HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 4.C 08/02/2010~ALU~t
~w,~, ,~ :
.,
Ig5';8
DATE:
TO:
FROM':
SUBJECT;
August 2, 2010
Hgnorable~ Mayor- and Members of the City Counci through City Manager ,
Scott Duiven, Setior.Planner ~~
Resolution Amending Resolutions 200.8-086, -08T, -08$, -089,, -090, -091, -092, -
093, -094 and. -095 N:C.S. Setting Various Development Impact Fees and. to
Reduce Development Impact Fees for Accessory ~ D;welling Units; and Amending
Resolution No. 2008-097 N:C.S. Setting Wastewater Capacity Fees to Modify the
Definition of Accessory Dwelling.
II)ECOIVlQi~1VI)A~IOl~I
It is recommended that the City Council ,adopt the attached Resolution Amending Resolutions
20.08-086, -087, -088, -089, -090, -,.0.91, -092, -093,. -094, and -095`N.C;:S. Setting. Various
Deuelopment,Impaet~ Fees and'to Reduce. Development Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling
Units; and Amending Resolution No. 200:8=097 N.C.S: Setting Wastewater Capacity Fees to
Modify the Definition of Accessory Dwelling. The water capacity :fee is not recommended for
rnodi~fication, for the reasons explained below.
BACKGYtOIJNID
In, May 2008, the City:•Council adopted 12 individual resolutions to,revse and increase the City's
development impact fees and ~water,.and wastewater capacity:. fees. The Council"s action was the
culmination of months of work 'fo bring°these items to the Council at the time of adoption of the
General Plan 2025. Except as to~the`wastewater capacity'fee, the fee resolutions do not expressly
establish. a: separate fee amount: for" accessory dwelling unts'(also referred to as .second units or
granny units). Consequently the fees. applicable to accessory dwelling units are currently the
same as for a~ sing ~~ y , p A s; from applicants, the proportionally
le-famil residential unit. Based on re ort
g ,, n of ,accessory dwelling; `units' has prevented construction of new
hi h fees for consfructio -
aeeessory dwelling units'iri,the city since the adoptionof the.ipdated fees in 2008.
In 2003 ~ the State. legislature enacted. statutory limits on local agencies' ability to constrain.
development of second units, based on a State policy ~deterrrination that second units contribute
to affordable fiousing stock statewide Petaluma''s most. recent update of its General Plan
9-20'14' notes that the i 'g n disincentive to
g ( ) mpaet' fees are creatiri a stro
p' g be iven to amend' g e im fee resolutions
deovelo m 1 second units. Consideration ~should~ g~ n ~th pa
Agenda Review:
Dept. Director City Attorney Finance Director~,City Manag ~ ~; '
. , ~.
.:.
lip. ~ ~ ,~.,, ~ ~ ~ 1
to reduce or eliminate 'the .majority of development impact fees'for second units." On.March 1,
20'10 the' City Council .established as,part of its Goals and .Priorities for 20.1.0 and. 20'11 the
following priority: "S'et impact fees° for second units; using atwo-tiered system that differentiates
between. impacts' on the City's infrastructure, and zero impact on the infrastructure."
DISCUSSION
Impact fees must demonstrate a reasonable .relationship between the amount of the fee and the
impact on city services and facilities created by the development for- which the fee is charged. In
the case of residential units, ,the~~impact fee. is.based on the average number of residents generated
by various unit types: The fee modifications recommended in the. City of Petaluma Mitigation
Fee Report (Sinclair 8e Associates;, May 2008) which would apply to second units include the
Aquatics Center Faci ties Impact. Fee, Community Center Facilities Impact Fee, Fire
Suppression Facilities Impact Fee,. Law`Enforcement Facilities I"impact Fee, Library Facilities
Impact Fee, Open'Space Acquisition.Fee, Parkland Acquisition Fee (non-Quimby Act
Development Projects), Parkland .Development Fee, and the Public Facilities Fee. For residential
development, these fees are based on the number of residents ;per unit type and the cost per
resident equivalent of services..and facilities needs .generated by:the'new residents. Single-family
and multi-family dwelling units were assumed to average 2:915 and, 1..963 residents per unit.
Given their limited size, a maximum of'640 square feet, staff recommends assigning accessory
dwelling units an average of ~l .0 resident per unit.
The City of Petaluma Traffic Mitigation'-Fee .Program Update (Fehr & Peers, May 2008) is based
p p p ' al unit. A single-family dwelling unit is assumed to
on eak hour vehicle tri s er residenti
generate 1.0 peak hour trip based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (7th Edition) Trip
Generation Manual. The same manual assumes .28 peak hour trips per person in asingle-family
unit. Using the assumption of 1.0 resident per unit .for an accessory dwelling unit, a reduced
Traffic Mitigation Fee for acces_sory~dwelling units would be determined by multiplying the cost
per.resideritial equivalent by .28 trips,
Tle City of Petaluma:Water and Wastewater Capacity Fee S. tudy~(Bartle Wells Associates, May
on which the City relied for its adoption of wastewater capacity charges; supported a
2008
reduced rate for accessory dwelling units of approximately 43% of the single-family dwelling
unit fee. Thee lower fee was derived ..from the smaller .size. and: lower expected occupancy of
accessory dwellings,, which results in less .use of wastewater facilities. No .change is
recommended to,, this fee, but the proposed resolution amends Resolution 2008-097 to conform
the definition of Accessory Dwelling to the definition. proposed for the other second unit fees.
Resolution 2008-0.96 N:C.S. updating water capacity fees was also based on the 2008 Bartle
Wells study, but did not expressly .set a separate fee for accessory dwelling units.' For city water
2
service, asngle-faintly residence may have up to two dwelling uats' on a ,single meter. If no new
meter is required,, there would be no Water Capacity Fee assessed for the accessory dwelling unit
because the fee is levied only on new water meters: If the applicant. requests. a separate meter for
an .accessory dwelling unit,. or if a separate meter is: required for reasons such as :meeting flow
requirements, an accessory dwelling unit would be required "to pay the Water Capacity Fee. Staff
is not proposing any change. to the..Water Capacity Fee resolution.
In applying the above methodologies staff proposes the fee achedule in Table 1 to apply to
accessory dwelling units. The table compares each impact fee to the current fees for single- and
.multi-family dwelling units, _Exsting fees .have been adjusted for annual increases as provided
for in the 2008 resolutions, .including the July 1, 2010 annual adjustment for FY 2010-2011.
TABLE 1
- - - - T Cinala-Farvtisu lI E1Au1ti-Familu I ®rraecne'u
BIViPACT EEE _...o._ .......y ._.~--- _..... ~
Drwelling iJnit< ~ Dwelling;llrait - -------- ~ it
Dwelling Unit
:Aquatics Center Facilities $346 $233 $119
Community Center.Facilities $1;458 $983 $500
Fire Suppression Facilities ~ $806 $5'43 $277
Law Enforcement Facilities ~ $.1,218 $820' $418
Library Facilities $621 $419 $213
Open Space Acquisition $6;039 $4,065.. $2,072
Park land Acquisition $3,257 $2,207. $1, .117
Park end Development $5,381 $3,62 ,;~ $1,846
Public Facilities $:1,387 $934 " '' $476
Traffic $19;957 $12,173 ' " $5,588
Wastewater Capacity $8;363 $5,576 $3,261
Water Capacity , $12,029 $12,0.29.
TOTAL $60;862 $43,605 $.15,886
*SEE DISCUSSION ABOVE
~~
.,
The Crty h'as received. inquiries from property owners who. have opted not. to construct accessory' '
dwehing~'uriits upon hearnirg of the current impact fee schedule. Historically,. the Cit 1i
.. Y as
approved approximately five:accessory. dwelling units each year. The~proposed fee reduction
should make these uriits more-.attractive to build and could even spur an increase in the ;number
of accessory dwelling units. That would be .beneficial to the City's: affordable housing program
because second units,. by their size, are presumed to be affordable and lend diversity to housing
opportunities available' in Petaluma while having lower impacts on ia'frastrueture and services
than traditional single=family dwelling units.
With respect: to the Council's policy direction. to consider establishing a second tier for
development impact°fees exempting accessory dwelling. units with zero impacts on the City's
3
i ~i. iii}~~ i i. ~ •• ; ~~ ~ III ~ ~. i ii ~ i
' ~~ i. ~:
~;i pu ..
~~~ infrastructure from fees, staff investigation was: unable to estal?lish~~a sufficient factual" b"asis for
' ~ the. required finding that an accessory dwelling has zero impact on City services and facilities.
For example; zero 'impact would require that residents, ofaccessory -dwelling units. not use or
access community facilities, parks, roads and street improvements;. emergency services; etc. Staff
investigated whether it would be possible under existing City codes and other regulations such as
..:
buildiag .codes and State greywater standards to build an accessory dwelling unit having no
;impact on the wastewater system thereby allowing for an exemption of this. fee. "However State
code requires all greywater ystems to be designed to. allow'the user to direct the °flow o either
the irrigation or disposal. field or the sewer system; that water used to wash diapers or similarly
soiled or infected garments be diverted to sewer; and that greywater ystems not include
wastewater from kitchen sinks or dishwashers, thereby necessitating a connection to the City's
" wastewater system.
The City Council does have the authority to reduce fees- for certain affordable housing projects,
and'some senioraffordable housing;projects are exempt from•community facilities fees under
existing Municipal Code"provisions, '(See, e.g., Chapter:.17.12, park,fees for some small projects;
Chapter 17.14, exemptions from community .facilities development i"mpact fees for senior
affordable housing by nonprofit developer, certain reductions at City Council's discretion for
affordable housing.) If the Council wished to establish. other ,exemptions from certain impact or
capacity fees for accessory dwelling units; it could do so as a matter of policy; rather than based
on zero impact. However, in order ao" meet Mitigation Fee Ac't and other applicable requirements,
any fees attributable to services and, facility use by the accessory units>for-which exemptions
were granted would have to be paid. from other funding; and could not be spread across
development or capacity fees charged to other users.
1FIllTA1~1CIAI. I1VI>PAC`TS
Establishing lower fees, for accessory dwelling units will not result, in.reduced fee revenues
because fees from second units. were not separately counted in the development projections for
the original fee studies: Assuming an average of 5 accessory dwelling units.. per year (based. on
.historic trends ,this proposal would "generate approximately $1.2 million dollar in fees over the
" ' g y ome would be;deposited
remamm 15~ ears, of the,General Plan 2025 time horizon. The fee, me "
in individual fee accqunts"and used only for the purposes collected.:B'ecause there would be a
corresponding increase in the cost of services and facilities needed to serge residents of new
accessory units which is proportional to the reduced fees collected, the: result. would beano -net
financial, impact. ~~
4
AT'TAC)FII~1~S
1. Resolution
Items listed below are large in volume and are not attached to this report, but may be viewed in the
City Clerk's office and are also available orr the City website as part of'agenda materials for the City
Council meeting of May 19, 2008.
1. .City of Petaluma General Plan 202'5 1Vlitigatiori` and~Capacity Fee Study Reports (May 2008)
2: Development Impact Fee Resolutions 2008-086,' -087;. -088, -089', =090, -091, -0.92, -093, -094, -
095, -096, and -097 N.C.S.
5
ATTACHMENT 1
>R)ES®LgJ~'I®N NO. 1v.C.S.
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 2008-0.86, -087, -088, -0.89, -090, -091, -092, -
093:, -094 AND -095 N.C.S. SETTING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT TMPACT FEES TO
REDUCE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ACCESSORY .DWELLING UNITS; AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION N0.2008-097 N:C.S. SETTING WASTEWATER CAPACITY
FEES TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF ACCESSORY DWELLING
WHEREAS, on .May 19, 2008, pursuant to its General Plan 2025 and applicable State and local
law, the City of Petaluma:,("CITY") updated certain fees acid charges applicable to new
development in the City; .including the Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee, Community Center
Facilities Impact Fee; Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee; Law Enforcement Facilities Impact
Fee, Library Facilities Impact Fee,.. Open Space Acquisition Impact Fee, Parkland Acquisition
Fee for Non-Quimby Act Development Projects, Parkland Development Impact Fee, Public
Facilities Impact Fee, Traffic, Impact Fee; and Wastewater Capacity Fee; and
WHEREAS; Section 7.030,A of ;the City of Petaluma Implementing. Zoning Ordinance ("IZO")
adopted by Ordinance No: 23;0;0 N.C.S. on July 2, 2008, sets a maximum allowable size of 640
square feet for an "Accessory Dwelling"; and
WHEREAS, Accessory Dwellings'typically have a lower occupancy count than single-family
residences due to their smallersize; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 65852:15Q, the. State legislature has found
that second units, defined in terms "tfiat would include the City's Accessory Dwelling category,
are a valuable form of housing in "California; and
~WH~EREAS, Government.Code section 65852.150 requires°that any provisions adopted b"y local
agencies relating to'uiit size, parking, fees; and other requirements for second units not be 'so
arbitrary, excessive or'burdensoine as to unreasonably restrict the ability of homeowners to
create; second unit's in,.zones'n which they are authorized by local ordinance; and
WHEREAS, by adopting A:B. 1866 in 2002, the State legislature amended Government Code
sections 65583.1, 65.852.2 and 6591.5, to implement pre-emptive statewide. policy regarding the
processing of applications for second units to further encourage he use of second units in
recognition of their contribution to affordable housing stock statewide; .and
6
Iu ~ ,. „,.
i
„ WHEREAS, Gove852:2; subdivisign {f) provides that fees charged for
rnment Code section 65
~~ `the cons"traction of second units shal be determined, in accordance with the. Mitigation Fee Act,
Governrrierit Code~sectons 6"6000; et seq.'and
WHEREAS, the studies of the impacts of developrncnt.on city services and facilities ("Cost
Studies") on which the, City'reled under the Mitigation..Fee Act for its. adoption of development
impact and wastewater capacity fees inResolutions No. 2008-086, -087; -088, -089, -090, -091, -
092, -093, -.094; -095; and =097 N:C;S:, ("the'Fee .Resolutions") as referenced and described in
each such resolution, rely in part on average occupariey of various .categories of residential
development in the City to establish the expected impact of such residential. development on City
"services and facilities; and
WHEREAS, of-the Fee Resolutions, only Resolution No: 2008-Q97 N.C.,S., setting wastewater
capacity fees,. expressly provided for a:reduced fee- for Accessory' Dwellings, premised on
smaller size and lower occupancy of Accessory Dwellings; and
WHEREAS,. the. Cost Studies.pro~ideva basis and methodology for establishing fees for
Accessory Dwellings for all of"the `Fee Resolutions at a lower''level' than fees for single-family or
multi-family residential dwel'lirig units because of the smaller"size and lower occupancy of
.Accessory Dwellings; and
WHEREAS,. Section 13 of Resolutions No. 2008-086,. -087, -0`8'8, -089, -090, -091, -092, -093,
and -094 N.C.S.; and Section. l l of."Resolutions.No. 2008=09'5 and -097 N.C.S:; each provides for
the subsequent analysis and revision ofthe respective fees; and
WHEREAS, in adopting the fee revisions contained in this Resolufibn, the City Council is
exercising -'its powers under Article XI, ,§§5 and 7 of the California: Constitution, Chapter S of
Division 1 of the Government. Code ("Mitigation Fee Act") commencing with Section 66000,
.Section 54 of the' City ofPetalurria;Charter and Chapter' 71.14 of the Petaluma Municipal Code,
collectively and separately; and
WHEREAS, this resolution,~s, exempt. from the California Enwironmental;~ Quality Act ("CEQA")
because the modification made to existing fees by°this Resolution;are~`not a "project" pursuant to
Title 14; Chapter 3, Califorria Code, of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines"), Section
15378(b)(4)(creation. of go~ernrnent funding mechanisms or°fiscal activities which do .not
involve cornmitment~to any specific project); and/or CEQA Guidelines Section 1''537$ (setting of
r"ates, fees and charges)'; and/or Public Resources.Code Section 2,1080(b)(8)(D)(obtaining funds
for capital projects necessary tq maintain service within existing service areas), and/or CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)(the common sense_exceptiori for projects`wliich have no
potential for causing ~a significaat effect on the environment).
7
NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
1. `Findri~s. The~reeitals set forth above are true and correct and adopted as findings of the
'City Council. The City Council ,further.finds,tbat the record of proceedings on the May 19,
2008 adoption,of the Fee, Resolutions and this action establish:
a. As to Accessory ~~Dwelings, the Cost Reports referenced in each Fee Resolution
and Fee Resolutions establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the
amount of fee ,reductions proposed herein. for Accessory Dwellings, the total
amount it will cost to construct or acquire, the ,public facilities and. services
described in the'Cost.Reports and Fee Resolutioris,(collectively the"Facilities")
and the, proportion, by which Accessory Dwellings within the City of Petaluma
contribute to the• need for the Facilities because the :reduced fees are calculated
based on the number of residents generated by AceessoryDwellings; and.
b. The method of'allocation of the reduced fees for Accessory .Dwellings modified
by this resolution bears.,a fair and reasonable relationship to each Accessory
Dwelling's burden on; ,and .benefit from, the Facilities to be funded by .each Fee,
because each Fee-is calculated based on the number of residents an Accessory
Dwelling will generate:
2. Amendment of Resolution No. 20Q8-086 N.C.S. A Resoluton~of the City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating the Aquatic Center Facilities Impact Fee for Future Development
Within the City of Petaliiina.and Superseding Such Fee Adopted by Resolution No. 2003-213
N.C.S., Adopted October 27, 2003, is~hereby amended as follows:
a. The following definition shal'1 be added. to Section 'l, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Acce"sso,y Dwelling" shall mean a second unit-which meets the
standards set forth in .Section 7:030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the City of Petaluma Implementing. Zoning Ordinance ("IZO"), as
modified by any subsequent amendment or successor zoning ordinance and/or
provision adopted by the G,ity which defines Accessory,
.development code.,
Dwelling, second unit or second dwelling unit:" .
b. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2008-086 N.C.S. is amended'to include the category
of Accessory Dwelling Unit and provide :in full as follows:
AQUATIC CENTER FACILITIES.IIGIPACT. )F'EE,
-- - - - ~ - -
Land Use 'Vype ~'ee Amount ~, Unit of 1•'leasurement
--
Sin le FamilylZesidE~n~i~i1
$3~i6
Unit
IVlultifamil ;Residential $233 .Unit
Accesso _, Dwellin - ;Unit $119 -Unit .
Corrimercal $66 1,000. s uare feet of buildin s ace
Office $63 1,000's ware feet of building s ace
8
~.~ f . ,~ a ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,I :,~ ~ i ~,i,i '
i;
Industrial $40 1,000. s uare feet of buildn s ace
3'. Amendment of Resolution No. •2008-087 N.C.S. A Resolution of-the City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating. the Community Center Faci'Iities Impact Fee to .Provide for Expansion
of ,Community Center Facilities for Future Development within the City of Petaluma .and
Superseding Such Fee.Adopted by Resolution No. 2003-208 N:C.S. Adopted October 27,
2003..
a. The fo'llowrg•definiton shall be added to .Section 1, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which meets the
standards set forth in,Secfion 7:030 of'Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the City of Petaluma Implementing,Zoning Ordinance ("IZO"), as
modified by any subsequent amendment or successor.zoning ordinance and/or
development code~pro~ision adopted by the City°wfiieh defnes Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second. dwelling unit;"
b. Exhibit A ofResolution No. 2008-087 N.C:S. is amended to include the category
of Accessory Dwelling Unit as follows:
CONI ViUNITY CENTER FACILITU:S iNiPACT F'EE~
)<,and Usc Typc ~'ee Amount Unit of Ir9easurement
-- -
5ingle Famtl , Restdential $1,4'58 IJnIG;
Multifamily':ResidentiaL. $983 Unit;
Accessory Dwelling Uriit. $500 Unit
Cotninelcial $277 1,000, s` uare feet of buildings .ace
Office. $264 :1,000. s uare feet of building s ace
Industrial $168 1_,000 square feet of building s ace
4. Amendment of Resolution No. 2008:-0.88 N.C.S. A Resolution,of the City Council, of-the City
,.
of Petaluma. Updating the Fire Suppression Facilities Impact Fee for Future Development
Within the City of Petaluma aril Superseding Such Fee. Updated by;Resoluton No. 2003-207
~N'C:S'. Adopted October'27, 2003..
a. The;folaowng definition shall be 'added. to ;Section 1,, "Definitions",. of said
Resoluti'ons'"Accessory Dwelling," shall mean a secondunit which meets the
standards set forth in Section 7:030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific. Land
Uses of the Cityof Petaluma Implementing Zoning,Ordrianee (``IZO"), as
rodifed by any subsequent amendment or successor-zoning ordinance acid/or
development code povision:adopted by-the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second dwelling unit."
b. ExhibitA of Resolution No. 2008-088 N.C.S. is amended to include the category
of Accessory Dwelling Unit as follows:
9
7 I
FIRE STPPRESSION FACILITIES IMPACT"FEE
Lanced else Type ' Ree Amount _
tiingle;,l-amily Residential $80b ~ VJnit of >V~eaSUrcr-aent
Unit
Multifamily Residential $543. Unit.
1Vlobile Home $806 Unit
Senior -Housing $543 Unit
Assisted-Liv.irig Units $543 Unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit $277_ Unit,
Commercial;Lodging $543 Unit
.Commercial. ffi153 1,000 s uare -feet of building-s -ace
Retail $153 ~ 1,000's uare feet of buildings ace
Office $147 ~ 1;000. 's uare feet of building.. s ace
Industrial $93 1,000 's -uare feet of building s ace
5. Amendment of Resolution No. 2008'-:0:89 N.C.S. A Resolution ofthe City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating the Law Enforcement Facilities., Tm'pact fee forFuture Development
Within the City of Petaluma and superseding Such Fee Updated by Resolution No. 2003-210
N.C.S. Adopted October 27, 2003. ,
a. The following def nitonahall be added to. Section 1, ."Definitions", of said
~,
Resolution: "Accessory `Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which meets the
standards''set forth. in Section 7.030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the' City of Petaluma Implementing Zoning Ordinance. ("IZO"), as
modified by any subsequent amendment or successor zoning ordinance and/or
development code provision adopted by the Cty=which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unf or second dwelling unit."'
b. Exhibit A of &csolution No. 2008-089 N.C.S. `is.amended to include the category
of Accessory`.Dweling Unit as follows:
LAW'ENFORCEIVIENT`FACILITIF.S IMPACT FEF,'
Land U~c Typc ! Fee Amount ~ Unit of iktexsurement
5mg1e~;,Family Residential $1,21!25, Unit ~ .
Multifamily~Residential $820 Unit _,
Mobile -Home $1,2.18 Unit _
Senior Housing $820 Unit
,Assisted' Living Units $820. Unit
Accessory Dwellin Unit $418 Unit
Commercial Lodging ~ $820 Unit'
Retail' $230 1,000_s uare:feeY.ofbuildings ace
Commercal $230' 1,000'x: uare feet of buildin s ace
Offce $221 1,000 s uare feet.ofbuildings ace
Industrial $I40 1,000'~s uare feet ofbuildin s ace
N
6. Amendment. of Reso'lution.No. 20.08-090 N.C.S. A Resolution'of the City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating, the Library Facilities Impact Fee for Futu. re:Development Within the
10
,:City"of P,etaluma;and Superseding .Such Fee Adopted by Resolution No. 2003-211 N.C.S.
Adopted, October 27, 2003.
a. The following definition shall be added to Section 1, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory Dwelling" shall. mean. a second unit which meets the
standards setforth in Section 7:.030 of Chapter~7, "Standards-.for Specific Land
Uses" of `the City of Petaluma Implementing Zoning Ordinance ("IZO"), as
modified by any subsequent amendment or successor zoning ordinance and/or
development code ;provision adopted by the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second dwelling unit."
b. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2008-090 N.C.S. s'amended to include the category
of Accessory Dwelling Unit as follows:
LIBRARY FACTtiTTIES INTPACT FF..E
hand YJse T~~pe Fee Amount YJnit of~IVIeasurement
__ - - - --
Single Famil ~ 1Zt~si~lcn~ial. $621 ~ Unit°
Single Family -attached $621 Unit
Multifamily Residential $419 Unit
IVlobile Home $621 Unit
Accessory Dwellmg U_ nit. $2 13 Unit
Commercial $118 1,000'~s uare feet of buildings ace
Office $112 1,000~s uare feetof:building s ace
Industrial $72 1,000's uare feet of building s ace
7. Amendment of Resolution No. 2008-091 N.C.S. A Resolution of the"City Council of the City
ofPetaluma Updating the Open Space Acquisition Fee for New Development Projects to
Provide for Open. Space Acquisition Necessary to Serve Future Development Within the City
ofPetaluma and Superseding Such Fee~Adopted by Resolution No, 2003-212 N.C.S.
Adopted October 27, 2003.
a. The following definition shall be. added to'Secton 1, "-Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which. meets. the .
standards set. forth in Section 7.030 of Chap"ter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the City ofPetaluma Implementing Zoning, Ordinance: ("IZO"), as
mgdif ed' by any subsequent amendment. or°successor zoning ordinance and/or
development code .provision adopted by-the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second dwelling unit."
b. Exhibit. A of Resolution No, 2008-091 N.C.S. 'is amended to include the category
of Accessory .Dwelling Unit as follows:
(JPEN`SPACE ACQUISITION FEE
Land Use 'g'ype Eec Amount j Unit of 1bleasuren~ent
11
Single Family, Residential. $6,03.9 Unit
Multifamily Residential $4,065 Unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit $2,072 ,Unit
Commercial' Lodging $4,065 Rental Unit
Commercial. $'1,144 1,000 s uare feet of building space
Office $'1,094 1,000's uare feet of building space
Industrial $696 1,000 s uare feet of buildin s ace
8. Amendment of Resoluton:No. 2008-.092 N.C.S. A. Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating the Park Land Acquisition Fee for .Mori-.Quimby Act Development
Projects to Provide for Park -Land Acquisition Necessary to: Serve Future Development
within the City of Petaluma and Superseding Such Fee Adopted by Resolution No. 2003-212
N.C.S. Adopted October 27, 2003.
a. The following ~defirition. shall be added to Section ~I, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory `Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which meets the
standards set forth in ..Section 7.030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the City of `Petaluma Implementing. Zoning Ordinance ("IZO"), as
modified by any subsequent amendment or ,successor zoning ordinance and/or
development code provision adopted by the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or_ second dwelling;unit."
b. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2008-092 N.C.S. is amended to include the category
of Accessory'Dwelling Unit. as follows:
PARK IJAND ACQUISITION FF.E (NON-(2UIlVIBY ACT'DEVELOPMENT PROJEC'1rS)
Land Usc'd'ypc !, Fee Amount fJnitoEl~Iet~suren~ent
Single Family Residential $3,257 Unit-
Multifamily Residential $2,207 Unit
Accesso Dwelling Unit $1,117 .Unit;
Commercial ~ $617 1.;000 s uare feet of buildings ace
Office $5:89, 1,000 s uare feet of building s ace
Industrial $376 1,000 s uare feet of building s ace
9. Amendment of`Resolution No. 2008-093 N.C.S. A Resolution ofthe City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating the :Park Land Development Impact. Fee to. Provide for Park
Improvements~for~Community and Neighborhood Parks for Future Development. Within the
City of'Petaluma and.Superseding Such Fee Adopted by Resolution No..2003-212 N.C.S.
Adopted October 27, 2003.
a. The following definition shall be added to Section 1, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which meets the
standards set forth in Section 7.030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the City of Petaluma Implementing Zoning Ordinance ("IZO"), as
12
r ~ e
i;
~i „ I
,d .i,
i i
modified by any subsequent amendment or successor zoning ordinance and/or
development code prov'is'ion adopted by the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second:dwelling unit."
b. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2008-093 N.C'.S. is amended to include the category
of Accessory Dwelling Unit as follows:
PARK-LANn'IDE~ ~ LOPMENT- I1VlPACT FF,E _ _
LandLTse Type ~ Fee Amount Unit of Measurement
Sin le Family _Res-dciitiuL ~ $5;381 Uiiit~
Single Family -.Attached ~~ ~ ~ $5;381 ~ ~Unii
Ivlultifamil .'Residential ~ ' $3,623 Unit
Manufactured Home- $5,381 Unit
Accesso Dwel'ling~Unit _ $1,846 Unit '
Commercial $1,019 1,000 s uare feet of:buildn s ace
Office $975 1,000 s uare feet of buildin s ace
Industrial $621 1;000" square feet of building s .ace
10. Amendment ofResoluton No. 20,08-094 N.C.S. A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Petaluma Updating the -Public Facilities Impact fee to Provide for Reconstruction of City
Hall; Acquisition of City- Vehicles; .and Necessary Technological. and Communications
Equipment to Provide :General Government Services for Future Development Within the .City
of Petaluma and Superseding Such Fee Adopted by Resolution No. 2003-209 N.C.S.
Adopted October 27, 2003.
a. Theefollowing definition shall be added to Section 1, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which meets the
standards set forth in Section 7.030 of Chapter, 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the, City of`Petaluma Implementing Zoning Qrdinance ("IZO"), as
modified by:any subsequent amendment o'r'SUCCessor zoning ordinance and/or
development code provision adopted by the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling; second, unit or second dwelling unit."
b. Exhibit A..of Resolution No. 2008-094: N.C.S. is amended to include the category
ofAeeessory Dwelling Unit as follows:
PUBLIC FACII:IT1lES.IlVIPACT FEE
9~and UJse ~'ype Fcc Amount
~Sin_Ir I.unily~Resideniial ~$1,38T ~ '
Unit of I~'&easuremeQt
l'iiit~
Mulfifaniily Residential $934" Unit
Accesso. ~ Dwelling Unit $476 Unit
Commercial $263 1,Q00 s uare, feet of building s ace
Office $251 1,000. s uare feet of building s ace
Industrial $160 1,000 s uare feet of building s ace
'i ~ ~y~~
r., ~ , '"
13
Il..
1.1.. Amendment,of Resolution No. 2008-.095 N.C.S. A Resolution of the City Council of the City
_ of Petaluma tTpdating the Traffic Devel'opmenf Impact.-Fee for Future Development Within
the City of Petaluma°and Superseding Such Fee. Updated by, Resolution No. 2003=206 N.C.S.
Adopted October 27, 2003.
a. The. following definition shall. be added to Section 1,."Definitions", of said
Resolution:. "Accessory Dwelling" shall mean a second unit which meets the
standards set. forth.in Section 7.030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of'the. City of Petaluma Irnplernentng Zoning; Ordinance ("IZO"), as
modified by any ubsequent:amendment or successor zoning ordinance and/or
development cgde provision adopted by the City which-defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second dwelling unit."
b. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2008-095 N:C.S. is amended to include the category
of Accessory Dwelling. Unit as follows:
TRAFFTC. TNYPACT FEE:- C'.4I:TRANS PREFERRF,D .4 LTEI2NATIVE
band Lase 'T~~pe ~'cc Amount 1Jnit of [~easuremeQt
- - -
Single Family Residential $19,957 ~ l nit.
Multifamily Residential $12,173 unit
Senior Housing $5,1'90 Unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit ~ $5;588 • ~; Unit,
Office $,19,160 1,000 s ware feet of building. s ace
Hofel/Motel $13,771. Room
CommerciaUSho ing $18,602 1,000 s uare feet of building s ace
Industrial/Warehouse $i 1,974 1,000 s uare feet of building s ace
Education $2,994 Student
Institution $8,581 1,000's uare feet of building s ace
LTRAFFIC DVTPAC'T FEE'- LOCALLY PREI+'1E_R_ R
Land UseType I Fee Amount
-
Sin 1e:~1~amil Residential ~ $16,290 ED AI;TERNATIVE _ ~
Unit of ~'9easurement ~
- -
Unit- '
Multifamil Residential $9,937 Unit
Senior Housin $4,235 Unit
Accesso Dwellin `Unit' $4;561 Unit
Office $15;638° 1,000 s uare feet ofbuildn s ace
HofelfNfotel ~ $1,1;240 Room
CommerciaUSho in .$15,150 1,OOQ s- uare. feet of buildin s ace
IndustriaUwarehouse $9,774 1,000•~s uare feet of buildii s ace
Education $2;444 Student.
Institution $7,005 1;000` s uare feet of building s ace
12. Amendment of Resolution No.2008-097 N.C.S. A Resolution of-the City Council of the City
of Petaluma. ~Updatirig the Wastewater Capacity Fees for New Development Projects Within
the City of Petaltzrna and Superseding Such Fee Updated by Resolution No. 2002-190 N.C.S.
Adopted December 2,'2002.
14
i. ~ ~ .. ~ ~, ~ ° ~ + p.,. ~, ~ ~ .~ . .. ~ ~.,
n~ .. .. ~~
.~'~ ~ ~ ..
I ~ ..n
i i ~ i
a. , The ~defiriition eriti~tled "Accessory Dwelling" shall b~e deleted from Section 1 of
„ Resolution No. 2008-097.
b. The following definition shall be added to Section 1, "Definitions", of said
Resolution: "Accessory Dwelling" shall. mean a second unit which meets the
standards set forth,in Section 7.030 of Chapter 7, "Standards for Specific Land
Uses" of the City of Petaluma Implementing Zoriing Ordinance ("IZO"), as
modified by any subsequent amendment. or successor zoning ordinance and/or
development code provisonadopted by the City which defines Accessory
Dwelling, second unit or second dwelling unit."
13. Effective Date. This Resolutonahall become effective immediately.
14. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution
is for any reason held invalid or'unconstitutional, such decision. shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this Resolution.
The City Council herby declares that it would have passed this,Resolution and each section,
subsection, phrase. or clause thereof irrespective of they fact that any 'one or more sections,
subsections, phrases or clauses be declared unconstitutional 'on their face or as applied.
15