the use of chemicals, a policy currently employed by the Music, Recreation and Parks Department. This project shall utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide use and fully commit to Integrated Pest Management techniques for the protection of bicyclists and pedestrians. 107. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any of the approvals of the project, including the certification of associated environmental documents, when such claim or action is brought within the time period provided for in applicable State and/or local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the applicants/developers of any such claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall coordinate in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participating in a defense of any claim, action, or proceeding and if the City chooses to do so appellant shall reimburse City for attorneys fees by the City. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as toj' Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting to on the ..........3`.J............ day of .........March ................................... 20..03, by the following vote: ... [y A Corney AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Harris, Healy, Moynihan, Vice Mayor O'Brien. Torliatt NOES: None ABSENT: N ATTEST:.........../..................................................................................... City Clerl: Coundl Flle.................................. Res Nn. ....... 20OM54 —N Cs 117ayor 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 E: FECTf�J � 1•� ORDINANCE NO. 2148 N.C.S. Introduced by Council Member Pamela Torliatt Seconded by Vice Mayor Mike O'Brien PREZONING A 123 -ACRE PARCELTO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW FOR 62 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND DEVELOPMENT OF 62 NEW RESIDENCES LOCATED AT WESTERN AVENUE AND WINDSOR DRIVE APN 020-030-037, 039, 013 and 015 File ANX 00004, TSM 00003, PRZ 0001, PUD 00004 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City Council its report set forth in its minutes of October 22, 2002, recommending the adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 1072 N.C.S., as amended, by classifying and prezoning certain lands being more particularly described as the 123 -acre Assessor's Parcel Nos. APN 020- 030-037, 039, 013 and 015. Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a public hearing on said proposed amendment on October 22, 2002, after giving notice of said hearing, in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended. Section 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, the City Council finds as follows: 35 1 36 37 The proposed Prezoning of the Rockridge Pointe property to PUD is consistent with the Petaluma General Plan, and is in general conformity with the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma as described in the project staff report. Ordinance 2148 N.C.S. Page 1 1 Additionally, the Fire Marshal, Police Department, and the Engineering Division 2 have prepared conditions of approval to address safety issues and design criteria 3 for grading, site improvements and construction of the residences. 4 5 2. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare clearly permit the adoption 6 of the Prezoning in that the zoning designation will result in residential uses that 7 are appropriate and compatible with the existing surrounding uses. The project 8 plans present a unified and organized arrangement of residential lots and public 9 streets, appropriate to adjacent and nearby properties. Proposed landscaping 10 would further insure compatibility. The proposed project would also require 1 I review and approval by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee, 12 13 3. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been 14 satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and the drafting of a Mitigated 15 Negative Declaration to avoid or reduce to a level of insignificance, potential 16 impacts generated by the proposed project. In compliance with the requirements 17 of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was prepared for 18 prezoning of the property to Planned Unit Development. Based upon the Initial 19 Study, a determination was made that no significant environmental impacts would 20 result. A copy of this notice was published in the Argus Courier and provided to 21 residents and occupants within 300 feet of the site, in compliance with CEQA 22 requirements. 23 24 Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., and based 25 upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made, the City Council 26 hereby adapts an amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., so as to prezone said 27 property herein referred to, in accordance with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. 28 29 Section 5. The City Cleric is hereby directed to post this Ordinance for the period and in 30 the manner required by the City Charter, 31 Ordinance 2148 N.C.S. Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 li 14 15 16 17 is 19 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said provisions be declared unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid. INTRODUCED and ordered Posted this 3`a day of March, 2003. ADOPTED this 17`i' day of March, 2003 by the following vote: AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Harris, Healy, Vice Mayor O'Brien, Moynihan, Torliatt NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: Gayle Petersen, City Clerk David Glass, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ich R �nansky, ity ttome�j Ordinance 2148 N.C.S. Page 3 Resolution No. 2430 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 August 6, 2003 RESOLUTION (IF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF St�NONLA MAKING DETERMINATIONS, APPROVING THE PROPOSED REORC,ANIZATION OF TERRITORY, DESIGNATED AS PETALUMA REORGANIZATIM, I NO. 2003-1 (MARDEL LLC) INVOLVING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PE rALUMA AND DETACHMENT FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS NO. 40 ;FIRE SERVICES) AND NO. 41 (MULTI-SERVICFS), AND WAIVING PROTEST PROCEEDINGS RESOLVED, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Sonoma, State of California, that WHEREAS, a petitio; i for the proposed reorganization of territory involving annexation to the City of Petaluma and detachment from County Service Areas No. 40 (Fire Services) and No. 41 (Multi - Services), in the County of So Loma, was heretofore filed by Mardel LLC and accepted for filing on July 10, 2003, by the Executive Of icer of this Local Agency Formation Commission, pursuant to Title Five, Division Three, commencing 'vith Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, it appears to the satisfaction of the Commission that all owners of property included in said proposal consent to sai I proceeding; and WAEREAS, the Exec rtive Officer, pursuant to Government Code Section 56665, has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report including his recommendations thereon, and has furnished a copy of this report to each person entified to a copy; and WHEREAS, this Corr mission, on August 6, 2003, heard from interested parties, considered the proposal and the report of the -"xecutive Officer, and considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to' his proposal including, but not limited to, factors specified in Government Code Section 56668: and WHEREAS, the Com nission has reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the City of Sonoma, NOW, THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Sonoma DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETEI-MR-IF and ORDER as follows: Section 1. The fon igoing recitals are true end correct, and each and every one of them is ratified ind adopted by this Commission, as hereinabove stated; Section 2. All pers nns desiring to be heard regarding the proposal have been given the opportu City to be heard, and all persons requesting to be heard have been heard. Section 3. The Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the City of Petaluma. Section 4. The Commission makes the following findings: a. Th, subject territory is within the sphere of influence of the City of Petaluma ami within the "urban service area" for the City of Petaluma in the Sonoma Ccanty General Plan. b. Th : subject territory is within the voter -approved Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Petaluma, is contiguous to City boundaries, and is consistent with the land use designation policies of its General Plan. The City indicates that it ha capacity within its systems to provide needed services. c. Th a purpose of the reorganization is to allow development at densities Permitted by the City's General Plan. d. Th e orderly development of the area along Western Avenue, which fronts the subject territory, is best achieved by installation of safety improvements rather than annexation of the right-of-way at this time. The developer will make or fin mce improvements to bring Western Avenue up to County standards, in the area designated by the County Department of Transportation and Public Works. Section 5. Subjec to the terms and conditions hereinafter specified, said reorganization is approv A. a. The City of Petaluma shall insure that safety improvements to Western Avenue, as described by letter from the Sonoma County Department of Trausportation and Public Works and agreed to by applicant, included herein as Exhibit A, are incorporated into any future approvals of the levelopment of the Rockridge Pointe subdivision. Installation of the ,-equired improvements is necessary to insure orderly development of d ce area, consistent with Commission policies and Government Code Sec ion 56300. Section 6. The bo mdaries of the territory proposed for reorganization, as set forth in the propos, d or as amended by condition, are hereby approved, as described in Exhibit B, attac hed hereto and made a part hereof. Section 7. The regular county assessment roll will be utilized. Section 8. The distinctive short form for this proposal shall be: "Petaluma Reorganization No. 2003-1 (Mardel LLC)." Section 4. The ter •itory shall be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligat, ons. Section 10. Approval of this application will have no effect on maintaining the physical and economic integrity of any agricultural preserve that might be considered within the sphere rf influence of any agency in this proposed reorganization. Section 11. Propery tax transfer to the City will be in accordance with the "Master Tax Exchat ge Agreement" as described in Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 89-0270. Section 12. Protest, proceedings are hereby waived in accordance with the provisions of Goven.rnent Code Section 56663. The foregoing resolu ion was introduced at a regular meeting of this Local Agency Formation Commission on the sixth day of August 2003 and ordered adopted by the following vote: Commissioners: Fudge: Aye Schaffner: Aye Kelley: Aye Kerns: Aye Brunton: Aye Massey: Aye Boyett: Aye Ayes: 7 Noe:: 0 Absent or not voting: 0 WHEREUPON, the Chairma t declared the foregoing resolution adopted and • •t.I_. i__Is ATTEST: Steven J. Sharpe; ExecutIv/ ,fficer The within instrument is a col Met copy of the original on file in this office. ATTEST: G$ -®Z i --,D Clerk COTUNV 1 .- OF SONOdA DEPARTMZ14T OF TRANS?r,RTATtOR' P!tiD PUBLIC WORKS 2300 COUNT r7RNTE.R LRIVE S 11TE B•!m SANTA. ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403 David D. Knight, Dire -tor July 23, 3003 Sonoma County LA.IFCI ) 575 Administranon Dr. 104A Santa Rose, CA 45403 Armition: Ms. Carol Gone Dear Ms. Cooper: Re: Petaluma Reorgan; zation No 2DO3-01 AP.5k coo=_ M73 RDADS .... .. des 7231 nARStT RM1312 AIRPORT 565 -flit AIR POLLVTIZIN.. .. 435.5911 PAY. . . ' .., %5-200 WWW m homeceMyPUb ADWeril.tom EKHIBIT A 11 lieu of the County's t risinal request to anrim a portion of West= Avenue, the County of Sonoma Transponation and Public Works Department has requested certain wort: and in4ieu payments rcgv-ding Western Avenue rather than annexation. The County's requestS.are as follows: Mardel o: its successor shall construct halt street improvements, incledina rsrriping, along that pari ci Western Avunue adiaoent to the prepezy ttnown as the vsmhagen property according to the plan prepwrd b;' David Robertson, county engineer, dated .iuiy 21, 2003, attached hereto as Ezitibit "A." 2 Mardel or its succo, sor shall remove all the eucalyptus trees an the Vamhagm property within 60 fee: of the right- ;r way for Wesle-To Avenue. 3 Mardel to its succei ssar shall dedicate land 10 the County snflucient to acconmutiate the Imorovernenic desc ibex in paragaph 1 above. Said dedication shall be a minimum of 43 feel Torts the rnteriine Df Western Avenue. Mardel shall make he dedication within 30 days atte the city o: Petaluml -cords a final map affecting!be Vamhagen property. M ardel or its succe Isor shall pay to -ht CoLmty c -_ t f - e to the ��nou^. ofNil3rde s fear share o; the cost to perform the work showiI on 3lthibn "A" from the no;theastcriy buwtia_ry,of ibt Vamhagen propen; to the extension of the ccntsrline of Cleveland Lane. Tnc atnount of the f�_ shall be daurminet by eg_rcemcnt between the Cannty and Mwrdet's civil mglnegr All the work described above shall constitute E ptojcct sepa;ctc from the subdivision_ Inprovwnents contemolated for the `✓4mhagcr. crone, —y. However, Mardel shall complete the rworh and offer the Improvements to the C )unty for acceptance before or at the same time as t✓Masdel offers the Sonoma County LA.7-C!? July 23, 2003 Pao ; wo subdivision improvements to the city of °etalums. hdardei shall pay the fr_ described it paragrzDh 4 withii ; 0 deys after tlat Count' issues an emmachmani permit forth- work descibed in paragraon I. Inconsideration of arm! station of the properties described in cky, of Petaluma R.arganizat.;0 Number 20!13 -Dl, Marcel agrees to perform all the work and nay the ice= described abovc within the rimes provided. 1 W B let=or intent ouGines the scop_ and terms of a future agteemet between the devetone: (hdardel) mid the Couu!ry of Sonoma to rrapmve Western Avenue, and is ir lieu of annexation along Western Avenue requir :d by LA_FCO. Sincerely, Davrd`�r»gilt �� Director of Transports, 10L and public'.ilorlcs ACCEPTED BY: mnrd(cl�:'LC ' rsy; U C Dokylc4. Deaton, i s massaging member Dated! -o Dd>/i ih'P.:mJt:c:9eners` 03l:nightVafco _kttachrrentc EXHIBIT B x2102106.0 April 17, 2003 :annexation No. 2003-01 Lands of Va_nhagett Blum, and California Water Service Company City of Petaluma April 17, 2003 Legal Description The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California, County of Sonoma Unincorporate( Area and is described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of parcel conveyed to Jason Blum by deed described in Document Number 200.!-101193, thence S89°30'00"E along the northerly line of said parcel 134.14 feet to tht southwesterly corner of parcel conveyed to Steven Geney by deed described in Docu nent Number 2002-211318, thence continuing S89°30'00"E along northerly line of said Blum parcel 153.12 feet to an angle point in the existing city boundary, thence along existing city boundary and northerly line of said Blum parcel N42029'45'3✓ 165.30 fe tt to the northeast comer of said parcel, thence S 00'00'15" E along existing city boundary and easterly line of said Blum Parcel 419.93 feet, thence S40°17' 14"W along exi sting city boundary and southeasterly line of said Blum parcel 376.86 feet to the south :asterly comer of said parcel, thence S88'33'33"E along existing city boundary and then >rtherly line of parcel conveyed to California Water Service Company by deed descaibed in Document Number 1975-0201195 252.13 feet to the northeast comer of said parcel, thence SOI°14'50"W along existing city boundary and easterly line of said pari -el 791.14 fest to the southeast corner of said parcel. thence N88°23'52"W along ex.sting city boundary and southerly line of said parcel 416.41 feet to the southeast corner of parcel conveyed to Stephen and Frances Varnhagen by deed described in Document Number 2001-14242, thence N89°49' 18"W along existing city boundary and southerly line of said parcel 1321.61 feet, thence SOI°11'49"W along existing city boundary and easterly Iine of said parcel 255.91 feet to the northern line of Windsor Drive, thence . 301°11'49"W 60.03 feet to the southern line of Windsor Drive, thence SOl °11'49"W al mg the easterly line of parcel conveyed to Stephen and Frances Vambagen by describe(, in Document Number 2000-27143,1040.66 feet to the southeast comer of said parcel, thence N 89°1 T23" W along the southerly line of said parcel 1,328.92 feet to the sou,hwest comer of said parcel, thence N 00°47'57" E along the westerly line of said parcel 1,7 34.83 feet to the northwest comer of said parcel, thence NOG°07'20" E along bo mdary line conveyed to City of Petaluma in Document No. 1990- 21163 303.88 feet, theme N 84°57'42" E along said boundary line and western line of said parcel 12.10 feet, t fence along; a non -tangent curve to the right the center of which bears N 84'5 7'42" W, ,with a radius of 830.00 feet, a central angle of 5°36'OT', for a distance of 8 L 15 feet, tnence N 00°33'48" E 80.23 feet, thence on a curve to the right through a central angle :)f 17018137 99.70 feet, with a radius 330.00 feet to a point of reverse curvature; then : alone a curve to the left the center of which bears N72007'35" E, with radius of 12o.oc feet; a central angle of 44°43' 18", for a distance of 93.67 feet; thence 568013'14"W along the western line of said parcel 12.79 feet thence N01*05'03"E along the western line of said parcel 20.90 feet to the eastern line of Western Avenue, thence N 49°29'55' E along the eastern line of said avenue 494.94 feet, thence S89°32'30"E ale.ng the northerly line of parcel conveyed to Stephen and Frances Varnhagen in Documen. No. 2001-14242 2'•_96.84 feet to the Point of Beginning. All bearings and distances shown in this boundary description are for informationai purposes only and are n n intended to affect the boundaries of this annexation_ AP. 020-030-037, 020-)30-015, 020-030-013, 020-030-039 Containing 136.24 acre; more or less APPROVED BY SONOMA LAFC® RES. N0. UA _ tel_ .....