HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 3.BLate1 08/02/2010Crump, K_atie
Monday, August 02, 2010 1;23 PM
- City Clerk
FV1l: Fer,rin Subdivision
° ~ ~ate document ~~ .
^'I
From: diane56@aol:com [mailto:diane56@aol.cqm]
~~~~~ Sent: Monday, A~ygust 02, 2010 1:18 PM ~ ~ ~ ~
,
~ •To: david@davidrabbitt.com• dave lass@„corneast net; citymgr; Mike4pet @aol.com; mthealy@sbcglobal.net;
'~ '" ptorliatt@aol.com; teresa4petaluma@comcast.net; ~tiff@tiffanyrenee~corn; , ''danly@meyersnave.com;
, jenpierrepetaluma@,yahoo.com
',;~~ ~.~ : Subject: Ferrin Subdivision
This e~ening you are being asked to accep4:the following charges under agenda ltem Consent Calendar, 3.6.
3.B-ClaimsBillsJune2010Parf2: ~
1. Page 5( 5 of 1D3) 6-10 Metropolitan Planning.GrouP 06tsm004q 4-10 $175.00
3.6-ClaimsBillsJune2010Part3. ~
2. Page 26 (60 of 123) 6-1`0 Metropolitan Planning Group 06tsm0040 4-10 $376.25
3.B-ClaimsBillsJune2010Part3,
3. Page 32 (66 of 103) 6-10 Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver 06tsm0400 4-10 $228.25
~ The $1.75.00 includes several charges related to my inquiring as to the status of the Initial Studyand billing issues.
g q g p onthly account balance. I am charged for that
g p''ded'; 'it was my hast nt~further de .osits. And, if I question an invoice from a
Becaus~ion. Then I am har ed when a letter is sent re ue
informa '
pri~ate contractor (traffic, legal, etc.) I am charged. The message sent is.clear, don t question or ask unless you want to be
charged.
I sent a letter to Jennifer O'Hagan on„June 21, 201:0 asking for an explanation of the $376.25 charge. It appears that
tfie charge^was;largely for staff°time providing information to tlie City Manager for the' preparation a response to my May
18, 201"0 timeline email. I ha~e not had a reply. ~
On July 6, 2010, I sent an email to Mr, Danly inquiring as to the reasorrfor'more charges to my cost recovery
account: The charges-are the one.above for $228.25 and one which you will be asked to approve next month for $284.75.
I have not had a r.eply:
Diane:Allen
1